Energy and the Human Journey: Where We Have Been; Where We Can Go

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ortiz:

No harm done.  Yes indeed, I have patience issues, but I am also spread very thin these days.  There are days when I have to literally fight for the time to do my public work.  I have to stay focused on my mission, and I seek pupils who do their homework, and I have plenty of it for them.  My best students don’t come up for air for months and years.  

I also faced my death in the mountains recently, and am still recovering from it.  I’ll write about it one day.  I have had to face it several times in the mountains over the years, and it is never fun, but it certainly can be a teaching tool.  Something unexpected happened and I got into trouble.  I was able to get myself out of it, but it took all that I had to do it.  As we get older, our margin for error and getting out of trouble gets smaller.  This last one was the beginning of my old age in the mountains, and we’ll see how the rest of my hiking career goes.  My goal since my 20s was doing it into my 80s, but I’ll have to make a serious regimen change to do it.  Working long hours at my day job does not help.  

I leave you with one last reply, as you wonder about spirituality and religion.  I have written at length about my mystical awakening and those of my fellow travelers.  I have written about how my jury is still out on if a mystical awakening is a choir requirement.  Even though it was critical to my journey and those of my fellow travelers, what is immensely more important is whether a person cares.  What attracted me to Dennis and Brian was not their talent, genius, or fame, but their great hearts.  What attracted me to Ralph McGehee, Uncles Noam, Ed, and Howard, and the few like them was the high personal integrity evident in their work, which they all confirmed during our relationships.  Some were brief, and some have been extensive.  When I heard from Peter Ward like I did, it only confirmed the sense that I had of his character, which I picked up from his writings.  It takes one to know one, and we were all a bunch of over-grown Boy Scouts, naively trying to help this world become a better place to live in, and that is what led us on our journeys.  

Dennis was raised with fire-and-brimstone sermons while growing up but did not believe them.  Only after his mystical awakening did he embrace the Old Tyme Religion that he was raised with.  He still has not spit out all of the Kool-Aid of his first religion: American nationalism.  His fervent embrace of those religions is part of who he is, and as I have written, I am on a different journey and never really drank the Kool-Aid that Dennis and Brian did, although I stand back in awe at their journeys, and their hearts led them on their odysseys, not their heads.  

I am likely a “gifted” psychic, and it runs in my family, but I have chosen to not develop those gifts in this lifetime.  I have my reasons.  I am likely an Old Artisan, but other than writing, I have zero artistic talent (although I have a high appreciation of it), and I think that my soul purposely blocked those avenues of expression so that I could focus on my mission in this lifetime.  That is just a sense that I have.  It is easy to fall down the mystical rabbit hole, and I have seen people get strung out, fall off the rails, etc.  I may be speaking from experience about the hazards of abusing those abilities.  I completely understand the conditioning statements in the Silva class, for instance, about not abusing those abilities.  There can literally be hell to pay for those who do.  

Back to my biography project.

Best wishes on your journey,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Krishna:

I regard TED as infotainment, but even Peter Ward has been on it, so it can be a good introduction to certain subjects.  I write a little about mirror neutrons, and your pal de Waal has studied the subject.  My essay update will go a little deeper into them and the human journey.  Yes, Lamarck is making a comeback.   

Suzana Herculano-Houzel is from Wrangham’s side of the house, and I cite her work a bit.  Yes indeed, the development of the human brain is a big issue.  

Thanks for the tips.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am hard at work on many tasks, including my biography project.  I have often written that my jury is still out on whether a mystical awakening is a choir requirement.  A mystical awakening opens many doors of perception and possibility that can remain closed for those who have not had theirs, particularly those who have committed to an ideology such as materialism, and the numerous variations that it can be clothed in.  

In my experience, materialists almost uniformly deny free energy’s possibility, as well as its organized suppression.  They often invoke the “laws of physics” to deny free energy’s possibility, and they deny evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” which I believe arises from the same well that is hostile to the idea of teleology.  The universe is a big, meaningless accident, in the minds of most materialists.  Denying free energy’s possibility on the “laws of physics” objection is both arrogant and naïve.  Today, I was reading a new Scientific American special issue titled Wonders of the Cosmos, which is about galaxies, stars, black holes, the universe’s structure and history, etc.  You can hardly turn a page of it in which scientists don’t admit how tenuous their theories are.  Take dark energy, for instance.  It has never been observed, but it supposedly makes up 70% of the universe, according to the current cosmological theories.  Scientists have had to admit that dark energy may not exist at all, and is just an artifact of relativity theory, which may not be universally applicable.  To rule out something that I actually know exists, because of rudimentary theories, is ignorant and flies in the face of what enlightened scientists know, which is how much we don’t know.

The key is always keeping an open mind, and to especially avoid becoming prey to somebody else’s theories, which are often not based on experience.  Most of the craziness that I have seen in intellectual and related circles is their thinking that they know something, when their “knowledge” is something that they were told, not something that they found out for themselves.  

Materialists also nearly uniformly fear death.  A mystical awakening, and especially an NDE, puts a big dent in the idea that physical reality is all that there is, and a mystic’s fear of death can be quite muted, even though all organisms try their best to survive.  The problems that surround manifesting free energy without exception revolve around fear.  So, the fearful minds of materialists are a huge handicap.  However, I believe that it is possible that a materialist can operate from the highest ethical level, because it is the right thing to do.  Materialists who live by the Golden Rule, not because they are trying to earn heaven or karma points, but because it is the ethical thing to do, even a loving thing, might just be the most advanced beings on Earth.  Have I ever met or heard of a materialist who reached that lofty level?  No.  But if one did, he/she would have reached the highest level of integrity attainable on Earth, in my opinion.  The problems of making free energy happen are matters of integrity and sentience, and mystics have no monopoly on those qualities.  Far from it.  

So, materialists who can act ethically, not deny realities and possibilities because of their adoptive ideologies, and put love and sentience front and center in their awareness, I think can definitely be choir material.  They are also going to be needles in haystacks, but so it is with any group on Earth.  This is a big subject, and I’ll likely write more on it later.  

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Ilie:

Brilliant little post.  Big subject.  This will take a few posts.  With materialists and the choir, my point is asking whether a mystical awakening is a “have to have” or a “nice to have” for the choir.  In my professional life, I have been in situations where standard “have to haves” were not only not “have to haves,” they weren’t even “nice to haves,” but were: “why the heck do you want that?”  It was insane.  

I fully admit that materialists have a huge handicap for what I am doing, but can any of them reach these understandings?

• At least free energy’s possibility, if not its reality;
• That organized suppression exists;
• Free energy’s Epochal significance;
• That only a high-integrity effort has a prayer of overcoming the pitfalls and avoiding the failed approaches;  
• Coercion will not work, as the means become the ends, and only a loving approach might work;
• A comprehensive awareness, which will help them stay focused on what is important.
  

If they can, I think that they can be choir material.  Is materialism incompatible with those above understandings?  I don’t see how, other than the pervasive fear that materialists often operate from, but materialists can operate with high integrity, too.  I was on my way to becoming a materialist before my mystical awakening, and Brian was a materialist, even though he was raised Catholic, until his mystical awakening.  Anybody with a scientific bent has been fed the Kool-Aid, and materialism is seductive, especially for the “smart.”  But it is really little different from religious Kool-Aid, nationalist Kool-Aid, capitalist Kool-Aid, etc.  It is abdicating one’s sentience and responsibility to be in some “club,” AKA in-group.  

In Brian’s materialist days, his Nobel-prize-winning colleagues would sip their sherry and ridicule the paranormal, and Brian smugly sipped his sherry, too.  Anybody can wake up.  Anybody can express love.  If materialists wake up to the Kool-Aid that they have been drinking, do they immediately become mystics?  I doubt it, and a mystical awakening can only come through experience, not received teachings and study.  Drinking New Age Kool-Aid is not how you get a mystical awakening.  A disillusioned materialist does not immediately become a mystic, just like a disillusioned capitalist does not immediately become a communist.  Among disillusioned idealists are where I am going to find the most fertile ground.  

Yes, good scientists are going to always couch their statements in uncertainly, as the guiding principle of science is doubt, not faith.  But are the “skeptics” ever cocksure.  They are religious zealots who perform criminal acts on behalf of their faith.  

A mystical awakening is one thing what my fellow travelers mostly had in common, but so were our Boy Scout natures.  

This is going to be a crazily busy week at my day job (it looks like it will not let up for a couple of months now), so this series of posts will take some time, while I also juggle my biography project.  Thanks again for that great post.  It is a lot of grist for the mill.  

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Edited September 24, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Materialism is a pretty sterile, dreary philosophy, IMO.  Most scientists are functional materialists.  There is a great deal of scientific evidence that materialism is a false faith, but when you have your own dramatic and undeniable experiences, it does not matter what the scientists say; you know.  Theories mean nothing when compared to knowledge.  For the scientifically minded, plenty of sturdy works provide grist for the mill of the idea that death is not end of our consciousness.  There is an intermediate view that does not deny psi but states that consciousness’s surviving physical death is an illusion.  Is There An Afterlife? deals at length with that idea, but the author decisively favors survival over illusion.  

I strongly agree with Ilie that acting with integrity while living in fear is almost impossible.  I’ll agree with the “almost” part.  I have had the “pleasure” of studying many dark events in the human journey, and while it was largely a horror story, such as the Holocaust, the biggest demographic catastrophe in the human journey (so far), Transatlantic slavery, today’s holocausts inflicted by my great nation, and so on, there were often dots of light in the blackness, acts of selflessness and heroism in the face of the blackest evil.  If I had not had my own experiences with how evil works, I wonder who much I would have understood.  

My pantheon has people in it whom we would call materialists.  Uncle Noam is one, and many prominent leftists are.  And I have to admit that their materialism has sent them down the path of justified violence.  Noam has said that when reason fails, he recommends violence.  Uncle Howard would not rule out violence in activism.  Michael Albert has long been one of the left’s most enlightened voices, but he advocates coercion and his reason for not advocating violence is that activists could never out-do the state in violence.  He does not support violence for strategic reasons, not on principle.  The left’s materialistic blinders really hamper them as a force of change.  I regard their advocacy of violence as reflecting the limits of their integrity, and one of the hazards of materialism.  

Materialists really don’t understand what love is: the energy of creation, and that is a big handicap to their acting with integrity.  However, some of the greatest humans that I know of were materialists.  I agree that a mystical perspective far more readily allows an awareness that puts love front and center, which opens up the intuition and paths to enlightenment.  And that is why I say that materialists that operate with high integrity just may be the most advanced souls on Earth, as they are not thinking of heavenly rewards, avoiding hell or the lower astral plane, or racking up karma points (or avoiding them).  That is why I state that if materialists can hit all the marks needed for the choir, I think that I will welcome them in.  

But materialism handicaps people in many ways.  Materialists make up the bulk of Level 3s, I have seen Michael Albert disparage the ET situation with the classic “little green men” retort, seen secular saints such as Richard Stallman unable to get over the Level 3 hump, and I have never really been able to interest a prominent leftist in free energy (we have some lefties at Avalon, such as Krishna and Serg, so not all is lost).  I have only met one environmentalist who was hip to free energy, and I watched his travails in trying to interest his brethren.  

There are most posts to make in this subject.  

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

Edited September 20, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ilie:

Responding to your latest is a pleasure.  We should do this more often.   

Just those two posts give me a lot to discuss, and they give me a chance to cover important concepts in my big essay.  Those will take a week or so of posts to reply to.

You are saying that when materialists begin to lift the lid on free energy and the milieu around it, they won’t remain materialists for long.  I agree, but I think that they can still come to the party as materialists, and even help start the party.  Almost nobody can come to my work without having their beliefs challenged.  Materialism is just one of many ideologies that my work takes a meat ax to.

In the Fifth Epoch, there likely won’t be any materialists, or they will exist only at the very beginning of it, like at the beginnings of the other Epochs.  Materialism is the religion of the Fourth Epoch, but it did not begin to become dominant until more than 150 years into it (about the time of Darwin).  It took centuries for the professional urban priesthood to stamp out the hunter-gatherer religion, with its singing and dancing rituals, and bring the agrarian religions into dominance, but the agrarian priesthood has been fighting a rearguard action against the ecstatic (Second Epoch) religions to this day.  Heck, rock concerts are throwbacks to the Second Epoch religion.  Even chimps engage in ritualistic behavior.  

The Fourth Epoch, based on fossil fuels, cannot last much longer, but if it could, it might take centuries for the agrarian religions to finally die out and be practiced only in “primitive” corners, and even they will die out.  However, it will not be through coercion, but because they will no longer make any sense.  Many practices of the Third and Fourth Epochs will no longer make any sense in the Fifth, and will die out.  I expect that the nuclear family will likely die out.  The USA has its Bible bangers because we were an agrarian society until recently (my grandfather lived in a sod hut, Dennis was raised as a migrant farmworker (some of his homes had dirt floors), and my father and Mr. Professor were raised on farms), and Christianity is largely a phenomenon of rural America (those Red States), with muted influence in cities.   I can see some materialist holdouts at the beginning of the Fifth Epoch, but they are going to be few and far between.  It is going to be hard to stay stuck in materialism (or the Second and Third Epoch religions) with the daily reality of the Fifth Epoch.  

You and I were raised to be materialists, but here we are.  I completely agree how hard it will be for a materialist to meet these qualifications, but I don’t want to say that they can’t.  At what stage of your development could you meet those qualifications?  Was it before meeting me?  The Epochal significance of free energy did not begin to become clear to me until about 2010, when I read an oil company book.  If I had not heard of Sparky Sweet, and if a close friend had not received his exotic technology show, free energy technology might still be on my mental shelf someplace, in the realm of, “maybe it is possible.”  

Some of my best students today are still materialists.  But they realize that they are, are not trying to defend their faith, and look forward to one day moving beyond it, but again, that can really only be done by experience and knowledge, not by trading one set of beliefs for another.  Unfortunately, the Silva course is a nepotistic shadow of its former self.  But, if a person is diligent, a mystical awakening is attainable.  There is also the issue of soul age.  Older souls will achieve mystical awakenings easier than younger ones will, and younger souls still comprise a huge fraction of humanity today.  But I think that anybody who is attracted to my work can have a mystical awakening, if they are diligent.  There is no denying that I seek needles in haystacks, and can some of them come to me as materialists?  Some already have.  

Back to my biography project.

Best,

Wade

Edited September 21, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ilie:

Yes indeed, we might see the complete end of materialism quickly, but I doubt that free energy alone will do it, as it will only operate under a new physics, or at least seem to.  Today, we have the quantum paradox, and while it can lead people to mystical ideas, it does not put much of a dent in today’s materialist ideas.  The ET issue is entwined with the FE issue, and I doubt that one will come without the other.  I have this feeling that when ETs come into general awareness (or interdimensionals, and as Greer says, it is not either/or, but both/and), that they will definitely not be materialists, and materialism will quickly be seen as an obsolete ideology, as will all organized religions.  But we have the Flat Earth society, (with their numbers growing daily!  ), so I imagine that there will still be some stubborn materialist holdouts.  It is a passing phase in a soul’s journey through the physical plane.  I think that we all go through it, somewhere in our journeys, and likely in the Young Soul stage, when we are the most outward-focused.  I know materialism’s seductions.  It is kind of funny, but with the rise of the idea of antimatter, among the astute, “materialism” is an obsolete term, and has been replaced with “physicalism.”  Call me old-fashioned, but I still go with “materialism.”

That idea that the ZPF is divine in nature is just something that slowly dawned on me over the years.  It was a cousin to my lessons on integrity.  When I saw how so many efforts failed, what they all had in common was a lack of integrity, and not only from within the efforts, but from within the organized suppression, too, obviously.  I began getting the idea that none of the efforts were divinely intended enough to get there.  It definitely had something to do with my choir idea.  

I suppose that my notion was related to the healing work that I did, experiments with subtle energy, hearing about Level 19s, and the like.  I have been in arguments whether that Level 19 energy is the same as the ZPF.  I don’t know, but I strongly suspect that they are close cousins.  In the end, it all comes from the godhead.  

Many years after that realization began to dawn on me, I read as much in a channeled magazine, which stated that not only was that source divine, but when a society finally tapped it, all other societies in the universe that have tapped it will immediately know it.  It is apparently akin to jumping into a lake, and everybody else in the lake will feel the ripples and immediately know who jumped in.

Mr. Professor was not really religious and never went to church, and while we never discussed it, he was likely somewhere along the materialist spectrum (but not today!  ), and he is one of the greatest humans that I ever met.  I just don’t see that attaining the qualities needed for the choir must preclude materialism.  I completely agree how hard it would be for a materialist, but, like you, meeting a materialist who operated at such an enlightened level would be quite an experience.  As I have written plenty, somebody who can become choir material while still dragging along their materialist baggage would be a mighty soul (although they would deny that they have a soul  ).  

Much more to come, but back to my biography project.  

Best,

Wade

Edited September 22, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

To Ilie’s comment on whether Godzilla is a materialist or not, he definitely is not.  He possesses the technologies that render today’s physics meaningless, he is all over the ET issue, and knows that there is far more to existence than the physical plane.  

As Ilie noted, Godzilla is quite mystically inclined, but firmly on the dark path.  Oh, the stories I have heard over the years.  All are plausible and many are likely true.  The scientific might describe Godzilla’s actions as psychopathy on a global scale.  But his orientation is not materialist.  He has an idea about the other planes of existence, but without love in his awareness, or as Ra says, only love of self, he really cannot comprehend dimensions where love is the basis for them, and far more obviously than it is in physical reality.  

I don’t want to dip too far into Godzilla’s darkness, but he knows something about karma, but thinks that he can beat the system.  He thinks that he can trick others into bearing his karma.  It is the height of delusion, but self-servers are the most deluded of all, even though they can seem quite clever.

Take the psychotronic equipment that was used to give Greer’s team those advanced cancer cases; the equipment operators get the diseases, too, but they aren’t told that.  They are among the disposable assets that Godzilla uses.  Godzilla may think that he can orchestrate the mayhem and not pay the price of his machinations, but that is the most foolish of all positions that one can have, particularly for those who think that they understand what lies beyond the physical plane.  And as I can’t stress too much, no lofty entity on the other side of the veil sits in judgment and punishes anybody on the other side, but beings go to where they are attracted.  Those who play evil games on Earth get every chance to keep playing them when they pass over, but they only get to interact with beings who share their delight, and the stray being who tries to help them wake up and leave their “heaven.”  Those who play at the highest levels of evil on Earth will “graduate” to a “heaven” that makes Max’s hell seem like a playground.  

As Road’s mentor said, those gray beings in that hellish world may think that they are the “winners” of that reality, but actually, they are the biggest losers.  All that we take with us is our awareness, and the patterns of thought and action that we develop while we are here is what we take with us.  Wherever we go, there we are, and those patterns of our thoughts and actions are by far the easiest to change while we are here, and harder to change on the other side (such as addictive behaviors).  But if you seek love, on the other side you will find it at levels that are not comprehensible in this cruel little dimension called physical reality.  The greatest challenge that we have here is choosing love, when fear is such a normal state, as we live in a reality of scarcity and survival.  There is nothing easy about being here, and for my part, Godzilla has my forgiveness.  I don’t wish him ill.  I don’t seek to interact with him, either.  He can go his own way, and if my little choir idea reaches its potential, Godzilla is just going to slink away, looking for easier meat, and he can go with my blessings.  The dark path is not forever, and some of his clique might even be redeemed in the Fifth Epoch.  That would be my ideal outcome.  

Best,

Wade

Edited September 24, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I would like to make a post on something that rears its head occasionally, spurred by my previous post.  I truly wish nobody any harm, not even Godzilla and friends.  What I sometimes hear is people savoring the day when the “bad guys” who have suppressed free energy and related technologies get their “just desserts.”  I don’t want to see them suffer.  When it clearly becomes “game over” for their evil plans, I would happily just have them slink away, and some might even be redeemed.  

I would never approach Bill the BPA Hit Man, Mr. Deputy, or Ken Hodgell.  Unrepentant dark pathers are highly dangerous for anybody to approach, particularly if they are going to be taken to task about their crimes.  If their consciences finally awoke and I heard from them, all that they could do, as far as I would be concerned, would be to publicly discuss their crimes and seek to repair their damage, even though they were merely soldiers following orders, in a way (although they had to demonstrate their capacity for evil to even be on the team).  I would not trust anything less from them.  They don’t owe me anything.  Their debt is to Earth and humanity, and ultimately, themselves.  

Focusing on the GCs and friends, and particularly wishing them ill, falls far short of the mentality needed to help along my effort.  No need to settle any scores or hope for retribution.  Leave that to wiser minds than ours to sort out.  

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Some of Ilie’s comments show how other groups besides materialists have their challenges.  People raised or living in the Third Epoch, in agrarian societies, also have strikes against them, but as with materialists, does their conditioning automatically disqualify them from choir consideration?  

One thing that I hope that my big essay gets across, and it will more so with my essay update, is that while energy forms each Epoch’s foundation, what is built on that foundation looked a lot different each time, while retaining some similarities.  We all need to eat.  We are social animals.  We have been behaviorally modern since before our ancestors conquered Earth.  

Ilie mentioned being pressed for time.  In agrarian societies, everybody is pressed for time, trying to get enough to eat.  From the earliest civilizations, they were always collapsing as they ran out of energy, which meant wood and food for agrarian civilizations.  Hungry, time-pressed people, living on the edge, are not going to be very helpful in imagining the coming Epoch as a way to help it manifest.  Desperate people are going to be more harm than good.  Similar to how materialism is a straightjacket that prevents true sentience from manifesting, so are the ideologies of the Third Epoch.  

In ways, it is amazing how far Dennis got dragging his religious and nationalist baggage with him, and he still tries the businessman’s route.  But there can also be a charming, naïve honesty that can come from people raised on farms, which my inner circle largely did.  There is something to that.  

But the stories of organized religion read like bedtime stories, as if their adherents took Grimm’s Fairy Tales literally or still believed in Santa Claus.  It is understandable that materialists entirely reject the agrarian religions, but they also miss the boat.  It is like they rejected a hypothesis that can’t be falsified, but then erected a similar hypothesis, kind of like a mirror image of what they rejected.  Instead of being met by Saint Peter and given a harp to strum, their story is that there is no story, and only oblivion awaits our consciousness when our bodies die.  A mountain of evidence suggests otherwise, and I am uniformly unimpressed by the debunkers, which comes from adherents to both Third and Fourth Epoch religions.  And like I state about awakenings, people can only awaken through experience, not beliefs that they were fed.  

If anybody, no matter what their backgrounds are, can achieve these understandings, I think that they can be choir material.  Is it harder for Third or Fourth Epoch people to achieve them?  Both have their challenges.  Materialists are often the most entrenched against to the idea of free energy.  Yet the credulousness of those adhering to the primary population management ideologies is a big problem going the other way.  I don’t need people who believe, but people who know, people who can think.  And you can’t get there by sitting in your easy chair.   

Best,

Wade

Edited September 28, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

To briefly revisit those understandings needed for the choir, a key understanding is the power of integrity, sentience, and combined positive intention.  The people I seek are going to understand that the choir can make a dent.  Nothing like it is has ever been seen or heard on Earth before, and who is to say what its harmonic effects might be?  Doing the work to learn the song and sing it is most certainly “doing something.”  And it can easily lead to manifesting the Fifth Epoch.  

On Third Epoch peoples helping out, they have big issues, and this may not be initially easy to understand.  In 1500 England, only about 5% of the population was literate, much less scientifically literate (scientific literacy did not really exist at the time).  Women were subservient, everybody spent all of their time making sure that they could eat, strangers were legally enslaved, the odds of surviving to adulthood were about 50%, and if you walked down a street in London without a weapon at your side, you were asking to be robbed or murdered.

There was a period of Neolithic bliss in horticultural societies, when women had high status and broke up the male gangs, but it did not last long.  Agrarian societies today, for all the influence of industrial societies, are relatively primitive, with agrarian religions dominating, women have low status, and scientific literacy among them is almost non-existent.  Leaving school early to begin one’s “career” on the farm is typical in agrarian societies.  While my inner circle was raised on farms, they all escaped them, too, lived in history’s richest and most powerful nation, and took advantage of the postwar boom, which was the most prosperous period in the human journey.  

Agrarian societies might produce some choir members, but it is going to be a long haul for such people, leaving behind their natal Epoch, living in the next one, imagining the one after that and helping it manifest.  My grandfather lived in a sod hut, his son helped put men on the Moon, and his son chased the Fifth Epoch.  In many ways, we live in truly extraordinary times.  

So, can people raised in agrarian societies learn the song of abundance and sing it?  Maybe, but theirs might be the longest journeys of all, to get there.  

This is my last planned post on this subject for now.  Back to my biography project.  

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This will be on current events…

I awoke to the news of the latest mass shooting in the USA.  I really can’t keep track of them all.  This one apparently broke the “record” of a shooting last year.  My life has been touched more than once by mass shootings in the USA.  I am nearing the end of my biography project, or, at least its first draft, and when people see who it was, and my readers will not be surprised, the following statement may make more sense.  

Since the heinous way that the USA comported itself in defeating Germany and Japan in 1945, capped off with nuclear weapons, the USA has been the greatest purveyor of international violence, by far, of any nation on Earth.  My great nation has slaughtered millions, in the name of freedom, of all things.  Today, black NFL players are protesting police brutality and how this nation is failing to live up to its rhetoric.  What nobody seems to be discussing is that the national anthem ceremonies are acts of religion in the first place, and we supposedly have freedom of religion.  When I read comments on Internet boards on the NFL protests, I see what I always see when such events happen, comments that state that the protestors are disrespecting those brave soldiers who fight for our freedom.  What a Big Lie.  Any American soldiers serving in America’s imperial archipelago of foreign bases and who participate in foreign invasions, who think that their efforts have anything to do with protecting American freedoms, are deeply deluded.  Sometimes, returning soldiers will begin to wake up to the evil that they participated in, but they are few and far between.  The last time that any American soldiers fought for the USA’s freedom was the War of 1812, when we were just a sideshow for the British, who were busy fighting the Napoleonic Wars, as they drubbed the USA and burned Washington D.C.  All American wars since then have been imperial ones, as we expanded our territory and influence, which is now global in nature, although the Empire is in swift decline these days.  

Our endless imperial crimes, while we fervently worship the symbols of our national religion, have everything to do with the increasing waves of violence in the USA.  The USA exports more weapons than any other nation on Earth, and our military budget is far and away the highest on Earth, at nearly ten times Russia’s, which is the demon of the moment in American ideology.  

There is no way that our prodigious international violence can fail to come back to haunt us (called “blowback,” “chickens coming home to roost,” and the like), and until the USA begins to face up to the reality of the evil that we endlessly inflict on the world’s peoples, this domestic violence will continue to escalate.  It obviously does not need to be this way.  

Back to work.  The next six weeks will be very busy one in my daily life, so I may get relatively quiet on the posting front.  We’ll see.  

Best,

Wade

Edited October 2, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Foxie, yes indeed, most Americans have no idea that the USA is an empire, even though Karl Rove openly admitted it, because Americans are history’s most brainwashed people.  We live in the land of Hollywood and Madison Avenue, where form prevails over substance, and where reality can be turned upside-down.  

Orwell knew what he was writing about.  Americans as a group have not been my target audience since about 2004.  As Darren noted, most Americans would “go into convulsions” if they read my site.  They aren’t going to awaken via work like mine.  Only experience can do that, which also applies to the free energy issue.  They can keep sleeping.  When the next Epoch is delivered into their lives, then they will begin to awaken, and probably not before that.  

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Today I was home sick, for the first day in years.  I always know when I will (salty or sugary foods, season changes), and I always get sick the same way (sore throat, sinus infection, flu symptoms).  I should be coming out of the woods tomorrow.

So, my down day (still did some office work from home, in these high-tech days) coincided with the aftermath of yesterday’s shooting in Las Vegas.  I have vacationed on the Strip about ten times, mostly with family, and have been to Mandalay Bay, so this one hits closer to home than usual.  

Of course, Trump called it “pure evil,” the Democrats renewed their calls for gun control, and the Republicans called for silent prayer, as they will rarely vote to limit weaponry in my great nation.  How many have to be slaughtered before they change their stance?  On the fringes, YouTube gets flooded with “false flag” clips for every mass shooting in the USA, within hours of the events, led by the dean of conspiracists, Alex Jones, and today was no exception.  Evidence?  Ha!  They have their ideology, which gives them all that they need.  ISIL took credit for the slaughter, and the apparent shooter’s brother had no warning at all that his brother, a multimillionaire high-rolling visitor to Vegas, was capable of such an act.

Is the USA capable of the introspection necessary to begin to come to grips with our endemic and escalating violence?  I am not counting on it.  We are a nation of gun nuts.  Today, I was reading some of Uncle Ed’s work on the USA’s awesome imperial hypocrisy, which is so great that Ed had to come up with a new word to describe it: chutzpah.  I am not sure what is more mind-boggling; the hypocrisy of our political system, or how the blatant lies are swallowed as truth by most.  Ed and Noam’s propaganda model explicitly did not deal with the media’s effectiveness in brainwashing the population – it only described how it worked – but Ed has remarked about how easy it is to bamboozle the American public to support any war.

How hard can it be to see the connection between our imperial violence and the escalating violence at home?  Most video games are first-person shooters, and violence is nearly an obligatory feature of most movies.  I find it a little ironic that the NFL is where the current protests against police brutality began, when the sport is the modern equivalent of the gladiatorial “games.”  Maybe the nature of their sport helped them make a stand, although I don’t think that I ever heard one of them say a word about our imperial behavior – our predatory military is universally revered in those circles.

In 1970 in The New Republic, Orville Schell wrote about the USA’s activities in Vietnam:

“One Newsweek correspondent told me on returning from Quang Ngai that he was shocked by what was going on in the countryside.  Having had experience in Europe during World War II, he said that what he had seen was ‘much worse than what the Nazis had done to Europe.’”

One scholar remarked that the primary cause of the Jewish Holocaust was likely World War I, as a generation of men in a formerly peaceful (relative, of course, for Europe) nation became professional killers, and German society became far more violent in the wake of World War I.

There has never been any accountability for the USA for its evil crimes in Indochina that killed millions, no Nuremburg equivalent for our crimes there, much less anyplace else where we invaded, such as Iraq and Afghanistan.  Again, I am not counting on it.  Germany and Japan only came to grips with their imperial behavior when forced into it by defeat.  The British and Americans have never had that moment of truth, and likely won’t.  But if the means of abundance were delivered to humanity, Americans just might grow a conscience, like the rise of machines meant the end of slavery, because people could afford more of a conscience.  I don’t expect Americans to wake up before then.  A few will, but it will only be a relative few.  

Best,

Wade

Edited October 3, 2017 by Wade Frazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Foxie and Limor:

I woke up the hard way thirty years ago, more than a decade after my mystical awakening, and if you had tried to tell me what was in store for me, I wouldn’t have believed it.  This, I know: the learning never ends.  However, that moment of awakening, when you realize that you have been drinking somebody else’s Kool-Aid, is the most important step of the journey.  So, if you have had your awakening moment, the hard part is over.  Almost nobody ever wakes up.  That is just the nature of being here.  There are also false awakenings, when somebody thinks they woke up, but they just trade one set of beliefs for another.  That is not what waking up means.  Changing the flavor of the Kool-Aid is not the answer.  Waking up is a matter of integrity and sentience, and few ever achieve it, in our world of scarcity and fear.  They sell out their sentience for the promise of security.  

When fear is not the constant drumbeat of our societies, a lot will change, and so much that this world will end, and it won’t be missed.   

Best,

Wade

Edited October 3, 2017 by Wade Frazier