Jump to content
The Education Forum
Cory Santos

Angleton and Mark Lane experts, your thoughts?

Recommended Posts

I think Glenn might be referring to my inadequacies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/17/2018 at 10:25 PM, James DiEugenio said:

That is correct Pamela and he also could not get his book published in America because of the FBI.

That is why he had to go to England.

So wrong of them, but not surprising.  To me, clear evidence of their complicity, at least in the cover up.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/18/2018 at 2:01 PM, Thomas Graves said:

James,

So if "The Sword and the Shield" is chock-a-block full of disinformation, it's fair to assume that it's another example of Russian active measures / strategic deception against us and our allies, yes?

--  Tommy  :sun

The Soviet involvement in disinformation about the assassination -- before and after -- deserves a thread of its own.  They are far more subtle than Americans, and have complicated things more that we can imagine, imo...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 1/18/2018 at 12:45 PM, Thomas Graves said:

 

EDIT ALERT: REMOVAL OF TWO HIGHLY SARCASTIC PHRASES

 

Paul,

 

Xxxx xxx xxx xxxxxxx, did it cause you a severe case of xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx?

 

How many pages did you read, anyway?

Did you read Bagley's explanation of how CIA went about "deciding otherwise" on Nosenko? 

(It's near the beginning of his 2015 PDF "Ghosts of the Spy Wars.")

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2014.962362

 

--  Tommy  :sun

 

 

Edited, kinda, and ... gasp ... bumped.

Edited by Thomas Graves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 1/18/2018 at 5:25 AM, James DiEugenio said:

Well Tommy anyone who would take Mitrokhin and his book seriously has reason to be confused.

And I wouldn't laugh at it.

 

 

James,

 

Sorry, but you wouldn't laugh at what?

 

Have you ever read Tennent H. Bagley's 2007 book "Spy Wars," or his 2014 follow-up PDF, "Ghosts of the Spy Wars"?

If you were to read those two works by Bagley, you'd come to realize how fooled by Ruskie active measures/strategic deception "official MI5 historian" Christopher Andrew is in "The Sword and the Shield."

For example, his pronouncement that Cherepanov and Nosenko were both true defectors! 

(Despite what Morley and Simpich say, Bagley wasn't "Angleton's guy," you know. Bagley's Soviet Russia Division (later called Soviet Block Division) was completely independent from Angleton's Counterintelligence Staff)

 

--  TG

 

Edited by Thomas Graves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×