Jon Pickering

The secondary assertion in your report - that Ruth recommended the ACLU to Marina Oswald - recalls the time the ACLU pressured Vincent Salandria into resigning from the organization one or two years into his revelatory writings on the central role the national security apparatus' had in Kennedy's murder. Unless there were two ACLUs at large at the time, that wasn't very friendly advice. In other words; kind of like what an agent would say, when the perception of the ACLU was still praiseworthy, to gain the trust of a vulnerable pigeon.

If aware of her presence, preparing to duck would have been prudent for any freely elected President - in this case Nicaragua's Ortega.

Perhaps the answer got flambeed in 1973 along with 13 million other military personnel files. Isn't that where the expression 'cooking the truth' originated? Perhaps?

Chomsky, the long term recipient of Pentagon favor and funding is a leftist? On what planet? The DoD has stated on many occasions its primary mission was to contain communism (a clear anti leftist mission) - I submit Chomsky is one of the Pentagon's tactics to contain liberalism, progressivism, leftism, and, to provide a false spokesman/leader for well-intentioned liberals - pursuant to misleading and sabotaging the efforts of youthful citizen-activists working for progressive change. Hopefully, his influence passes with his.

It's clear the perps ran a phony parallel plot designed to leech attention from their commanding role in John Kennedy's murder, and, bring the righteous ire of Americans onto the heads of any sap and sucker who could be plausibly construed as a civilian 'Kennedy hater' local to Dallas or New Orleans. The mob, rejects from Castro's Cuba, the oilmen, the cadet leaders, the Eastern pilot, various hustlers, mercenaries, Agency boobs, undercovers, the whole of New Orleans' gay community, some of them willing, even eager, some not - but all were to become 'guilty' parties to the eye of many citizens, yet, more wasteful to the reader, the carefully crafted legends of sponsored JFKA 'researchers'. Oswald was merely one of a gaggle of patsies in the JFKA.

What is weird in this debate is how murderers, pimps, gun molls, extortion artists, prison rats, head breakers, racketeers, all hustlers and XXXXX - ie., the Mafia - are given credibility. Is this an attempt to deflect? Anyone in the 'mob did it club' wanna explain?

If Lowenstein was a progressive/liberal, the particular set of principles which would indicate he was one, was left in abandonment when he advocated pro military anti communist action

Thanks to their success in handling that pesky Kennedy fellow in '63, the Italian mob now flies it flag over armed bases in over 150 countries worldwide and saw the wise guys behind it retire as wealthy and free men secure in the knowledge they could forever cover up the murder of a U.S. president, and, not end up in oil drums and subterrenean apartments with two shots behind the ear. Or, go to hoosgow for terms no less than their full natural lives, or, even face constant legal pressure from various do-gooders in the system. How fortunate that Carlos never got brought down in BriLab like some street punk. The world of the Mafia would have been frothing with these type occurrences were it not for their successful hit on John Kennedy.

A more realistic appraisal of New Orleans before the murder is that it was used by the killers as a civilian patsy factory with a large population of compromisable male homosexuals there for recruitment. Remember: Lee Oswald wasn't the only patsy created in the conspiracy to murder the President. Include in this gallery of fronts and cutouts, Shaw and company, along with the Cubans, the mob, right wing activists, the FBI, CIA, and anything or anybody else that could plausibly be construed as civilian. In reality we know now they were simply egoistic fascist saps, used and then thrown away. But, U.S. cmdrs and key subordinates nurtured and managed the New Orleans civilian-framing operation, make no mistake about it, as surely as they managed the killings of important liberal leaders in the period before, during, and, after the 60s. Subsequently, we now learn that the other intended targets for assassination were liberal governance and its guiding philosophy - as no one currently in business, gov, or, media, qualify as liberal, nor, will there be anyone with this political philosophy occupying an influential position in these professions anytime, soon.

Got it - let us purge from history and our minds that he attended a picture show in his haste to flee

He didn't immediately flee Dallas. He didn't dip.

Got it - we should disregard Oswald's thwarted attempt to contact military intelligence on the night of the assassination. Anything else we should remain blind to?

No, the DoD controls the Senate.

Corona (rumor of contagion always precedes U.S. military invasions of sovereign nations ) , domestic mass casualty events, even most elections and certainly all major political campaigns (the best way to think of Democrats and Republicans is that they are Pentagon contractors vying for selection through corruptible electronic balloting) - all contain indicators of being psychological warfare missions, courtesy of Pentagon planners and the cmdrs and personnel of the military's two psychological operations divisions, often with partnerships between two or more branches.

Thanks, I'll be listening. I predict though, we'll hear something along the lines of 'due to national security concerns, at this time I cannot authorize blah blah blah, yada yada yada, the (duly authorized) release of remaining JFKA files'. The assassins own Presidents to the point that they're interchangeable, while their policies remain the same, throughout, always glaringly, and, dangerously similar to our Pentagon 'planners', and the sociopathic wish lists of their mentally unbalanced Chiefs.

Yes, Lt. Colonel James Fetzer. He can always be counted on to endorse or come up with the most ludicrous theories and claims, especially in the case of the President's murder. But, then, what are Marine colonels suppose to do in the aftermath of a military coup. P.S. Thank you for laying down some cover for me in the other thread.

If we really want to discover who was involved in the President's murder, we must check for military backgrounds among the established suspects. An affirmative hit points to guilt in the greenlighting, planning, or physical execution of the assassination---or the 58 year-long cover-up. For example - to begin our research, let's start with everybody's favorite suspect, Lt. Colonel John Edgar Hoover from U.S. Army Intelligence Reserves. J. Edgar was military? Shocking, eh? Well, no, not really - not in the local, state, or, federal governments of the U.S.A., where radio, then television, along with the brass, instruct us that Military-Americans are the best candidates for jobs in civilian governance and most importantly in civilian law enforcement. His more famous hustle - so they say - was a stint with the Federal B.I. where he posed as a mafia-denying closeted civilian. And, where he also did immense damage to the civilian sector in a run that lasted over 50 years. So, come on - the list of suspects won't check itself. Let's get to it, then, shall we?

Don McGovern's review was exhilarating - and, thank you to James DiEugenio for having it on the excellent Kennedys & King site.

Disagree. Dulles, in fact, was what he was always intended to be - a "civilian" patsy to draw heat away from the true ramrods of the assassination, and, other horrible crimes around the planet. They would be - in my opinion - the Joint Chiefs, operating under the full institutional weight of the Armed Forces , as embodied by the Generals and Admiral corps, their staffs, and, key lower ranked personnel.

Hi, Benjamin - how are you?Have you considered the round that went into the right temple of the President - signifying, along with the timing, fire from the right, i.e., from the direction of the knoll?

so, now it's burkey, burke, and, burkley. way to muddle a thread. anyway, one of the techs said it was a high-ranking uniform smoking a cigar - in the gallery - that instructed not to explore. Was burkley in the gallery smoking a stogie, or, standing on the floor with the autopsists, smoking a stogie?

"Maybe They Don't Do This Anymore, But Are There Any Recent Polls Regarding Warren Report Belief or Disbelief?" One of the indications of a question is a question mark. Funny that.

Google is your friend. Innane questions such as yours serve only to hasten more important issues off the front page.

CIA, like Oswald, was a patsy, but, it served as such for all manner of Military ops including the Joint Chiefs' 'get the Kennedys' project. That's why it was established by Military brass in the first place - to draw heat. Look at how many JFKA 'researchers' spend so much time and energy on the CIA 'done it' conclusion, as well the number of obvious agents who entice those researches into that line of inquiry and conclusions with false leads and inflamatory accusations against its heads and personnel - which may very well be accurate but hardly conclusive of CIA supervision over the JFKA plot.

When all the euphemisms, nicknames, and, other examples of avoidance speech, which are used to describe the rulers of the USA and much of the rest of the planet - the Deep State, the Shadow government, the One Percent (this is a pretty good label for the 3.5 million employees of one very persuasive Department of the government in a nation of 350 million citizens - but it was popularized during Operation: Wall Street, and, talk about a mis-direction), the Banksters, and, the future terms people will come up in their quest to run from the cold hard truth - are stripped away, we'll be left with just one word; Junta. Say it with me, now.