Jump to content
The Education Forum

Jeffrey Reilley

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Jeffrey Reilley

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

902 profile views
  1. So, crazy Lee brought a rifle to work not knowing if he'd be alone long enough or be able to get a clean shot off at JFK? He practiced a couple times at a shooting range with stationary targets from a flat line of fire and amazingly was able to pull off some insanely good shooting on a moving target from six stories up with several people all around and managed to only kill his target? (Under that kind of pressure, ole Lee should have been better than Pistol Pete at shooting) Then crazy Lee scrambles around all willy nilly via foot and bus only to kill a cop and bring a ripped dollar bill to a theater? It is just a matter of coincidence that Dulles, Johnson, oil barons, cia folks holding a grudge, and the list goes on and on all had a lot to lose if Kennedy saw another term and a hell of a lot to gain with his death? Nope, early 20's Lee went and blindly solved everyone's problems by himself. The people that don't believe this to be true you claim to have issues with sanity. Friend, look in a mirror. Honestly, I'm sure this late in the game you've thumped your chest so many times claiming how right you are that there's no going back, and you must be a very proud person to hold such strong beliefs but you're the guy that stands on the street corner shouting the end is near and you don't even know it.
  2. Because that realization would be false.
  3. Mr. DiEugenio, I know this is off topic, but I will ask anyways, looking over Kissinger's timeline is it fair to say that he took over where Allen Dulles left off? I have always and will always believe that in 200 years, Dulles will be looked at as one of the worst villains in American History. Dulles was reaching his end as Kissinger was coming into his villainous prime. Where Dulles set the table in SE Asia and Latin America, Kissinger broke it down and washed the dishes. I could be way off, and am just curious. Thank you.
  4. Just a question, but do you think there is a big difference between anyone at that level of the game? It just seems to me that anyone able to reach the highest levels of government have been tainted so long that there really isn't that big of a difference in anyone. Clintons and the Trumps go to the same parties and seem cordial, but on television you'd think that they've had a blood feud for three generations.
  5. Jeffrey Reilley

    Carter: the POTUS nearest to JFK?

    3 bullets left on a windowsill overlooking where Carter was giving that speech, if I recall correctly.
  6. Jeffrey Reilley

    Bernard Wilds' website of rare JFK research PDFs

    I've been reading this non-stop since I saw this
  7. Jeffrey Reilley

    Bernard Wilds' website of rare JFK research PDFs

    Thank you so much for sharing!!!
  8. Jeffrey Reilley

    New document releases 2017

    Just an "as I go" comment on this reading: I find it interesting that Chief of Station, I think Devlin(off memory) had heard nothing about assassinating Lumumba in late July of 60'. Lumumba was assassinated what, 3 days before Kennedy's inauguration? So, I take that as the ones giving orders were banking on Nixon winning, and when Kennedy started to pull away, panic mode was instilled. They realized that the status quo may have been in jeopardy
  9. Jeffrey Reilley

    Jack Ruby Monologue--the beginning

    This reminds me of the scene in Goonies, when Chunk is being questioned by the antagonists. Just talking, talking, talking...
  10. Jeffrey Reilley


    Mr. Santos, First off, great post. Second, when and where do you give lectures? I would gladly attend. Thirdly, I have never heard this. Please enlighten. I will pay if I must.
  11. Jeffrey Reilley

    George W. Anderson

    Not sure if this will help, but I am intrigued and reading currently. Try to find some other relevant stuff as well.
  12. Jeffrey Reilley

    How did the conspiracy to kill JFK start?

    I don't understand this statement. Not saying I disagree at all, but why kill him if he hadn't ascended to power? I'm of the belief that if Nixon had won, the good ole' boys would have been running the show, they would have had the chance to have their own little war in Cuba, and the status quo would have gone on undeterred. I believe once Kennedy won the election, the truly powerful people of the country went into a sort of "panic mode" and did everything they could to undermine or sabotage his presidency. When everything failed and it looked like Kennedy was going to win again the next year, "panic mode" went into desperation, which leads to hastily made assassination.
  13. Jeffrey Reilley

    Ted Kennedy

    I forgot all about. Good call.
  14. Jeffrey Reilley

    Ted Kennedy

    If my two brothers were assassinated the way they were and at the times they were, and then Chappaquiddick happened to me, two things would happen in my mind: 1. Any doubt I may have had about my brothers' murders would be gone. 2. I would worry about myself and the rest of my family and would never speak of it again.
  15. Jeffrey Reilley

    Lee Bowers Accident

    4th paragraph, "To me, he is a sensationalist". About sums everything up right there. I hate that language being used when discrediting anything. To me, it sounds like mere opinion."To me, Geraldo Rivera is a sensationalist. His staff does not take time to confirm witnesses' stories. His research consultants' veracity is usually unquestioned. The search for documentation is superficial. Opinions pass as facts." I didn't go with the exact quote before, sorry. But I really cannot stand when people do that. "