Jump to content
The Education Forum

Keyvan Shahrdar

Members
  • Posts

    459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Keyvan Shahrdar

  1. I read this whole CIA / Oswald in Mexico episode different from everyone else. The CIA lack of information on Oswald in Mexico leads me to conclude that CIA officers were reading and executing messages sent to them. They really did not know why they were doing them, they just knew they had to do it. This comes to mind the letter I read of a CIA officer looking for George de Mohrenschildt; they had no clue why they were looking for GM in April of 63. To me, this CIA/Mexico episode cements my thoughts of Generals at the Pentagon dishing out instructions to their minions.
  2. Watching a JFK conference from 2013, Mark Lanes states that David Atlee Phillips stated Oswald never went to Mexico. Citing video upload by @Vince Palamara Is there a video of DAP stating so?
  3. Tucker Carlson: "...Today we decided to find out. We spoke to someone who had access to the still hidden CIA documents. Person deeply familiar with what they contain. We asked this person directly. Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of JFK, and American president?" Here is the reply we received verbatim - "The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake." This is a carefully crafted message from Tucker Carlson to protect the source. It says someone who had access to the still hidden CIA documents. When did they have access to the still hidden documents? An anonymous source with access to hidden CIA documents? Are those documents in the national archive or the CIA? Are they at someone's home after their loved one passed away? His statements does not mean much! Which is good if he is sincere about hiding the source. I sent Tucker's team an email on Thursday December 15, 2022 @ 11:00 am CST. I don't know if he called the person I asked him to call. I hope he did. I crossed out the relevant information as obviously the source wants to remain anonymous. I have a feeling that Tucker got more information that he is letting us know. Maybe he is working on another JFK assassination show where he will tell us more.
  4. The link to the Nix study is in this thread. Feel free to watch factual evidence of the assassination when ever you want to watch it. Fact is fact. Fact does not change with anyone’s opinion.
  5. I just read what you said and I watched the Nix film without listening to LeRoy. Can you believe I watched shots from the cement structure in the grassy knoll no matter what your opinion on this is. Facts are facts and they don’t change no matter what you or anyone says.
  6. What ever Leroy reminds you of does not change facts. There are shots from the cement structure at the grassy knoll, fact. Everything else is a narrative invented by politicians.
  7. Hi Lance, I want to introduce the Nix Film Study. It has no bias created by politicians. Just the facts.
  8. You are ignoring that people are watching the president when the car comes into view. They are seeing the car come towards them and then leave. When there is a delta of 12mph in speed, you will notice it. To them, as the car is moving away, it slows down to what it seemed to them, an almost stop.
  9. A witness perspective of a limousine slowing down from 20 to 8 mph, that is a delta of 12 mph, probably seems to them that it almost came to a stop.
  10. Talbot Bielefeldt writing to Bruce Solie: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/104-10120-10459.pdf
  11. https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2022?search=William+K.+Harvey#
  12. Someone should ask Ruth who is Talbot Bielefeldt. Maybe she can explain if her father, William Avery Hyde worked for the CIA. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/104-10051-10096.pdf
  13. Expedite check on Subject, exact reason unknown: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/104-10113-10011.pdf
  14. A good smoking gun. The CIA was actively looking for George de Mohrenschildt starting in April 26, 1963. I wonder why? https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/104-10166-10144.pdf
  15. All the documents that Richard Helms does not want the public to see are the documents that we must see. Richard Helm - Conspirator.
  16. The report of the U.S. Secret Service on the assassination of President Kennedy states: "The organization followed in Dallas was identical to that regularly used for presidential motorcades on trips." on Page 18 Is this a true statement? https://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcdocs/pdf/wcd3v1.pdf
  17. I have tried looking for a post that shows the carcano rifle disassembled, similar to what it would look like in a bag. Does anyone have any pictures or links that I can use?
  18. After further investigation, it seems the burst is a reflection from the street curb.
  19. This is a gif version that I created. I don't know how to add an arrow to the location. zframe 341 seems to be a replacement frame in the Zapruder film that we all have. My logic on the frames is they had to replace frames that were inspected and studied and burnt over the hot bulb. There is a reason why those frames were studied. For zframe 341, it does look like a a bullet pierced the windshield, IMO originating from the pergola, outward towards the south side of elm street. If you look at the cab during this frame, there seems to be a disruption. What I find interesting is that this cone type expulsion of glass in the front side of the windshield seems to be near or at the location that we have discussed in the past and where the photograph show a hole. I understand that people have the believe the bullet entered from the front, but what I am seeing in the Zapruder film is indicative of a bullet entering from the cab of the limousine and exiting the front of the windshield. If anyone is an expert with video, it would be great if you can make a better video with arrows pointing to the expulsion of glass, etc...
  20. Maybe I misspoke. It is the guy standing next to the front windshield. Look around his left foot. The windshield has a cone looking blowout from frame 340 to 341.
  21. Look at the left side of the windshield by Altgen's left foot. If you look at 340 then 341 you can really see it then.
  22. Looking at zframe 341, it is clearly a replacement frame and it looks like a blow out of the front windshield close to Altgen's shoes. Anyone have any history on zframe 341?
×
×
  • Create New...