Jump to content
The Education Forum

Jim Harwood

Two Posts Per day
  • Content Count

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jim Harwood

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

74 profile views
  1. Trump promotes FDR policy which you say he knows nothing about but instead you believe that all the American people know about GS due to the collapse? That's a lunatic comment , completely false. First of all if that were the case they wouldn't have allowed the 1999 repeal of Glass Steagall and secondly If they really knew what caused the collapse they'd shut down Wall Street but instead they continue to look at the financial indices as barometers of wealth and economic health . Then Trump promotes the JFK space policy of returning to the moon and from there a Mars mission. He sets a time frame of 5 years. You're wrong Cliff. In fact I think we are going to see the start of some arrests within the previous Obama / British Empire administration. We may see Obama in jail for treason before it all ends. The other thing I like about Trump is he is anti drugs.
  2. He's very aware of Glass Steagall despite your assertions to the contrary. It's the majority of American's that don't understand the significance of GS and therefore any promise to restore that legislation would not have been met with massive popular support. It would not move the so called Trump base. To suggest Trump is "just saying this" is false . You're just keep trying to minimize his entire Presidency and the freakout response by those opposing him, the same interests that go back to the assassination of JFK. The same power that killed Kennedy are behind the coup attempt of President Trump. Try reading this https://phys.org/news/2019-04-moon-nasa-mars.html Keep it up with this idea that Trump is a fascist. Power elites have always loved fascists have they not? -- Mussolini, Hitler Bonaparte. As Keynesian economist Abba Lerner said during a public 1971 debate " if the German people had accepted Schacht's economic policies then Hitler would not have been necessary". But for some reason with Trump, he is under attack at the get go and for colluding with a foreign power to interfere with an American election. ,And how do we know this because we have this dossier provided to us by a foreign power and not just any foreign power but a foreign power that we went to war with on this continent on 3 different occasions (the last time was war with their Confederate puppet) A foreign power that have been behind every assassination of every American President. Yes they have interfered with many of our elections.
  3. Here is a good lead David--New York Times 1970. Robert Vesco (who most researchers agree took over Meyer Lansky's dope business) and Bernie Cornfield of IOS or Investors Overseas Services are in talks with JFK intern (Keith Barrish)and JFK press secretary Pierre Salinger to merge IOS and GRAMCO Management Ltd. Also on the GRAMCO side are five former JFK White House staffers and advisors including one guy who would go on to become the CEO of Nike (of course he was a Larry O'Brien man and O'brien would get rewarded for his role in Watergate by getting the plum job as Commissioner of the NBA "I like Mike"). Also on the Gramco Management Ltd side of the equation was Prince Borghese of the infamous "Black Pope" Nato and Gladio terrorist networks sometimes fingered in the killing of JFK as well as Enrico Mattei. So what's Salinger and five former JFK loyalist doing partnering up with Prince Borghese as well as the Vesco/Cornfield / Lansky mob? It's a puzzle isn't it? By the way Keith Barrish the JFK intern and head of GRAMCO would go on to produce many hollywood films ala Joe Kennedy Sr. as well as form the restaurant chain Planet Hollywood with partners Bruce Willis, Sly Stallone and Maria Schriver's husband Arnold the "Governator" . Them Kennedy's they're so clean. Heroin addiction, dead wives and dead female staffers, Teddy's collaboration with the KGB against the SDI policy. I could go on and on. So when you claim Nixon is mobbed up you might want to look closer at the facts. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/12/19/archives/ios-and-gramco-break-off-talks-ios-and-gramco-terminate-their.html
  4. Let's see President Trump made a campaign promise to reinstate Glass-Steagall which would be the revival of FDR's policy and after the Mueller probe was complete he came out with a 5 year moon mission which is a long over due revival of JFK's science driver policy. Is this theocratic fascism? Or is there an American system president in office once again and the Empire cannot tolerate such a thing happening again. http://fortune.com/2017/03/20/donald-trump-glass-steagall/ During a press briefing earlier this month, White House Spokesman Sean Spicer said the administration remained committed to a Trump campaign promise to restore Glass-Steagall, which effectively prohibits commercial banks from engaging in investment banking. The law was created in 1933, but most of it was rescinded in 1999. However unreliable Spicer has shown himself to be, bringing back the law would be a welcome move for anyone hoping to get tough on Wall Street’s continuing risks.
  5. What is most interesting is the President is now calling this hoax a "coup" and it sounds like he intends to fight the coup plotters some more. He said he wants to know when this whole thing started. In reality for him to get a real understanding of what, who and why, he needs to go back to November 22, 1963 to get a real understanding of what happened to him in 2016-2019 period. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-says-he-was-the-target-of-an-attempted-coup-with-mueller-investigation/ar-BBVO0Xb?li=BBnb7Kz
  6. I received an email which states that maybe even that media blow hard Rush Limbaugh is now fingering the British as the key culprit pushing the Russigate hoax. Break the Brits on this Russia gate coup attempt of a US President and you can get them on the JFK assassination From: Gerald Pechenuk < > To: Gerald Pechenuk <cities > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 7:02 PM Subject: Rush Limbaugh Nails the British Origins of the Attack on Trump on His Show: April 8, 2019 "The American People Deserve to Know How the Hoax Began." Hi, I thought this might be of importance. Take a look. Gerald I have highlighted only one excerpt on the British , there is a lot more in the transcript on the link below. Gerald Wonder of wonder, Miracle of Miracles. Rush Limbaugh attacks the British and the Bushes!! https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2019/04/08/the-american-people-deserve-to-know-how-the-h But I think if we ever get to the bottom of this, you’re gonna find this started in 2015, late in 2015. And that it was the Brits who got hold of Brennan and fed Brennan a bunch of stuff about suspicious relationships between Trump people and Russian people. It had nothing to do with Papadopoulos. Nobody ever heard of Papadopoulos in 2015. He had nothing to do with it. The Brits do not like Trump because he is perceived as anti-NATO. The Brits have been worried about Trump since his first campaign salvo anti-NATO. NATO is the way they defend themselves. And they are scared to death that Trump meant it, about either making everybody pay up or disbanding the organization because it’s no longer valid in this present day. So the diplomats and intelligence people who are progressive leftists looked at Trump as an existential threat to this post-World War II order that John McCain talked about when he was describing his hatred for Trump. Why would we want to blow up the world order we created after World War II? McCain thought he was among the elites — and he was — that built and maintained what was called the world order. I don’t mean that in a conspiratorial sense like the New World Order conspiracy buffs do. There was a management of United States and Europe set up after World War II, and it’s how we got the Cold War. It’s how we got Soviet Union is legitimate bad guys and the rest of Europe, and NATO was part of this, and it’s a gigantic money bunch. NATO is a bunch of money for a lot of people to get money that’s not theirs, comes from us. Anything that would upset that would not be tolerable. oax-began/?fbclid=IwAR2BpdnsLUTJ9rqiHZQkE7e4qTIa5P64sCGI47a75A7xiSjzYxh4CKc4ybw
  7. I'm sorry David I cannot follow your comment although I am sure it's very insightful. I don't know what "neo-LaRoucheist" means nor do I know what the acronym BNDD means. I do disagree with your assessment that Nixon was mobbed up higher than his two predecessors. The Kennedy political machine was organized crime in government. Just look at who went on to run Meyer Lansky's Resorts International subsidiary INTERTEL, all the Kennedy justice boys. Those that didn't join INTERTEL joined the Jacobs money laundering apparatus Emprise. I think Tricky Dick had one of his advisors Jack Caufield (???) warn him about what he called the Kennedy machine using their Stephen Smith run private intelligence apparatus INTERTEL to run some kind of operation against him in 1972. We got Watergate so it looks like caufield was at least correct about an operation run against Nixon. And by the way Pierre Salinger and five of JFK' s white house staff and advisors (they were Larry O'brien boys-- wasn't Larry the head of the DNC when Watergate burglary happened?) went on to run GRAMCO Management Ltd. a London , Bahamas based "off shore" hot money company that planned to merge with Robert Vesco and Bernie Cornfield's Investors Overseas Services in 1970. Now that's Dope Inc. and you might want to answer what the Kennedy machine is doing running security for Meyer Lansky and laundering dirty money at GRAMCO. It's a puzzle isn't it?
  8. And further quotes: Roosevelt's understanding of the threat posed to world peace by the continuation of imperialism, was recorded by his son Elliott in his book, As He Saw It. FDR told his son, ``The colonial system means war. Exploit the resources of an India, a Burma, a Java; take all the wealth out of these countries, but never put anything back into them, things like education, decent standards of living, minimum health requirements--all you're doing is storing up the kind of trouble that leads to war. All you're doing is negating the value of any kind of organizational structure for peace before it begins.'' At the Casablanca conference in January of 1943, Roosevelt was even more emphatic: ``I'm talking about another war. I'm talking about what will happen to our world, if after this war we allow millions of people to slide back into the same semi-slavery! Don't think for a moment, Elliott, that Americans would be dying in the Pacific tonight, if it hadn't been for the shortsighted greed of the French and the British and the Dutch. Shall we allow them to do it all, all over again? Your son will be about the right age, fifteen or twenty years from now.'' Roosevelt understood the danger that British imperial policies posed to the world, and he was acutely aware that he would have to deal with this threat, in a forceful manner, at the conclusion of the war. In 1942, Roosevelt quipped, prophetically, to one of his advisors: ``We will have more trouble with Great Britain after the war than we are having with Germany now.''
  9. Thanks Paul. Excerpts from Elliott Roosevelt's book "As He saw it" . FDR and Churchill were going at each other tooth and nail regarding how the world would look after the fascist menace had been defeated. Some historians think the British extended the war in Africa (Montgomery) in the hopes that a frail FDR would die, and they could get regain ownership of their former colonial Empire. Essentially if FDR had lived and carried out his plan there would have been no return of the French or British colonialists retaking Vietnam, which of course became a waterloo for a post war America. We still have not recovered from that debacle. QUOTE: Roosevelt and Churchill Discuss Colonial Questions, August 10, 1941, excerpt from Elliott Roosevelt, As He Saw It (New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1946). Father [FDR] started it. "Of course," he remarked, with a sly sort of assurance, "of course, after the war, one of the preconditions of any lasting peace will have to be the greatest possible freedom of trade." He paused. The P.M.'s [Churchill's] head was lowered; he was watching Father steadily, from under one eyebrow. "No artificial barriers," Father pursued. "As few favored economic agreements as possible. Opportunities for expansion. Markets open for healthy competition." His eye wandered innocently around the room. Churchill shifted in his armchair. "The British Empire trade agreements," he began heavily, "are--" Father broke in. "Yes. Those Empire trade agreements are a case in point. It's because of them that the people of India and Africa, of all the colonial Near East and Far East, are still as backward as they are." Churchill's neck reddened and he crouched forward. "Mr. President, England does not propose for a moment to lose its favored position among the British Do-minions. The trade that has made England great shall continue, and under conditions prescribed by England's ministers." "You see," said Father slowly, "it is along in here somewhere that there is likely to be some disagreement between you, Winston, and me. "I am firmly of the belief that if we are to arrive at a stable peace it must involve the development of backward countries. Backward peoples. How can this be done? It can't be done, obviously, by eighteenth-century methods. Now-" "Who's talking eighteenth-century methods?" "Whichever of your ministers recommends a policy which takes wealth in raw materials out of a colonial country, but which returns nothing to the people of that country in consideration. Twentieth-centurymethods involve bringing industry to these colonies. Twentieth-century methods include increasing the wealth of a people by increasing their standard of living, by educating them, by bringing them sanitation-by making sure that they get a return for the raw wealth of their community." Around the room, all of us were leaning forward attentively. [Harry] Hopkins [a major FDR adviser] was grinning. Commander [C. R.] Thompson, Churchill's aide, was looking glum and alarmed. The P.M. himself was beginning to look apoplectic. "You mentioned India," he growled. "Yes. I can't believe that we can fight a war against fascist slavery, and at the same time not work to free people all over the world from a backward colonial policy" "What about the Philippines?" "I'm glad you mentioned them. They get their independence, you know, in 1946. And they've gotten modern sanitation, modern education; their rate of illiteracy has gone steadily down "There can be no tampering with the Empire's economic agreements." "They're artificial ..." "They're the foundation of our greatness." "The peace," said Father firmly, "cannot include any continued despotism. The structure of the peace demands and will get equality of peoples. Equality of peoples involves the utmost freedom of competitive trade. . ." It was after two in the morning when finally the British party said their good nights. I helped Father into his cabin, and sat down to smoke a last cigarette with him. Father grunted. "A real old Tory, isn't he? A real old Tory, of the old school." "I thought for a minute he was going to bust, Pop." "Oh," he smiled, "I'll be able to work with him. Don't worry about that. We'll get along famously." "So long as you keep off the subject of India." "Mmm, I don't know. I think we'll even talk some more about India, before we're through. And Burma. And Java. And Indo-China. And Indonesia. And all the African colonies. And Egypt and Palestine. We'll talk about 'em all."
  10. 384 pages of key date in the Jim Garrison case against Ferrie, Shaw http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/White Files/Garrison/Garrison-Chronology/Garrison-Dates.pdf
  11. I though this might be a decent thread for this story----JFK at the 1959 Rice Festival in Louisiana https://countryroadsmagazine.com/art-and-culture/people-places/the-rice-festival-welcomes-mr-kennedy/
  12. Estranged from the eastern establishment and CIA because of his mob connections? That's funny David. A wise old bird said to me once that the only reason we have organized crime in this country is because the blue bloods (Eastern Establishment) needed "money launderers". Nixon actually launched a war on drugs and the Eastern Establishment Tories and their cousins in the British Empire didn't like that. These two groups had been in the business at least as far back as the British Opium Wars against China. When they got Nixon to cancel FDR's Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates in favor of today's City of London's floating exchange rates they no longer needed him and ousting Nixon helped their longer range plan of weakening the office of President. The British still had a fresh memory of what FDR did during his twelve years in office and they didn't want to be subjected to that ever again. In fact what FDR intended to do post WWII was even more frightening to the British. FDR intended to do away with the British Empire. According to FDR's son Elliot who wrote a book "As I saw it" said that Clay Shaw's buddy Winston Churchill almost went mad when FDR told him point blank "No more British colonial system". FDR planned to use the American System to modernize the old British, French colonial nations and bring them into the 20th century.
  13. I find it more than perplexing that two different gentlemen a Frenchman and a Canadian subject working on the same issue over a decade a part would both use the Bloomfield archives as a means to claim there was no connection between Permindex and the assassination of John F. Kennedy. They both received a lot of Canadian media attention for their efforts to get access to his papers. Here is the issue of Bloomfield library archive by Maurice Phillips that posted on this site way back in year 2006. Then almost 10 years later Maurice's work was duplicated to a tee by another gentleman. It doesn't make much sense to me to duplicate Maurice Phillips work , down to the same documents like the George Bush Sr. correspondence. We saw that over ten years ago. But both men who reviewed the Bloomfield archives are clear in their assessment that there is no connection to the murder of JFK and Louis Bloomfield and Permindex. What an odd undertaking and what an odd conclusion. What did these two men expect to find in Bloomfield's personal archive a signed confession? It reminds me of what the old sage Harold Weisberg used to say that there are no smoking guns to be found in the Government or CIA or FBI files regarding the JFK murder because the murder was never investigated in the first place. Philipps, author of the book De Dallas a Montreal (From Dallas to Montreal), which explores a possible Montreal connection to JFK's 1963 assassination in Dallas, stumbled on a reference to the Bloomfield connection in the mid-1990s and was intrigued - particularly given allegations advanced by some JFK conspiracy theorists that tied Bloomfield to the shooting, a shadowy international company called Permindex, the CIA and the agency that preceded it, the OSS. While the conspiracy theory connection between Bloomfield and JFK's assassination is a complex one and has evolved over time, it appears to stem from the fact that he was named as a major shareholder in Permindex. There are allegations that Permindex was a front or shell company for the CIA and was used to funnel money for intelligence operations. While Philipps does not believe the papers implicate Bloomfield in the shooting -- in fact, he thinks they may clear Bloomfield's name -- he says they might contain clues that could help shed light on JFK's assassination.
×
×
  • Create New...