Michael Griffith

[Wim Dankbaar]

THE CONCLUSIONS AND RESEARCH OF THE HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS: WHOSE SIDE DO THEY SUPPORT?

Michael T. Griffith

2001

@All Rights Reserved

Revised and Expanded on 1/21/02

Few assassination researchers would dispute the fact that the JFK assassination investigation of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was much more thorough and comprehensive than the Warren Commission's investigation.

Both conspiracy and lone-gunman researchers cite HSCA analyses and conclusions to support their positions. However, some researchers who are apparently unfamiliar with logic and debate fundamentals argue that one cannot cite a conclusion of one of the HSCA's expert panels unless one accepts all of the panel's conclusions. Or, they argue that one cannot cite an HSCA conclusion unless one accepts all of the HSCA's conclusions. Of course, this is faulty logic. In point of fact, virtually no one accepts all of the HSCA's conclusions, although, as mentioned, both sides cite HSCA conclusions and research to support their positions.

Which side, the conspiracy theorists or the lone-gunman theorists, is in a better position to accept all of the HSCA's conclusions and analyses? Which side can more consistently accept most of the HSCA's conclusions and analyses? Without a doubt, it is the conspiracy camp.

If one were to accept all of the HSCA's conclusions and research, one would believe the list of statements that appears below. Before we get to that list, let's remember that not all of the HSCA's findings and evidences were highlighted or mentioned in the committee's report. The HSCA volumes contain a number of important evidences and expert conclusions that were either passed over or only briefly mentioned in the final report. With this understood, let's see what one would have to believe if he or she accepted all the evidence that was developed by the HSCA experts and all the conclusions expressed by the HSCA and/or by one of its expert panels:

* Kennedy was probably killed by a conspiracy. This was the key finding of the committee, a finding that the committee argued was supported by existing evidence and by additional evidence that it developed during its investigation.

* Four shots were fired during the assassination, one of them from the grassy knoll.

* Two gunmen were involved.

* Oswald fired three of the four shots.

* Oswald might have had links to Jack Ruby.

* Oswald shot Officer J. D. Tippit and also took a shot at General Edwin Walker.

* There was a gunman on the grassy knoll.

* A Dallas police dictabelt recording contains four impulses that are the result of the sounds of four gunshots that were fired in Dealey Plaza during the shooting (and possibly as many as seven to nine such impulses). One of these impulses was caused by a shot that came from the grassy knoll.

* The Zapruder film shows Kennedy was first hit at around Z188-190. (Lone-gunman theorists now reject this conclusion because they know it proves there were four shots and because they're now committed to the alleged magic-bullet hit occurring at Z224.)

* The jet-effect theory to explain the head shot in the Zapruder film is untenable or possible. (The HSCA experts were divided on this: Dr. Sturdivan implicitly rejected it and noted that any force generated by the right-frontal explosion would have been minimal, while Dr. Baden, who recently defended O. J. Simpson and the nanny in the Nanny Trial, cited the theory as a possible explanation for the violent backward motion of the head snap.)

* The Dillard and Powell photos of the sixth-floor window taken less than 2 minutes after the shooting show that boxes were being moved during a time when Oswald was known to be downstairs on the second floor encountering a police officer. (It's worth mentioning that two witnesses also reported seeing movement in the window just a few minutes after the shooting. This could not have been Oswald.)

* Ruby did not enter the basement via the Main Street ramp, contrary to what the Warren Commission (WC) claimed. (The WC took Ruby's word on this, but it's clear Ruby lied about how he entered the basement.)

* Ruby entered the basement via another means, probably with help from someone in the police department.

* Ruby had considerable ties to the Mafia.

* Ruby's AGVA alibi doesn't seem to be a credible explanation for all the long-distance phone calls Ruby made to Mafia contacts all across the country after Kennedy's visit to Dallas was announced.

* Ruby's polygraph test indicates he was quite possibly lying when he denied he was involved in the assassination.

* Ruby's killing of Oswald probably was not a spontaneous act but a premeditated act that reminded one of Mafia hits to silence witnesses. Ruby's story that he killed Oswald out of sympathy for Mrs. Kennedy was a lie, as revealed by a note that Ruby wrote to one of his attorneys.

* The eyewitness reports of seeing puffs of smoke above the firing point on the grassy knoll are credible.

* Abraham Zapruder's report that one of the shots caused a great reverberation around him indicates that shot came from the grassy knoll, since it is very unlikely that a shot from the sixth-floor window could have caused such a reverberation.

* Kennedy's autopsy was flawed and incomplete.

* There was a huge discrepancy between the autopsy pathologists' descriptions of the wounds and the wounds as they appear to be shown on the autopsy photos and x-rays. (For example, if the autopsy photos are to be believed, the autopsy pathologists mislocated the rear head entry wound by at least a staggering 3 inches, if not 4 inches.)

* The FBI and the CIA misled and withheld information from the WC.

* Military intelligence destroyed important evidence relating to the case that should not have been destroyed.

* The HSCA formally cleared the CIA of involvement in the assassination as an institution. The committee did not do so for the military. As Rockefeller Foundation scholar Henry Hurt notes in his book REASONABLE DOUBT, this astonishing fact is often overlooked by researchers and newcomers alike.

* The FBI failed to properly investigate an informant report that an anti-Castro activist named Homer S. Echevarria appeared to have advance knowledge of a plot to kill Kennedy. Just one day before the assassination, during a discussion about a shipment of illegal weapons for anti-Castro activities, Echevarria told the informant that his anti-Castro group had plenty of money and that they would proceed "as soon as we take care of Kennedy." The Secret Service tried to investigate the matter, but the FBI made it clear it wanted the investigation halted, and, incredibly, the FBI itself did not pursue the issue further. The HSCA noted that Echevarria was associated with Juan Francisco Blanco-Fernandez, military director of the anti-Castro group DRE, and that the arms deal was being financed through one Paulino Sierra Martinez by hoodlum elements in Chicago and elsewhere. The committee also found that Echevarria may have been a member of the 30th of November anti-Castro organization, adding,

The 30th of November group was backed financially by the Junta del Gobierno de Cuba en el Exilio (JGCE), a Chicago-based organization run by Paulino Sierra Martinez. JGCE was a coalition of many of the more active anti-Castro groups that had been rounded in April 1963; it was dissolved soon after the assassination. Its purpose was to back the activities of the more militant groups, including Alpha 66 and the Student Directorate, or DRE, both of which had reportedly been in contact with Lee Harvey Oswald. Much of JGCE's financial support, moreover, allegedly came from individuals connected to organized crime. (HSCA Report, p. 134)

* Security arrangements for the presidential motorcade might have been uniquely insecure.

* Although the committee said it "could not credit" former anti-Castro leader Antonio Veciana's story of having seen a CIA officer meet with Oswald before the assassination, the committee did find some support for aspects of Veciana's story. Veciana claimed that prior to the assassination the CIA assigned him a case officer who went by the name of Maurice Bishop. Veciana said he saw Oswald and Bishop talking on one occasion. Some of the committee's staff suspected that Bishop's real name was David Atlee Phillips, a CIA officer who had been heavily involved in anti-Castro activities.

* The committee concluded Veciana probably did in fact have a case officer from some government agency, and it noted the CIA had assigned case officers to lesser figures in the anti-Castro movement. The committee found a record of $500 in operational expenses, given to Veciana by a person with whom the CIA had maintained a longstanding operational relationship.

* Phillips denied under oath that he had even known Veciana. The committee said it suspected Phillips was lying when he denied knowing Veciana, given the fact that Veciana was a prominent figure in the anti-Castro Cuban exile community, and that Phillips was deeply involved in anti-Castro activities.

* Veciana declined to identify Phillips as Bishop, although Veciana also said Phillips bore a physical resemblance to Bishop. Veciana also told a committee staffer that he wouldn't disclose that Phillips was Bishop even if he were. Based on the way Veciana acted when he said this, the staffer came away suspecting Veciana may have been trying to tell him Phillips was Bishop after all.

* The committee's report includes a footnote that says the committee suspected Veciana was falsely denying that Phillips was Bishop! In other words, the committee in effect said, or at least implied, that it suspected Phillips may have been Bishop and that Veciana denied this because he hoped for further CIA support for his anti-Castro operations!

* A former CIA case officer who was assigned from September 1960 to November 1962 to the JM/WAVE station in Miami told the committee that Phillips had in fact used the alias, Maurice Bishop.

* A former CIA director and a former CIA agent said a man named Maurice Bishop had worked for the CIA.

* The Clinton-Jackson witnesses who reported seeing Oswald with David Ferrie and Clay Shaw were credible.

* Mafia boss Carlos Marcello was a plausible suspect for having been involved in the assassination conspiracy.

* Oswald associated with David Ferrie, an ultra-right-winger who was involved in the Carlos Marcello Mafia organization. (Very strange company for an alleged Marxist to be keeping.)

* Oswald had ties to the Marcello crime organization.

* Sylvia Odio's story is credible. (Her story supports the position that there was a conspiracy involved in Kennedy's assassination and that CIA-backed anti-Castro Cubans were involved in it. Odio's account also strongly suggests someone was impersonating in the weeks leading up to the assassination.)

* The Mafia had the means, motive, and opportunity to assassinate President Kennedy.

* The bullet that struck Kennedy in his back and allegedly exited his neck had a slightly upward trajectory. The pathology panel even noted that the photos of the back wound show the tissue inside the wound to be tunneled upward. (The committee's trajectory study ignored the pathology panel's placement of the back wound.)

* The eyewitness reports of hearing shots from the grassy knoll are credible and cannot be dismissed as merely being the result of echoes.

* The WC failed to adequately investigate the possibility of conspiracy.

Of course, most conspiracy theorists do not accept every single one of the HSCA's findings. But they accept many or most of them, and a few conspiracy theorists accept all of them.

Lone-gunman theorists, on the other hand, accept very few of these conclusions and findings. They are constantly forced to pick and choose among the HSCA's evidences and conclusions. And, needless to say, they of course reject the committee's central conclusion of a probable conspiracy. They must also reject the photography panel's findings that the Zapruder film shows Kennedy was first hit at around Z188 and that the Dillard and Powell photos show boxes were being moved in the sixth-floor window at a time when Oswald was known to be downstairs encountering a policeman.

------------------------------------

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Michael T. Griffith holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Excelsior College in Albany, New York, and two Associate in Applied Science degrees from the Community College of the Air Force. He is also a two-time graduate of the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, and of the U.S. Air Force Technical Training School in San Angelo, Texas. He has earned instructor certification from both the U.S. Army and the U.S. Air Force. He is the author of the book Compelling Evidence: A New Look at the Assassination of President Kennedy (Grand Prairie, TX: JFK-Lancer Productions and Publications, 1996). His articles on the assassination have appeared in several journals that deal with the subject. In addition, he is the author of four books on Mormonism and ancient texts.

JFK Assassination Web Page

JFK Assassination Web Page 2

JFK Assassination Web Page (Old)

[Wim Dankbaar]

SUSPECTS IN THE JFK ASSASSINATION

Michael T. Griffith

1996

@All Rights Reserved

Revised 10/09/99

Who would have wanted to see President Kennedy dead? Warren Commission (WC) critics have identified a number of people and groups whom they suspect were either involved in the assassination or had foreknowledge of it and did nothing to prevent it because they wanted JFK out of the way. According to many researchers, the following individuals and organizations are suspects:

* Lyndon Johnson

* The CIA

* J. Edgar Hoover

* Oil baron H. L. Hunt

* The Mafia

* Anti-Castro Cubans

* General Edward Lansdale

* Richard Nixon

Lyndon Johnson

I suspect Lyndon Johnson may have been involved in the plot to murder President Kennedy, though I am by no means certain. I believe Johnson might have known about the plot ahead of time and either sanctioned it or actively took part in it. Another possibility, in my view, is that Johnson realized soon after the shooting that Kennedy had been killed by a conspiracy, and that Johnson had an idea as to who had been behind it.

In any case, Johnson was a driving force behind the cover-up that followed. Craig Zirbel assembles circumstantial and anecdotal evidence that Johnson was involved in the plot in his book THE TEXAS CONNECTION. Noel Twyman presents evidence along the same line in BLOODY TREASON. Johnson's former mistress, Madeleine Brown, has said that Johnson told her shortly before the assassination that after November 22 he wouldn't have to worry about Kennedy anymore.

The CIA

As a conservative Republican, initially I was flabbergasted by the accusation that the CIA was involved in JFK's death. My first reaction was to dismiss the charge as the absurd ravings of die-hard liberals. But now, a few years and hundreds of hours of research later, I am not so sure. I dismiss the idea that the CIA's top command was involved in the plot. However, I believe there is credible evidence that powerful renegade elements of the CIA took part in the assassination conspiracy.

When conspiracists speak of the CIA in reference to its alleged involvement in the assassination, they are referring primarily to the CIA's covert action personnel, i.e., those agents who deal in sabotage, propaganda, and assassination. There is evidence that suggests that some of the Agency's covert operations personnel have also taken part in drug trafficking (see, for example, 36; 37; 38; 39:164-226; 40; 65:125-127, 132-136, 164-166, 183-185, 234-235; 77:331-343; 78:285-287; 79).

Most CIA personnel are not involved in such activities and would be appalled at any attempt to harm an elected official. The covert operations personnel make up a large portion of the CIA, and they, along with the Agency's top officials, are the most powerful group in the CIA. Some high-ranking CIA officials have attempted to frustrate presidential policies and have initiated or sanctioned illegal operations, to include working with organized crime.

I reject Zirbel's suggestion that the CIA was, if anything, happy with Kennedy and therefore had no conceivable reason to want to see him dead. JFK and the CIA were in a virtual state of war from the moment of the Bay of Pigs disaster until the day he died. JFK did not trust the CIA and he reportedly intended to dismantle it after the 1964 election. In Vietnam, the CIA refused to carry out instructions from the ranking American official in the country (4:ix). It also ignored JFK's orders to stop working with the Mafia. When Kennedy heard the news that

South Vietnam's dictator Ngo Diem had been murdered by a CIA-backed coup, against his express wishes, he was outraged. Kennedy was no fan of Diem's, but he did not want to see him murdered. General Maxwell Taylor wrote that upon learning of Diem's death JFK "leaped to his feet and rushed from the room with a look of shock and dismay on his face" (70:334).

Senator George Smathers reported that Kennedy blamed the CIA for Diem's murder. According to Smathers, Kennedy said he had to "do something about" the CIA and that the Agency should be stripped of its exorbitant power (70:334-335). On another occasion, Kennedy reportedly said he would scatter the CIA "into a thousand pieces."

One of the more troubling cases of CIA disobedience to presidential authority was its behavior in relation to Cuba. In September 1963, long after President Kennedy had ordered a halt to the covert campaign against Castro, senior CIA staffers, including the deputy director, Richard Helms, and Desmond Fitzgerald, the head of the Agency's Cuba unit, approved plans to kill Castro, without seeking presidential authorization. They also continued other covert operations against Cuba in violation of the President's instructions. Needless to say, these CIA officers did not inform the President of their activities; nor did they inform Congress or the Attorney General, Robert Kennedy. They didn't even tell then-CIA director John McCone, probably because he was appointed by President Kennedy following the Bay of Pigs disaster. In short, as Anthony Summers has observed, "in September and October 1963--a crucial moment politically--CIA officers were acting in a way that gravely endangered White House policy" (14:322).

A key figure linking the Agency to the assassination was CIA man David Atlee Phillips, who was seen with Oswald a few months before the shooting (14:504-519; 61:128-171, 391-400, 408-409).

Among many other things, Phillips was the propaganda chief for the Bay of Pigs operation and later rose to become the chief of the CIA's Western Hemisphere Division. In 1954 Phillips worked with E. Howard Hunt and others to overthrow the Arbenz government in Guatemala. Based on his extensive investigation of Phillips for the Church Committee and then for the Select Committee, Gaeton Fonzi believes that "David Atlee Phillips played a key role in the conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy" (61:409). Phillips was in charge of the CIA's Cuban operations in Mexico City at the time of the assassination, so he was strategically positioned to frame Oswald, and it is quite possible, if not probable, that he was involved in the phony Oswald visits to the Cuban embassy (cf. 61:292).

Another former CIA agent who has come under suspicion is E. Howard Hunt. Hunt, a former high-ranking covert operator and a propaganda specialist, was a key figure in the Bay of Pigs invasion. As mentioned, Hunt and David Atlee Phillips helped to overthrow the Arbenz government in Guatemala. According to former (and now deceased) CIA operative Frank Sturgis, who knew Hunt well, Hunt was involved in CIA assassination operations.

Hunt has made no secret of his intense dislike for John Kennedy. To this day, Hunt blames JFK for the failure at the Bay of Pigs. When Watergate whistleblower John Dean opened Hunt's private safe, he found bogus telegrams that falsely linked JFK with the assassination of South Vietnam's corrupt dictator Ngo Dinh Diem (16:79).

Where was E. Howard Hunt on November 22, 1963? Hunt has given conflicting accounts of where he was at the time of the shooting. In his 1985 libel trial in Miami, Florida, the jury's forewoman concluded Hunt was not being truthful about his whereabouts on the day of the assassination.

Several researchers have identified Hunt as the small "tramp" in the famous "tramp photos." The tramp photos show three supposed tramps who were arrested in the railroad yard behind the grassy knoll shortly after the assassination. The tramps were found in a freight train that had pulled out from behind the TSBD without authorization. The railroad tower controller stopped the train because he knew it did not have permission to depart. The police then searched the train and found the tramps. In the tramp photos the tramps are being escorted by some Dallas police officers who are holding shotguns, presumably en route to the police station.

The tramp in the rear, the third tramp, is the man identified by some researchers as E. Howard Hunt. I have studied several photographs of Hunt and compared them with those of the third tramp, and I am struck by the resemblance between them. In their book COUP D'ETAT IN AMERICA, which was endorsed by Congressman Henry Gonzalez, authors Alan Weberman and Michael Canfield provide photographic overlays of Hunt and the third tramp to demonstrate the marked resemblance between the two. In 1988, experts at 3M's Comtal Corporation analyzed photos of Hunt and of the third tramp and found a noticeable resemblance between them. All of this does NOT prove Hunt was the third tramp, but it is worthnoting that he bears a strong resemblance to a man who was arrested in Dealey Plaza shortly after the assassination.

According to lone-gunman theorists, the men in the tramp photos have been positively identified and had nothing to do with the assassination. Soon after attention was focused on the tramp pictures by the movie "JFK," Dallas authorities released police files that included what were alleged to be the arrest records of the men shown in the photos. Then, a short time later, the news show A CURRENT AFFAIR claimed it had found two of the tramps mentioned in the arrest records, John Gedney and Harold Doyle.

WC defenders assert that the arrest records and the finding of Gedney and Doyle "finally lay to rest irresponsible theories of conspiracy" about the tramps. The third man listed in the records is Gus Abrams. Richard Trask notes that Abrams' sister has identified her brother as one of the men in the pictures. Thus, says Trask, "the painstaking discovery of Mr. Doyle, his and the other two mens' stories, and the evidence of Doyle's own face all come together into a more than credible explanation" (87:347). However, there are several problems with the arrest records and with Doyle's and Gedney's stories (16:347-353).

There are reports that certain CIA operatives had foreknowledge of the assassination. One of these reports has been related by Gaeton Fonzi, a former investigator for the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). Fonzi reports that a CIA operative code-named Ten-One told him that one of his fellow CIA operatives dismissed the claim that Oswald shot Kennedy because "he knows some of the people who were involved" and that these individuals "were talking about it [the shooting] before it even happened" (61:238-239).

Fonzi has also written that a close friend of CIA hitman David Sanches Morales, Ruben Carbajal, told him that Morales once indicated to a mutual associate, in Carbajal's presence, that he had been involved in the assassination. Not only was Morales a CIA hitman, but he was involved with the infamous Phoenix Program in Vietnam. Morales also took part in the Bay of Pigs invasion and was reportedly violently angry at Kennedy over the invasion's failure. Carbajal arranged for Fonzi to interview the man to whom Morales had made his shocking admission. The man was named Bob Walton, an attorney and a Harvard Law graduate. Fonzi met with Walton and Carbajal. Walton told Fonzi that Morales had in fact indicated he had been involved in Kennedy's death. Says Fonzi,

I looked at Ruben Carbajal, who had remained silent while Walton was telling me this. Carbajal looked at me and nodded his head. Yes, he was there, it was true. (61:390)

In 1977 it came to light through a declassified CIA document that a notorious French assassin who reportedly had links to the CIA and to the Mafia was in Dallas on the day of the shooting (5:202-209; 71:414-419). The hitman's name was Jean Soutre. As of a few years ago, Soutre was still alive and had been located. He was about 35 years old in 1963, which would put him at close to 70 today. Within 48 hours of the assassination, Soutre was picked up in Texas by U.S. authorities and immediately expelled.

The CIA document mentions that Soutre received mail from a dentist named Alderson. The FBI located this individual, Dr. Lawrence Alderson, who had met Soutre while stationed in France as a first lieutenant in the U.S. Army. Dr. Alderson told former Rockefeller Foundation scholar Henry Hurt that the FBI agents who interviewed him informed him that the FBI felt Soutre "had either killed JFK or knew who had done it" (71:418). When he spoke with Hurt, Dr. Alderson produced a snapshot of Soutre that he took when he was stationed in France. To make a long story short, the FBI dropped the ball in the investigation of Soutre and essentially swept the whole thing under the rug.

J. Edgar Hoover

J. Edgar Hoover strongly disliked, and in fact hated, John Kennedy. Hoover began collecting smear material on Kennedy's personal life when young Jack was in the Navy, and he continued to monitor JFK's private affairs until the day of the assassination. There is evidence that Hoover provided LBJ with derogatory information on Kennedy that enabled Johnson to blackmail his way onto the ticket (64:271-273).

In 1979 the HSCA discovered that the FBI had recorded conversations in 1962 and 1963 between various Mafia leaders and their subordinates in which threats to kill JFK and wishes to see him murdered were expressed (28:290; 56). Incredibly, Hoover never reported these threats to the Secret Service. Even more disturbingly, he did not mention them to President Kennedy, nor to Robert Kennedy, who was the Attorney General (and Hoover's boss) at the time. And, after the assassination, Hoover saw to it that little if any evidence of Mafia involvement in the shooting reached the Warren Commission (28:281-303).

Hoover's principal motive for wanting President Kennedy dead is fairly obvious: He knew JFK was not going to reappoint him as the director of the FBI after the 1964 election. In addition, Hoover felt Kennedy was an immoral, bleeding-heart liberal who was endangering America and the free world. (In point of fact, Kennedy was quite conservative on economic matters and had shown a willingness to stand up to Soviet aggression. Furthermore, under Kennedy's economic policies, which included generous tax cuts, the economy performed well, as even conservative leaders like Jack Kemp and Donald Lambro have noted.)

For more information on Hoover's role in the assassination, I would recommend Mark North's book ACT OF TREASON: THE ROLE OF J. EDGAR HOOVER IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY.

Oil Baron H. L. Hunt

Conspiracy theorists are generally suspicious of the late Texas oil billionaire H. L. Hunt. Hunt was a rabid right-wing extremist with intelligence connections. According to one of Hunt's special assistants, Hunt's top aides often heard him say that America would be "much better off without Kennedy" (5:277). On one occasion Hunt reportedly expressed his desire to see JFK shot (21:215).

The day before the assassination, Eugene Hale Brading, a Mafia man with a long arrest record, visited Hunt's office building in Dallas. Brading was arrested in Dealey Plaza on the day of the shooting when he was found to have taken an elevator to the ground floor of the Dal-Tex Building shortly after the shots were fired. Brading was released, however, because he gave the police an alias. While in Dallas, Brading stayed at the Cabana Hotel.

Jack Ruby visited that hotel, and Hunt's office building, on November 21. Moreover, according to Hunt's former chief aide, John Curington, Marina Oswald met with Hunt two days before the shooting.

On November 23, Hunt asked his chief aide to see what kind of security the police had for Oswald. The aide reported that Oswald had very little protection and that security was very lax at police headquarters where Oswald was being kept. Hunt flew to Washington, D.C., shortly after receiving this report. Oswald was killed on November 24.

Dick Russell's book THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH contains an important examination of H. L. Hunt's troubling activities before and after the assassination, as does Livingstone's KILLING THE TRUTH (see also 5:276-278 and 10:568, 573-574).

A few years after the assassination, a disturbing handwritten note surfaced. The note was addressed to a "Mr. Hunt" and was signed "Lee Harvey Oswald." Three independent handwriting experts retained by the DALLAS MORNING NEWS concluded the note was written by Oswald. In the note, which is dated November 8, 1963, Oswald asks about his "position" and requests a meeting before "any steps are taken by me or anyone else."

Was the "Mr. Hunt" oil giant H. L. Hunt? Or, was it E. Howard Hunt of the CIA? Documents declassified in 1983 revealed that the FBI apparently believed the note was addressed to H. L. Hunt's ultra-conservative millionaire son, Nelson Hunt.

The Mafia

Zirbel takes the view that the "Mafia assassination theory is not logical" (21:66). Zirbel believes the Mafia had enough compromising information on the Kennedys that it did not need to kill JFK. Zirbel further says that only small-time Mafia men were involved in the assassination. In my opinion, Zirbel's position is contradicted by the evidence. While the Mafia did indeed have some embarrassing information on John and Robert Kennedy, I think the record is clear that the Mob had strong motives for wanting the President dead. There is evidence of Mafia involvement in the assassination. Even the ultra-cautious HSCA concluded the Mafia had the means, the motive, and the opportunity to assassinate President Kennedy. Prior to the assassination, various Mafia leaders were heard to threaten JFK's life.

On November 20, two Mafia men told Rose Cheramie that it was common knowledge in the underworld that Kennedy was about to be killed. Mafia-CIA man David Ferrie was very probably involved in framing Oswald while he was in New Orleans, and Ferrie engaged in highly suspicious activity shortly after JFK was shot. And, as mentioned, a Mafia courier named Eugene Hale Brading was arrested in the Dal-Tex Building overlooking Dealey Plaza immediately after the shooting. Brading had an FBI rap sheet with about three dozen arrests. He had met with one of the sons of avowed Kennedy-hater H. L. Hunt the day before, ostensibly to discuss some oil business. After he was arrested, Brading gave the Dallas police an alias, and told them he had merely gone into the building to use the phone. The police released him a short time later.

Without question, a Mafia man, Jack Ruby, silenced Lee Harvey Oswald before he had a chance to tell his side of the story. Furthermore, right after the President's visit to Dallas was announced, Ruby began making numerous calls to important Mafia contacts all over the country. Ruby, like Eugene Brading, was in H. L. Hunt's offices the day before the shooting (71:124).

Convicted Texas hitman Charles Harrelson has been identified as the tall man in the famous photos of the three "tramps" who were arrested in the railroad yard behind Dealey Plaza shortly after the assassination. In the early 1980s, Harrelson was convicted of murdering federal judge John Wood with a high-powered rifle, and is currently serving his sentence in a Texas prison. During the stand-off that preceded his arrest, Harrelson not only confessed to killing Judge Wood, but also said he had been involved in the Kennedy assassination. Harrelson later retracted his statement about having taken part in the assassination, claiming he had fabricated it under the influence of cocaine. When arrested, Harrelson was found to be carrying the business card of R. D. Matthews, who, according to the HSCA, was acquainted with Jack Ruby and with other Dallas crime figures. At Harrelson's trial, Joe Chagra, the brother of the man who was believed to have hired Harrelson, testified that Harrelson was given the contract to kill Judge Wood after he claimed to have participated in the JFK assassination. Indicted along with Harrelson in the plot to kill Judge Wood was the brother of New Orleans crime boss Carlos Marcello, who was one of the Mafia figures identified by the Select Committee as possibly having been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy. Researcher Gary Mack asked an anthropologist to compare photos of the tall tramp with pictures of Harrelson. The anthropologist reported it was likely they were same person. Similarly, police officers trained in photo identification have advised Harrison Livingstone that Harrelson definitely appears to be the tall tramp. So far federal authorities have shown no interest in investigating Harrelson in connection with any role he might have had in the assassination.

Why would the Mafia have wanted JFK dead? Quite simply, because the Kennedy administration was threatening the very existence of organized crime in America. Robert Kennedy was waging an unprecedented war on the Mafia, a war that targeted not just Mafia operations but also Mafia leaders themselves.

Anti-Castro Cubans

In speaking of anti-Castro Cubans, I am referring only to those exiles who were associated with the Bay of Pigs invasion or who were involved in other CIA-backed anti-Castro activities.

In Zirbel's view, the anti-Castro Cubans were admittedly furious with Kennedy over the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion but later forgave him because, among other things, he ransomed 1,200 captured exile troops from Castro (21:57). But there is strong evidence that some anti-Castro Cubans never forgave Kennedy for the failure at the Bay of Pigs, and many of these same individuals were furious at Kennedy over his handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and over his shutting down of their para-military training camps. It should be noted that the militant anti-Castro exiles were almost exclusively under the control of the CIA.

Zirbel cites Kennedy's support of the post-invasion efforts to get rid of Castro as another reason that the Cuban exile troops would have forgiven JFK. However, Zirbel fails to deal with the fact that Kennedy subsequently tried to shut down the anti-Castro training bases and that he ordered an end to the covert operations against Castro.

Anthony Summers' books CONSPIRACY and NOT IN YOUR LIFETIME contain thorough analyses of the possible role of some militant anti-Castro Cubans in the assassination (14:268-339, 386-429; see also 5:135-155).

Major General Edward Lansdale and the Military

One figure who has come under close scrutiny by some conspiracists is the late Major General Edward Lansdale, U.S. Air Force. Lansdale is undoubtedly the unnamed "General Y" in Oliver Stone's movie "JFK." Lansdale was a special operations officer with links to the CIA. His professional patron was CIA director Allen Dulles. The character of the shady political manipulator, Colonel Hillindale, in the famous novel THE UGLY AMERICAN, was based on Lansdale's activities in the Philippines in the early 1950s, where his operations reportedly included torture and political assassination (37:25). In Vietnam, during the Eisenhower administration, Lansdale managed several ruthless internal security programs for South Vietnam's corrupt and oppressive dictator, Ngo Dinh Diem. These programs later developed into the CIA's infamous Phoenix program, which was responsible for the execution of over 20,000 Vietnamese and for the death and torture of countless civilians (37; 43:79-80; 7:40).

It is clear that Lansdale schemed and plotted "to capture the emerging Vietnam policy apparatus" (42:36), and he was a major player in the effort to subvert Kennedy's Vietnam policy. Lansdale tried to get Kennedy to appoint him the new ambassador to Vietnam, but his plan was foiled when Secretary of State Dean Rusk learned of Lansdale's covert credentials and shady reputation from the Assistant for Far Eastern Affairs, J. Graham Powers.

Was Lansdale involved in the plot to kill JFK? Lansdale was surely angry at Kennedy for refusing to introduce U.S. combat troops into Vietnam and for balking at further escalation of the conflict. One can only imagine his reaction when he learned of Kennedy's withdrawal plan. It was Lansdale who reportedly ordered Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty, one of Kennedy's strongest military/security supporters, on a useless two-week trip to the South Pole eleven days before the assassination, placing him thousands of miles from Dallas on the day of the murder (43:103). Col. Prouty has identified Lansdale in a picture taken in Dealey Plaza shortly after the assassination. Prouty also reports that Lansdale told him he would be in Dallas on November 22.

Was Lansdale the only senior military officer who was possibly involved in the plot to kill President Kennedy? Sadly, the answer to this question might very well be no. Several generals were known to view Kennedy as almost dangerous to the free world. Kennedy's relations with a number of senior military officers were reportedly about as bad as his relations were with the CIA. Some senior military officials attempted to give JFK a misleading, inaccurate picture of the true state of affairs in Vietnam, as John Newman discusses in his highly acclaimed book JFK AND VIETNAM.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, one very high-ranking general took the unbelievably irresponsible step of ordering a missile to be fired, WITHOUT Kennedy's authorization. The missile was unarmed, but the launching could have triggered a Soviet response. A recent episode in the BBC 2 documentary series TIME WATCH detailed how during the '50s and '60s leading generals were anxious to go to war with the Soviet Union and wanted to launch a "preventive" nuclear first strike. Even President Eisenhower distrusted some senior military officers, and at the end of his second term spoke out against the threat posed by an unchecked military-industrial complex. There is sworn testimony, from one of the autopsy doctors, that a senior military officer prevented him from performing a standard but crucial autopsy procedure during the autopsy.

Richard Nixon

As a conservative Republican, I was even more shocked by the suggestion that Richard Nixon was involved in the assassination than I was by the idea that the CIA had played a role in it.

However, it is no secret that Nixon was one of the most corrupt presidents in the history of our republic. If nothing else, I believe Nixon might have had foreknowledge of the assassination (and obviously did nothing to prevent it). Actually, though, I am more inclined to believe that Nixon had no direct involvement in the assassination but that after the shooting he had some idea about who had been involved. Nixon believed Kennedy had stolen the election from him and that therefore JFK's election was illegitimate.

Most Americans are familiar with the Watergate scandal, which led to Nixon's resigning in disgrace in 1974. What is not as well known is the degree to which Nixon aided the Mafia during his tenure in the White House. This is not surprising, given the fact that Nixon's friends, and even some of his appointees, included several people who had important Mafia connections.

The Nixon administration repeatedly intervened to quash prosecutions and investigations of criminal activity in Mafia-dominated labor unions. Nixon was involved in a number of highly questionable--and, in some cases, Mob-connected--financial dealings. Nixon pardoned organized crime figures after the government had spent millions of dollars to put them in jail. Among those pardoned was Mafia killer Angelo DeCarlo. On one occasion, recorded on a 1971 Watergate tape, Nixon and his aides discussed using Mob thugs to attack anti-war protestors. Not surprisingly, by all accounts the Mafia warmly endorsed and supported Nixon's campaigns. John Davis, an authority on organized crime, has said, If ever there was a candidate for the presidency whom the mob wanted elected, it was Richard Nixon. Since the earliest days of his political career in California, Nixon had seemed to walk hand in hand with the Mafia, functioning with the family bosses in an apparent symbiotic relationship that was to last right down to his resignation from the presidency in 1974, and perhaps even beyond. (28:397)

David Scheim presents an extensive, well-documented discussion on Nixon and the Mafia in chapter 22 of his book THE MAFIA KILLED PRESIDENT KENNEDY.

A study of the Nixon presidency reveals a consistent pattern of serious corruption and suspicious deaths, as several authors have discussed in detail. Former Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill said the following:

. . . I've been around politics for a long time, and I can say with assurance that what went on during the Nixon presidency was unlike anything I had ever seen, or even heard of. We're talking about blackmail and corruption in the highest office in the land. (24:280)

O'Neill went on to relate that several wealthy businessmen who had previously supported Democratic presidential candidates were suddenly giving money to Nixon because the Nixon administration was using the IRS and other agencies to blackmail them into donating (24:281-286). The businessmen were first threatened with all sorts of investigations and inspections; then, they were led to understand that if they would donate to the Nixon campaign, they wouldn't have anything to worry about.

Harrison Livingstone writes,

I feel that the real reason Nixon was pursued over the Watergate break-ins was that there were a series of murders connected with Richard Nixon's presidency.

Not only was the liberal-centrist leadership that represented the majority of Americans crippled, but numerous others--witnesses, journalists, lawyers, bureaucrats, and ordinary people were liquidated. Watergate itself saw a number of deaths, including an entire planeload of people in a crash onto the streets of Chicago under very strange circumstances. (10:421)

Those who would summarily dismiss Livingstone's claims here (and he is by no means alone in making them) would do well to examine chapter 19 of his book HIGH TREASON 2. Therein he discusses some of the murders reportedly connected with Nixon's presidency.

The plane crash victims to whom Livingstone refers were on Flight 553. The plane crashed under very suspicious circumstances on December 8, 1972, a few months after CIA agent E. Howard Hunt and other intelligence operatives had broken into the Democratic Party's campaign headquarters at the Watergate Hotel. Among the aircraft's passengers were Hunt's wife, Dorothy, and CBS correspondent Michelle Clark. According to Watergate witness and Hunt associate James McCord, by the time Mrs. Hunt died in the crash, she was upset at having to bribe witnesses and defendants, and wanted out. It was rumored at the time that she was about to leave Hunt and perhaps even turn on him. Reportedly, when Dorothy Hunt boarded the flight, she was carrying documents that were very damaging to her husband and to the Nixon presidency. (After the crash, columnist Jack Anderson said the documents were returned to Hunt in August 1972.) Law enforcement officials were quoted as saying that ten thousand dollars was found in Mrs. Hunt's purse. Other reports put the figure at well past $100,000. Hunt claimed his wife was taking the money to her cousin to invest. Charles Colson, Nixon's counsel, later told TIME magazine, "I think they killed Dorothy Hunt."

Michelle Clark was actively pursuing an investigation into the Watergate scandal. She reportedly had learned from inside sources that the Hunts were considering blowing the whistle on the Nixon White House. If so, Clark's sources were on target. In late 1972 Hunt began to demand payoffs from the Nixon White House, and in early 1973 he blackmailed Nixon for one million dollars.

One of the most disturbing things about Flight 553 is that the plane appears to have been sabotaged. Not only that, but somehow swarms of FBI agents (at least 50) just happened to be near the crash site well BEFORE the plane went down. In fact, the FBI agents reportedly were in the crash area before the firemen arrived, even though the fire department had received an emergency call within one minute of the crash.

The day after the crash, Nixon appointed Egil Krogh Undersecretary of Transportation. Krogh had previously headed up Nixon's "plumber's" unit, which employed E. Howard Hunt and was involved in the Watergate break-in. Krogh himself later went to prison for burglarizing a psychiatrist's offices. As Undersecretary of Transportation, Krogh was in a position to supervise the two government agencies responsible for investigating the crash of Flight 553, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA), and witnesses later testified that he played a "leading role" in at least one attempt to intimidate members of the NTSB when it was investigating the crash.

Eleven days after Flight 553 went down, Nixon named Alexander Butterfield head of the FAA. Butterfield had worked for the CIA and was the White House aide in charge of secretly taping presidential conversations and phone calls. Livingstone presents a thorough analysis of the case of Flight 553 in chapter 20 of HIGH TREASON 2.

It is now known that Nixon delayed the withdrawal from Vietnam for political reasons, causing the needless deaths of thousands of American troops. In a speech in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 26, 1994, Congressman Pete Stark observed,

Mr. Speaker, I speak today about the murderous actions of the late former President Richard Nixon and his national security advisor Henry Kissinger in the early 1970's.

The Nixon administration, elected with a pledge of having a secret plan to end the Vietnam war, took credit in the 1972 elections for the withdrawal from Vietnam and the wind down of the war. The just-published HALDEMAN DIARIES, however, reveal that the withdrawal was delayed for raw, gross political reasons--to look better in the 1972 elections. . . .

Each day that we delayed our withdrawal, American servicemen died needlessly. Kissinger advised against early withdrawal for election reasons in December of 1970. According to Department of Defense statistics, 2,412 men died in 1971, another 767 in 1972, and 65 more in 1973. In total, 3,244 men died while the withdrawal was delayed for the purposes of ensuring the re-election of Richard Nixon and the sinecure of Henry Kissinger.

One hundred and forty slabs of stone carry the names of 58,191 dead servicemen at the Vietnam Memorial. If Nixon and Kissinger had considered the lives of their fellow Americans instead of their own political victories, 7 stones would not have been needed. The next time you visit the Wall, think about it--1 out of every 20 names would not be there if we had pulled out quickly and decisively when

Kissinger first discussed it. One out of every 20 names is there to help win an election for CREEP. The blood of 3,244 servicemen is an enormous burden on the soul to take to your grave. (88:E1116-1117)

What about Nixon and the assassination? For one thing, there is some evidence linking him to Jack Ruby. It was reported in a 1947 FBI document that Jack Ruby had performed "information functions for the staff of Congressman Richard Nixon" (5:269). Nixon flew to Dallas on November 20, 1963, two days before the assassination. Asked later why he had come, he said he was there to attend a board meeting of the Pepsi-Cola Company. Yet, a subsequent review of Pepsi-Cola corporate files revealed there was no record of any Pepsi-Cola board meetings in Dallas in 1963 (5:270).

Nixon left Dallas on the morning of the assassination. However, during an FBI interview in early 1964, he said the only time he had been in Dallas in 1963 was two days before Kennedy was killed (16:84; 5:271). It has been said that Nixon must have been the only adult at the time who could not remember where he was on November 22, 1963. Why did Nixon tell the FBI he had not been in Dallas on the day of the murder? What exactly was he doing there from November 20 till the morning of the assassination?

According to none other than Nixon's chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman, Nixon attempted to force the CIA to assist in thwarting investigations into Watergate by threatening to expose the CIA's role in the Kennedy assassination (43:110-111; 16:329-330; 28:402-404; cf. 5:272-273; 16:87-92). In connection with this, it is worth mentioning again that E. Howard Hunt of the CIA was able to blackmail Nixon for a million dollars. What did Hunt know?

Several of the people who were hired or considered for employment by the Nixon White House during Watergate had been connected with the Warren Commission (3:273-274; 28:410-414). Was this just a coincidence? In addition, some of the operatives and Cuban exiles who were involved in the Bay of Pigs operation later turned up in the Watergate affair (16:80-82; 28:402-410).

Final Thoughts

In my opinion, the principal individuals and forces behind the assassination were fanatical right-wing elements in the CIA and in the military, J. Edgar Hoover, oil barron Hunt, and possibly Lyndon Johnson. I believe CIA and Mafia operatives, to include disaffected anti-Castro Cubans, constituted the largest part of the on-the-ground, operational arm of the plot. I believe that members of the Dallas law enforcement community were involved in the Dallas end of the cover-up, and that some of them knowingly allowed Jack Ruby to murder Oswald. I believe that FBI agents, along with J. Edgar Hoover, played a major role in most aspects of the cover-up.

In my view, the main reasons President Kennedy was killed were (1) he refused to further escalate American involvement in Vietnam, (2) he was moving to end the Cold War, and (3) his monetary reforms posed a serious threat to certain international bankers. Just below these reasons, I would list J. Edgar Hoover's hatred of JFK and his desire to remain director of the FBI, the Mafia's outrage over the Kennedy war on organized crime, Kennedy's reported intent to drastically reorganize or dismantle the CIA, and possibly LBJ's well-known all-consuming lust for power.

I believe Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King were killed by the same forces that murdered President Kennedy. I believe RFK and Dr. King were targeted because they had begun to pose a serious threat to the continuation of the Vietnam War. Their deaths, like President Kennedy's, have yet to be adequately investigated and give every indication of having been the result of a conspiracy. I believe the plotters decided they had to act against Robert Kennedy once it became apparent that he was on his way to becoming the next President of the United States. RFK was murdered shortly after he convincingly won the all-important California primary.

----------------------------------------------------------------

About the Author: Michael T. Griffith is a two-time graduate of the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, and the author of four books on Mormonism and ancient texts. His articles on the assassination have appeared in DATELINE: DALLAS, in DALLAS '63, in THE ASSASSINATION CHRONICLES, and in the JFK-DEEP POLITICS QUARTERLY. He is also the author of the book COMPELLING EVIDENCE: A NEW LOOK AT THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY (Grand Prairie, TX: JFK-Lancer Productions and Publications, 1996).

Bibliography

4. Mark Lane, RUSH TO JUDGMENT, Thunder's Mouth Press Edition, New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1992.

5. Jim Marrs, CROSSFIRE: THE PLOT THAT KILLED KENNEDY, New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1989.

9. James DiEugenio, DESTINY BETRAYED: JFK, CUBA, AND THE GARRISON CASE, New York: Sheridan Square Press, Inc., 1992.

10. Harrison Edward Livingstone, HIGH TREASON 2, New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1992.

11. Dick Russell, THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH, New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1992.

12. G. Robert Blakey and Richard Billings, FATAL HOUR: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY BY ORGANIZED CRIME, Berkley Books Edition, New York: Berkley Books, 1992. Although Blakey and Billings do posit a conspiracy in the assassination, they also provide a lot of misinformation, and they support a number of the WC's claims.

14. Anthony Summers, CONSPIRACY: THE DEFINITIVE BOOK ON THE JFK ASSASSINATION, Updated and Expanded Edition, New York: Paragon House, 1989. An extensive revision of the book was recently published under the title NOT IN YOUR LIFETIME.

15. Matthew Smith, JFK: THE SECOND PLOT, Edinburgh, England: Mainstream Publishing Ltd, 1992.

16. Alan J. Weberman and Michael Canfield. COUP D' ETAT IN AMERICA: THE CIA AND THE ASSASSINATION OF JOHN F. KENNEDY, Revised Edition, San Francisco, California: Quick American Archives, 1992.

19. Jim Garrison, ON THE TRAIL OF THE ASSASSINS, Warner Books Edition, New York: Warner Books, Inc., 1988.

21. Craig Zirbel, THE TEXAS CONNECTION, New York: Warner Books, 1992.

24. Tip O'Neill, with William Novak, MAN OF THE HOUSE: THE LIFE AND POLITICAL MEMOIRS OF SPEAKER TIP O'NEILL, New York: St.Martin's Press, 1987.

25. David S. Scheim, THE MAFIA KILLED PRESIDENT KENNEDY, London, England: Virgin Publishing Ltd, 1992. First published under the title CONTRACT ON AMERICA: THE MAFIA MURDER OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY, New York: Shapolsky Publishers, 1988. The retitled 1992 edition is a revised and updated version of the 1988 original.

28. John Davis, MAFIA KINGFISH: CARLOS MARCELLO AND THE ASSASSINATION OF JOHN F. KENNEDY, Signet Edition, New York: Signet, 1989.

36. Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks, THE CIA AND THE CULT OF INTELLIGENCE, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1974.

37. Douglas Valentine, THE PHOENIX PROGRAM, New York: Avon Books, 1990. A disturbing history of a CIA covert action program in which thousands of Vietnamese civilians were killed, tortured, and imprisoned, all without even the semblance of due process of law.

38. Brian Freemantle, CIA, New York: Stein and Day, 1983.

39. Jonathan Vankin, CONSPIRACIES, COVER-UPS AND CRIMES, New York: Dell Publishing, 1992.

40. Leslie Cockburn, OUT OF CONTROL, London: Bloomsbury Publishing LTD, 1987.

42. John M. Newman, JFK AND VIETNAM: DECEPTION, INTRIGUE, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR POWER, New York: Warner Books, 1992.

43. Mark Lane, PLAUSIBLE DENIAL: WAS THE CIA INVOLVED IN THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK, New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1991.

56. Mark North, ACT OF TREASON: THE ROLE OF J. EDGAR HOOVER IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY, New York: Carroll & Graf, 1991.

61. Gaeton Fonzi, THE LAST INVESTIGATION, New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1993.

63. Harrison Edward Livingstone, KILLING THE TRUTH: DECEIT AND DECEPTION IN THE JFK CASE, New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1993.

64. Anthony Summers, OFFICIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL: THE SECRET LIFE OF J. EDGAR HOOVER, London: Victor Gollancz, 1993.

65. Linda Hunt, SECRET AGENDA: THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, NAZI SCIENTISTS, AND PROJECT PAPERCLIP, 1945-1990, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991.

70. Herbert S. Parmet, JFK: THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY, New York: Penguin Books, 1984.

71. Henry Hurt, REASONABLE DOUBT: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE ASSASSINATION OF JOHN F. KENNEDY, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1985.

77. Paul Eddy, Hugo Sabogal, and Sara Walden, THE COCAINE WARS, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988.

78. John Prados, PRESIDENTS' SECRET WARS: CIA AND PENTAGON COVERT OPERATIONS SINCE WORLD WAR II, New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1986.

79. Alfred McCoy, with Cathleen Read and Leonard Adams, THE POLITICS OF HERION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA, New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

87. Richard Trask, PICTURES OF THE PAIN: PHOTOGRAPHY AND THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY, Danvers, Massachusetts: Yeoman Press, 1994.

88. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, 104th Congress, 1994.

Back to Michael T. Griffith

[Paul Kerrigan]

Oh, don't put all his essays in here unless you e-mailed him first and got permission. It wouldn't be right.

[Jack White]

Oh, don't put all his essays in here unless you e-mailed him first and got permission. It wouldn't be right.

I doubt that Mike will mind. His aim is to help

researchers understand the assassination.

Maybe there is hope for Dankbaar if he is studying

Griffith.

Griffith is on the right track, and is a good analyst

of information. To his credit, he is quick to incorporate

new information into his research. He is right most

of the time.

Jack

[Bernice Moore]

Hi Jack:

Your right....His aim is to help the researchers......as always..

and

Maynard, we have Mike's permission, as long as he is accredited and nothing is

altered in anyway...

[Wim Dankbaar]

"Maybe there is hope for Dankbaar if he is studying

Griffith. "

Don't worry, Jack. I have studied his work well and like it very much.

I have also communicated with him.

Did you see his thoughts on Harrelson being the tall tramp?

FWIW: He doesn't think much of Files either., although he never explained to me why.

Wim

[Paul Kerrigan]

"Maybe there is hope for Dankbaar if he is studying

Griffith. "

Don't worry, Jack. I have studied his work well and like it very much.

I have also communicated with him.

Did you see his thoughts on Harrelson being the tall tramp?

FWIW: He doesn't think much of Files either., although he never explained to me why.

Wim

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Probably for the same reasons McAdams doesn't believe him.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/files.htm

[Wim Dankbaar]

Maynard, Paul, whatever ..

Mcadams doesn't believe ANY piece of credible evidence for conspiracy. Or at least he states he does not. That is his job. He lies continously to make his points, for Files he makes no exception. His claim is that Oswald did it all by himself, I'm sure you know that. Are you one of his flunkies?

Wim

Edited July 4, 2004 by dankbaar

[Paul Kerrigan]

Maynard, Paul, whatever ..

Mcadams doesn't believe ANY piece of credible evidence for conspiracy. Or at least he states he does not. That is his job.  He lies continously to make his points, for Files he makes no exception.  His claim is that Oswald did it all by himself, I'm sure you know that. Are you one of his flunkies?

Wim

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yes, that is true. But none of the information on that page is made up by him. It all comes from different sources.

I especially like this piece from conspiracist David Perry

http://home.flash.net/~dperry2/lettermn.html

[Wim Dankbaar]

Yes, all Posnerites like that! And they don't seem to care its full of lies, nor that Perry refuses to correct his errors.

Suggest you read this:

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/files1.htm

Wim

Edited July 5, 2004 by dankbaar

[Paul Kerrigan]

Yes, he is a great researcher when it comes to the Kennedy Assassination. But his ultra-conservative views make me sad. I'm glad that he has faith in something but it angers me that he tries to use that faith in order to justify Bible readings in school or ban gay marriage.

http://ourworld-top.cs.com/mikegriffith1/id169.htm