Jump to content
The Education Forum
Bart Kamp

----- >>>>> It's Lee <<<<< -----

Recommended Posts

For any person who believes that the "Prayer Man" figure is Lee Harvey Oswald and for those who are unaware of the document linked below, I'd recommend that they read that document, which is an April 3, 1964, FBI report consisting of signed statements from 73 different Book Depository employees. The FBI, in these statements, sought to discover some basic information from those 73 TSBD employees, including whether each of the employees had seen Lee Harvey Oswald at the time of JFK's assassination.

And if you read through all 73 statements, you'll find that there wasn't a single employee who said they saw Oswald at the time the shooting took place --- not even among the several people who said they were located on or near the front steps of the Depository at 12:30 PM on 11/22/63.

Do the "Prayer Man" advocates think all of the people who were in a position to see Oswald on or near the steps were lying? Or were they all just not very observant? And if it's the latter option, then conspiracy theorists have got to admit one thing for sure --- any conspirators who might have been attempting to frame Lee Harvey Oswald for President Kennedy's murder on November 22nd sure as heck got awfully lucky when their designated "patsy", who was standing right out in the open in front of the building for all to potentially see, just happened to go totally unnoticed in the eyes of every single spectator who was standing nearby.

Patsy-framing assassination plotters don't get that lucky very often. Do they? ....

CD706-Logo.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, David Von Pein said:

But at the same time....so meaningless.

Marina Oswald looked at the same crappy, fuzzy image that all of us have looked at, and yet she somehow KNOWS "It's Lee".

Yeah, right.  Eyeroll-Icon-Blogspot.gif

TSBD-Front-Entrance-11-22-63.jpg

David, there's a reason the authorities get the next of kin to identify a body. It's because they know the person best and can identify them even when others can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, David Von Pein said:

For any person who believes that the "Prayer Man" figure is Lee Harvey Oswald and for those who are unaware of the document linked below, I'd recommend that they read that document, which is an April 3, 1964, FBI report consisting of signed statements from 73 different Book Depository employees. The FBI, in these statements, sought to discover some basic information from those 73 TSBD employees, including whether each of the employees had seen Lee Harvey Oswald at the time of JFK's assassination.

And if you read through all 73 statements, you'll find that there wasn't a single employee who said they saw Oswald at the time the shooting took place --- not even among the several people who said they were located on or near the front steps of the Depository at 12:30 PM on 11/22/63.

Do the "Prayer Man" advocates think all of the people who were in a position to see Oswald on or near the steps were lying? Or were they all just not very observant? And if it's the latter option, then conspiracy theorists have got to admit one thing for sure --- any conspirators who might have been attempting to frame Lee Harvey Oswald for President Kennedy's murder on November 22nd sure as heck got awfully lucky when their designated "patsy", who was standing right out in the open in front of the building for all to potentially see, just happened to go totally unnoticed in the eyes of every single spectator who was standing nearby.

Patsy-framing assassination plotters don't get that lucky very often. Do they? ....

CD706-Logo.png

David, 13 TSBD employees are on the steps and they manage to identify who is standing behind them, in front and beside them.

But they all fail to identify one person, the same person.

And they don't even say there was a stranger there. Not one. Even though he is clearly visible standing right next to the door they need to open to get back into the building. 

And no-one saw this stranger even though the FBI asked them if they saw any strangers that day.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Vanessa Loney said:

David, 13 TSBD employees are on the steps and they manage to identify who is standing behind them, in front and beside them.

Well, Vanessa, as Tony Krome pointed out earlier (and he made a good point), Sarah Stanton failed to say that Buell Frazier was there. And we certainly know that he WAS there.

But the "Prayer Man" person could most certainly be a STRANGER. There's no reason why it COULDN'T be a "stranger", despite the protests of CTers saying that that is impossible.

CD706/CE1381 doesn't specifically say that all 73 of those employees saw no strangers OUTSIDE the confines of the building on Nov. 22. Most of them said they saw no strangers INSIDE the building. But do you think that statement is also meant to convey that they didn't see any unknown people standing on the steps of the building during the motorcade? I don't think it means that at all.

Therefore, IMO, the possibility (or even probability) of Mr. Prayer Person being a "stranger" is certainly still on the table.

 

Edited by David Von Pein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides Danny Garcia in CE1381

no strangers on the steps or inside the building

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"But they all fail to identify one person, the same person"

"no strangers on the steps or inside the building"

Checkmate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, David Von Pein said:

Well, Vanessa, as Tony Krome pointed out earlier (and he made a good point), Sarah Stanton failed to say that Buell Frazier was there. And we certainly know that he WAS there.

But the "Prayer Man" person could most certainly be a STRANGER. There's no reason why it COULDN'T be a "stranger", despite the protests of CTers saying that that is impossible.

CD706/CE1381 doesn't specifically say that all 73 of those employees saw no strangers OUTSIDE the confines of the building on Nov. 22. Most of them said they saw no strangers INSIDE the building. But do you think that statement is also meant to convey that they didn't see any unknown people standing on the steps of the building during the motorcade? I don't think it means that at all.

Therefore, IMO, the possibility (or even probability) of Mr. Prayer Person being a "stranger" is certainly still on the table.

 

David, it would make sense if even one or two people on the steps said they saw a stranger. Although out of 13 people on the steps (who were all employed in the building) I would actually expect more than that to ID a stranger standing right in the doorway as they are re-entering the building.

But for none of them to see him?

As Andrej has pointed out so well this stranger, who none of them saw, just happens to be identified by Marina as Lee and has the same height, weight, hair and clothes as Lee. How can it not be Lee?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Bart Kamp said:

Besides Danny Garcia in CE1381

no strangers on the steps or inside the building

Big deal. You found ONE. Hooray for Kamp!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Vanessa Loney said:

As Andrej has pointed out so well this stranger, who none of them saw, just happens to be identified by Marina as Lee and has the same height, weight, hair and clothes as Lee. How can it not be Lee?

This is how....

[Click....]
XX.+Oswald+Is+Guilty+Blog+Logo.png
 

Edited by David Von Pein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, David Von Pein said:

Big deal. You found ONE. Hooray for Kamp!

shows what your plan has been all along.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bart Kamp said:

shows what your plan has been all along.....

And that would be.....?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, David Von Pein said:

This is how....

[Click....]
XX.+Oswald+Is+Guilty+Blog+Logo.png
 

David, stick to the new evidence. It cancels out all that old 'evidence'. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of the 6th Floor Museum and Film quality, etc., I would encourage members to take a listen to Midnght Writer News Show #107 w/Doug Horne: 

https://midnightwriternews.com/mwn-episode-107-douglas-horne-on-the-zapruder-film-alteration-debate/

Absolutely fascinating, shocking and honestly, and in a way, horrifying...

Ed & Barto thanks a ton for sharing as always!

Edited by B. A. Copeland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...