Jump to content
The Education Forum
Sign in to follow this  
James DiEugenio

Pierre Finck Learned his Lesson

Recommended Posts

As everyone understands who reads my book, the second edition of Destiny Betrayed, Pierre Finck did much to blow open the JFK case at the trial of Clay Shaw in 1969 in New Orleans. (pp. 300-303)

Under some adroit questioning by Al Oser, he admitted things that the American public was never supposed to know.  For instance, that there were dozens of military higher ups in the room, Admirals and Generals, (one of them turned out to be LeMay.)  He also said that Humes shouted out, "Who is in charge here?" And a general replied, "I am".  When asked why the back wound was not dissected, after eight different restatements of the question, FInck finally said, because Humes was ordered not to. This should have been front page news but we know how the MSM operates on the JFK case.

Well, at Paul Seaton's site he extracts some of Finck's last testimony on the subject. (Piere passed on, I think last year.)  This was before the ARRB and Jeremy Gunn.  Man did Pierre learn his lesson.  He just lied his head off this time around.  He learned that in the JFK case, you don't tell the truth.  It gets you in trouble.  Read it and weep.

 

http://www.paulseaton.com/jfk/humes-notes/finck-notes.htm

Edited by James DiEugenio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Finck, the only Forensic pathologist among he, Hume's and Boswell, called in at the last minute, arriving after the autopsy had started, had his notes stolen in the morgue after it was over while he was washing up?  And he managed to forget this until he was grilled about it by the ARRB in the 90's.  Though others there helped him look for them, and, he did in fact admit actually taking notes.

This say's a lot about control over the morgue that night and the people in it for years afterward.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does Ron.  It was a vacuum operation.

FInck did not admit that anywhere that I know of, not even on the stand at the Shaw trial.

And he would not have admitted it here except that Gunn had him cornered.

These guys did not want to testify at all before the ARRB.  They all had to be subpoenaed. 

Note how non committal he is in all of his replies.  In a real murder inquiry, he should have been indicted for perjury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note this exchange:

 

Q: Let me quote from two paragraphs of the affidavit and then I will ask you if that helps refresh your recollection to any events.
Paragraph X states:
"I clearly heard Dr. Finck, who was speaking sufficiently loudly for his words easily to be overheard, complain that he had been unable to locate the handwritten notes that he had taken during the autopsy on President Kennedy. Dr.Finck elaborated to his companions with considerable irritation that immediately after washing up following the autopsy, he looked for his notes and could not find them anywhere. He further recounted that others who were present at the autopsy also had helped him search for his notes to no avail.............Dr. Finck concluded his story by angrily stating that he had to reconstruct his notes from memory shortly after the autopsy."
The question, Dr. Finck, is do these two paragraphs help refresh your recollection first on the question of whether you took notes during the autopsy?
A: I don't know."

 


"Q: Dr. Finck, would it have been your regular practice during the course of an autopsy in which you participated to take notes and measurements?
A: Yes.
Q: Would that be a standard practice and procedure that most prosectors would engage in during the course of an autopsy?
A: Yes.
Q: Dr. Finck, did you keep any kind of diary or written record of events that you were involved in?
A: I don't know.
Q: Dr. Finck, you have no idea at all whether you kept something like a diary in ?
A: I don't remember.

 

He does not remember if he kept a diary?  :stupid

Edited by James DiEugenio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This touches on an aspect of the autopsy that has reeked the most to me for years.  The selection of the autopsy Doctors.  None of them were current practicing Forensic Pathologists.  As I understand it, if I remember right, Finck was a Forensic Pathologist but he had not practiced in quite some time.  He reviewed the paperwork of others.  Humes and Boswell were general Pathologists.  Granted, they were all experienced and familiar with anatomy given the training required in their fields.  But, if your setting up the autopsy of the recently murdered President of the United States wouldn't you want the best available Forensic Pathologists?

I don't think Humes thought or said, I'm the head of this medical school, I'll take this one myself and selected Boswell to join him.  He was ordered  to do this.  Adding Army Doctor Finck was an afterthought to supposedly bring legitimacy to the proceedings given his official title. 

I forget which author in which book I read years ago pointed out that at least a couple of the leading, most respected, experienced Forensic Pathologists in the country were within about an hour of Bethesda by car or helicopter.  New York City comes to mind.

I realize the powers that be did not want the best available public or military.  They wanted someone who would suffice medically that would take orders unquestionably.  Per the AF1 transcripts they planned to take him to Walter Reed Army hospital, about a mile from Bethesda.  I imagine they had a pre approved team ready and waiting there.  But I've read somewhere back there that Jackie was insistent that if an autopsy had to be done at a military facility it should be Bethesda since JFK had been in the Navy.

So JFK's personal physician, Admiral Burkley directed the autopsy from the gallery.

Sorry Jim, wasn't trying to hijack you thread topic, I thought this kind of relates to the bigger picture regarding Finck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a mystery that has never been solved.

Why was not someone like Helpern brought in to do the autopsy?

In all the reading I have done on this subject I do not think I have ever see this problem addressed.  I mean no one, like Galloway, at Bethesda realized this was a problem?

Helpern sure did.  He compared sending Humes to do JFK's autopsy to a 12 year old doing a Chopin violin concerto at Carnegie Hall.

Edited by James DiEugenio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting reference to Lemay.  I think he knew what the SBT was and how the autopsy should read based on the SBT. He might have been in communication with Air Force One (from Dallas to Washington DC).  Here is a relevant article from Bill Kelly's blog (JFKCountercoup)..

Author:

Larry Haapanen holds a Ph.D from Washington State University, is an ex-Air Force Captain and retired college professor.




SOMEWHERE IN GOVERNMENT FILES 
 
Somewhere in government files is a tape recording of much greater historical importance than any of the so-called “Watergate tapes” that helped force the resignation of President Nixon.

 
Instead of centering around a bungled burglary, these tapes contain conversations between high government officials immediately after the assassination of President Kennedy, as his successor, Lyndon Johnson, assumed the responsibility and authority of the Presidency.

 
The existence of the “LBJ tapes” remained a closely held secret until April 21, 1964, when author William Manchester learned of them while conducting interviews for his book, Death of a President.

 
Manchester found that President Kennedy had ordered the Signal Corps to record all communications to and from Air Force One whenever the presidential party was aboard, and that then-Vice President Johnson had been unaware of the order. Manchester then requested White House permission to obtain a complete transcript, which he wished to include as an appendix to his book.

 
President Johnson initially refused his request, but eventually, perhaps because the book had the backing of the Kennedy family, Manchester was allowed to read an edited transcript at the White House on May 5, 1965. “Doubtless,” Manchester wrote in his book, “the tapes will be available to future historians.”

 
But since security was not an issue, why was it necessary to edit the transcript before it was shown to Manchester? Perhaps because the principals didn’t know they were being recorded on orders of a man who by then lay in a casket in the back of Air Force One.

 
As the tape reels turned on November 22, 1963, they captured radio traffic between Air Force One (flying from Dallas to Andrews Air Force Base in Washington), the cabinet plane (over the mid-Pacific carrying half the Kennedy cabinet toward a conference in Tokyo) and the White House Situation Room.


 
As fearful and distraught men sought to keep themselves and the republic together at a most delicate moment in history, they spoke without knowing their conversations were being recorded for posterity.

 
Another (or possibly the same) transcript was made available to Pierre Salinger, JFK’s former press secretary, to assist him in writing With Kennedy. In 1967, Philadelphia attorney Vincent Salandria learned from Salinger that his copy, originally provided by the White House Communications Agency, had been sent among some personal papers to the National Archives. 2.

 
When the National Archives could locate neither the tape nor the transcript, Salandria appealed directly to the White House Communications Agency. Colonel James U. Cross, military aide to President Johnson and former Air Force One pilot (and later executive director [of)]the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department) replied for the agency:

“Logs and tapes of radio transmissions of military aircraft, including those of Air Force One, are kept for official us only. These tapes are not releasable, nor are they obtainable from commercial sources.” 3

 
In 1974, Fred Newcomb took up Salandria’s cause. If Manchester and Salinger could gain access to the elusive transcript, he reasoned, how could the government turn down another private citizen? Repeated inquiries of the National Archives and the presidential libraries (and finally, legal threats) produced and edited copy of the transcript from the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library in Austin, Texas. According to library director Harry J. Middleton, “This Xerox copy came to us from the White House in a group of miscellaneous papers.” 4

 
There was nothing to indicate when it was prepared, by whom, or for what reason, and nothing to identify it as the transcript used by Manchester or Salinger.

 
There are a number of historical questions the original tapes or a complete transcript might clarify. This edited transcript, however, raises more questions than it answers. For instance, among students of the Kennedy assassination there has been cynical curiosity about the selection of the Bethesda, Maryland Naval Hospital over Walter Reed Army Hospital and Parkland Hospital in Dallas.

 
One reason has been that the autopsy performed there is so fraught with unexplained conflicts and secrecy that it qualifies as a major scandal of the Warren Report.

 
Another is the fact that but a few hours earlier in Parkland Hospital there had been a nearly violent confrontation between Dr. Earl Rose, Dallas County Medical Examiner, and certain members of the official party when Dr. Rose had tried to detain the body in Dallas for the autopsy required by Texas Law. 5

 
As Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry described it, “They more or less snatched that body away from him.” 6

 
The Manchester account – which supposedly drew on this same transcript – satisfied most of that curiosity. He reported that Rear Admiral George Burkley (personal physician to JFK, and later to LBJ) had proposed Bethesda to Mrs. Kennedy; she had consented; and Brigadier General Godfrey McHugh, JFK’s Air Force aide, had alerted Washington to send an ambulance to Andrews. This last conversation was described in detail. 7

 
But in the Newcomb transcript we find this three-way exchange between Army Surgeon General Leonard Heaton in Washington and Major General Chester V. Clifton (JFK’s military aide) and Dr. Burkley aboard Air Force One:

 
BURKLEY: General Heaton, this is Admiral Burkley. Did you contact MDW in regards to taking care of the remains of President Kennedy taking him directly to Walter Reed? Probably Mrs. Kennedy will also be gion out there. We will clarify that later.

HEATON: All right.

BURKLEY: Just a minute. General Clifton is here.

CLIFTON: This is General Clifton. We do not want a helicopter to go to Bethesda Medical Center. We do want an ambulance and a ground return from Andrews to Walter Reed, and we want the regular post-mortem that has to be done by law under guard performed at Walter Reed. Is that clear?

HEATON: That is clear, General Clifton.8

Yet in the very next conversation we find General Clifton talking to Gerry Behn, head of the White House Secret Service Detail. He begins:

CLIFTON: This is Clifton. I understand that you have arranged for an ambulance to take President Kennedy to Bethesda. Is this correct?

BEHN: It has been arranged to helicopter the body to Bethesda.

CLIFTON: Okay, if it isn’t too dark. 9

 
The exchange indicates a mutual awareness that Clifton’s order to go to Walter Reed has been authoritively countermanded during the flight. Though the order may have come from McHugh as Manchester states, its omission in (the) transcript tends to renew old speculations.

 
There is reason to believe the Newcomb copy differs from others: the transcript shown to Manchester apparently did not include the conversation between Behn and Agent Kellerman that took place while Air Force One was parked in Dallas, prior to President Johnson’s taking the oath of office. Had he seen it, it is unlikely he would have written that taping did not begin until the plane was airborne. 10

 
Other in-flight conversations recounted by Manchester (whether from his transcript or his interviews is unclear) include calls from LBJ aide Bill Moyers and from Secret Service Agents Clint Hill and Lem Johns to the White House, and calls from Congressmen Albert Thomas and Jack Brooks to their offices. 11

 
None of these appear on the Newcomb transcript.

 
The Newcomb transcript does, however, include communications with the cabinet plane, implying that the same tape monitored both aircraft.

If this is true, then it is obvious from the conversation (the White House is reading from (a 10:40 bulletin on the AP ticker) that still more conversations are missing. 12

 
We know that LBJ had used the Air Force One communications system from Love Field to talk to his aide Walter Jenkins and to JFK advisor McGeorge Bundy in the White House, and to speak twice to Robert Kennedy in Virginia (the text of these calls is an unresolved dispute).

 
Local calls were also placed to Dallas lawyers J.W. (“Waddy”) Bullion and Irving Goldberg, and to Judge Sarah Hughes, and U.S. Attorney H. Barefoot Sanders. 13

 
These too are missing.

 
It invokes a twinge of bitter humor to find among the remnant conversations an unsigned footnote which reads:

 
(Note:) The next part of the tape is traffic between SAM COMMAND POST and AF-1 advising them of weather conditions – tornadoes in AF-1’s immediate flight path. I’m not putting in this traffic but I do have it in my draft if you want it. 14.

 
So far, the omissions are of doubtful importance – unlikely to yield anything more than firecracker surprises. But among the missing is at least one conversation of nuclear potential. According to Manchester, General Clifton talked to McGeorge Bundy, “asking again [!} whether an international plot was emerging” in the wake of  the assassination. 15

 
Author Jim Bishop, in The Day Kennedy Was Shot, wrote, “It seemed that he [LBJ] was phoning McGeorge Bundy in the White House Situation Room ever few minutes.” 16

 
Johnson, who first raised the question of conspiracy during the lifesaving efforts at Parkland Hospital, is also alleged by Manchester to have requested a briefing from CIA Director John McCone. 17

 
The Newcomb transcript yields only one Clifton-Bundy exchange; and only three lines from President Johnson (to Rose Kennedy and Nellie Connally); and no mention of any conversation of conspiracy, of an international plot, or of the CIA. 18

 
If it were not for Theodore H. White, the story would end here – Manchester’s reputation stalled against the anonymity of the transcriber/editor.

In the Making of the President 1964, White wrote “On the flight [from Dallas] the party learned that there was no conspiracy, learned of the identity of Oswald and his arrest; and the President’s mind turned to the duties of consoling the stricken and guiding the quick.” 19

 
It was so peripheral to the drama White was presenting that its inclusion in his narrative seems almost accidental. Even now, its significance is not readily apparent. Yet if it is true, it will rank as one of history’s most electrifying revelations. Let’s restore the perspective of the afternoon of November 22, 1963.

 
·        When the plane touched down in Washington at 4:59 P.M. (C.S.T.) it had been less than 3 hours since Oswald had arrived at Police Headquarters.

 
·         There was no firm - - or even apparent – link between the crime for which he had been arrested (the shooting of Patrolman J. D. Tippit in Oak Cliff) and the assassination of President Kennedy across the river in Dallas.

 
·         The rifle had not been traced, there were no handprints, no bullets, no incriminating photos nor line-up identifications at that hour to connect Oswald (or anyone else) with the assassination.

 
·         But for those who could imagine such a connection, it would have been difficult to dismiss conspiracy. Oswald’s name was first announced at 3:23 P.M.; his Russian visit and his involvement in the Fair Play for Cuba Committee were announced at 3:26 P.M. 20

 
·         It was 1:35 A.M. the next morning before the Dallas Police felt secure enough of their suspect to charge him with the President’s murder. 21

 
·         As late as 10:15 P.M., Police were still reported to be questioning other employees of the Texas School Book Depository. 22

 
·        On the afternoon of the following day, Police were still looking for a negro suspect who was believed to have driven Oswald from the crime scene. 23

 
·         While the plain was aloft, at least one other man (Donald W. House) was being detained as a suspect assassin. 24

 
·         The American military had been put on global alert. 25

 
·         Pennsylvania troopers had thrown a guard around former President Eisenhower’s Gettysburg farm.

·         The CIA watch committee had been activated. 27

 
·         The government of West Germany was bracing for a possible invasion.28

 
Within the time frame of the historical flight, strong suspicions of conspiracy were emerging and none had been laid to rest.

 
But aboard the presidential plane, according to White, people were being told not only that Oswald was the assassin, but that he acted alone!

 
The implications stagger the senses. These same central conclusions which the Warren Commission would labor to bring forth by September of the next year are seen in full dress rehearsal aboard the presidential jet less than four hours after last rites were given the late President – now lying in a bronze coffin in the back of the plane.

 
This is obviously not the sort of allegation to be hung on a broadcast transcript of unknown origin; it challenges our whole vision of American reality.

 
When something like this turns up, it must be a mistake. Perhaps Theodore White’s Pulitzer Prize – winning journalism lapsed as he wrote this account. No one else’s account confirms it.

 
“There is a tape-recording in the archives of the government which best recaptures the sound of the hours as it waited for leadership. It is a recording of all the conversations in the air, monitored by the Signal Corps Midwestern center Liberty, between Air Force One in Dallas, the Cabinet plane over the Pacific, the Joint Chiefs communications center and the White House communications center in Washington. The voices are superbly flat: calm; controlled. One hears the directions of “Front Office” (the President) relayed to “Carpet” (the White House) and to the cabinet above the Pacific….It is a meshing of emotionless voices in the air, performing with mechanical perfection. Only once does any voice break into a sob…..”

 
When asked by Vince Salandria for the source of his news denying conspiracy, White wrote back describing the tape. 30

 
Perhaps it is better that the tape has vanished. If someone talking to the presidential plane knew the outcome of this investigation before it began, how many on the plane knew it, too?

 
What if we were to assume the worst here: that the primary beneficiary of the assassination, the former vice-president, was somehow involved in a plot to promote himself? After all, it is a matter of public record that the office did fall vacant on his home turf, and that the fatal trip had been made at his behest to mend his political fences.

 
It becomes obvious now to see how such a tape could be loaded with incriminating conversations; how the tape (and later the transcript) could disappear from the archives after Mr. White has revealed it; and why subsequent researchers would have to lobby and threaten to get even a severely edited transcript. There are at least 25 reported conversations missing from the Newcomb edition – who knows how many unknown.

But if the transcript were edited to conceal links between the former Vice President and the murder, our conjectures seemed doomed by another exchange retained in the Newcomb transcript.

 
BEHN: Yes, go ahead.

KELLERMAN: I’ll have to call you back. Get a couple of men, rather the Volunteer (LBJ) boys to go over to his car and so forth. We’ll also need hers and several others. 32

 
The presidential limousine was a mobile murder scene. Its internal ravages – bullet holes, blood spray, embedded bullet fragments – would be crucial evidence in determining the source of the gunfire.

 
Here is Roy Kellerman (Secret Service Agent in Charge of the Dallas trip) ordering [!] his superior to have men – LBJ’s men – go over the car “and so forth.”

 
If there was no controversy about the source of the shots, these speculations would be pointless. But so many things do conflict with the official notion of Oswald firing down from the Sixth Floor window; the Zapruder movie shows JFK thrown violently backward (toward Oswald); the shots seem to have come too fast for Oswald’s rifle; gunpowder odors are smelled in the motorcade; the Parkland doctors describe a frontal entrance wound, etc. Since there are few likely sources of shooting in Dealey Plaza which would not have ripped up the innards of  the limousine, this car was obviously hot evidence.

 
Yet the LBJ “boys” who went over it that night produced neither bullet holes nor any description of blood spray pattern (the blood was washed out at Parkland by Secret Servicemen, according to hospital employees) 33

 
Only a skull fragment, a cracked windshield, and five bullet fragments were found. 34

 
It will surprise no one that two larger fragments, with parts of copper jacketing still about them, were later matched to the rifle found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, and which was later traced to Oswald.

 
But it may surprise some that all were lying loose on the seats and floor of the car.

 
To put this in perspective, let us digress. Several hours before these discoveries, Secret Service Agent Richard Johnson announced another. He turned over to James J. Rowley, Chief of the Secret Service, a nearly unblemished copper-jacketed bullet given him by a hospital employee at Parkland, where it had been found on a stretcher. This became Warren Commission Exhibit 399, the famous “magic” bullet later credited (with creating) seven wound and two broken bones. 37

 
Like the limousine fragments, it was matched to Oswald’s rifle. 38

 
Johnson apparently told no one of his bullet (no one on Air Force One seems to have heard about it) until he returned to the White House, and then both he and Chief Rowley broke the chain of evidence by not inscribing it, as standard police procedure.

 
This is not the place to evaluate the controversy about the “single bullet theory” or CE399. But because LBJ’s “boys” were sent to “go over” the limousine, and because they found fragments of a copper-jacketed bullet, we should note that all ballistic evidence lining Oswald to the assassination passes through a single agency.

 
The doctors at Parkland found only lead particles in Governor Connally, 39 as did the autopsy pathologists at Bethesda in President Kennedy. 40 A bullet impression found on a curb near the shooting was also leaden. 41 In fact, no copper jacketing was found embedded anywhere. It was all found lying loose, and it was all produced by LBJ’s “boys.”

 
Barely three weeks after the shooting, UPI found that the limousine had been quietly shipped to the Ford Motor Company in Dearborn, Michigan to be bullet-proofed and completely refitted. One wonders why LBJ – who so loved the status symbols of office – wanted to ride about in this same car with its bitter (or at least bittersweet) memories. If this was some macabre gesture of economy, it was most unfortunate since it prevented the Warren Commission from making its own examination and using the car in its filmed re-enactments. Only the bullet-scarred windshield (scarred with lead, not copper) was saved for the Commission 43 and there is both photographs and testimonial evidence to suggest it was not the same one that went to Dallas.

 
But enough. Asking questions about the Warren Commission, the evidence, the meanings of it all, is like punching the Tarbaby of Uncle Remus tale. Let’s end the speculation.

 
What we have here is a tape – a tape originally made without the knowledge of those being recorded; belatedly discovered; and eventually released by a President in edited form. The trail of discovery beckons analogy to the Watergate tapes. The existence of the tape is at least established, and if it does not turn up, or is not released to the American public, the mystery of its unavailability will surely darken.

 
CITATIONS

 
1.      William Manchester, The Death of a President (New York; Harper & Row, 1967) p. 371n.

2.      Letter from Pierre Salinger to Vincent Salandria, 12/25/67.

3.      Letter from Colonel James U. Cross to Vincent Salandrai, 1/2/68.

4.      Letter from Harry J. Middleton to Fred T. Newcomb, 5/16/75.

5.      Manchester, p. 302-305.

6.      Telephone Interview, April 1971.

7.      Manchester, p. 349-350.

8.      Transcript.

9.      Transcript.

10.  Manchester, p. 371n., 268.

11.  Manchester, p. 341.

12.  Transcript.

13.  Manchester, p. 268-272.

14.  Transcript.

15.  Manchester, p. 342.

16.  Jim Bishop, The Day Kennedy Was Shot (New York; Funk & Wagnalls, 1968) p. 273.

17.  Manchester, p. 346.

18.  Transcript.

19.  Theodore H. White, The Making of a President 1964 (New York; Signet Books, 1965) paperback edition p. 48.

20.  Manchester, p. 284.

21.  Bishop, p. 505.

22.  There Was A President (National Broadcasting Co. 1966) p. 20.

23.  Warren Commission’s evidence, Vol. #24, p. 765.

24.  NBC-TV Broadcast, 2:45 P.M. (C.S.T.) Nov. 22, 1963.

25.  White, p. 20.

26.  White, p. 20.

27.  Manchester, p. 253, 269.

28.  Bishop, p. 285; There Was A President, NBC, p. 30.

29.  White, p. 21.

30.  Note from Theodore White to Vincent Salandria, undated.

31.  Telephone interview, Oct. 17, 1975.

32.  Transcript.

33.  Joe L. Richards, Warren Commission Hearings, Vol. #21, p. 226. Ibid, Vol. 21, p. 217.

34.  Warren Commission Exhibits NO. 841, 843.

35.  Warren Commission Document NO. 5, p. 163.

36.  Report of Secret Service Agent Richard E. Johnson, Commission Document NO. 3; Testimony of Roy Kellerman, Warren Committion Hearings Vol. #2, p. 99.

37.  Warren Report, p. 104, New York Times Ed. , P.B.

38.  Warren Commission Document NO. 5, p. 163.

39.  Testimony of Robert A. Frazier, Warren Commission Hearings, Vol. #5, p. 72.

40.  Ibid., Vol. #15, p. 700; testimony of Lyndal L. Shaneyfelt.

41.  New York Times, December 17, 1963.

 

 
 
Posted by Bill Kelly at 2:45 PM icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
 
 
 

2 comments:

dalethorn said...

"The American military had been put on global alert. Pennsylvania troopers had thrown a guard around former President Eisenhower’s Gettysburg farm. The CIA watch committee had been activated. The government of West Germany was bracing for a possible invasion. Within the time frame of the historical flight, strong suspicions of conspiracy were emerging and none had been laid to rest. But aboard the presidential plane, according to White, people were being told not only that Oswald was the assassin, but that he acted alone!"

And that sums up the story. The wider reality was fear and doubt, but the reality in the inner circle was about tying up loose ends to create the false yet official narrative.

January 11, 2019 at 7:23 PM icon_delete13.gif Tyler Newcomb said...

Right spot on Dale

January 11, 2019 at 7:27 PM icon_delete13.gif

Post a Comment

 
 
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stuff about Lemay is so important.

Not only because he was a hawk on Vietnam and how he tried to compare the blockade to Munich with JFK, but also because of his close ties to the CIA through the whole SAC.

That story about him coming in that day actually made the news.  We even had Doug Brinkley talking about it.

BTW, the question is:  Why was it edited out, and how do we know there is not more missing?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read part of this by Bill Kelly before but missed or forgotten the part on the AF1 transcript about a helicopter to take JFK's body to Bethesda.  That's important.  A chopper would have arrived much quicker than the hearse, that had his body in it.  I can't remember who, but somebody in the morgue remembered a chopper landing "out back", well before the grey Navy hearse did.  Before the black private funeral home hearse did before it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Chuck Schwartz said:
 
dalethorn said...

"The American military had been put on global alert. Pennsylvania troopers had thrown a guard around former President Eisenhower’s Gettysburg farm. The CIA watch committee had been activated. The government of West Germany was bracing for a possible invasion. Within the time frame of the historical flight, strong suspicions of conspiracy were emerging and none had been laid to rest. But aboard the presidential plane, according to White, people were being told not only that Oswald was the assassin, but that he acted alone!"

And that sums up the story. The wider reality was fear and doubt, but the reality in the inner circle was about tying up loose ends to create the false yet official narrative.

   

The President Has Been Shot. Charles Roberts  (p. 141) A reporter for Newsweek, Roberts was on AFI and met McGeorge Bundy at Andrews.

<quote on>

I remember looking at (McGeorge) Bundy because I was wondering if he had any word of what had happened in the world while we were in transit, whether this assassination was part of a plot. And he told me later that what he reported to the president during that flight back was that the whole world was stunned, but there was no evidence of a conspiracy at all.

<quote off>

Edited by Cliff Varnell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Halpern could not be bossed around like Humes and the others. They wanted people they could control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Mark Wengler said:

Halpern could not be bossed around like Humes and the others. They wanted people they could control.

I don't know who Halpern is.  Jim D. referenced him earlier regarding the autopsy doctors.  He must not be the Halpern ordered by Helms to besmirch the Kennedys.

A Forensic Pathologist reasonably close to Bethesda?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dr. Milton Helpern of New York City was the first coroner who made himself a national reputation.  

This was in the Coppolino case and the Joan Robinson Hill case. (If you want to read one of the best murder mystery books ever, pick up the late Tommy Thompson's Blood and Money. How that has not yet been made into a movie eludes me.)

 But prior to those two cases he was already known as one of the best pathologists in the country.   

He had nothing but scorn for the very idea of Humes, Boswell and Finck doing the examination, and the way they conducted that autopsy.

There was a whole book written about his career called Where Death Delights by Marhsall Houts. He was called Sherlock Holmes with a microscope.

His great line was:

“There are no perfect crimes. There are only untrained and blundering investigators, and slipshod medical examiners.”

Edited by James DiEugenio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from the Marshall Houts  article in the July 1967 issue of Argosy magazine, where Dr. Milton Helpern discussed the subject of JFK's wounds and his autopsy:

"A relatively simple case was horribly botched up from the very beginning; and then the errors were compounded at almost every other step along the way.  "I've already touched on the gravest of them all - the selection of a 'hospital' pathologist to perform a medico-legal autopsy. This stemmed from the mistaken belief that because a man can supervise a laboratory or perform a hospital autopsy to see whether a patient died from emphysema or heart disease, he is qualified to evaluate gunshot wounds to the body. It's like sending a seven-year-old boy who has taken three lessons on the violin over to the New York Philharmonic and expecting him to perform a Tchaikovsky symphony. He knows how to hold the violin and bow, but he has a long way to go before he can make music." 

In the article, Helpern goes on to state that "Humes was a 'hospital' pathologist, rather than a forensic or medico-legal pathologist." The hospital pathologist performs his autopsies on cases where death occurs in a hospital, usually as a result of some disease and where the cause of death can be presumed. It is generally performed to confirm a diagnosis. A forensic pathologist, on the other hand, performs autopsies usually where death is not attended by a physician. In these cases, a pathologist often follows misleading, frustrating clues. His work is much trickier, since cause of death is often crucial to subsequent legal action. The 'hospital' pathologist is as much out of his field when he attempts a medico-legal autopsy as is the chest surgeon who attempts a delicate brain operation. The Warren Commission did not attempt to establish the expertise of Commander Boswell in gunshot wounds, because "he had absolutely none worthy of mention." Commander Boswell was chief of pathology at the Naval Medical School.

Colonel Finck, who was then chief of the Wound Ballistics Pathology branch of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, told the Warren Commission that he had personally performed about 200 autopsies for the Army in Frankfurt, Germany, while serving there from 1955 to 1958. In his current capacity, he said, he had personally reviewed 400 autopsies. But he was vague on the number of bullet-wound cases in his 200 personally performed autopsies, except to say that there were "many." Moreover, the fact that he reviewed 400 cases did not mean that he "presided at the autopsy table and attempted a personal evaluation of whether a bullet wound...is a wound of entrance or a wound of exit. Finck was perhaps the most qualified of the three who performed the autopsy on the President, but his experience was mostly "supervisory and administrative."  Colonel Finck's position throughout the entire proceeding was extremely uncomfortable. If it had not been for him, the autopsy would not have been handled as well as it was; but he was in the role of the poor bastard Army child foisted into the Navy family reunion. His experience was limited primarily to 'reviewing' files, pictures and records of finished cases. There's a world of difference between standing at the autopsy table and trying to decide whether a hole in the body is a wound of entrance or a wound of exit, and in reviewing another man's work at some later date in the relaxed, academic atmosphere of a private office.

The men were accomplished in their respective fields of general pathology, the author sadly concludes, but their field "was not bullet wounds in the body."  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After Wecht, I think Helpern was the first pathologist to call out the complete mismatch of the gravity of the crime with the quality of the practitioners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...