Robots head found on Moon.

[Guest Stephen Turner]

Richard Hoagland claims to have spotted a robots head in official NASA photographs. This was taken at the "shorty" crater. he further claimed in a TV programme (mystery of the crystal skulls) That the pledge to return to the moon is becaus ethe haed has told NASA that they need to build a base on the moon.

[Dave Greer]

Richard Hoagland claims to have spotted a robots head in official NASA photographs. This was taken at the "shorty" crater. he further claimed in a TV programme (mystery of the crystal skulls) That the pledge to return to the moon is becaus ethe haed has told NASA that they need to build a base on the moon.

The resemblance is uncanny... The head on the moon looks very much like me now. I guess I better get started on that diet!

Unfortunately someone who disagrees with my opinion on Apollo saw fit to edit or create the above post by hacking my account. I'm leaving it viewable in quotes as evidence of the lengths some people will go to to try and discredit/ridicule other people.

Sad or creepy? I'll leave that to you to decide, dear reader.

Edited June 10, 2008 by Dave Greer

[Evan Burton]

Hmmmmm...

[Dave Greer]

Actually I think we're all wrong. I suspect this may be the remains of a whistle-blower who was assassinated by the CIA. They left his skull in this photo as a subtle clue to other whistle-blowers who may have been tempted to reveal to the world their involvement in the Apollo scam.

Since no whistle-blowers have come forward, the only possible conclusion is that I am correct.

[Guest Stephen Turner]

Here is another possibility, The bird men of easter Island obviously flew a lot higher than originially believed.

[Guest David Guyatt]

Hoagland has a concealed sequence going here:

1. The Face on Mars:

2. The Face on the Moon:

3. Next face coming soon to a planet near you:

Gollum rocks!

[Jack White]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

[Dave Greer]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

You're correct about that Jack. That's why provocateurs like myself ridicule your excellent photographic studies which expose the many anomalies in the Apollo photography.

Another of my posts that someone saw fit to hack and change. The tone does sound somewhat familiar...

Edited June 10, 2008 by Dave Greer

[Dave Greer]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

You're correct about that Jack. That's why provocateurs like myself ridicule your excellent photographic studies which expose the many anomalies in the Apollo photography.

Jack,

This study showing a strange shoe print anomaly on the "moon" is one of your best finds. This one photo alone proves that there were other people on the Apollo moonset besides the astronauts.

This is also an excellent study showing a Whistle-Blower special . There is no way the Rover could have driven through that pitiful excuse of a crater without tipping over. Nicely spotted old bean!

[Jack White]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

You're correct about that Jack. That's why provocateurs like myself ridicule your excellent photographic studies which expose the many anomalies in the Apollo photography.

Jack,

This study showing a strange shoe print anomaly on the "moon" is one of your best finds. This one photo alone proves that there were other people on the Apollo moonset besides the astronauts.

This is also an excellent study showing a Whistle-Blower special . There is no way the Rover could have driven through that pitiful excuse of a crater without tipping over. Nicely spotted old bean!

Thanks for pointing out the study of the rover going thru the crater. That's a good one.

Jack

[Scott Deitche]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

So I guess in addition to not being able to disagree with the ruling elite on this board we are no longer able to make jokes.

[Guest David Guyatt]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

You're correct about that Jack. That's why provocateurs like myself ridicule your excellent photographic studies which expose the many anomalies in the Apollo photography.

Jack,

This study showing a strange shoe print anomaly on the "moon" is one of your best finds. This one photo alone proves that there were other people on the Apollo moonset besides the astronauts.

This is also an excellent study showing a Whistle-Blower special . There is no way the Rover could have driven through that pitiful excuse of a crater without tipping over. Nicely spotted old bean!

Dave, I am always impressed by your image artistry. I want to be your slavering, worshipping pupil.

I have a copy of Adobe photoshop CS which I sometimes open and look at adoringly, then quickly close when my head begins thumping. I know I must be able to use it to draw and create interesting images, but it's rather like opening a motor mechanics toolchest... it looks great but what the hell do you do with it all?

Do you do tutorials old lad?

Or should I wait for Len to Google for an hour and then join his masterclass?

PS, my penultimate para should read: "Do you do FREE tutorials old lad?"

Edited June 10, 2008 by David Guyatt

[Jack White]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

You're correct about that Jack. That's why provocateurs like myself ridicule your excellent photographic studies which expose the many anomalies in the Apollo photography.

Jack,

This study showing a strange shoe print anomaly on the "moon" is one of your best finds. This one photo alone proves that there were other people on the Apollo moonset besides the astronauts.

This is also an excellent study showing a Whistle-Blower special . There is no way the Rover could have driven through that pitiful excuse of a crater without tipping over. Nicely spotted old bean!

Dave, I am always impressed by your image artistry. I want to be your slavering, worshipping pupil.

I have a copy of Adobe photoshop CS which I sometimes open and look at adoringly, then quickly close when my head begins thumping. I know I must be able to use it to draw and create interesting images, but it's rather like opening a motor mechanics toolchest... it looks great but what the hell do you do with it all?

Do you do tutorials old lad?

Or should I wait for Len to Google for an hour and then join his masterclass?

PS, my penultimate para should read: "Do you do FREE tutorials old lad?"

I think you misunderstood Greer's scoffing.

He posted MY images in hopes of SCOFFING AT THEM. He had nothing to

do with their creation.

To see all of my Apollo studies, go to aulis.com and take a look.

http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html

Jack

Edited June 10, 2008 by Jack White

[Dave Greer]

Ridicule is a standard attack of provocateurs. If you can't explain something, ridicule it.

Jack

You're correct about that Jack. That's why provocateurs like myself ridicule your excellent photographic studies which expose the many anomalies in the Apollo photography.

Jack,

This study showing a strange shoe print anomaly on the "moon" is one of your best finds. This one photo alone proves that there were other people on the Apollo moonset besides the astronauts.

This is also an excellent study showing a Whistle-Blower special . There is no way the Rover could have driven through that pitiful excuse of a crater without tipping over. Nicely spotted old bean!

Dave, I am always impressed by your image artistry. I want to be your slavering, worshipping pupil.

I have a copy of Adobe photoshop CS which I sometimes open and look at adoringly, then quickly close when my head begins thumping. I know I must be able to use it to draw and create interesting images, but it's rather like opening a motor mechanics toolchest... it looks great but what the hell do you do with it all?

Do you do tutorials old lad?

Or should I wait for Len to Google for an hour and then join his masterclass?

PS, my penultimate para should read: "Do you do FREE tutorials old lad?"

I think you misunderstood Greer's scoffing.

He posted MY images in hopes of SCOFFING AT THEM. He had nothing to

do with their creation.

To see all of my Apollo studies, go to aulis.com and take a look.

http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html

Jack

Jack,

I know you will find this almost impossible to believe but I wasn't scoffing at you or your studies. I have had a change of heart about Apollo and have come to realize that something was very wrong with the official record. I found this post today which expresses how I feel about Apollo now. I'm sorry you mistook my previous post as scoffing at you because that was not my intention at all.

This was written by a chap named Eric McHenney in 2001, on a CNN discussion forum about the TV programme called; Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?

I am posting his comments here to explain how I now feel about The Apollo Program.

"If anyone would bother to do some of their own research on the matter, they would discover that there are unanswered questions involving the moon landing. I have seen pictures of the moon landing and seen a reflection in the mirror on one of the helmets of a camera man! I am an imaging specialist and alter photos for a living and know what to look for in photos that are false. The government was trying to look good at the time, to the rest of the world, and would have gone to any lengths to prove themselves. Anyone who remembers the end of the 60's would remember the turmoil that was present in this country at the time.

There is some good evidence that something was not right about the moon landing. If you look at the technology we use today and the technology we used back then, it is hard to believe we came up with a way to reach the moon then but can't send a manned mission to Mars 32 years later. A computer in 1969 was huge! It encompassed an entire room. Did the Moon mission not have a computer? Just a bunch of fuel, oxygen and food? That sounds like fiction to me.

I have read a lot of these messages and it seems that people feel unpatriotic even to think that it is possible it may have been faked. That is simply not true. It is more patriotic to question those who may be creating falsehoods for the betterment of the entire nation!

There will more than likely never be proof that it was faked and NASA will never admit to it, so does it really matter in the long run? What really bothers me is that some people take things like this to extremes and can't look at it in perspective."

Edited June 10, 2008 by Dave Greer

[Dave Greer]

Unfortunately some joker has seen fit to hack my account and post on my behalf.

No doubt whoever he was thought he was having a jolly good chortle at my expense!

Such a shame. Here was I thinking that the internet was the last bastion of free speech. Apparently not! Some people would rather HACK SOMEONE'S ACCOUNT, and STEAL THEIR ONLINE IDENTITY in order to get a cheap thrill out of trying to ridicule them!

More sad than sick I think....

For the record, I'll edit the posts that have been made in my name under false pretences.