Widow of Officer Tippit shares letter from Jackie

[Douglas Caddy]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2510589/Widow-Dallas-cop-gunned-JFK-killer-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-shares-letter-Jackie-wrote-her.html

[Joe Bauer]

Once again for the 50,000th time we have a writer insert into their JFK related article a suggestive statement of fact that has never been proven.

That of describing Lee Harvey Oswald as the killer of JFK versus Oswald being the "alleged" killer of JFK.

Not one person in Dealey Plaza or the Texas Schoolbook Depository building on 11,22,1963 ever testified under oath or otherwise claimed they personally witnessed Oswald as the shooter from the TXSBD that day. Forensic evidence couldn't prove Oswald was the shooter and Oswald himself stated until his dying breath that he didn't shoot John F. Kennedy.

Oswald was never allowed a trial and so, he was never legally found to be guilty of the murder of JFK.

These facts are historical reality.  

Stating Lee Harvey Oswald as the killer of JFK is factually incorrect. 

The factual truth is he was, is and always will be the "alleged" killer of JFK. 

The difference between the two depictions is hugely important in the effect they have on our collective perception and understanding of the true historical reality of not just the JFK assassination but most everything since that has effected us as a society.

Yet for over 5 decades in thousands of nationally published articles, reports, stories and commentaries regards the JFK event, this historical falsehood regards Oswald as unequivocally JFK's killer is obsessively perpetuated. Just adding to the damage JFK's assassination brought about.

Sorry for the side trek from the Tippit widow / Jackie Kennedy sympathy letter story, but I was more effected by the author's factually false Oswald guilt statement injected into it.

The $680,000 Mrs. Tippit received from the public ( 4.2 million in today's dollars ) is seriously mind boggling. Much sympathy to Tippit's children, especially his eldest son.

 

 

Edited November 30, 2017 by Joe Bauer

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

On 11/26/2017 at 9:06 AM, Joe Bauer said:

Once again for the 50,000th time we have a writer insert into their JFK related article a suggestive statement of fact that has never been proven.

 

FYI - This is the dillard image, you have to admit that the person inside the yellow circle does resemble Oswald.

 

 

2

 

[Paul Brancato]

Oh come on. Resembles anyone

 

[Joe Bauer]

Agree, the circled image is extremely vague and interpretable.

Reminds me of so many "ghosts in windows" images posted on paranormal websites.

And some of those photos have clearer and better defined figures than the Dillard one.

That Dillard photo would be ripped apart in a court of law proceeding as depicting Oswald definitively.

Even young, sharp eyed Dealey Plaza eye witness Arnold Rowland ( better than 20/20 vision) and who had the clearest 15 to 20 second view of a man with a rifle in one of the sixth floor windows 15 minutes before the motorcade arrived and just 50 to 60 yards away, repeated through 7 FBI interviews that he could not identify this rifle holding man as Oswald.

Anyone stating and writing that Oswald was absolutely the shooter of JFK on 11,22,1963 from the Texas Schoolbook Depository building as fact is doing so on disputable forensic evidence and absolutely no eye witness testimony.

Arnold Rowland's Warren Commission testimony is extremely intriguing,interesting and thought provoking. I want to post about it soon for discussion and debate. I wonder if he is still alive?