Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team
Sign in to follow this  
John Dolva

Genocide a legitimate business model. ?

Recommended Posts

Devastating US-EU trade pact would make genocide a legitimate business model

24.a.jpg

Max Keiser, the host of RT's ‘Keiser Report,’ is a former stockbroker, the inventor of the virtual specialist technology, virtual currencies, and prediction markets.

Published time: November 12, 2013 03:58

Download video (41.95 MB)

The United States and the European Union are negotiating a free-trade agreement they hail as mutually beneficial but in actuality would allow corporations to supersede countries’ sovereignty and legal framework, says Max Keiser of RT’s The Keiser Report.

The US and EU’s Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) aims to hand foreign corporations ways to evade domestic laws and courts while giving “them the ability to sue the countries for compensatory damages from the economies that they’ve just devastated,” Keiser told RT.

“It gives all the power to the entities that have destroyed the European economy, the big banks that have gutted the European economy,” Keiser said.

Closed-door talks for the agreement started in July and will ultimately create an “investor-state” system in which regulatory structures on both sides of the Atlantic are weakened for the “profit-seeking” motives of mainly American corporate entities.

“This gives extrajudicial power to corporations, to the investor state... beyond what is imaginable beyond the worst Orwellian nightmare,” Keiser said.

RT: An annual profit of 119 billion euros sounds pretty good and it could not come at a better time for the struggling European economy. Why be unhappy about this deal?

Max Keiser: This is an unbelievable act of corporate hubris. They’ve invented something now – ‘the corporate state’ or ‘the investor state’ - so that corporations have the ability to override sovereignty, to override countries’ legal framework for profit-seeking or rent-seeking. To give you an example, you’ve got Chevron Corporation, which has been active in Ecuador, devastating the ecology there. Not only will they not be able to go after Chevron for damages, but Chevron can claim the fact that the Ecuadorians are going after them for damages means Chevron can sue Ecuador’s government for damages for being inconvenienced for the ecological holocaust that they’ve created in Ecuador. This is the most remarkably corporate-friendly, devastating, human-centric-non-benefitting law that I’ve ever seen in my life.

RT: But European corporations will make huge profits, too. And profits are taxed, aren’t they? Isn’t that exactly what governments want, income from taxation?

MK: Corporations are taxed less and less. Here in the UK, the big corporations that we know are taxed very little if anything. Very little of what corporations make and what the wealthy in the world make is actually taxed. That’s the taxable income, the reportable income. Most of the income they make is through offshore accounts, through special-purpose-entities accounts, it’s completely untaxed.

I don’t think we’re getting to the nettle of how devastating this is. This is basically a business model based on holocaust. This is like saying that the manufacturers of Zyklon B during World War II would sue the million or so victims that were exterminated with Zyklon B for having the nerve of dying for being gassed by the manufacturers of Zyklon B. This makes holocaust a legitimate business model.

This makes Monsanto’s genetically-modified seeds, which are causing widespread devastation across the world - not only can it cause devastation, but Monsanto can sue a country like India for the Indian farmers who are committing suicide. Because they inconvenienced them. This is the most devastating piece of legislation, pro-corporation in history that we’ve ever seen! It’s absolutely mind-numbing!

RT: What if someone comes to you and says, ‘Surely this means my job prospects in Europe are going to be improved.’ Why not let this deal go ahead? Because it’s my life, my life at stake at the moment and it’s a devastated European economy and I want a job to improve my prospects.

MK: Because it gives all the power to the entities that have destroyed the European economy, the big banks that have gutted the European economy. This now gives them the ability to sue the countries for damages they impose on these economies, for compensatory damages from the economies that they’ve just devastated. They can then get the governments to sue the citizens for more money after they’ve stolen the money. Imagine, for example, Goldman Sachs. They ransacked Greece, they stole billions from Greece. Now this gives them the opportunity to sue the Greek government for more compensatory damages. Then the Greek government has to go to the population for more money.

This gives extrajudicial power to corporations, to the investor state...beyond what is imaginable beyond the worst Orwellian nightmare. Whoever cooked this up - and I know who it is, by the way, Barack Obama. The most corporate-friendly, holocaust-, genocide-provoking idiot who has ever occupied the White House. He just threw the keys to these corporations and said, ‘Sue everybody you kill.’ It makes killing and genocide a legitimate business model.

RT: Surely Brussels will listen to what you have to say, they have those concerns. And they will surely make those laws protecting consumers’ interests, and, indeed, the environment from any invasive policies from the US.

MK: Some countries are pushing back against this, but unfortunately in this current era, with the NSA spying on every country - what happened to Angela Merkel in Europe? She said I don’t want the NSA spying on me. Now she’s laying down supine, just letting this new law which favors American corporations to roll over her like a little frau in the woods. Like Bambi in the woods, just rolled over. She should stand up for her citizens. She’s being completely duplicitous by saying, ‘We don’t want NSA, but we want this new law.’ So she’s been identified as completely duplicitous, completely in the pocket of American corporations.

There are some companies that are trying to push back. But, remember, with the NSA in power, with the US dollar as world reserve currency and the Federal Reserve Bank running the world’s economy, there’s very little recourse. And you’ve got extrajudicial killing, extrajudicial lawmaking. America has become a rogue state. America has become an outlaw state. These countries have to wake up or they’re going to find themselves an American-casino-gulag state where they’re just going to be thrown down into a dungeon and forced to trade online virtual games to make virtual gold for their masters at Facebook or some other virtual corporation or gaming entity or casino operator. It’s devastating!

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RT:

10:02

German coalition negotiators back national referendums on EU decisions

Germany should be allowed to hold national referendums on major European policy decisions, coalition negotiators have proposed. The decision concerns issues relating to transferring powers to Brussels or committing German money at EU level, according to a document obtained by Reuters. “The population should be asked directly on European policy decisions of special importance,” the document says. It was put together by a working group on domestic policy led by Interior Minister Hans-Peter Dietrich of the Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU) and Thomas Oppermann, a senior member of the Social Democrats (SPD).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RT:

In a leaked negotiation document about going trade negotiations, it becomes clear that the United States is still asserting its role as the world’s master of self-entitlement.

On Wednesday, a document leaked from an ongoing trade negotiation was published by WikiLeaks. It concerns the monopolies and exclusive rights we know as copyrights, patents, trademarks, and so on. While the contents of the proposed trade agreement are certainly interesting, not to say very alarming, it's even more interesting to see how the United States keeps asserting its industry interests over the world under the false flag of “free trade.”

This process started with Japanese cars in the 1970s. As people in the United States started shunning Detroit's cars in favor of Toyota, policymakers in the US realized that the country's age of industrial competitiveness had effectively come to an end, and sought new ways to keep the United States at the top of the food chain, competitive or not. The result was as audacious, daring, and provocative as it was successful: redefine "value,” "industry,” and "production" in a series of lopsided interstate contracts masqueraded as "free trade" deals that would make sure the United States kept being paid by the rest of the world.

The first of these "free trade" deals - more accurately described as Industrial Protectionism (IP) - was the agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which stands at the heart of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Its champion had been then-CEO of Pfizer, Edmund Pratt, who wanted to prohibit people in the third world from using their own raw materials and pharmaceutical knowledge in their own laboratories and plants to cure and treat their own people's diseases. He wanted to force them to buy from Pfizer or die trying. Millions died as a result of the success of the TRIPS "free trade" agreement and the WTO.

There is no word for this type of behavior short of "evil.”

As the TRIPS agreement on Industrial Protectionism (IP) was being negotiated, every industry interest in the United States chimed in and wanted their piece of the pie. Hollywood's movie industry, the record industry, everybody. This new leaked trade agreement - that has absolutely nothing to do with free trade, but with the upholding of exclusive rights and monopolies that limit free trade - builds on the previous TRIPS agreement; it harshens it and deepens it. It is named TPP, the "Trans-Pacific Partnership.”

The divide between the United States and other countries on the unfairness of the aggressively pushed "United States uber alles" agenda is very clear. It's almost enough to read the introduction, where the vast majority of participating countries have proposed this language, to safeguard our common cultural and scientific legacy:

"The objectives of this chapter are... to maintain a balance between the rights of intellectual property holders and the legitimate interests of users and the community in subject matter protected by intellectual property; protect the ability of Parties to identify, promote access to and preserve the public domain; ensure that measures and procedures to enforce intellectual property rights do not themselves become barriers to legitimate trade."

The United States blanketly opposes all of it. There shall be no balance, there shall be no promotion of monopoly-less trade (which, ironically, is anybody's normal definition of free trade). There shall only be exclusive rights, which are typically held by the United States.

Also, the legal language is deliberately convoluted - the United States wants to give Hollywood the right to shut people off from the internet (and therefore most of their citizens' rights) without due process, but this is hidden deep down in legal jumbo. How many would recognize the terms "injunctive relief" or "liability conditions" as depriving citizens of their freedoms of speech, press, and assembly? I fear many people would be shocked once they realized what the legal language means - but at that point, it will be much harder to stop this idiocy.

This agreement is not about free trade. Copyright and patent monopolies, by definition, are the opposite of free trade; they are exclusive rights preventing free trade. This agreement is about asserting trade monopolies held by the United States and forcing everybody else to pay protection money or go to jail for disrespecting the powers that be.

This is not free trade. This is racketeering. And it is disgusting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×