Jump to content
The Education Forum
Jim Hargrove

New Article by John Armstrong

Recommended Posts

Clearly McBride originally thought that Oswald was with him in '57. And clearly when Lifton showed McBride proof -- a Marines document -- that Oswald couldn't have been with him, McBride had no choice than to change his recollection.

The same thing happened with some of the Parkland doctors who said the gaping wound was on the back of JFK's head. When shown proof --the BOH photo -- that they must be wrong, they had no choice than change their recollection.

But not all the Parkland doctors bought what they saw in the photo. They realized there was a third possibility... that the photo had been faked.

Same thing with McBride. After Lifton's brow-beating, McBride put more thought into the timing and realized he had been right from the beginning. He realized that there was a third possibility... that there were two Oswalds. One with him in '57 and the other in the Marines in '57.

Kudos to the principled Parkland doctors and McBride for sticking to their guns.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. Parnell, as usual, wants to claim the H&L evidence is debunked elsewhere and does not want to discuss it here, on the JFK Assassination Debate forum, because he knows how lame the arguments against it are.

For example, one of the people confirming Palmer McBride's recollection that "Lee Harvey Oswald" worked for Pfisterer Dental Lab after Sputnik 1 was launched by the Soviets (in October 1957) was Linda Faircloth, the general manager and president of Pfisterer, who was interviewed by John Armstrong in 1995.  Here is her interview:

 


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ms. Faircloth's recollection of how the FBI descended on Pfisterer's the first day after the assassination and confiscated all the employment records of "Lee Harvey Oswald" is a familiar one in this sordid affair.  From Harvey and Lee:

The day after the assassination (Saturday morning) the FBI visited the Pfisterer
Dental Lab and interviewed the four partners who owned the company. Each of the
partners was taken to a different area and questioned individually. Each of the owners
were warned not to discuss the case with anyone or among themselves. All payroll and
other records pertaining to Oswald were taken by the FBI agents and never returned
(there were no Pfisterer records published in the Warren Volumes, none in the National
Archives, and the FBI claims to have no Pfisterer records in their files). After the origi­-
nal payroll records disappeared it was impossible for anyone to accurately determine the
dates of "Lee Harvey Oswald's" employment at Pfisterer's. If Oswald did work at
Pfisterer's in 1955, he could have worked there prior to his employment at Dolly Shoe
(March 12, 1955), or anytime after he was fired from Dolly Shoe (April 12, 1955). [H&L p. 117]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for presenting actual evidence, Jim, as opposed to the opinions and polls we see from the other side.

 

Edited by Sandy Larsen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/5/2017 at 5:53 PM, Michael Clark said:

There is another link [to a PDF version of the John Armstrong "Harvey and Lee" book] that requires no key for the download. I'll post it here when I find it. 

Michael, did you ever post the above-referenced file link?  If so, would you mind repeating it, please?  Thanks! ML

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Mark Lawson said:

Michael, did you ever post the above-referenced file link?  If so, would you mind repeating it, please?  Thanks! ML

Hi Mark, I don’t know that I have that link. I will look. In the meantime let’s ask Jim.

On 12/23/2017 at 7:40 AM, Jim Hargrove said:

....::..
 

Hi Jim, do you know where Mark can download H&L?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Michael Clark said:

This link will work for you, I think.

https://www.krusch.com/books/kennedy/Harvey_And_Lee.pdf

Yes it did - and I thank you very much.  I have read the entire contents of the http://harveyandlee.net/ Web site, but having this same (or more) information searchable within one PDF file will be most useful.

In the meantime, since I came to this late-2017 message thread in search of specific John Armstrong-related information, might this be as good a place as any to continue discussion of his (and others') "two Oswalds"  theory?  I am obviously new to the forum, and will post biographical information soon, but for now would appreciate receiving any pointers that forum members would be willing to offer.  Best, ML

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mark Lawson said:

Yes it did - and I thank you very much.  I have read the entire contents of the http://harveyandlee.net/ Web site, but having this same (or more) information searchable within one PDF file will be most useful.

In the meantime, since I came to this late-2017 message thread in search of specific John Armstrong-related information, might this be as good a place as any to continue discussion of his (and others') "two Oswalds"  theory?  I am obviously new to the forum, and will post biographical information soon, but for now would appreciate receiving any pointers that forum members would be willing to offer.  Best, ML

I would normally, with regard to most topics, say yes, this is as good as any.

Yet, with H&L there are groups of adherents and those who are vociferously opposed. 

I would go ahead and start a new thread. Perhaps there will be some measure of restraint for the questions from a new member. Also, it will not be as easy to divert away from your fresh inquiry by digging into the the older posts on this thread.

Start a new thread, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Michael Clark said:

... with H&L there are groups of adherents and those who are vociferously opposed....

Ah yes!  Having read read all 19 pages of this thread, I understand precisely.  Stay tuned....  ML

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Mark Lawson said:

I am obviously new to the forum, and will post biographical information soon, but for now would appreciate receiving any pointers that forum members would be willing to offer.

You are obviously receptive to the Armstrong information. My advice would be to look at the other side of things while you are studying the Armstrong theory. There are several extensive threads right here at EF if you do a search. I would also recommend my own site (click on sitemap) as well as Greg Parker's and Jeremy Bojczuk's:

http://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×