Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton


      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

George Sawtelle

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About George Sawtelle

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason You said ... "Joannides cared about one thing only - Cuba - which is almost totally irrelevant to the assassination. He hid the names of etc.etc.etc. ........ the massive Cuban fiasco." How do you know what Joannides cared about? And how much room is there between almost totally irrelevant and totally irrelevant? Is this speculation or do you have documentation? Reading your posts and reading Paul's you are getting a lot like Paul. When you first started posting you seemed so level headed but now you're Paul's alter ego.
  2. Key Documents to Stay Concealed?

    Trump will make a deal with the CIA whereby the CIA won't release all the documents in exchange for favors from the CIA. Just like Trump will forgive Puerto Rico's debt and not allow FEMA and the government to rebuild Puerto Rico in exchange for relocation of Puerto Ricans to US, US banks (real estate offices) buy Puerto Rican land at cheap prices and develop the land for tourism (that is how the US banks recover their loans). Trump of course will get his cut of land free of price and build his hotels with casinos. The banks can easily forgive their loans to Puerto Rico for the land that will give profits forever. What a country right?
  3. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason No one from the CIA, agent or contract agent, would work with the radical right to kill Kennedy simply because the radical right had no assurrance that their crime would be covered-up. No one would have their back. However in working with Dulles to kill Kennedy the rogue agents knew the CIA would have their back and do all they could to cover-up the crime and blame a patsy.
  4. Number of shots in Dealy Plaza?

    Mathias Excellent question. Thomas indicates that the blur analysis and the acoustics analysis back up each other. I have the book and checked out both and it's very close, but not exact. IMO Farrell made Thomas accept the SBT. So in Thomas's conclusion he supports the SBT and four shots. Thomas must have wanted his book published so much that he accepted the SBT despite the fact that the SBT violates physical law and the SBT bullet was almost pristine.
  5. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason What you provide with the FBI documentation is not evidence. It's documentation that has not been proven in a court of law to be evidence. Most of it is hearsay and speculation. Plus the CIA helped cover-up the crime also. It wasn't only the FBI. You seem stuck on the radical right but with out any proof. If you have these guys cold then where are the names. Who were the shooters?
  6. Number of shots in Dealy Plaza?

    Three independent analysts recorded six blur episodes on the Zapruder Film. Each episode is the result of a rifle shot. Based on blur analysis, six shots were`fired in Dealey Plaza. Based on the acoustics analysis by BBN, six shots were fired in Dealey Plaza on 22 Nov 1963. The first shot was a misfire that had only four peaks on the oscilloscope. The other five had 11 or more peaks. No one has debunked the acoustics analysis according to Donald Byron Thomas, who wrote the book "Hear No Evil". He also followed up on the acoustics analysis in the book to debunk every subsequent attempt to derail BBN's analysis. His book is the premier book on the forensic evidence in the Kennedy murder case. His follow-up reports can be accessed on the internet. For a complete account of the blur and acoustics analysis refer to Thomas's book. Both Thomas and BBN had constraints placed on them so that their conclusions would follow as closely as possible the Warren Report and mainstream media reporting on the assassination. Thus their conclusions were tempered to stay in line as much as possible with the Warren Report. To veer off into an "extreme" conclusion would mean censor or the the case of Thomas no one to publish his book. So Thomas could not go over four shots. BBN was forced to admit that one shot, the first one, was not a rifle shot, and eliminate a fifth shot. BBN eventually settled on four shots.
  7. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason I say the autopsy was fake because it supports a fake theory, the lone nut theory. False begets false, truth does not beget false. Which means both are false. It's obvious that six shots were fired in Dealey Plaza on 22 Nov 1963, thus three shots by a lone gunman, one bullet wounds two people, one misses and causes the injury to Tague and one hits Kennedy in the back of the head is false and the conclusion of the autopsy that supports the lone gunman must be false also. Leaving something to chance is far different than faking evidence. Leaving something to chance is a wish, hoping something doesn't happen while faking evidence is an act, changing the outcome. One implies wishing and hoping while the other implies acting. One can say the evidence is false but as long as you are granted control so what. You have the final say. Nothing is left to chance in that scenario.
  8. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason Nothing left to chance is sequestering the body of Kennedy and performing a fake autopsy at Bethesda that would become the official autopsy, the only one that counts. The official autopsy trumps all the mistakes made, all the events left to chance that would upset the lone nut theory and all unforseen events that might derail the WC report which would be released later. The plotters and their helpers could cover-up the crime of the century by dominating the evidence and spreading plausible deniability in the right places. Fifty four plus years later and it still carries the day.
  9. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason All well and good but big capital doesn't want to make a habit of transfering losses to us by etc, etc, etc. Going to the well too many times leaves them open for discovery. Apparently you've already discovered their modus operandi and many others privy to the same information. When the average citizen finds out it could get ugly and that is what big capital would like to avoid. That is the main reason communism scares them so much. A communist revolution could take them down or drive them out of the country. A French type revolution and especially a communist revolution in the US would seriously compromise the retention of big capital's assets IMO. You forgot the disclaimer IMO in your post above.
  10. The CMC-Permindex Papers

    Paz Thank you. I understand.
  11. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Paul and Jason Sullivan and Cromwell is not small capital. They and their clients would lose $$millions if Castro stayed in power. Kennedy's back channel peace efforts would eventually lead to peace with Cuba where Castro would stay in power. Capitalist gain drove these people. The fear of losing their capital drove them to murder, IMO.
  12. The CMC-Permindex Papers

    Paz Does Michelle believe that Borghese and his friends plotted and carried out the assassination?
  13. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason I hope you're not trying to give Allen Dulles the Nuremberg defense, i.e., he is not guilty of murder because he was ordered by his boss. It didn't go over then and it won't go over now. Allen Dulles is not the Mr. Nice Guy that you think he is.
  14. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason If you order a subordinate to kill you are just as guilty of murder as your subordinate who kills (on your orders). Killing in a wartime situation is different, i.e., soldiers are not guilty of murder during a war battle. War crimes are of course different. Lumumba and Allende were murdered during peace between our country and theirs. The rest of your post above is your speculation.
  15. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Jason "This S American stuff is relevant to JFK how exactly?" I tried to link the murders of Patrice Lumumba and Jacobo Arbenz to the coups in the Congo and Guatemala, coups executed by the CIA. David Andrews corrected me by posting Arbenz died 16 years after the coup in Guatemala, not shortly after the coup in Guatemala. I was wrong about Arbenz's death. However S Allende was killed shortly after the coup in Chile, another CIA sponsored coup. You stated earlier in a post that Dulles never murdered anyone. However I disagree. Allen Dulles is responsible, as director of the CIA at the time of the coups, not only for the coups but also for the murders of both Lumumba and Allende, who were both murdered as a result of the coups. Allen Dulles stated that all his actions were cleared by higher authority but that does not absolve him for the murders of Lumumba and Allende.