Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team
Wade Frazier

Lessons learned from my journey with Dennis

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi:

I have to rush off to work, so this will be short.  One of the lessons I learned on my journey is that “overnight successes” and “explosions” and “revolutions” don’t just happen, but the events that led to them can be seen.  Even the Big Bang is being challenged in orthodox corners these days, as being more of a quantum event, with the physical universe gradually blinking into existence.  The Cambrian Explosion vexed scientists from Darwin onward, as it challenged evolutionary theory, if everything appeared overnight from nothing.  But now scientists have been able to trace the contours of life’s journey on Earth for billions of years, and the Cambrian Explosion was a long time in coming.  Similarly, the Mammalian Explosion happened because the dinosaurs were wiped out, and the mammal line was dominant before dinosaurs were, and all dominant orders of mammals today had appeared by the time the dinosaurs disappeared.  

On the human journey, the story is also one of gradual changes, which could result in something relatively dramatic at times, but the roots of the “explosions” or “revolutions” are evident today, after a great deal of sleuthing.  The Industrial Revolution is the only “revolution” or “explosion” that happened during recorded history, and the events of the Third Epoch can today be readily seen that led to the Industrial Revolution, as a deforested England turned to coal.

There is a temptation to attribute things like the rise of humans or megalithic architecture to ET intervention and the like, but that seems to be just magical thinking that inserts some miracle, because people do not really understand what happened.  Invoking some kind of divine or ET intervention is common among the scientifically illiterate, and is the equivalent of folk tales.  I have had plenty of divine intervention in my life, so I know it is real, but it was up to me to do the work.  Those interventions did not come out of nowhere, and came as a response to need (or to help direct me on my path, such as that voice).    

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

I have written about the spooks now and then, such as here, but this will be a little more on the timely subject, in the wake of the latest from Wikileaks.  Learning about the spooks was important for what I am doing.  I suppose my introduction to it was my father’s having to get a top-secret security clearance to work for NASA, as Brian also did.  The Space Race was a Cold War concoction, and JFK tried to end the Space Race before he was murdered by the spooks, and if what E. Howard Hunt told Doug Caddy was valid, and I have little doubt that it was, the ET issue was part of the rationale, but a proximate cause at most.  The Soviets also knew plenty about the ETs, and the USA’s spooks knew that they did.  If I had gone to the Air Force Academy, I would have been deeply immersed in the USA’s national security culture, and I will always be thankful that my mother had my father talk me out of it.  For all that happened afterward to wreck our relationships, they get big points for that.  I have seen what the culture does to people.  They either drink the Kool-Aid or drink themselves to death.  

Several years before meeting Dennis (who was an honorary spook for a brief time, which was typical in the Vietnam era), I lived with a close relative who was a CIA contract agent, who nearly tried to recruit me into the “business,” but I luckily moved away before he could make his pitch.  I only found out about his secret life from his wife, after they divorced, and she was wife number four or so.  His life was a train wreck, and he essentially drank himself to death, certainly partly due to the cognitive dissonance of his secret life.  In the many years since then, I have seen and heard plenty about that spook toll on people’s lives, including their families.  

Spooks aren’t spooks just for the heck of it, and I doubt that many of them thought that they would become spooks when they grew up, just like few hookers ever aspired to that “career” when young.  Spooks are professionals who protect the interests of their employers, and relatively few are psychopaths, but chumps who believe in the “cause,” as those employees work partly for “psychic income” and come cheaper than “break glass in case of fire” psychopaths, who must be used very carefully, because they will instantly turn on their employers for the right price.  The chumps are infinitely more loyal.  John Perkins envied the naïveté of those who worked for him, and a close friend once worked in such an operation.  He never caught on to the real game being played, and I don’t have the heart to try to tell him, and it would risk our relationship if I did.  

When I met Dennis through one of those larger-than-life events, his company was on the way to being bludgeoned out of existence by the gangsters who run my home state, and a real-life psychopathic hit man was involved.  It was educational to see how easily he duped people by playing to their self-interest.  My boss helped engineer the theft of Dennis’s company, and the ringleaders may well have been on Godzilla’s payroll as contract agents, as Ken Hodgell was, whom we met the next year.  They were all Mormons, and I doubt that it was a coincidence.

God only knows how much spook surveillance Dennis was under in those days, but it was substantial.  The so-called White Hats also took interest, and I am not sure how long ago their interest began, but they began contacting us directly in Boston, and we got the first friendly buyout offer in Boston.  The next year, the CIA openly got involved, and they simply added a couple of zeroes to the initial offer, which I came to discover was also standard procedure.  

When I was with Dennis, he played secrecy games, which ended up costing me greatly, and I hated every minute of playing the secrecy game.  I eventually realized that if you have to play the secrecy game, you are defeated before you begin.  That is one reason why the choir will not be comprised of anonymous people.  They are going to be worse than worthless for what I have in mind.  Complete transparency is the only route with a prayer for this epochal task.  I have likely been under constant surveillance since the 1980s.  It just comes with the territory, and I don’t lose any sleep over it.

But I also don’t make it easy for the spooks, such as trying to stir things up in Washington D.C. or holding a conference.  Those are suicidal behaviors in this milieu, and if you are “lucky,” you will only have your life wrecked or get run out of your home nation.  

I find it somewhat amusing that free energy newbies almost always get the risks entirely backwards.  They live in quaking fear of Godzilla’s minions, but then proselytize to their social circles, which is where the greatest risk is, by far.  Only people like Dennis, Brian, Greer, Trombly, and me have anything to fear from Godzilla on the free energy front, and I do what I can to stay relatively low on the radar.  Nobody who gets involved with my effort needs to fear spook interference, but they also have to be vigilant and not do naive and stupid things.  Not paranoia, but awareness.  

After staggering from my home town in 1990, radicalized, I hit the books and soon discovered Ralph McGehee’s work.  He is at the pinnacle of credibility for whistleblowers: a career CIA agent who went through immense legal battles to publish his memoirs, and whose life was a made a living hell for daring to do it.

In the years since Ralph published his memoirs, a kind of spook “whistleblower” cottage industry has grown, and I am regularly bombarded with the latest “revelation” from those self-professed “whistleblowers.”  Virtually none of them have any credibility with me.  They are nearly all going to be compromised in one way or another, even if they were genuine, and most likely aren’t.  The spook world does not leave much in the way of paper trails, so almost anybody can claim that they were a spook (or get the “inside scoop” from spooks), and provide almost no evidence at all to support their wild claims.  Most of those “insider revelations” are disinformation, to put it politely.  

I certainly can’t out “cloak-and-dagger” the spooks, and it is foolish and potentially suicidal to try, but all sorts of newbies think that they can play that game, as they think that they can live out some kind of fantasy.  The people that I seek need to raise their games far above those adolescent levels.  The spooks are definitely a potential hazard for what I do, but I do what I can to give them a wide berth and build something that is not very vulnerable to their activities.  They are watching, and they can keep watching for all I care.  They can stay in the shadows and slink away with my blessings in the Fifth Epoch, in which secrecy games no longer make any sense.  The can even let go of those dark activities and learn to live in the light.  That is unlikely, but very possible for those who did not quite sell their souls.    

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

I am going to go fairly quiet over the rest of the month, as my day job goes nuclear.  But I want to briefly discuss one important lesson that my journey taught me.  My days with Dennis were the big class in which I learned my most important lessons in no uncertain terms.  The subsequent years of study were largely about seeing how our experiences fit a larger pattern of how the world really works, not the propaganda version that is taught by the various Establishments.  That was not my intent when I hit the books, but it began to become clear.

When I saw the media just make it up as it went regarding us, it fit a pattern that I later discovered through long years of study, that lying to the public is perhaps the media’s primary function.  What I learned about personal integrity being the world’s scarcest commodity was confirmed repeatedly during my subsequent years of study and experience.  There were many of those kinds of lessons, in which years of study showed our experiences to be part of a larger pattern that goes way back.

But those years of study also allowed for ever-larger patterns to appear, largely based on the findings of scientists and historians.  Some of the “way back” patterns go back to the beginning of life on Earth and a watershed event was when complex life began to become social.  Even plants can be social, as can be seen in The Hidden Life of Trees.

I did not develop my epochal framework until relatively late in my studies, and it became clear that human sociality was dependent on each epoch’s energy levels.  For the past three epochs, human biology has essentially been the same.  What changed was the energy surplus of each epoch, first and foremost.  Everything else followed from that.  Almost nobody ever mentally escaped the constraints of their epochs.  In the late Second Epoch, killing strangers on sight was normal.  In the Third Epoch, turning people into property was normal.  In the Fourth Epoch, becoming faceless cogs in some industrial, commercial, or governmental enterprise is normal.  In the Fifth Epoch, working for a wage, for survival, and the like will be seen like today’s Fourth Epoch peoples look at slavery, as some barbaric relic of a bygone epoch.  Warfare will also be seen as a primitive mark of those prior epochs of scarcity and fear.  

However, unlike the prior epochal events, making this one happen will require an unprecedented act of integrity and sentience, which I suppose is fitting, given what the Fifth Epoch means.  But it only needs a tiny fraction of humanity to initiate it.  Indeed, only a tiny fraction of humanity is fit for the task.  

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

In the next week, I plan to post my final lessons learned post, to finish off this sequence of the series.  I have been sketching out its themes.  In the meantime, I am working long hours, and this post will revisit a familiar theme, on the megafauna extinctions and the real world of science.  What spurred it was recent reading on the Permian extinction.  Climate change related to volcanism, on a supercontinent that already presented great stresses on land and marine life, chemically and otherwise, with collapsing oxygen levels, were related to a series of extinctions the began 20 million years before the end extinction.  That controversy, as far as just what the causal mechanisms were, will likely outlive me, and that is normal science at work.  I have written plenty on scientific literacy, which is not about knowing the answers so much as knowing the questions and processes, and thinking through the issues for one’s self.  That is where we build the mental muscles of scientific literacy, and the critical-thinking aspect of scientific literacy can serve us well in many key areas.  It is one reason why scientific literacy will be an important quality of the choir.  

For the most recent extinction, of the large animals on several continents, there is a clique of scientists, largely from Australia, that is obsessed about climate change, and I believe that they either have academic tunnel vision or are being disingenuous.  If I had to guess their motivation, it seems to be absolving humanity from causing those extinctions, perhaps to somehow rehabilitate various indigenous peoples.  It may not be entirely conscious on their part, or at least for most of them.

The dinosaur extinction became a kind of scientific parlor game, and the current equivalent seems to be the mammoth extinctions, and I have become tired of seeing various parties sally forth in attempting to explain the mammoth extinctions as anything other than human agency, and I recently saw those Australian scientists trumpet another “climate change did it” paper on the mammoth extinctions.  Such papers suffer from tunnel vision at best.  

I recently read The Monkey’s Voyage, and it was a marvelous book on how species have dispersed across Earth, and the monkey’s journey from Africa to South America was perhaps the most epic of the dispersals, hence the book’s title.  As a sidelight, the book discussed extinction and survival dynamics.  

One of most wrong-headed aspects of the infatuation with the mammoth extinctions, especially all attempts to explain human agency away, which seems to be the primary goal of most such theorists, is that mammoths and mastodons were merely one of the most iconic animals to suddenly go extinct when behaviorally modern humans arrived on the scene.  Going after the mammoth extinctions with climate change, bolide event, and other explanations, which “coincidentally” absolve humanity of responsibility, is to ignore key aspects of the current ice age and how the megafauna survived the glacial intervals just fine.  

I recently linked to a vegetation map from the last glacial interval.  The rainforest completely disappeared in the bonobo home range, where they have been isolated for more than a million years, and they did fine every time that their preferred habitat disappeared.  On continental land masses, it is pretty easy for animals to migrate to where their best habitats are.  Their numbers would certainly decline when most of their habitat shrank, but they all adapted.  There have been no mass extinctions of note since the 200-million-year greenhouse Earth phase finally came to an end about 35 million years ago.  All species since then have been adapted to icehouse Earth conditions.  The closest was the mid-Miocene extinctions of 14 million years ago, but it was trivial compared to other events.

Until the rise of humans, the elephant family was the most successful land mammal ever.  Like humans, elephants evolved in Africa, and their high intelligence, huge size (adults had no predators), prehensile trunks, and opportunistic feeding patterns meant that they thrived in every place on Earth that they could get to.  They could not swim to Australia and had nothing to eat on Antarctica, but flourished everyplace else, at least until humans arrived, and then they quickly went extinct everywhere but Africa and parts of Asia, and that was very likely because humans evolved alongside those elephants, which learned to survive being around those super-predatory humans.  

While Africa retained nearly all of its megafauna with the rise of humans, Australia and the Americas quickly lost theirs, and elephants prospered in the Americas for many millions of years, to suddenly all go extinct when humans arrived, along with nearly all of the other megafauna, and climate change somehow did it.  The bald fact is that the preferred habitat of mammoths and mastodons never disappeared in the past 15 million years, it only moved north and south with the advancing and retreating ice sheets, which they easily migrated with, and those elephants survived in the most marginal environments of the elephant family.  One elephant species abounded in the Americas, and there is evidence that people made homes from their hides before they quickly went extinct.  That was just like what happened when behaviorally modern humans met mammoths in Eurasia and made their short-lived mammoth villages.  

A related elephant also heavily populated the Americas, to quickly go extinct when humans arrived.  I regard it as either crazy or dishonest to keep flogging the climate change explanation for the megafauna extinctions, especially where the elephant family is concerned.  It is time to put the mammoth extinctions to bed.  All of the “nuance” that I see seems designed to obscure the factor that dwarfed everything else: people.  It did not matter what the climate was doing when people arrived.  The easy meat was doomed.  

It can be very educational, however, to watch those climate change advocates for the megafauna extinctions while watching Global Warming deniers ply their trade.  Although seeming to come from opposite ends of the spectrum, they are actually blood brothers, as both groups labor to absolve humanity of responsibility for our impacts on this planet.  The conflicts of interest among the Global Warming deniers are more blatant, but the climate change advocates for the megafauna extinctions are also defending their in-group: humanity.  

These issues serve to highlight my journey’s primary lesson: personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity, and scientists and academics certainly do not reside at some loftier level of integrity.  As Uncle Howard noted long ago, their interest-conflicted work can be quite deadly.  In Western medicine, it can be truly deadly.  

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

This is a short addendum to the previous post.  Developing scientific literacy in these areas not only can help hone one’s critical thinking skills, but people can use them to make their own assessments of the evidence.  Not necessarily at the specialist level, but deeply enough to understand the issues, think about it by themselves, and begin making the connections that can lead to a comprehensive perspective.  

For instance, on species dispersals, refugia, speciation, radiation, and extinction, people can develop their own informed views on the matter, even if it just chewing on the information for some time.  That is what scientists do when they come up with their testable hypotheses.  For instance, monkeys and apes (AKA simians) can’t swim.  Humans are the only member of the line that can.  Elephants, however, can swim.  The leading hypothesis for how monkeys made it to South America is that some were washed down something like the Congo, on a vegetation raft, around 40 million years ago, and like shipwrecked sailors, survived some weeks as the currents took them across an Atlantic Ocean that was maybe half the width of today’s, as far as the distance between Africa and South America went, and there may have been some islands between those continents, which would have made the feat easier.  

An ape would be too big to make such a trip, and elephants surely could not have rafted over or swum.  Elephants made it to the Western Hemisphere via the Arctic during the warm Miocene, but those Miocene apes were not adaptable to cold like elephants were, so they never made it past Eurasia.  Similarly, it seems that no placental land mammal, other than some rafting rodents (and some also rafted from Africa to South America), made it to Australia from Asia, as the ocean barrier was too formidable for swimming or accidental rafting.  Humans were the first significant placental mammal to migrate to Australia, and it was not until humans invented boats.  

People can think about those events for themselves, and conclude what was likely, what was not, and why.  That can lead to a deeper understanding of how our world works, and that is always good work.

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

I decided years ago to reveal his name after he died, and this is very appropriate for one of my last lessons learned posts.  It was David Rockefeller who called Dennis at home, and that story takes a little telling.  It was far from the first time that the Rockefellers got involved, and it would be no surprise to discover that they were part of the billion dollar offer that the CIA delivered to Dennis.

I was never very interested in Dennis’s 100-MPG technology.  I had no doubt that it was genuine, but when he invited me to the White House for an eve-of-the-election demonstration of that technology, sponsored by Bush the Second’s energy advisor, it was like I had come full circle, wringing more energy out of a gallon of gasoline, which Mr. Mentor’s engine also did.  Dennis certainly gave it the college try and then some, but gasoline conservation has long been suppressed by the Rockefellers and friends.  The oil companies have been involved with keeping the lid on such technologies for a century or more, and Ron Waugh’s story was just one of many that I had heard over the years.

When the rocket took off in Ventura, it was because of Dennis’s USA Today ads.  Dennis advertised in USA Today for more than 20 years.  Around the time that Bush’s eyes were bugging out at Dennis’s WIREC exhibit, a Detroit automobile company (three guesses which one  :) ) was testing dozens of Dennis’s retrofit kits, after early tests confirmed those high MPGs.  Bush’s energy advisor was one of Dennis’s fans, but it did not matter when David Rockefeller and friends got involved.  David Rockefeller handpicked every American president since Jack Kennedy, and he owned the Bushes, who had been Rockefeller fixers from way back, serving the Rockefellers even before Prescott Bush.  

Around the time of WIREC, Dennis ran a full-page ad in USA Today about his retrofit kit.  David Rockefeller called Dennis at home to discuss that ad, before the ad ranAlison answered the phone that fateful morning, she is completely unfazed by people like that, and called to Dennis across their home, “Dennis, David Rockefeller is on the phone.”  Rockefeller was about 93 years old at the time.  After that phone call, that enthusiastic Detroit company suddenly treated Dennis like he had the plague and disavowed all knowledge of him.  The wheels at the federal level began grinding, which resulted in that attack by the FTC, that slandering TV show by Dateline, featuring Mr. Skeptic (of course, such shows never contacted me), and that time, they took a different legal tactic, which resulted in Dennis’s being permanently banned from participation in the energy industry in the USA.

Naming Rockefeller like this also emphasizes another lesson of my journey: the Rockefellers are not at the top of the global power structure.  David likely was not a Global Controller.  We had interactions with the GCs, and they don’t call people at home, using their names.  You have never heard of the people at the GC level.  The Rothschilds also got involved, and again used their names, which means that they are not GCs, either.  They are from the old guard, and there is plenty of “churn” at the top.  If the Rockefellers and Rothschilds were ever at the top, it was long ago.

One of the greatest lessons of my journey with Dennis was realizing how multi-level organized suppression is.  Whether it was the local electric industry, national-level institutions, the oil-industry level, or the Global Controller level, they all played the same game, and were all likely acting largely independently.  Bill the BPA hit man worked for the GCs for a time, but it is hard to say exactly when that relationship began.  He cultivated his fake alternative energy credentials long before he was sicced on Dennis’s company.  Like Ken Hodgell, he was likely a contract agent and had to fend for himself when not performing hit man duties.  Bill’s tactic of using the legal system as a weapon against the people that he stole from predated his phony bankruptcy lawsuit in Seattle, and that behavior has continued in recent years.  If you work for the right people, the legal system is yours to use with impunity, and you are immune from prosecution for your evil deeds, although Ken eventually lost that protection.  Contract agents are expendable, as my close relative was.  If I outlive that household-name diplomat that my relative worked for, I may reveal his name, and he also worked for the Rockefellers.  It is a small world at those levels of the game.  

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi Krishna (FKA Freeknowledge):

Mr. Mentor’s engine is extraordinary even if it could not make free energy, as is Fischer’s.  Neither one was invented for free energy purposes, but to make more efficient engines.  The second law of thermodynamics says that you can’t make free energy by using heat engines and heat pumps, or, at least, the mainstream interpretation of that so-called “law.”  But soon after Dennis got his naïve idea of marrying his heat pump with a low-temperature turbine, we encountered scientists who challenged the second law.  Eugene Mallove told me that the second law was rubbish, and that he reproduced Reich’s results with a Faraday cage.  Mr. Mentor and Fischer believed that they could make free energy by marrying the panels of Dennis’s heat pump with their engines.  Fischer tried for years, largely without success.  They once got his engine running for a whole day, but it started with a “battery” of a cold heat sink, so I doubt that they proved free energy before Fischer ran off.  

Like Sparky Sweet’s device defied mainstream notions of electricity, with an ungrounded circuit, Mr. Mentor’s engine did not need a low-temperature heat sink to exhaust to.  That was a mind-boggling, yet simple, aspect of his engine.  My jury is still out on whether Mr. Mentor’s or Fischer’s engine could produce free energy, but people such as Mallove said that such contraptions could work.  It is widely considered one of the more promising paths to free energy today.  Studying the current theories can be very helpful, and at least make what Mr. Mentor, Fischer, Mallove, and others alleged become comprehensible.  

All the theory in the world, however, can be killed by simple facts, which Einstein noted.  All theories eventually die.  The technologies that my friend saw takes the corpus of today’s scientific theories and chucks them out the window.  As Einstein said, one day, his theories would be proven wrong, but the best parts of them would survive in the subsequent theories.  That is how science works.  Mainstream science has a long way to go to catch up to the physics behind what Godzilla has in his Golden Hoard.  That is where the good stuff is.  Science in the Fifth Epoch will bear only a faint resemblance to today’s, and that heavenly Roads world provides a glimpse.  

For me, free energy and antigravity are plenty to usher in the Fifth Epoch, and those technologies are already here.  As Greer has said, we only need a version 1.0 of free energy to get the Fifth Epoch going, not the version 35.0 that Godzilla has.  I see my effort ultimately helping a version 1.0 get built and be given to humanity, or help version 25.0 or later come in from the shadows.  Either way works for me.  But it has to be a loving effort and avoid the paths to disaster that so many have trod.  David Rockefeller likely helped wreck my life, but I said a prayer for him yesterday.  He’ll need it.  His passing is generating plenty of articles like this, and deservedly so.  Dark stuff.    

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

I’ll be working insane hours until next weekend, so will be pretty quiet.  I want to briefly revisit the David Rockefeller issue.  I have very close knowledge of some of the cloak-and-dagger methods of Rockefeller’s circle that predates my days with Dennis.  Some has come into the light, such as Rockefeller’s involvement in October Surprise (which was no surprise :) ).  Rockefeller’s bank (Chase Manhattan) wiped out Dennis’s manufacturer during his Seattle days, and Rockefeller’s calling Dennis at home just before the government wiped him out was just him getting more directly involved, still minding the store at age 93, instead of having his underlings doing it all.  When Mr. Big gets directly involved, there will be dire consequences.

While plenty of articles are stressing Rockefeller’s nefarious international activities, and even Global Controller-ish activities, I don’t see anybody writing about his domestic activities that helped prevent anything being used other than hydrocarbons, cars, etc.  He was all about business as usual for the oligarchy, both internationally and domestically, and technology suppression was one of his primary activities, which has been completely silent in the narratives that I have seen.  

The Dulles brothers were among David’s many assets, Nixon was also their creature, and the Rockefellers were almost certainly involved in the JFK hit.  If the real story of the Rockefeller dynasty was ever told, it would curl people’s hair.  Of course, the Clintons and Bushes are both gushing over Rockefeller right now, who was their master. Brian O’s buddy Jon Rappoport wrote a little ditty when Trump was elected, which was likely not far from the truth.  But again, Rockefeller was not at the top, and likely not even close to it.  Every American president since JFK was a puppet and knew it.  Rockefeller was one of the puppeteers, and may have been the primary one.    

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi:

I just finished an 80-hour week, and my death march is not over yet.  I’ll get a brief break, of maybe a day or two in the coming week, and then it is another march to mid-May.  I am getting too old for this.  :) Corporate America is a truly insane place to work, but this is the planet I came to live on, and that voice in my head led me into business.  It has some explaining to do. :)  

When the dust briefly settles, I will be back to posting, but also working on that essay update.  

Sears was legendary for stealing from inventors, and Detroit’s car companies are largely criminal enterprises, and seeing Sears go the way of the dinosaur, and watching Detroit crumble, is just karma, as far as I am concerned.  

High on my list of writing topics is wrapping up this iteration of the lessons learned series.  Between bouts of grinding away, such as commuting to and from home (been sleeping in my car, too, on the long ones, which has worked out, after a fashion, so I can get more work done), I think plenty on what my effort is all about.  It will come through very clearly as I wrap up that series of posts.  

Back to the salt mines.

Best,

Wade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

I have a few minutes this morning, and am thinking about that final post, or series of them, to wrap up my lessons learned thread for now.  If I had to put it in a nutshell, I might call it “developing an epochal perspective.”  That is really what I am trying to help my readers achieve.  Once they can do that, the path to FE can become pretty clear, and they won’t be distracted by the daily circus, by “solutions” proposed by people firmly stuck in their epoch, and so on.  They will keep their eyes on the goal, understand how our world really works, and rise above the egocentric levels of delusion that trap nearly everybody.  It took a lifetime to attain the perspective that I have today.  I would not wish my journey on anybody, and am trying to help people get there by easier paths.  If my path was the only way, almost nobody would “graduate” from the curriculum.  But I know that I still seek needles in haystacks, people with highly unusual qualities.  They are not extraordinary, but just rare.  Caring is really not hard to do, but almost nobody does it to any significant degree.  

Sociality is pre-sentient, and is worthless for this task.  Money is only accounting, retail politicians are merely puppets of the economics interests, all institutions are about survival above all else, and are all mired in scarcity.  For people mired in scarcity, the concept of abundance is literally beyond their imagining, and when they glimpse it, they react in fear, as all they can see is their world coming to an end.  Denial and fear are by far the most common reactions to the idea of free energy and abundance that I have witnessed.  We can only get there via love.  

Even when people glimpse a world of abundance and are not frightened by the prospect, extremely few of them can relinquish their scarcity-based baggage, and they almost invariably propose paths to free energy and abundance that have been miserable failures and are often suicidal.  When people truly achieve epochal perspectives, the reasons for failure, and the path to success that I propose, will become clear.  It might only help a little, but it might be the critical missing piece, and nobody is going to waste their time developing an epochal perspective.  Our awareness is all that we take with us when we go.  

Time for work.

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi:

I have a little writing time this week, and I’ll wrap up that lessons learned thread for now.  This will take more than one post.  I began my life as a precocious super boy, a bookworm from the time I could walk, and was groomed to be a scientist since I was knee-high.  That year of mystical, cultural, and energy awakening when I was 16 was critical, which set me on my adult path.  A few years later, that voice in my head first spoke to me, when asked for, which really began to set my life’s trajectory.  Eight disillusioning years later, I again asked for that voice, for the last time in my life so far.  That voice landed me in the middle of the greatest attempt ever made to bring alternative energy to the American marketplace, and before that year had ended, I was pursuing free energy.  I still look back at those events in awe, finding it hard to believe that they happened, and I lived them.  Consequently, I find it normal for my story to be met with skepticism.  But true skepticism is getting out of one’s armchair and finding out for one’s self, which none of my vociferous critics have ever done.  Some of my assailants were probably professionals, as Mr. Skeptic likely was.

The next three years after meeting Dennis were my radicalizing years.  When the dust settled, my life was shattered and I would never see the world the same way again, and I would likely have little worthwhile to say if not for those years.  In the nearly 30 years since then, my life was one of picking up the pieces, deep study, writing, getting back into the fray, pulling back and recovering, more study and writing, then going back at it again, more study, and so on, while juggling my life, digging out of financial abysses, outliving my allies, and getting older, and I turn 60 next year.  I am the last man standing from my close circle.  What a long, strange trip it has been.  I would not recommend my journey to anybody.  What a way to learn.

Little did I know it at the time, but I was developing a comprehensive perspective during my adventures and study, and the learning never ends.  It eventually became an epochal perspective.  I needed those activities to attain my perspective, for better or worse.  

What follows will be the fruit of my life’s journey so far.  I don’t know how many more years I have on this planet, but I plan to make them count.  

Best,

Wade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

I’ll start off these ending posts with my journey’s most important lesson, which I have seen so denied and misunderstood over the years: personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity.  It is just a fact, and no judgment is implied.  I resisted that lesson every step of the way, until I had it beaten into my head in no uncertain terms.  Of course, few people are willing to admit that fact, as it conflicts with humanity’s egocentric self-image.

I just looked at my list of failed approaches to free energy, and they all were about failures of integrity.  Some were blatant, others were subtle, some were on the side of the aspirants, others were on the side of the suppressors, but it always boiled down to a situation of insufficient integrity.  Not enough integrity on the side of the aspirants could overcome the complete lack of it on the side of the suppressors.  It is almost as simple as an equation, of whatever side has the most “oomph” will prevail.  The suppressors’ turf is the dark path, and no inherently selfish approach has a prayer, as the aspirants are then playing on the turf of the masters, and it is foolish and even suicidal to try to play that game.  It took me many years to articulate what I found unsettling about all mass movement approaches to alternative and free energy, and I was a spear carrier in five different efforts.  My sixth and final effort seeks to avoid the many pitfalls that I witnessed.  The integrity issue is merely the love issue.  Victims operate from fear, and creators operate from love.  It is really that simple.

It is normal to desire to be fairly compensated for one’s efforts, but there is nothing “normal” about manifesting the biggest event in the human journey.  With the several levels of organized suppression, inventors trying to patent their technologies, or go the proprietary technology route, are defeated before they begin.  And little did any of them know it before they began, but the biggest threats to their efforts were themselves and their allies, not the agents organized suppression.  I began learning that lesson when my boss helped engineer the theft of Dennis’s company in Seattle, and at the moment when it became clear that the theft was successful, all of those “loyal” employees cheered the theft, many of whom gave Dennis a standing ovation on the day I met him.  That was really the first awakening moment of my journey with Dennis.  

Over the next two months, the remaining “loyalists” all dropped out but me.  In the end, only two dropped out with honor, and several of them later tried to extort money from us.  Those were really only gentle previews of what our business associates were really all about, similar to how those attacks by a former girlfriend were only a gentle preview of the betrayals and attacks that would come from my friends and family, some of which have even continued to this day.  By the time it got to me that my own mother was campaigning against me, it did not even hurt anymore.  The thefts and attacks from the employees in Ventura made what happened in Seattle pale to insignificance, and Mr. Engineer’s and Mr. Researcher’s jumping into bed with Ken Hodgell and friends was only icing on the cake.  While Mr. Deputy’s evil performance in the courtroom was the turning point of my life, that pivotal moment was set up by the behaviors of our allies and my family and friends, not so much the agents of organized suppression.  Having my face rubbed in evil was educational, to put it mildly.  

When the dust finally settled in Ventura, human behavior could never surprise me again.  I had my real-world anthropology lesson long before I ever began to study scientific anthropology, which only reinforced what I learned the hard way.  For instance, the findings in Moral Origins only confirmed what I long knew: people can justify anything, with humanity’s “flexible conscience,” even eating their own children.  

When I saw Dennis in 2013, he said that of all the people who ever made it to his inner circle, only Mr. Professor (and his widow) and I walked away with our integrity intact.  Everybody else failed the integrity test, at one level or another.  I don’t know of anybody else on Earth like Dennis, and countless thousands of people came into his sphere during his journey.  Only two made it into the inner circle and left with their integrity intact.  I later found that it was a normal ratio.  It is just what it is, and it does no good to judge it.  This is who humanity is, but the fact is also that with each Epoch of the human journey, as the energy surplus steadily increased, human societies became more humane.

After the easy meat was rendered extinct and humans became fiercely territorial again, killing strange men on sight, and trying to slaughter one’s neighbors and steal their women, was standard behavior among Stone Age hunter gatherers, who lived in the most violent phase of the human journey.  With the Inuit, eating one’s children during hard winters was justified, and the elderly were left out in the elements to freeze to death, as feeding and caring for them was too expensive in that energy-scarce culture.  Among the African hunter-gatherers who never left their evolutionary homeland, if a woman gave birth to twins, she was allowed to decide which infant to murder, as she could not afford to carry and care for two infants.  The “retirement” plan of the Inuit, of leaving their elderly to the freezing elements for a painless death, would not work in Africa, as predators would not allow a peaceful slip into death, so the elderly in Africa were “retired” by sneaking up on them and bludgeoning them with a mighty blow to the backs of their heads.  A Fourth Epoch human can scarcely imagine such barbarities, but those were “normal” behaviors for people in the late Second Epoch.  We still have the same biological equipment as we did 200,000 years ago, and behavioral modernity is at least 70,000 years old, so humanity’s seemingly more “civilized” behaviors in subsequent Epochs has nothing to do with some spiritual or biological breakthrough, but the rising standards of living with the higher energy surpluses of each Epoch led to more humane behaviors, because people could afford to be.

The craziness that we see in the USA today (the aftermath of 9/11 was only a preview) is just what declining empires look like, with the USA’s middle class disintegrating, as the USA entered its energy decline nearly 50 years ago.  Today’s waxing and waning fracking boom is merely sucking the dregs of Earth’s hydrocarbon deposits.  The golden age of hydrocarbon economies is long gone.  

Similarly, I could chronicle the barbarities of the Third Epoch, with the rise of mass warfare, slavery, awesomely draconian laws, and women returning to their subjugated state, after a brief period of Neolithic bliss, and Fourth Epoch humans would once again regard the Third Epoch in awe, at how primitive such people were.  We can see it today, as standard agrarian economy practices still extant invoke revulsion in Fourth Epoch humans, such as stoning adulterous women, or “honor killings” of raped ones, which make the global news whenever they happen.

Virtually everything that has changed in human societies for the past 70,000 years has been from nurture, not nature, and energy surplus levels first and foremost.  Everything else is merely noise.  

Because selfishness is Godzilla’s turf, only a selfless path to free energy has a prayer, but I know that if I subjected everybody in the choir to the kinds of tests that Dennis survived, I would have a choir of one.  I am not asking for heroic levels of integrity, and those who have to go out and play the free energy hero, and storm the ramparts with their army, need to look elsewhere.  Been there, done that.  Those so-called armies have never had the proper motivation.  

In the end, humanity’s “flexible conscience,” and abysmal lack of integrity when the chips are down, are the just the facts of existence for our species.  Anybody who denies that reality as they sally forth is in for some very rude awakenings, if they survive the experiences.  It does no good to judge the terrain that has to be navigated.  It is just the reality of the world we live in.  

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

As a brief addendum to my previous post, I am going to wax a little mystically here.  Along with the personal integrity issue, or lack of it, almost nobody has ever escaped the conditioning of their Epoch or been able to even imagine what lied ahead.  What I am doing, envisioning aspects of the Fifth Epoch, which are easily predictable when thinking about the ramifications of free energy and related suppressed technologies, has never been attempted before, as a way to reach the next Epoch.  I am not the only visionary out there, for sure, but I am the only one that I know of who is trying this strategy, and the only who is an activist on the free energy front.  I don’t know if I will make a dent, but this beats watching TV or YouTube.  :)

Teleology is about putting a goal or purpose to things.  In evolutionary circles, teleology is generally considered a sin.  Evolution is blind, the universe is purposeless, and the like, which are tenets of the religion of our Epoch.  In that view, humans have no special purpose.  Humanity is just another animal, and appeared on the evolutionary scene by chance, and other than precipitating a mass extinction, humanity will go the way of all other species into extinction one day, and perhaps sooner than later, at the rate we are going.  In the scheme and scale of the cosmos, humanity is nothing more than an “interesting” trend in evolution, which may soon correct itself, as high “intelligence” with manipulative ability can be suicidal for a species.  

I have had far too many experiences that falsify the materialist models of consciousness that establishment science has erected.  In the pile of books next to my bed are Handbook to the Afterlife and Is There an Afterlife?, which clearly demonstrate that not all scientists are materialists, although even tame challenges from within the ranks can be treated quite harshly.  Brian died in exile, partly because he could no longer drink the materialist Kool-Aid.  

So, I do not buy the tenets of a random, purposeless universe, and the best scientists will say that while there may not be evidence of purpose, neither is there evidence of purposelessness; today’s science is simply unequipped to address the issue, and the greatest scientists usually had a perspective that could be called at least quasi-mystical.  

With that preamble, let me get a little teleological for a moment.  I believe that all of Creation has a purpose, and my understanding is that the purpose of physical reality is to express and evolve consciousness.  For humans, who are social animals, the most enlightened message yet received, and may ever be received, is that all of Creation is one.  Perhaps its pithiest packaging was Jesus’s “love the enemy,” which in scientific terms might be characterized as the idea that there is no out-group.  

I believe that we are here to learn the Creator’s lessons, and creators create with love.  That is the great lesson before all of us, and in a world of scarcity and fear, only masters such as Jesus hit the mark, while the rest of us miss it to varying degrees.  But in a world of abundance, in which fear is no longer the background hum of our existence (like it was for Frank  :) (he is in the “A Little Vision” vignette)), it is going to be far easier for the mass of humanity to get in touch with their hearts, and something that is exceedingly rare today will be normal in the Fifth Epoch.  I believe that humanity’s greatest aspiration is to manifest and ground love on this planet, in a way never done before.  It has not been an easy trick so far.  :) To me, that is humanity’s purpose, and if enough of us can muster the integrity (AKA love), then this world beckons.  My life may well be an audition to incarnate into that world the next time around.  I don’t know.  Nobody lets me in the on joke, but I know that this world becomes eminently feasible with the toys in Godzilla’s Golden Hoard, and not only is a loving approach the only worthy one for making the Fifth Epoch manifest, it may also be the only one that will work.  

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

The integrity issue trumps all.  It does not matter how intelligent or talented people are; if they don’t have integrity, the rest does not matter.  Some examples can be taken from science and history, such as how a brain-damaging industrial waste received a makeover from poison to compulsory medicine, and the situation lasts to this day.  Or how mass murdering thieves became national heroes, with their greatest achievements/crimes swept under the carpet by historians.  Brains and talent mean nothing, if the integrity is not there.  Some of the stupidest things I ever heard came from the mouths of some of the smartest people I knew, and when I thought about how they could do that, it always came down to the integrity issue.  People readily sell out their sentience for their self-interest.  What attracted me to Dennis and Brian was their integrity, not their fame, genius, or talent.

That lack of integrity manifests in obvious and subtle ways.  It can manifest in feigning interest in free energy, but rejecting very friendly invitations from world experts to find out more about the very situations that they write about, and then write “authoritatively” afterward as if they thoroughly investigated the issue and found the “claims” wanting, so that they can keep beating the drums of doom to their rapt audiences.

When physicists parrot “the laws of physics” as a way to dismiss even the idea of free energy, they betray their ignorance as well as a lack of integrity.  There are no “laws of physics,” only theories, and it is a quasi-religious conceit to call them “laws” at all.  The big breakthroughs in science and technology often came from the fringes of the “impossible,” such as powered flight, the lightbulb, “impossible” microscopes, “impossible” nuclear reactions, an “impossible” heat pump, and so on.  What my friend witnessed turns the physics textbooks into doorstops.

The circus on the fringes is also due to a lack of integrity.  There is a mountain of chaff for every kernel of wheat on the fringes, and plenty of charlatans play to their undiscerning audiences, as well as disinformation professionals who easily sucker the naïve and unwary.  I watched leading voices in the free energy field eagerly embrace the disinformation specialists while they turned around and attacked Dennis and Brian.  It was bizarre to witness at first, but I eventually realized that it was just another variation of this post’s theme.

This also touches on the issue of sentience.  The crazed reactions that Brian got in his ride as the Paul Revere of Free Energy, from leading authorities, was about brilliant people selling out their sentience for their self-interest, to the degree that Brian began openly wondering if humanity was a sentient species, and it is a fair question.  I call humanity a semi-sentient species; the potential is there, but is rarely achieved, and it always starts in the heart.  In-group allegiance, such as waving a flag, is something that monkeys can do.  Sociality is pre-sentient behavior.  

Those lessons only became clear after many years.  I got over the “hump” of barriers to comprehension during my radicalizing days with Dennis, so even while I was open to the lessons ahead (and my greatest one was learned by the end 1988), it still took many years to learn them, and I am still learning.  The learning never ends.  

What I found was most important was wanting to learn.  Just like Heinberg’s feigned interest, I came into contact with many intellectuals, some of whom were far smarter than me.  They really were not interested in learning, but defending their self-serving delusions.  After many such encounters, I realized that wanting to learn trumped “intelligence” by a long ways.  My big essay, for instance, is not really all that challenging, from an intellectual perspective.  What is challenging about my work is how people have to relinquish their self-serving in-group delusions before they can begin to understand.  That is the hard part, and it hinges directly on the integrity issue.  Much of my work is about unlearning what we think we know.  When people attack me for challenging their cherished notions, without exception, their notions were based on blind belief, not a careful consideration of the evidence.  They “knew” such things not through experience, but because they were taught them while young (while they discarded the truly important lessons taught while young), they never examined those beliefs again, and would defend them to the death.  Death threats have been issued over my work.  

Those were some of the most important lessons of my journey, and have a great deal to do with my current approach.  

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi:

This will be a current events post, as the USA once again risks igniting a nuclear war.  I have been publicly writing about the USA’s imperial behavior in the Middle East since 1991, and my published letter before the USA invaded Iraq predicted the events fairly well.  I lost friendships over that letter, as Americans eagerly swallowed the lies, and voices like mine were unwelcome.  In that letter, I wrote about the early days of the USA’s cowardly drone warfare, and today, Apple censors drone strike news, like good imperial tools.

Those so-called White Helmets in Syria are a public relations outfit for the USA, not some selfless humanitarians, so their being first-responders for the “chemical attack” is suspicious, as usual.  There are credible suspicions that the entire event was a false flag event, although the evidence today suggests that a Syrian bombing raid hit a chemical weapons depot maintained by the USA’s assets in Syria.

Assad would have to be completely insane to launch a chemical attack the week after the USA stated that regime change in Syria was off the table.  Trump is not the sharpest tool in the shed, and it looks like he has been coopted by the neocons.  His foreign policy is fast becoming indistinguishable from Hillary’s.  As I have stated plenty, it really does not matter much who the sitting president is, as the imperial juggernaut steamrolls onward, although the empire is in terminal decline, which I have also been writing about for a long time.

On a lighter note, I sent Uncle Ed my annual birthday email.  He is 92 now.  Ed replied with a wry observation about the “choice” that Americans had for president last year.  Ed was part of the Nader effort back in 2000 (as was I, and that was the last time that I voted for president) and learned his lesson regarding American electoral politics.  Soon before he died, Brian O told me that American electoral politics was a dead-end, and he would have known.  In the latest Z Magazine, Ed’s article was on the new anti-Russian hysteria in the USA (that link will work in a couple of months), as the USA has been raising Joe McCarthy from the grave.  Uncle Noam recently talked about what a “joke” the anti-Russian rhetoric is.  It beggars the imagination that Brian Williams, a legend in his own mind, is on TV at all these days, but there he was, gushing about the USA’s bombing of Syria, with its “beautiful” missiles.  Ed wrote about the “Cruise Missile Left” before we invaded Iraq, and cruise missile lovers are alive and well today.

Ed has been deconstructing the USA’s imperial ideology since the 1970s, and he has particularly exposed the ludicrous conceit of the USA’s “humanitarian” interventions.  Ed does so to this day.  Imperialists don’t like having their lies exposed, so the Wikipedia article on him is a hack piece.  My pal Ralph McGehee, on the other hand, has a nice bio at Wikipedia (somebody did a great job on it recently), probably because Ralph was silenced by the CIA and friends.  Similarly, I can live with Brian O’s Wikipedia biography as it stands today, and the “editors” finally went away, who kept trying to make the Moon landings issue prominent.  If the “rebels” are dead or silenced, then their treatment at Wikipedia can be almost fair, but if they are still active, even at 92 years old, the hacks can have a heyday.  

This subject matter is very appropriate for my lessons learned thread.  With a comprehensive perspective and a devotion to discovering the truth, it is not that hard to escape today’s propaganda barrage, which makes Orwell’s vision look like amateurs doing it.  

Best,

Wade

Edited by Wade Frazier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×