Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Thank you, Martin. The bottom image is excellent and clearly contradicts earlier frames in which the wound is painted over in black. I have asked Jack if he could post pages 357, 358, 359, and 360 from "Dealey Plaza Revisited", which place this image in perspective in relation to the witness reports and David Mantik's studies of the autopsy X-rays, which illustrate several points. ''Dealey Plaza Revisited: What Happened to JFK?''Please See pages 357 through 360 of chapter 30 here:for further studies...fyi bhttp://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/UNDchapter30.pdf Thank you Bernice for all that Pictures. I found a good enlargement of frame 374 in the PDF file you have uploaded. I copied it and attached it below. I hope thats OK with you and Jim Fetzer. At last a crop from frame 359. Credit: Robin Unger Martin I have been out all day and will copy the pages Jim mentions later tonight. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 (edited) John, Surely you understand that Costella removed pincushion and aspect ratio distortion, which does not make them "altered". Quite the opposite. He has removed forms of distortion to create more accurate images. I am very puzzled by your odd remark. in the third last gif the hair/scalp movement picks up with this flap on the way backwards, flapping back over the lower posterior revealing skull bone/brain. ie in rough doctorese a large posterior head wound, or a large wound in the rear of the head. (then cycles. For the gif to be meaningful, from this point of view, it should include a few more frames either side imo. (and chuck in a couple of black frames at the beginning of a cycle, please?) Great work all around and thanks for posting those, I wonder if 373 and 375 is available in same res as a good 374, (ie not Costellas altered frames), but a series of the three supposedly closer to the original with all from the the same, but high res?. (I'd like to attempt a more precice Limo speed calculation.) Edited January 30, 2010 by James H. Fetzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 (edited) I just did quick screenshots of the pages Jim wanted. Here they are all together. If more or bigger are wanted, I can do that also. I hope this serves Jim's purpose. Edit...I guess the file size was too large. I will split it into separate pages. Now I have tried 3 times. I will post when I figure why it is not posting. I HAD USED UP MY ALLOTTED IMAGE SPACE. I WENT BACK AND ELIMINATED 5MB OF IMAGE SPACE FROM FIVE YEARS AGO. I WILL TRY AGAIN. Edited January 30, 2010 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 TRYING AGAIN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Jack, Could you do just one per post or create a vertical sequence, which would be much easier to view? Many thanks! Jim I just did quick screenshots of the pages Jim wanted. Here they are all together.If more or bigger are wanted, I can do that also. I hope this serves Jim's purpose. Edit...I guess the file size was too large. I will split it into separate pages. Now I have tried 3 times. I will post when I figure why it is not posting. I HAD USED UP MY ALLOTTED IMAGE SPACE. I WENT BACK AND ELIMINATED 5MB OF IMAGE SPACE FROM FIVE YEARS AGO. I WILL TRY AGAIN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Jack,Could you do just one per post or create a vertical sequence, which would be much easier to view? Many thanks! Jim I just did quick screenshots of the pages Jim wanted. Here they are all together.If more or bigger are wanted, I can do that also. I hope this serves Jim's purpose. Edit...I guess the file size was too large. I will split it into separate pages. Now I have tried 3 times. I will post when I figure why it is not posting. I HAD USED UP MY ALLOTTED IMAGE SPACE. I WENT BACK AND ELIMINATED 5MB OF IMAGE SPACE FROM FIVE YEARS AGO. I WILL TRY AGAIN. OK...this was much easier for me. Doing separate pages will take about 30 minutes more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 first page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 page two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Page three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dolva Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I'm surprised you are puzzled Jim. The process of lens correction necessarily results in data loss, creation. Then a smoothing and color adjustment. That's alteration, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 Show you study Craig.Please draw an outline of JFK's head. Sure Martin...And if you go back to say 325 and step forward you can see the highlight on JKF's head move up and around as his head goes forward and down...all in perfect sync with the position of sun... Thank you Martin for your contributions this below also posted above was done by bill miller he came to your conclusion also..though i think yours is clearer but thanks also to his work...two heads and all that...best b.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 page four Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 Here's groden's frame 337 thanks to robin unger... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dolva Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Thank you Bernice. My bad. I should have proofread. I'd like a sequence showing also the wheels, of that series, but that's ok, I'll come across some sooner or later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 gif series chris davidson ...then after frAME 313 AUTHOR OF GIF UNKNOWN at present..study zap 341 chris davidson.. then a study by greg burnham ..life magazine recoil study...all for now thanks fellas and thanks for your time...b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now