Lee Bowers Accident

[Ron Bulman]

I realize the death of Lee Bowers is only one of many witnesses who died under questionable circumstances documented by Jim Marrs in Crossfire and others, to Hit List by Belzer & Wayne.  The probabilities of the number of them have been well analyzed, e.g. Richard Charnin in Reclaiming Science.  For several years I've thought Bowers was near the top of the list of importance of them.

That admission by his widow to Penn Jones, "they told him not to talk" makes me wonder.  When was he first told not to talk?  By who?  On 11/22/63?  For reasons of National Security?  Before his Warren Omission testimony?  He seems obviously stymied in it.  Two years later he spoke to Mark lane on camera.  

Four months later he veered or was ran off the road into a bridge embankment.  His brother attributed it to allergies trying to get the insurance company to pay on the Life Insurance policy Lee had taken out a year or so before.  They both had allergies he said.  Maybe he passed out from antihistamine's was proffered. Mabye he had a sneezing fit was also.  The insurance company didn't want to pay because they thought he might have committed suicide. Okay.

No investigation other than "unofficial' by his friend Texas Department of Public Safety officer Good.  Why?  LBJ was still president then, Connally was still Governor, ? 

Is there a more important eyewitness?

Edited April 6, 2018 by Ron Bulman

[Michael Clark]

A document regarding researchers an Witnesses, including Mark Lane, Jean Hill, Lee Bowers and Warren Reynolds.

"On March 28, 1966, Lee E. Bowers, Jr., 1923 view crest, Dallas, Texas, telephone DA-7-2528, telephonically advised the Dallas office of the FBI that one Robert Blake had approached him on March 26, 1966, concerning the making of a film on the assassination of President Kennedy. Powers advised that he did not have time to talk to Blake at the time of the approach and that Blake was supposed to reconnect him later."

Bowers died on August 9. 4 months later.

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32207231.pdf

 

 

 

 

[Ron Bulman]

I wonder if Blake might not have been an advance man for Lane?  I know Lanes interview of Bowers was in 66. I thought about 4 months before his "accident".  I can't believe I started a thread on Lee Bowers and never linked Mark Lane's interview of him.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=lee+bowers+mark+lane+interview&view=detail&mid=DEAC114C8362ECDAC951DEAC114C8362ECDAC951&FORM=VIRE

[Ron Bulman]

On 3/28/2018 at 11:05 AM, Larry Hancock said:

I can add the anecdotal point that very reliable individuals interviewed his brother who stated that Bowers had been threatened and in the months following became extremely worried about some action against him for details he had observed but not officially elaborated on...

bump

[Micah Mileto]

Somebody needs to scan Beyond the Fence Line and upload it for free. In general, JFK Lancer really does ask a chunky price for all of their digital goods. $100 per conference! That's like $3000 for the CD-roms of every conference they've done! By now all of the information should be out in the open. They're committing the same crime they accuse the government of doing by not releasing all of their information!

Edited July 28, 2020 by Micah Mileto

[Ron Bulman]

On 3/27/2018 at 10:16 PM, Larry Hancock said:

I'd go with Gary Shaw's insights on this one.  Bowers was one of a handful who tried to get official's interested in certain anomalies he thought were suspicious but quickly realized they really didn't want to hear it.  He said just enough to make it clear that he had suspicions, a dangerous thing to do in the event that for some reason a real investigation were to occur later.

I'll go with the Guru's here.