David Josephs Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 (edited) On 12/7/2017 at 10:57 AM, John Kowalski said: David; The notes also reference the recruitment of people involved in narcotics. Any guesses as to what was recruited? "what" was recruited or who? I assume you're asking about the drug pipeline... This is Peter Dale Scott territory... ===== The only references to NARCOTICS I found is to the Bureau contacting him ... this top highlight offers the characteristic of the personnel desired... Regardless... those in the Narcotics trade do indeed meet the criteria: professional, proven operationally, competent, ruthless, stable, CE-experienced (what is that?), able to conduct patient(?) search, w/guts..... Edited June 18, 2018 by David Josephs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 On 12/7/2017 at 11:53 AM, David Josephs said: "what" was recruited or who? I assume you're asking about the drug pipeline... This is Peter Dale Scott territory... ===== The only references to NARCOTICS I found is to the Bureau contacting him ... this top highlight offers the characteristic of the personnel desired... Regardless... those in the Narcotics trade do indeed meet the criteria: professional, proven operationally, competent, ruthless, stable, CE-experienced (what is that?), able to conduct patient(?) search, w/guts..... I think I read somewhere that this funding was renewed for 1963. The narcotics world is where assassins are hired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Kowalski Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 David, Paul: The drug network would be a good place to look for assassins because this business is controlled by people who have no qualms about eliminating their rivals. Money laundering also is a necessity for drug dealers who need to clean their money using corrupt banks and front companies, and who else uses these methods, the CIA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 CE = counter-espionage? Why be prejudiced against CIA? There's enough mayhem to spread around the intel community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Bulman Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 (edited) On 12/8/2017 at 4:37 PM, David Andrews said: CE = counter-espionage? Why be prejudiced against CIA? There's enough mayhem to spread around the intel community. Is not Counter Espionage the action aspect of Counter Intelligence? Thus encompassing Angleton? I think he knew all about the French Connection, though nobody completely controlled it more than one used it. Edited December 10, 2017 by Ron Bulman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now