Jump to content
The Education Forum

Mike Kilroy

Two Posts Per day
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mike Kilroy

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Mike Kilroy

    Oswald IS Wearing a Ring upon his Arrest

    I don’t find Judyth Baker very believable but she is one of the few who have noted what jewelry LHO was wearing that day and their possible significance... http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/2010/11/this-november-24-remember-lee-harvey.html?m=1
  2. Mike Kilroy

    Oswald IS Wearing a Ring upon his Arrest

    So the alleged commie assassin that the WC said was alienated and had a problem with America is wearing his Marine Corps ring the day he assassinates POTUS for Castro? Is there anything that makes any sense in this case?
  3. Mike Kilroy

    Oswald IS Wearing a Ring upon his Arrest

    I realize you’re being sarcastic Cory but the lone nutters are the ones who make a big deal out of LHO allegedly leaving his wedding ring at the Paines the day of the assassination. My question is - why would you leave a ring as a final goodbye to your wife but replace it with another ring?
  4. Just what kind of ring is it? It's on his wedding ring finger... https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/lee-harvey-oswald-wears-handcuffs-after-dallas-police-news-photo/515512510
  5. Mike Kilroy

    A simple question to James DiEugenio

    In my mind, all anyone needs to know about questioning the official story of the JFK assassination is ‘The Big Coincidence.’ - Somehow this little low-life, sociopathic nobody named Oswald stumbled across a secretly funded and guided CIA anti-Castro group when he stepped into Carlos Bringuier’s store in New Orleans in the summer of 1963. - Somehow Oswald ties the Fair Play for Cuba Committee with the communists at the exact moment David Atlee Phillips and James McCord are running a propaganda campaign in the US against the FPCC. And shows up to get a travel visa to Mexico the day after the CIA tells the FBI they’re exporting their program internationally. - Somehow Oswald’s well-publicized antics with the DRE in NO that summer are instantly seen on national TV the night of the assassination and make the newspapers the next day, immediately branding him as a pro-Castro agitator in the public’s eye. - Somehow the CIA never tells the Warren Commission that the agency founded, funded and guided the DRE. The CIA’s liaison to the WC is Richard Helms who personally hired agency’s DRE case officer George Joannides in the Miami-based station. Joannides reported directly to Helms. - Somehow the CIA lies and obstructs in its relationship with DRE again in the 70s with HSCA, telling Congress it had stopped working with the group in 1963. When young investigators start heading down the path of the nexus between the CIA, Cubans and Oswald, the agency feloniously runs a covert operation against the HSCA to subvert any further inquiry by bringing Joannides out of retirement to act as liaison, never revealing he ran the DRE. In his testimony, Helms perjured himself by saying he knows of no other information material to the case, never mentioning his hiring of Joannides to Congress. - Somehow Joannides’ files around the time of Oswald have never been released by the agency to this day. The files of DRE case officers before and after him have been released. That’s a 55-year illegal cover-up by the nation’s spy agency in the assassination of a president. The case can never be closed until the reasons for that cover-up are revealed. Also, Jim Di, curious what you think of this:
  6. Mike Kilroy

    Ed Butler and Oswald in New Orleans

    I went to read a bit more about Butler on Jim Di’s site and found this: I think "Howard" would have to be George Joannides who ran the DRE from the JMWAVE station in Miami and used Howard as his pseudonym with the group.
  7. Mike Kilroy

    John Kenneth Galbraith: A Hero in our Time

    Not sure how John Galbraith felt about the JFK assassination, but his son is fairly clear about his POV: http://bostonreview.net/archives/BR28.5/galbraith.html https://www.statesman.com/news/20131109/advisers-son-reflects-on-jfk-after-50-years Great article, btw, Jim. I'll be sure to check out the book.
  8. There’s been a lot of re-enactments of Oswald during the shooting. I’d like to see a re-enactment from the moment LHO gets out of Wesley’s car and: - gets the rifle in the TSBD without anyone even seeing him carrying a package into the bldg - gets the rifle to the 6th floor and stashed there with people all around without anyone seeing him - either finds a safe time and place to assemble the rifle before the shooting, or waits for the worker to finish eating his lunch on the 6th floor just minutes before the motorcade comes by and somehow knows when he’s done and goes to the 6th floor to assemble the rifle with no time to spare - somehow assembles the rifle without a screwdriver ever found I’d like to see the hilarity of someone trying to re-enact all that and make it look plausible.
  9. Thanks, Michael. I have John’s book so I’ll do some searches on McCord.
  10. I have a vague idea of McCord's possible involvement in this, Michael. Could you share a couple of good links I could review? IMO, researchers, if they are truly interested in solving this case, need to treat the American media and public like a jury. We need to provide reasonable arguments backed by compelling evidence. For me, the Helms-Phillips-Kent-Joannides connection fits the bill. You can prove all four knew about the CIA's control of the DRE and either kept quiet, lied about it or actively covered it up. And the CIA of today continues to follow their lead and withholds relevant information. That for me is incriminating and requires a full investigation.
  11. For me, the most compelling evidence pointing to the conspirators are those CIA officials who lied and covered up the agency's involvement with the DRE during the time of LHO. Richard Helms, David Phillips and William Kent all knew each other, knew the CIA was involved with the DRE during the late summer and fall of 1963, and covered up that connection and their knowledge of it. Helms personally put George Joannides in charge of handling the DRE. And the circumstantial evidence is strong that all four officials knew or were personally involved in an anti-FPCC operation in NO and Mexico City, and that this likely included the use of LHO as a witting or unwitting asset. Helms kept the WC in the dark about the agency's DRE control and committed perjury during his HSCA questioning when he said he knew of no further relevant information regarding the assassination. Helms, Phillips and Kent all kept quiet as Joannides took over as the CIA's liaison to the HSCA. Former HSCA investigator Dan Hardway does a great job summarizing the incriminating evidence against these guys here: https://aarclibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Doc.-156-1.-Dan-L.-Hardway-Declaration.pdf For me, the main problem with the JFK research community is that it goes in so many different directions rather than focusing on the most compelling evidence of wrongdoing or suspicious behavior. That way the American media and public remain bewildered and confused rather than outraged and demanding answers. The tale of these four officers and their cover-up of the DRE-CIA connection and the anti-FPCC operations in NO and MC in the weeks before the assassination, as well as the decades-long refusal of the CIA to explain or release pertinent files regarding this issue, is the best evidence of conspiracy we have in this case, IMHO.
  12. That’s a compelling photo and I don’t like photo analysis zaniness either. if you scroll to the left you can see a lady and man looking behind them to their left as if they are watching the President’s car still in sight. The lady appears to have her hand on her mouth in shocked horror and disbelief. Three things: 1) Would love to know who that officer is and if he gave his testimony to anyone 2) Would like to know what the object is in front of fedora man and a similar-looking object on the vertical bridge post a little further from him 3) Very few photos of Dealey if any have captured in stark relief and poignancy the magnitude of what had just occurred. The expression on the larger gentleman to the far left says if all. And the reckless bravery of the officer is also dramatic and at least one plus for the performance of the DPD that day. Also, for some reason, this photo looks more ‘present- day’ and real than any I’ve seen.
  13. Mike Kilroy

    New document releases 2017

    I’m curious who the “highly productive agent” is that accepts no salary that they’re trying to do a favor for...
  14. Good point. Not proven in a court of law but you don’t commit felonies protecting information that’s embarrassing - you do that because the information is incriminating. My parents sat us kids down to watch the JFK funeral at the time telling us over and over again we needed to sit still and watch because it was ‘historic.’ They had no idea.