Michael Clark Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 (edited) https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10096-10131.pdf A bunch of Index cards with interesting names, circa 1972-3, incuding William F Buckley p.1 Michael (Doulas) Cady. P.9 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10095-10314.pdf More of same, of earlier interest. Edited July 25, 2018 by Michael Clark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 26, 2018 Share Posted July 26, 2018 https://whowhatwhy.org/2018/07/26/analyzing-the-new-jfk-revelations/ ANALYZING THE NEW JFK REVELATIONS Review of New CIA and FBI Documents That Change Cold War History Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted July 27, 2018 Share Posted July 27, 2018 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10246.pdf october 8, 1963 description of LHO in Mexico City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted July 27, 2018 Share Posted July 27, 2018 (edited) On 7/26/2018 at 5:15 PM, Michael Clark said: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10246.pdf october 8, 1963 description of LHO in Mexico City. A bit more info on that document... This is the one that Anne Goodpasture and Barbara Mandel send to CIA HQ ... from Ch 6 on Mexico: https://statick2k-5f2f.kxcdn.com/images/pdf/chapter6_3c.pdf "Bill Simpich provided me with the documentation links showing that Goodpasture, working with LADILLINGER (Soviet Desk officer Barbara Murphy Manell), took what was obviously a photo from 12:22 on Oct 2nd and represented it as Oct 1 to match the call transcript." There is literally nothing factual in that memo... and Ms. Goodpasture did not make mistakes over simple dates... ===================================== Why it fits so well that DAP masterminded the CI operation of OSWALD IN MEXICO.... David Atlee Phillips receives a package as MICHAEL CHOADEN sent from MX to HQ on OCT 1 On OCT 2 a memo is sent from MX to HQ stating that the "AMMO REQUESTED STILL NOT REC'D".... SUGGEST CHOADEN BRINGS AMMO ON NRETURN MEXI" Wasn't TIPPIT killed with .38 Special Ammo? An OCT 4 memo goes from HQ to MX informing them of DAP's position and his arrival OCT 7 The Memo you posted is from OCT 8, 1 day after Phillips arrives as CUBAN DESK CHIEF... the problem which arises is that the contemporaneous SUMMARY REPORTS for LIENVOY activity for the month of SEPT 1963 does not mention any of the calls from SEPT to the RUSSIAN numbers... This report is also dated OCT 8 It has always been my theory that any "evidence" created after the fact would have to conflict with any contemporaneous reports filed o was the FBI/CIA watched Oswald... If this man actually called these locations on the 27th and 28th it would have been mentioned in these reports... Only when we get to OCT do we see mention of the English speaking man... From the OCT 8 report https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10413-10268.pdf we are told of only 2 leads of operational interest in SEPT 1963... neither one is OSWALD... How can there be transcripts of LEE OSWALD calls from SEPT 27/28 yet them not mentioned until the NOV report on OCT activity, and only a single line in passing... by the NOV SUMMARY REPORT - shouldn't we be seeing the name OSWALD We must also remember that the Cuban Embassy closed at 2pm, and was closed on weekends... yet Oswald. "notwithstanding" was able to proceed with his discussions and meetings. Edited September 24, 2019 by David Josephs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10112-10028.pdf re: Lucien Conein In response to request, reply is made that because of past experiences with Lucien Conein, contact with on use of him is to be avoided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10256-10020.pdf Mitch Werbell, unscrupulous wheeler dealer, selling arms to Thais, Cambodians and Vietnamese Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 As I said, David is doing stellar work on Mexico City. IMO, he is resetting the paradigm. My God David, what on earth do you think that request to Choaden for .38 ammo means? Did Phillips need it for a CIA operation down there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michaleen Kilroy Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 On 7/27/2018 at 8:46 AM, David Josephs said: A bit more info on that document... This is the one that Anne Goodpasture and Barbara Mandel send to CIA HQ ... from Ch 6 on Mexico: https://statick2k-5f2f.kxcdn.com/images/pdf/chapter6_3c.pdf "Bill Simpich provided me with the documentation links showing that Goodpasture, working with LADILLINGER (Soviet Desk officer Barbara Murphy Manell), took what was obviously a photo from 12:22 on Oct 2nd and represented it as Oct 1 to match the call transcript." There is literally nothing factual in that memo... and Ms. Goodpasture did not make mistakes over simple dates... ===================================== Why it fits so well that DAP masterminded the CI operation of OSWALD IN MEXICO.... David Atlee Phillips receives a package as MICHAEL CHOADEN sent from MX to HQ on OCT 1 On OCT 2 a memo is sent from MX to HQ stating that the "AMMO REQUESTED STILL NOT REC'D".... SUGGEST CHOADEN BRINGS AMMO ON NRETURN MEXI" Wasn't TIPPIT killed with .38 Special Ammo? An OCT 4 memo goes from HQ to MX informing them of DAP's position and his arrival OCT 7 The Memo you posted is from OCT 8, 1 day after Phillips arrives as CUBAN DESK CHIEF... the problem which arises is that the contemporaneous SUMMARY REPORTS for LIENVOY activity for the month of SEPT 1963 does not mention any of the calls from SEPT to the RUSSIAN numbers... This report is also dated OCT 8 It has always been my theory that any "evidence" created after the fact would have to conflict with any contemporaneous reports filed o was the FBI/CIA watched Oswald... If this man actually called these locations on the 27th and 28th it would have been mentioned in these reports... Only when we get to OCT do we see mention of the English speaking man... From the OCT 8 report https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10413-10268.pdf we are told of only 2 leads of operational interest in SEPT 1963... neither one is OSWALD... How can there be transcripts of LEE OSWALD calls from SEPT 27/28 yet them not mentioned until the NOV report on OCT activity, and only a single line in passing... by the NOV SUMMARY REPORT - shouldn't we be seeing the name OSWALD We must also remember that the Cuban Embassy closed at 2pm, and was closed on weekends... yet Oswald. "notwithstanding" was able to proceed with his discussions and meetings. I’m curious who the “highly productive agent” is that accepts no salary that they’re trying to do a favor for... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 Harry Dean Doc. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/157-10008-10130.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 Deposition of Marine Navigator who flew Investigative team to and from Atsugi in Dec, 1963. He read the report which determined that LHO could not have acted as determined by the WC. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32260435.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paz Marverde Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Thomas Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 On 7/29/2018 at 2:03 AM, Mike Kilroy said: I’m curious who the “highly productive agent” is that accepts no salary that they’re trying to do a favor for... Mike, And who would have a .38 special that he couldn't get ammo for down in Mexico? It implies that he is not a local. Steve Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted August 24, 2018 Share Posted August 24, 2018 FBI monitoring LHO in NOLA https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32261286.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted August 26, 2018 Share Posted August 26, 2018 Some CIA documents regarding Garrison investigation ----------------------- Hugh Aynesworth informs Brown (& Root) of implications https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10104-10372.pdf Similar https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10104-10373.pdf ---------------------- https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10104-10311.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted August 26, 2018 Share Posted August 26, 2018 An interesting one regarding Clay Shaw https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10106-10768.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now