David G. Healy Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 (edited) Just amazing how fast and how much this thread was hijacked. Many of those who left this forum did so because they were BANNED. AFAIK none of the founders of the DPF were banned, but left of their own volition. Like the rest of them you have difficulty getting your facts straight my-o-my, ol' Len knows a lot concerning the inner workings of this here Ed forum doesn't he... Getting facts straight, hmmm? Doesn't that rely on some sort of interpretation of said facts? And doesn't that lead the one doing the interrupting of said facts to conclude: here we are again, personal *opinion* concerning said facts? and fwiw keeping to the thread topic -- there are but few JFK assassination researchers (narrowly defined subject specialists) left on this forum. (I understand, initially, we were invited here to get the numbers (aka *hits*) up. Which is fine. But lets be realistic, what's left here, after 5 years, are data gatherers and disinfo specialists. Best internet based "political" (local/regional/world) researchers by far, are located at the Deep Politics Forum. (unlike me, all can pen quite a few back-to-back paragraphs) I'm still trying to figure out who, and what function the dude with the bow-tie provides (if anything) around here? He the money guy? Or is that Bill Miller? Edited February 25, 2009 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Meredith Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Just amazing how fast and how much this thread was hijacked. Many of those who left this forum did so because they were BANNED. AFAIK none of the founders of the DPF were banned, but left of their own volition. Like the rest of them you have difficulty getting your facts straight "smoke, smoke, smoke that cigarette..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Meredith Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Just amazing how fast and how much this thread was hijacked. Many of those who left this forum did so because they were BANNED. AFAIK none of the founders of the DPF were banned, but left of their own volition. Like the rest of them you have difficulty getting your facts straight my-o-my, ol' Len knows a lot concerning the inner workings of this here Ed forum doesn't he... Getting facts straight, hmmm? Doesn't that rely on some sort of interpretation of said facts? And doesn't that lead the one doing the interrupting of said facts to conclude: here we are again, personal *opinion* concerning said facts? and fwiw keeping to the thread topic -- there are but few JFK assassination researchers (narrowly defined subject specialists) left on this forum. (I understand, initially, we were invited here to get the numbers (aka *hits*) up. Which is fine. But lets be realistic, what's left here, after 5 years, are data gatherers and disinfo specialists. Best internet based "political" (local/regional/world) researchers by far, are located at the Deep Politics Forum. (unlike me, all can pen quite a few back-to-back paragraphs) I'm still trying to figure out who, and what function the dude with the bow-tie provides (if anything) around here? He the money guy? Or is that Bill Miller? omg, this is the best post i have read here in so long. lmao. (ok andy, i'll leave now) dawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myra Bronstein Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Just amazing how fast and how much this thread was hijacked. Many of those who left this forum did so because they were BANNED. AFAIK none of the founders of the DPF were banned, but left of their own volition. Like the rest of them you have difficulty getting your facts straight my-o-my, ol' Len knows a lot concerning the inner workings of this here Ed forum doesn't he... Getting facts straight, hmmm? Doesn't that rely on some sort of interpretation of said facts? And doesn't that lead the one doing the interrupting of said facts to conclude: here we are again, personal *opinion* concerning said facts? and fwiw keeping to the thread topic -- there are but few JFK assassination researchers (narrowly defined subject specialists) left on this forum. (I understand, initially, we were invited here to get the numbers (aka *hits*) up. Which is fine. But lets be realistic, what's left here, after 5 years, are data gatherers and disinfo specialists. Best internet based "political" (local/regional/world) researchers by far, are located at the Deep Politics Forum. (unlike me, all can pen quite a few back-to-back paragraphs) I'm still trying to figure out who, and what function the dude with the bow-tie provides (if anything) around here? He the money guy? Or is that Bill Miller? omg, this is the best post i have read here in so long. lmao. (ok andy, i'll leave now) dawn It's a boffo post. It's so funny it brought me back from the dust bin of history just to say: LOL!!! "Puff puff puff and if you smoke yourself to death..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 But what about David Guyatt? He seems to have gone - probably not to a better place. I have no information regarding the circumstances of his departure. You will have to quizz another. Maybe if one keeps spinning around in wizened circles this is what happens - gives one hope for Charles does it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I was not banned, but merely suspended. And I'm proud to note that I'm likely the most irritating of the many burrs under Sherrif Walker's greasy saddle. Self Knowledge at last You are indeed a minor pain in the posterior Charles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Meredith Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 But what about David Guyatt? He seems to have gone - probably not to a better place. I have no information regarding the circumstances of his departure. You will have to quizz another. Maybe if one keeps spinning around in wizened circles this is what happens - gives one hope for Charles does it not? Then how did he get set to "guest" if he was not banned? And he SAYS he was banned, so I believe that settles it. And if I remember clearly Magda was banned too. But who's counting? Dawn "What's your name, who's your daddy?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Then how did he get set to "guest" if he was not banned? And he SAYS he was banned, so I believe that settles it. And if I remember clearly Magda was banned too. But who's counting? Dawn "What's your name, who's your daddy?" You don't appear to have read what I posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted February 26, 2009 Author Share Posted February 26, 2009 I was not banned, but merely suspended. And I'm proud to note that I'm likely the most irritating of the many burrs under Sherrif Walker's greasy saddle. Self Knowledge at last You are indeed a minor pain in the posterior Charles. Now Andrew, The last time you attempted to engage me in a battle of wits, for which you were and are woefully unarmed, you took a beating and then ran to hide behind your administrator's battlements. Hence my suspension. Would you have at it again? Perhaps on a dedicated thread? Give me your public assurance that, once bested, you will not turn tail, and the games will begin. Charles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted February 26, 2009 Author Share Posted February 26, 2009 But what about David Guyatt? He seems to have gone - probably not to a better place. I have no information regarding the circumstances of his departure. You will have to quizz [sic] another. But Andrew, Did you not previously write, "[N]one of you, despite your best efforts, were banned." Care to squirm out of this one, old sport? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I was not banned, but merely suspended. And I'm proud to note that I'm likely the most irritating of the many burrs under Sherrif Walker's greasy saddle. Self Knowledge at last You are indeed a minor pain in the posterior Charles. Now Andrew, The last time you attempted to engage me in a battle of wits, for which you were and are woefully unarmed, you took a beating and then ran to hide behind your administrator's battlements. Hence my suspension. Would you have at it again? Perhaps on a dedicated thread? Give me your public assurance that, once bested, you will not turn tail, and the games will begin. Charles Come come Chazza you can do better than that How about something profound from on the "deep" politics forum? Preregister an account for me and I'll gladly lock horns with your piddling intellect and massive ego on any topic you like :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 In all [or some] fairness to Andy [the guy in the bowtie] his posts are most sane, enlightening, normal and germain in the 'rest' [other part where few here dare to venture] of the Forum. He seems to transform when he enters the 'Magic Theatre - Not For Everyone' (Damian, Hess) of the 'Conspiracy' Section. Maybe it is the moonlight. errhhmmm.... thanks ...........I think. Maybe Gurdjieff was right about the power of the moon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted February 26, 2009 Author Share Posted February 26, 2009 I was not banned, but merely suspended. And I'm proud to note that I'm likely the most irritating of the many burrs under Sherrif Walker's greasy saddle. Self Knowledge at last You are indeed a minor pain in the posterior Charles. Now Andrew, The last time you attempted to engage me in a battle of wits, for which you were and are woefully unarmed, you took a beating and then ran to hide behind your administrator's battlements. Hence my suspension. Would you have at it again? Perhaps on a dedicated thread? Give me your public assurance that, once bested, you will not turn tail, and the games will begin. Charles Come come Chazza you can do better than that How about something profound from on the "deep" politics forum? Preregister an account for me and I'll gladly lock horns with your piddling intellect and massive ego on any topic you like :lol: Sigh ... Why not here, where you control the field? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Why not here, where you control the field? Think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted February 26, 2009 Author Share Posted February 26, 2009 Why not here, where you control the field? Think. Stop talking to yourself and answer the question. Oh ... wait a minute ... you can't risk the exposure. Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts