Robert Mady Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 Paul, thank you for the reference to Mae Brussell, I have never heard of her, she seems to be well worth listening to. Bob Mady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Mady Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZuCX3fEQWQ Mae Brussell, uncovered significant evidence concerning LANE and GRODEN as early as 1976 which indicated that they were working for the government to control information on the assassination and to control the direction and content of conspiracy research. I believe what Mae Brussell claims is substantial and convincing. It is also interesting that Mae confirms my opinion on these two researchers with additional information I was not aware of. Paul thanks again, if I had listened to Mae in 1976 it might have expedited my awakening by a significant amount of time. I had no idea people were so devious and could get away with anything as long as the system was in support of their folly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Mady Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Early on I regularly listened to Alex Jones - INFO WARS and believed he was telling the truth, one of his many guests was Bob Dornan, he talked a good game and was believable and seemed to be aware of conspiracies. I was listening to Steve Allen show on youtube with guests Jim Garrison and Bob Dornan, I was shocked that Dornan was nothing but a tool of the conspirators and was there for no other purpose than to divert Garrison from communicating an effective message that the assassination was not done by a lone nut. We must do our own research and analysis, and not trust without absolute verification. IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Speer Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Early on I regularly listened to Alex Jones - INFO WARS and believed he was telling the truth, one of his many guests was Bob Dornan, he talked a good game and was believable and seemed to be aware of conspiracies. I was listening to Steve Allen show on youtube with guests Jim Garrison and Bob Dornan, I was shocked that Dornan was nothing but a tool of the conspirators and was there for no other purpose than to divert Garrison from communicating an effective message that the assassination was not done by a lone nut. We must do our own research and analysis, and not trust without absolute verification. IMO WOW, Robert. Bob Dornan. Really? For those not in the know, before Michelle Bachmann came along to regularly embarrass the Republicans and make non-Republicans question their sanity, there was Bob Dornan. He was so bad and so out there that he eventually lost his seat in Orange County, California, which had been for a long time the most conservative county in America. When he lost, moreover, he proved his total lack of class by claiming he only lost because a large number of illegal aliens had voted for his opponent, who just so happened to be hispanic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Steve Allen was one of the greats of Television, and he took risks. Dornan was a weird guy and not trustworthy at all. Robert - glad you are listening to Mae Brussell. She had lots of integrity. John Judge followed in her footsteps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 (edited) Bob Dornan is pretty hideous here, and his arguments against Garrison are pure rabble rousing: Choice cut: "Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy, and Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln..." Edited January 13, 2015 by David Andrews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Mady Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 Pat, I know... I also can laugh at it now, it was a good learning experience. It is not important to me that I listened to Dornan or Jones thinking they were sincere, it is that I have realized that people are not always what they seem or what we want them to be. Dornan's sole intention was to disrupt meaningful dialog on Steve Allen show and he accomplished his mission. The same principles apply to LANE and GRODEN, they are not what they seem or what we want them to be, I firmly believe this more than ever. What is shameful is that Mae Brussell provided compelling information about these two characters nefariously controlling conspiracy evidence as early as 1976, what did the research community do with Mae's information? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 Mae Brussell has unfortunately been marginalized throughout, though John Judge fared much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Mady Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 (edited) Paul, I thought academics and researchers where smarter than that? It appears it is difficult to impossible for people to think outside of group thought or not be bullied into conformity. Edited January 14, 2015 by Robert Mady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now