Jump to content
The Education Forum

Mervyn Hagger

Members
  • Content Count

    347
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mervyn Hagger

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://yesterdayneverhappened.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Forensic investigations of cultural origins

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Who was the 'handler' who met Lee Harvey Oswald at Southampton, England? Has anyone researched this issue? He seems to have left Ft Worth and arrived in Southampton, England with more money than he started out with. He arrived on the day after the British General Election and every hotel in London was full. But lo, he managed to get to Helsinki and possibly Stockholm, even though there were no direct flights. Did he go by military aircraft? Who paid for his stay at the expensive hotel in Helsinki? Before Oswald got to Minsk where he worked at a radio and tele
  2. Aside from Matthew Smith and his book 'JFK the Second Plot', has anyone else written a detailed account of the movements of Lee Harvey Oswald when he left his mother's house in Fort Worth? I am interested in a documented timeline that goes from September 13,1959 to September 13, 1962. This includes his voyage from New Orleans to Le Harve, France and then on to Southampton, England. Lee Harvey Oswald arrived in England on the day after the General Election and all London hotels were full. So where did he go when he left the port and how did he end up with much more money than when he
  3. I am researching the time period from October 8, 1959, when LHO arrived at La Harve, France on the Marion Lykes which had sailed from New Orleans. He then made his way to Southampton, England. How? He then possibly went to London and eventually ended up in Helsinki, Finland on October 9, 1959. Then he possibly made a side trip to Stockholm, Sweden before departing on October 15, 1959 for Moscow by train. Has anyone compiled a detailed account of the time period from October 8, 1959 to October 15, 1959 that accounts for the precise and documented movements of LHO? My interest in his t
  4. Hello Paul. I realize this is rather a prolonged delay in responding to your question, but Brandsetter collides with De Vosjoli and they both come together under the guidance of Jones Harris in the Bill Weaver book called 'Triple Double Cross'. It is supposed to be a novel - fiction, and yet it is based upon Weaver's life and experiences as they concern Radio Nord off Sweden, and which I have now linked to Colonel Stig Erik Constans Wennerstrom, a Swedish spy for the USSR who was exposed in 1963 and sentenced in 1964 to 20 years imprisonment but was released after 10 years. All of this is wrap
  5. Hi Paul - in answer to your question, no, I have not read his book, but then, this entire subject is on the periphery of something I am investigating which collides with it. Hence my question about Ruby, but also and especially about McLendon. What do you know about McLendon with regards to this topic, especially since he is tied to David Atlee Phillips? Mervyn
  6. Paul, you are not the only one who disappeared and it seems I get notifications from your posts. Your theory that Walker was involved begs a question about Ruby and McLendon. Is there a connection? - Mervyn
  7. Pam, I was trying to keep this very basic with my original questions. Based upon the fact that the bubble top was not bullet proof, have any tests been carried out on that bubble top to show what would happen to it if a bullet was fired at it from any direction and knowing that the distance from the gun (or guns) that fired the bullet (or bullets) had to be at least a minimum distance from the target. The minimum distance being any distance encompassing any location suspected of being involved with the shots being fired? Mervyn
  8. Pam, then what answers have been provided in response to the action by the SS? What would have been the result if it had not been removed? Mervyn
  9. Hi Pam. I posed the question to discover what would have happened if the bubble top had not been removed. It seems that there was a possibility that it could have deflected the bullet. It would certainly have made a noise. Mervyn
  10. Michael, as usual you are twisting words. I asked two questions when I began this thread. That is all. If you are confused, and you appear to be either confused or trying to pick a fight with me over words, then forget my comments to others in reply, and only respond to my original questions. Mervyn
  11. Hi Evan. From what you and Pam have stated the bubble top would have placed an obstacle in the path of the killing bullet which may or may not have found the same target point. It would have created a noise factor that was not present due to the removal of the bubble top. Mervyn
  12. Michael, I began by asking two related questions. No conclusions. No speculation. I asked questions. Others added the "may or may not" part in reply. Therefore, based ONLY on my two questions that began this thread (nothing to do with as LHO guilty or not guilty), and the fact that JFK was killed by a bullet to the head in Dallas while sitting in his car, others said that maybe and maybe not that a bullet would have hit JFK in the manner that it did. What I added was that the added noise factor, while keeping in mind that an obstruction has now been placed in front of the shooter, would have a
  13. Hi Mike. You make a statement that LHO "did not do it". That is your opinion based upon no demonstrable evidence. It is a theory held by some. You could not take that into a court of law because an army of people would disagree with you. If you read what I wrote, you will see that I posed two questions. It was answered by others who stated that bullets may or may not have hit JFK. Mervyn
  14. Hi Evan. You hit the nail on the head. Without that bubble top removed, a bullet of the type that hit JFK in the head might have hit him, or it might not have hit him. But the sound of ricocheting bullets hitting the bubble top would have given the driver a chance to step on the gas and get out of harm's way. It seems to me that it was essential to remove the bubble top for a good chance of killing JFK. Mervyn
×
×
  • Create New...