Jump to content
The Education Forum

Keyvan Shahrdar

Members
  • Posts

    450
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Shreveport, LA
  • Interests
    AI and writing code

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Keyvan Shahrdar's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • Dedicated
  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

  1. During the interrogation of Buell Wesley Frazier on the day of President John F. Kennedy's assassination, the interrogation was abruptly halted. Frazier, who worked at the Texas School Book Depository and was a colleague of Lee Harvey Oswald, had driven Oswald to work on the morning of November 22, 1963. Because of his connection to Oswald and the fact that he had given Oswald a ride that day, Frazier was brought in for questioning by the Dallas police. The interruption occurred because a Secret Service agent, Forrest Sorrels, intervened. Sorrels was the Special Agent in charge of the Dallas office of the Secret Service at the time of the assassination. Recognizing the importance of the situation and possibly to coordinate the interrogation efforts more effectively amidst the chaos of the day, Sorrels instructed the Dallas police to stop questioning Frazier. The exact motivations behind Sorrels' intervention might have been related to concerns about the interrogation methods, the need for federal oversight given the assassination of the President, or the desire to ensure that the investigation was conducted in a manner that preserved critical information and evidence. This moment underscores the intense and chaotic atmosphere that enveloped Dallas law enforcement and federal agencies in the immediate aftermath of the assassination, as they scrambled to gather information and understand the events that had unfolded. Frazier, who maintained his innocence and was never charged in connection with the assassination, provided significant information about Oswald's actions on the morning of November 22, further contributing to the investigation.
  2. Marvin Wise had cotton in his ears. He told the FBI that the cotton was there because he had an ear infection. The reality of the 60's is that shooters would put cotton in their ears to muffle the gun shot. If you have ever shot a gun, you know how loud the report is. What intrigues me the most is how L Fletcher Prouty figured all of this out, happens to be out of the country when the assassination occurs, and knows Edward Lansdale, yet he was not involved in the assassination in any way!
  3. This photograph of Lansdale walking among the hit team says one thousand words. 1. The Tramps - Harold Doyle, Gus Abrams, and John Gedney know Lansdale. How did Lansdale recruit them? Where they Mercenaries? 2. Lansdale knows the Tramps. 3. Lansdale gets alerted by monitoring the DPD radio that the tramps were arrested after the Rail Yard intendant notified the police he saw three people running and entering a train car. 4. There must have been a command center where Lansdale was monitoring the assassination. Where? What building? From a car? When somebody decides to investigate the Tramps in-depth, we will know this aspect of the assassination. What else does the picture of the Tramps with Lansdale say?
  4. The Single Bullet Theory (SBT) was not originally conceived to explain the number of shots fired by Oswald. Rather, it seems to have been crafted to shift focus away from a pivotal detail: the timing of the shot that struck Governor Connally, which was not only later than officially reported but also, it appears, intended for Bill Greer, the driver. Greer's decision to intentionally slow down the car placed him unwittingly at the center of a plot aimed at eliminating co-conspirators and creating turmoil on Elm Street. The sequence of events could have been simply explained by three shots — one hitting JFK in the back, a second wounding Connally, followed by a final headshot to JFK. However, the actual sequence appears to be more complex: JFK first received a throat shot from the pergola, then a shot to his back, followed by one to the back of his head, and another to the right side of his head originating from the pergola. Subsequently, Connally was shot, an event captured by both the Nix and Zapruder films, which show a sudden downward movement at the moment of impact. Finally, a shot struck the front chrome of the windshield, again from the pergola. Interestingly, Connally moved into the direct line of fire between the gunmen and Greer, a move he made inadvertently as he shifted away from his wife in an attempt to lower himself in the limousine.
  5. I neglected to mention that as you drive along Elm Street through Dealey Plaza, you'll find yourself descending a slope. The car naturally gains momentum, continuously rolling downhill, which necessitates deliberately applying the brakes to moderate your speed.
  6. I am staying at a hotel on Elm St for work and everyday I pass through Dealey Plaza. Today, Saturday January 13,2024 I decided to slow my car down to about 10 mph while passing next to the pergola while driving through Dealey Plaza. I even turned my head to look at my back seat twice. if you do this, you will see how evident it is that Bill Greer slowed the car down on purpose so JFK’s head could get blown off.
  7. Kevin, do you think this is the best approach to take? We are here to discuss and debate, not to pit one another against each other.
  8. It's important to emphasize that regardless of opinions or statements, facts remain facts. It seems that in this discussion, there are individuals who prefer narratives over factual evidence. Interestingly, some contradict themselves by alleging alterations in the Zapruder film, autopsy images, and X-rays by the government, and then paradoxically cite government officials to support their narrative. It's quite astonishing. I recommend viewing the Nix Film below, which clearly illustrates the events surrounding JFK's assassination and the manner of his injury. This is not about crafting a story, but rather presenting undeniable evidence and facts. My objective is to encourage people to focus on factual information rather than getting swayed by narratives.
  9. Coincidental Discovery: Ruth Paine could have found the letter by coincidence in her house. This scenario suggests she was not knowingly involved in any conspiracy but became inadvertently entangled in the aftermath of the assassination. Intentional Planting of the Letter: The letter could have been deliberately planted in her house for her to find, possibly by Oswald himself or by another party wishing to frame or involve him. In this case, Ruth Paine's discovery would still be coincidental, but the placement of the letter would be part of a larger conspiracy. Active Involvement: A more complex theory could involve Ruth Paine being knowingly involved in the conspiracy, where she was instructed to give the fabricated letter to the FBI as part of the plot. This would imply her active participation in the conspiracy. Unwitting Participant: Ruth Paine might have been manipulated by others involved in the conspiracy, not fully understanding the significance of the letter or her actions. This scenario places her as an unwitting participant, used by others without her full knowledge. Misinterpretation or Misrepresentation: The letter's discovery and its contents might have been misinterpreted or misrepresented either by Ruth Paine, the FBI, or other parties involved in the investigation, leading to confusion or false leads.
  10. The expedite check on George de Mohrenschildt was initiated by Gale Allen, a case officer in the Domestic Operations Division of the CIA. This request was made on April 29, 1963, and was relayed through Anna Panor. The context and exact reasons for this expedite check remain unknown. This request coincided with de Mohrenschildt's trip through Washington, D.C., New York, and Philadelphia in the spring of 1963. The interest from Gale Allen in de Mohrenschildt during this period is noted as significant, especially considering that there is no detailed information about what the de Mohrenschildts were doing or whom they were in contact with during this trip. One known associate of Gale Allen was Thomas J. Devine, a former CIA staff employee. Devine later became an oil-wildcatting associate of George Bush, and their joint activities led to the establishment of Zapata Oil in 1953. After selling Zapata Oil, Bush entered politics while Devine joined the investment firm of Train, Cabot and Associates in New York. This relationship between Devine and Bush continued through the late 1960s, including the period when Bush served as the United States Ambassador to the United Nations. Gale Allen was aware of the project WUBRINY/LPDICTUM, which involved proprietary commercial operations in Europe and was connected to Devine and Bush. This project and its associations were known to Allen through his role at the CIA However, further detailed information about other known associates of Gale Allen, specifically in the context of his work with the CIA, is not readily available in open sources. The nature of intelligence work, especially during the era in which Allen was active, often involved maintaining secrecy about personal and professional associations. Consequently, comprehensive public records of his associations might not be fully documented or accessible.
  11. Michael, there are X-rays and autopsy pictures and they all refute what the doctors at Parkland have said after the WC report was released. Facts are facts and narrative is narrative. I don't understand why people are hell bent on believing a narrative. Here is a YouTube video of the Nix study which shows you were some of the shots came from, again, facts based and not a narrative.
  12. Facts are facts and facts don't change with what people say! Historical film, photo, x-rays ... of the assassination do not show a hole in the back of JFK's head. I know you want to discredit the film, photos, and x-rays in order to convince people of a narrative that the parkland doctors started, but facts are facts, and they just don't change no matter what anyone says.
  13. You would be right unless you have wayward doctors that would say otherwise and an never ending stream of book authors and film makers that believe there is an alternate reality to facts.
  14. @Pat Speer Why do you entertain this silliness? Facts don't matter anymore to some people. Narratives do! @Sandy Larsen You are taking peoples opinions as fact. Why? Look at the factual evidence in front of you. The historical film that shows exactly what occurred in that moment. You have the Zapruder Film, Nix Film, Marie Muchmore film, and the Mary Moorman photo. Seriously, you should be awarded the equivalent of the Golden Raspberry Award for this post.
  15. I'd like to offer a perspective on why some people may prefer narratives from doctors, authors, or filmmakers over what appears to be undeniable facts captured in historical footage. It's understandable that many have deeply invested in their interpretations, but when faced with irrefutable evidence, I wonder how one can continue to support a narrative that contradicts it. Coming from a family of medical professionals, I've observed a certain reluctance among doctors to acknowledge errors. This "god complex" seems common in the medical field, leading to a stubborn insistence on being right. In the context of the JFK assassination, I believe the doctors at Parkland Hospital, and subsequently the filmmakers who adopt their perspective, are not presenting an accurate account. Take, for instance, the equivalent of Zapruder Frame 313 in the Marie Muchmore film. It clearly shows JFK’s brain and blood matter ejecting from the top of his head towards his left. This is similarly depicted in the Zapruder film, where matter is seen ejecting towards the grassy area on Elm Street. These pieces of visual evidence are hard to dispute, yet narratives that contradict them continue to persist. Why is that?
×
×
  • Create New...