9/11: Seismic Proof + Video Fakery = Inside Job

[Len Colby]

LOL note the lack of endorsement of this rubbish by anyone with a background in seismology or geology etc.

[Glenn Viklund]

I was confused about why Jim would raise such easily disproven points, why he teaches critical thinking but chooses not to apply those skills to his own 9-11 work, etc, but now I understand: Jim is actually on our side! He is some type of disinfo agent. I mean, all his claims have been rejected by the mainstream 9-11 truthers:

http://www.911review...agon/index.html

Then I found out about how many people questioned his actions and motives.

http://911research.w...dex.html#fetzer

http://gastronamus.p...int&thread=2635

http://en.wikipedia....or_9.2F11_Truth

Now it all makes sense!

My, my. Pick a subject and this pattern keeps repeating itself.

[Bill Sherwood]

Just a FWIW, here's a truck in Australia that was left behind when the big fires went through Victoria a couple of years ago. What you are looking at is the remains of all the aluminium parts in the truck after they have melted from the heat of the fires - The fires were just grass and other organic combustibles, yet it was hot enough and for long enough to melt substantial chunks of metal.

Just making a point that whilst seemingly simple things like having 'X' amount of combustible material (grass, kerosene, etc) may only seem to allow for a certain amount of heat to be passed on, it can sometimes be deceiving and here is proof that it can sometimes be far greater than what you would expect.

I've also seen a photo of melted steel from those grass fires, but I cannot find it again sorry.

Edit - might be a good idea to add the photo Bill!! Hey it was getting very late & cold and I only remembered after I was tucked-up in a nice warm bed, it had to wait until morning.

Edited September 6, 2011 by Bill Sherwood

[Steve Knight]

Just a FWIW, here's a truck in Australia that was left behind when the big fires went through Victoria a couple of years ago. What you are looking at is the remains of all the aluminium parts in the truck after they have melted from the heat of the fires - The fires were just grass and other organic combustibles, yet it was hot enough and for long enough to melt substantial chunks of metal.

Just making a point that whilst seemingly simple things like having 'X' amount of combustible material (grass, kerosene, etc) may only seem to allow for a certain amount of heat to be passed on, it can sometimes be deceiving and here is proof that it can sometimes be far greater than what you would expect.

I've also seen a photo of melted steel from those grass fires, but I cannot find it again sorry.

I found a few :

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2009/02/25/1111118/956053-truck-saves-trio-from-blaze.jpg

http://static.binscorner.com/f/forest-fire-in-victoria-australia/part-032.jpeg

http://images.smh.com.au/ftsmh/ffximage/2009/02/08/fire9__2__gallery__600x400.jpg < this one's not too clear on melted parts at the side - wrong Angle of View.

However, from the same series : http://images.smh.com.au/ftsmh/ffximage/2009/02/10/bushfire15_gallery__600x400.jpg

and http://images.smh.com.au/ftsmh/ffximage/2009/02/08/fire14_gallery__600x379.jpg

and http://www.smh.com.au/ftimages/2009/02/08/1234027840624.html

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/firetruck-3.jpg

Should be enough for you

[Bill Sherwood]

Should be enough for you

Thanks!

[Bill Sherwood]

A quick PMSL moment from my car forum, where this 9/11 nonsense is being talked about.

There were no people rescued from the rooftops of the tower, mainly because the access doors were locked. I said that I'd get through them any way I could, fire axe, etc.

Someone simply replied, "They could have used some of the explosives used to do the controlled demolition to open the doors....."

Ha!