James DiEugenio Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 I have posted this at Facebook and Twitter. Mili Cranor's article on Baden was getting all kinds of hits, so we have now put it on the first page of K and K. He already covered up the death of JFK. https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/michael-baden-s-deceptions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 It’s unbelievably weird innit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 Pat Speer has a gigantic list of problems with Baden, under "Baden's reign of error" http://www.patspeer.com/chapter13b%3Aattackoftheclones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted August 15, 2019 Author Share Posted August 15, 2019 (edited) That is an understatement Paul. And Micah is correct, Speer has done a good job on him also. Of all the famous medical professionals they could bring in, and they choose this guy? What would have been wrong with Henry Lee? When you bring in someone like Baden, you are asking for trouble. Its almost like they knew he could be compromised off the JFK case. Sort of like the DOJ wanting to send Boswell to Memphis after King was shot. Edited August 15, 2019 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Bulman Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 Jim you explain the bigger picture to us in this link I posted on another thread recently of one started by Sandy Larsen. What amazes me is how some sometimes question how the assassinations of the 60's JFK, MLK, RFK relate to today. Baden is a perfect example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted August 15, 2019 Author Share Posted August 15, 2019 He is more than perfect, he is an icon. I once asked Tanenbaum how Baden learned to BS like that on JFK. Bob said, "After I left the HSCA." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 And FoxNews' legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano, discussing the Epstein autopsy, calls him "the great Dr. Michael Baden." Why do I keep tuning in to that news channel at all? I confess there's only one reason. Some good-looking babes. (Though they are getting fewer. I was really disenchanted when they ran off Andrea Tantaros.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrence Schnapf Posted August 15, 2019 Share Posted August 15, 2019 Im not surprised he was selected. he is a former medical examiner in nyc and has worked on many high profile cases. Not disagreeing with the views expressed herein but simply explaining he was a logic as logical choice in thes 555circles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 10, 2019 Author Share Posted November 10, 2019 (edited) This is a really interesting story in all its implications. They forced Amy to recant, and then they fired the person who spirited the tape out. This is the kind of MSM we have. Always nice to be reminded of just how bad it is. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cbs-news-fires-staffer-who-leaked-abc-news-video-about-epstein-cover-up-report?fbclid=IwAR0bKOR4UoMuQ54O3H9rb_oPNMH9s4XG2tD0Y8peCLcrLVdr0Ts4untGCEU Edited November 10, 2019 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 The person who was fired denies in the Megyn Kelly interview that she leaked the tape, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 10, 2019 Author Share Posted November 10, 2019 Then she has a good lawsuit for wrongful termination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph McBride Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Lawsuits against two networks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Bauer Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 (edited) Do any of you here believe the story of the Royal Family successfully influencing ABC or any other major U.S. media giants to bury the Epstein story to protect Prince Andrew and their own public image as well? And if true, isn't this just another outrageous example of our MSM being influenced by self-interest protecting super wealthy groups and individuals to the detrimental extent of compromising the reporting of important truths to average citizens? A major historical question is how much this type of influence has been exerted on our U.S. major media since JFK times through today and how successful has this type of influence been in compromising the integrity of our 4th estate and their almost sacred goal of protecting the public with full truth informing in a democratic society? Personally I believe most of our main steam media has been compromised like this in spades since JFK and even today regards their downplaying of the truly outrageous divisive, inciting and abuse of power damaging behavior of Trump as President and in honestly reporting not just this reality but also his corrupt background which is much more extensive than the average citizen could imagine. Through peripheral reporting study one does learn of Trump's corrupt career, but most of our MSM keeps this buried and downplayed imo. Just Trump's massive efforts at keeping his tax history from public view is an obvious tip off of nefarious doings on his part and if our MSM really honored their democracy protecting precepts they would be much more demanding of their release. You don't see any Trump career corruption expose's on 60 Minutes. Yet there's more there by far than what the Clinton's were accused of and 60 Minutes had no problems reporting on theirs. Honestly it's amazingly disturbing how silent our MSM generally is regards Trump and his unprecedented conflict and anxiety creating behavior, words and actions and how much this has negatively effected our entire society. With Trump it's like we all are being subjected to a constant angry shouting match via his thousands of angry Twitter tweets, rally speeches and yelling over his helicopter noise press meets where all he does is angrily attack his critics and often with added personal insult name calling. And this constant anger display of Trump's seems to be making so many in our society angry as well with it's accompanying anxiety. It's like one big ANGER FEST! What an embarrassing and tragic legacy to leave as President ... constant angry and anxiety causing shouting that carries into our national daily discourse and mind set. Only one newspaper has front page called for Trump's resignation. The Hartford Conn. Post? Hard to believe only one has done so. Connecticut newspaper calls on Trump to resign, citing ... https://thehill.com › media › 463489-connecticut-newspaper-calls-on-trum... Sep 28, 2019 - One of Connecticut's largest newspapers on Friday published an editorial calling on President Trump to resign, citing “damning evidence” that ... Missing: hartford | Must include: hartford Edited November 11, 2019 by Joe Bauer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Pickering Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 One certainly can conclude that the forces (most likely the armed type) that murdered JFK ran broad media, then, and, continue to do so to this very day. That leaves out advertisers, media execs, media owners of record, U.S. presidents, civilians, civilian office holders, Queen Elizabeth, the pope, the prime minister, Jews, the heads, or, practicioners of any religion, or, ethnicity for that mattered, and, the lizard people. However, what remains, is organized psychopathy, innate and embodied within the leaders, and, induced within the ranks. Final approval for what appears on a television, or, in a newspaper - on or off line - must necessarily fall under the authority of the killers, who, by definition, must be martial in nature and power, global in reach. Otherwise, a U.S. President could never have been hit in broad daylight, utilizing military tactics and organization, or, have every news source on the planet bury the facts surrounding that action, forever thereafter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 13 minutes ago, Jon Pickering said: One certainly can conclude that the forces (most likely the armed type) that murdered JFK ran broad media, then, and, continue to do so to this very day. That leaves out advertisers, media execs, media owners of record, U.S. presidents, civilians, civilian office holders, Queen Elizabeth, the pope, the prime minister, Jews, the heads, or, practicioners of any religion, or, ethnicity for that mattered, and, the lizard people. However, what remains, is organized psychopathy, innate and embodied within the leaders, and, induced within the ranks. Final approval for what appears on a television, or, in a newspaper - on or off line - must necessarily fall under the authority of the killers, who, by definition, must be martial in nature and power, global in reach. Otherwise, a U.S. President could never have been hit in broad daylight, utilizing military tactics and organization, or, have every news source on the planet bury the facts surrounding that action, forever thereafter. Nothing to add, just no like button here. Tongue in cheek response - might be lizard people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now