Keyvan Shahrdar

Could it be that Frazier was Oswald's handler?

Foxnews reports - https://www.foxnews.com/media/jfk-author-discovered-eerie-incident-occurred-year-before-assassination

Does anyone know if Buell Frazier was a member of JROTC in High School?

Buell’s father is Albert Eunice Frazier, died in 1993. He was in the military. Does anyone have information about him?

In the ongoing discussion about the JFK assassination, specific known facts about Buell Wesley Frazier have been widely acknowledged: Frazier moved from Huntsville to Irving, Texas, to live near his sister. He started working at the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) in September 1963. Frazier owned a car. On November 21, 1963, he drove Lee Harvey Oswald to Irving, during which Oswald mentioned needing to pick up curtain rods. The following day, Frazier drove Oswald to the TSBD and inquired about the contents of a bag Oswald was carrying. Frazier claims he was in the hallway on the ground floor of the TSBD when JFK was shot. He asserts that the shots he heard seemed to originate from behind the pergola on the grassy knoll, a detail he noted while in the TSBD hallway. Frazier allegedly encountered a well-dressed man with a rifle on Elm Street, outside the Depository, shortly after the assassination. This individual is said to have stored the rifle in his car's trunk before leaving the scene. However, these points, particularly 4 through 8, are based solely on Frazier's account and lack external verification. Consider the following hypothetical scenarios: What if Frazier was the one who suggested Oswald visit Irving on November 21, possibly to meet with Marina? This is done to assure the conspirators that Oswald was at the TSBD on November 22, 1963. Could it be that Frazier himself brought a bag into the TSBD and not Oswald. What if Oswald carried his lunch bag inside? Is it possible that Frazier was the one firing shots from the Depository window? What if Frazier met a co-conspirator outside the Depository post-assassination, who instructed him to return inside and remain silent? Since Frazier had a car, he could have been the one visiting the rifle range for shooting practice. Oswald did not own a car, raising questions about how he would have managed such trips. The relationships and interactions between Frazier, Oswald, Marina Oswald, and Ruth Paine are intricate and often puzzling. Reevaluating Frazier's role could offer new insights into the dynamics of the assassination, suggesting a scenario where he might have been more involved than previously thought.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jfk-assassination-60-years-later-we-know-truth-about-real-killer

Groden does not have frame sets. Groden copied the Zapruder film in 1975 to Betamax, in part that is how he got the HSCA gig in 1976. You can’t see the sprockets in his film.

@Chris Davidson, Gotcha - When transferring film to a digital format, some software may use interpolation to smooth out the footage. This process can sometimes create additional frames or alter existing ones to produce a more fluid motion in the video. While this can improve the viewing experience, it's important to be cautious as it might also introduce artifacts or alter the original content of the film.

I am using Cyberlink and I advance the Robert Groden version of the Zapruder film frame by frame. Anything is possible as both of you mentioned but this seems to be a new frame that was omitted in the NARA version of the Zapruder frames. Do you guys have the Robert Groden version of the Zapruder Film. If not DM me.

Delve into the enigmatic Zapruder frame 312.5, a crucial yet often overlooked frame in Robert Groden's version of the Zapruder film, absent from the NARA collection. This frame captures a haunting, reddish mist enveloping President Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, accompanied by the startling sight of fragments exiting the top of JFK's head.

I recently watched "JFK: What the Doctors Saw" and found the documentary to be a complex presentation of different opinions and interpretations about President Kennedy's assassination. The focal point of the documentary is the nature of the wound in the back of JFK's head, with varying interpretations from the Parkland Hospital doctors featured. The doctors in the documentary discuss the possibility of the throat shot originating from the front, leading them to conclude that the hole in the back of Kennedy's head was an exit wound. They also describe an injury to the top right of JFK's head, visible when he was lying on his back with a flap of hair and scalp moved downward. Additionally, the documentary delves into the analysis of autopsy photos, where the doctors speculate about an entry wound to the right temple area. This observation is presented as a potential explanation for the hole in the back of the head. It's important to note, however, that these doctors are not pathologists, which might affect the accuracy of their assessments. Moreover, the Nix film, which was briefly mentioned in the documentary, appears to provide crucial evidence. This film seems to show that the shots came from the direction of the pergola in the grassy knoll area, hitting JFK from the right in the temporal region above the ear. This could suggest a tangential shot that exited through the top of the skull. The documentary "JFK: What the Doctors Saw" presents a series of interpretations and theories about the assassination. The contrasting views among the doctors and the potential evidence from the Nix film contribute to the ongoing debate and mystery surrounding this historical event.

In the aftermath of World War II, the United States became a new home for many European immigrants, including those from Russia. Cities like New York and San Francisco are known for their Russian immigrant communities, but the story of such communities in smaller cities, particularly Irving, Texas, is less known and intriguing. This historical obscurity raises critical questions: Did the U.S. government, in the midst of Cold War anxieties, extend its surveillance network to Russian communities in cities like Irving, as it did with Japanese communities during World War II? Could this surveillance have been a part of a larger strategy, especially during the tense period of the JFK administration, marked by high-stakes espionage and international conflict? The plot thickens when we consider Lee Harvey Oswald, a pivotal figure of this era with ties to the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Could there have been covert surveillance programs in Irving that intersected with Oswald's path? Is it possible that these programs were designed not just to monitor, but also to influence individuals like Oswald? The Wesley Buell Frazier Connection A central figure in this puzzle is Wesley Buell Frazier, known for informing Oswald about the job opportunity at the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD). If a surveillance program was indeed active in Irving, could Frazier's move to Irving and his subsequent role in Oswald's employment at the TSBD have been influenced by intelligence assets? This hypothesis offers a potential explanation for the seemingly serendipitous chain of events leading to Oswald's placement at the TSBD.

Instances of federal intelligence assets being placed in a neighborhood to influence the decision-making of a specific subject would be highly secretive and typically not disclosed to the public. Such operations, if they exist, would likely fall under covert surveillance or influence operations conducted by intelligence agencies. However, there are historical examples of intelligence agencies conducting surveillance and influence operations: 1. **FBI's COINTELPRO**: The FBI's Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) in the 1950s to 1970s targeted various domestic political groups and individuals deemed subversive. While COINTELPRO involved a range of tactics, including infiltration, it's not clear if this extended to agents living in neighborhoods to influence individuals. 2. **CIA Operations**: The CIA has been involved in various covert operations globally, which have included surveillance and influencing political outcomes. While specific methods are often classified, the use of agents in key positions is a known strategy. 3. **Modern Surveillance Techniques**: Modern intelligence agencies often use technology for surveillance, reducing the need for physical presence. This includes electronic monitoring, internet surveillance, and other forms of remote observation. In conclusion, while historical and current practices of intelligence agencies include surveillance and influence operations, the specific tactic of agents living in neighborhoods to influence an individual's decision-making is not publicly documented and would likely remain classified if it were used.

What if Marina is the instigator and was trying to get Lee the job at the TSBD? One thing we know for sure, Lee was placed there. The questions is, who placed him there? This would mean that Marina's father was a double agent for the CIA or Marina and the Russians had a hand in the assassination. I have been thinking about this issue for years.

If you listen to Frazier speak, he said Thursday Oswald told him he was getting curtain rods then on Friday, Frazier has no idea what Oswald has in the bag, so he asks him what’s in the bag.

Wesley Buell Frazier's connection to Lee Harvey Oswald's employment at the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) cannot be overlooked. Beginning his tenure at the TSBD in September 1963, Frazier soon became an inadvertent bridge, facilitating Oswald's association with the Depository. It was Frazier who communicated about the job opening, initially to his sister, Linnie Mae Randle. She, in turn, relayed the information to Ruth Paine, leading to Oswald's subsequent hiring. It's curious to consider that if Oswald was strategically positioned at the TSBD, someone must have nudged him in that direction. While I'm not implying Frazier was an orchestrator, it's plausible he could have been unknowingly maneuvered by external forces to spread word of the job vacancy among his kin and acquaintances. The Warren Commission's narrative raises eyebrows. Their pronounced emphasis on Ruth Paine and Linnie Mae Randle in the chain of communication about the job, while subtly sidestepping Frazier's initial role, is suspicious. This evasion is reminiscent of their notable silence regarding the mysterious "three tramps." In sifting through the Warren Commission's findings, it seems prudent to focus on what they chose to downplay or omit. Their silences might just be where the real stories lie. I would ask Frazier: Who told you there was an opening at the TSBD and what did they tell you?

In the vast and intricate web of conspiracy theories surrounding the JFK assassination, there exists a plethora of figures, some more prominent than others. While Lee Harvey Oswald remains the central figure in official narratives, what if we turned our gaze to Wesley Frazier? Setting the Stage: In the televised testimony during the Oswald trial, a seemingly innocuous detail caught the attention of many. When asked if Oswald talked much during their car ride, Frazier's eyes darted to the right before he responded that Oswald remained mostly silent. According to some interpretations of body language, this eye movement might suggest deception. But what if there was more to it? Wesley Frazier: A Puppet Master? Let's indulge in a speculative scenario. What if Wesley Frazier knows more than he lets on? What if he was aware that Oswald had a gun when he transported him to the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD)? Could it be possible that Frazier was planted at the TSBD in September, with a mission to manipulate and push Oswald towards the heinous act of attempting to assassinate JFK? Frazier's own account places him in the shadows of the hallway of the TSBD during the shooting, a mere couple of steps behind Billy Lovelady. Yet, he was confident enough to pinpoint the area from where he believed the shots were fired. This claim raises eyebrows. How could someone in the shadows have such a clear perception? The Grassy Knoll Connection: Taking our speculation a step further, what if Frazier was not at the TSBD at all during the shooting? What if he was strategically positioned at the Grassy Knoll, playing a more direct role in the assassination? Conclusion: While this narrative is entirely speculative and fictional, it adds to the vast tapestry of theories that surround the JFK assassination. It's essential to approach such theories with a critical mind and always distinguish between fact and fiction. The purpose of this exploration is not to rewrite history but to engage in a creative "what if" scenario that poses new questions and perspectives.

https://nypost.com/2008/11/23/the-man-who-drove-oswald-to-work-on-nov-22-1963/

The Many Facets of Wesley Buell Frazier in the JFK Assassination The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, stands as one of the most pivotal moments in American history. Among the key figures scrutinized during the Warren Commission's investigation was Wesley Buell Frazier, the man known for driving Lee Harvey Oswald to the Texas School Book Depository on that fateful morning. Unraveling a Military Past While Frazier's involvement in the JFK case has been under the spotlight, a New York Post article has brought to light that Frazier had two stints in the U.S. Army. This revelation presents a broader perspective of Frazier's life, stretching beyond his notable connection with Oswald. The specifics and broader implications of his military service have not been widely discussed, but this newfound knowledge enriches Frazier's profile, prompting inquiries into how his Army tenure influenced his beliefs and possibly his interactions in the year 1963. Decoding the TSBD Connection Frazier's employment at the Texas School Book Depository invariably links him to the assassination. But did he inform Oswald of potential job openings at the Depository, thereby indirectly shaping the events of November 22? The Warren Commission often underscores the roles of Ruth Paine and Linnie Mae Randle, Frazier's sister, in facilitating Oswald's employment at the Depository. However, a lingering question remains: Why would Linnie inform Ruth, who would then relay the message through Marina to Lee, especially when both Linnie and Wesley had direct access to Oswald? It's worth noting that Linnie and Wesley lived adjacent to Ruth's residence. Further, was Frazier already offering carpooling services to Oswald between Dallas and Irving even before Oswald's tenure at the Depository began? Conclusion Although there's scant evidence to suggest that Wesley Buell Frazier had any conspiratorial role in JFK's assassination, the layers of his life, particularly his military background, paint a multifaceted portrait of the man. As is true with many historical events, a deeper dive into the lives of those involved can elucidate a more nuanced understanding of the broader scenario and the intricate dynamics at play.

I lost Robert Groden's email. Can anyone share it here or send me a message?

The Incision in the JFK Autopsy Photo: A New Perspective The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, has been the subject of investigation, speculation, and countless theories. Among the myriad of evidence examined over the decades, a particular autopsy photograph labeled BE1_HI has recently come under renewed scrutiny. When zoomed in, this image appears to reveal an incision between Kennedy's ear and shoulder. Observations from the Image Upon inspection by ChatGPT, an advanced language model developed by OpenAI, the mark visible in the zoomed-in photograph indeed resembles an incision. Furthermore, the material overlaying the indentation appears consistent with stitches or sutures, commonly used in medical procedures to close wounds or surgical sites. This observation aligns with the account of Phyllis Hall, a nurse present in the operating room at Parkland Hospital where Kennedy was taken post-assassination. Hall has reported witnessing a bullet lodged between JFK's ear and shoulder. If her account holds true, this might suggest a bullet trajectory that entered the throat and lodged in the aforementioned position. The visible incision in the BE1_HI photograph could very well indicate a point of surgical intervention to extract such a bullet. Speculations on the Stitches Given the appearance of the sutures and the context in which the autopsy was conducted, it's plausible to speculate on the sequence of events: An incision was made at Parkland Hospital to extract the bullet. The incision was subsequently sutured, either as part of standard medical procedure or out of respect for the deceased. During the autopsy, pathologists might have reopened the sutured incision to investigate the wound and the bullet's trajectory. Post-examination, the incision was likely sutured again. Further Statements from Secret Service Agents Paul Landis's statement to the Warren Commission, beginning on page 30 of volume 18, offers a detailed account of the events from his perspective as a Secret Service agent present on that fateful day. Landis is now adding to his statement that he picked up a bullet in the back seat of JFK and eventually placed it on the stretcher. There are suggestions, albeit speculative, that Landis might have more to share beyond his written account. Conversations with other Secret Service agents, such as Lewis Merletti, could potentially shed more light on the series of events and any undisclosed details. https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/pdf/WH18_CE_1024.pdf

Here is a zoomed image of the incision in the BE1_HI autopsy photograph of JFK.

Has anyone else been able to zoom in on BE1_HI to see the incision that I am seeing?

Here is the video of Phyllis Hall discussing the bullet between the neck and the shoulder.

Looks like fatty tissue inside an incision with stitches coming out of it.