Jump to content
The Education Forum

The JFK Conspiracy: Breakthrough Evidence" by E.Z. Friedel, M.D.


Recommended Posts

"The JFK Conspiracy: Breakthrough Evidence," by E.Z. Friedel, M.D.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/JFK-Conspiracy-Bre...6276&sr=1-1

Synopsis

THE JFK CONSPIRACY: BREAKTHROUGH EVIDENCE The first hand experience of the Naval Surgeon assigned to perform the Kennedy autopsy documents a conspiracy at the highest levels. Before the forensic exam , the gunshot evidence was changed by a covert team of specialists. Two wounds from the front became one artificial one from the rear. The new findings became the key evidence for the immediate and final conclusion. There had been one, and only one, shooter. In less than twenty-four hours, the lone assassin had become a permanent part of American history and Lee Harvey Oswald was cast as one of it's great villians. Factual and frightening. Precise CSI technology, painstaking research, and a unique deathbed revelation come together to answer the key questions. WHO DONE IT and HOW HAVE THEY MANAGED TO COVER IT UP?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Only three questions

1) Is it a novel?

2) If not, who was the dying surgeon ?

3) Who is the M.D. Friedel ?

Charlie Black

It's a novel and it's been self-published by a vanity press. I know a lot of people who get their books "published" this way.

Anyway, it seems lively. The writer attempts to put a secret camera and cameraman in Dealey Plaza, creating the other film. I wonder if this might not be on the mark:

"A casually dressed photographer stood next to a large mounted movie camera deep in the bowels of the marble monument on top of the Plaza. Both man and object were completely obscured by the deep shadows created by the overhanging roof of the Pagoda. The camera operator had just finished using the telescopic of the three lenses on the 16mm. camera, which rested on the heavy tripod. Switching to the medium range lens, he again panned the relatively sparse crowd on the opposite side of Elm, continuing down to the overpass. He now aimed the camera back to the corner where Houston Street intersected Elm and held it, ready and still filming."

Kathy

Link to post
Share on other sites
Only three questions

1) Is it a novel?

2) If not, who was the dying surgeon ?

3) Who is the M.D. Friedel ?

Charlie Black

______________________________

Charlie,

To your "only three questions," I've got "only" two answers:

1) Maybe it's a "Flash" Gordon (Novel) :o

3) Who is Dr. E.Z. Friedel? Well, hell, that's easy (Get it?). He just wants to be Hidel's self-published alter ego or nom de plume or doctor or controller or half brother or apologist or....

--Thomas B)

______________________________

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to post
Share on other sites

SENARIO:

Its true. Dr. Alpha died March 14th 07. He was in the transfer room where the body was cared for soon after pronouncing the President was gone. He studied the body some minutes, then about 8 men arrived, and asked him for privacy. Dr. deceased, the only Parkland Dr. there said, "Best you go, alls is fine." But Parkland was not in charge. I saw him 12 minutes later and his wounds were completly changed to fit one bullet from the back.

CAN WE HYPOTHESIZE: What does this equal?

Will it shake goverment or Will it fade in a week from the news?

Link to post
Share on other sites
SENARIO:

Its true. Dr. Alpha died March 14th 07. He was in the transfer room where the body was cared for soon after pronouncing the President was gone. He studied the body some minutes, then about 8 men arrived, and asked him for privacy. Dr. deceased, the only Parkland Dr. there said, "Best you go, alls is fine." But Parkland was not in charge. I saw him 12 minutes later and his wounds were completly changed to fit one bullet from the back.

CAN WE HYPOTHESIZE: What does this equal?

Will it shake goverment or Will it fade in a week from the news?

If it's in any way relevant it'll probabaly fade. But take heart, there'll be lots of stuff to fill the veacuum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anybody else hate "novels" about the Kennedy Assassination?

At any rate, the genre of JFK Assassination related "novels" and "novelists" have had some very credible individuals, although "credible" is not the best word to use in the context of the subject matter.

Don DiLello, the late "Eduardo", Robert Tannenbaum, or did he have a ghostwriter for Corruption of Blood?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a novel and it's been self-published by a vanity press. I know a lot of people who get their books "published" this way.

And unfortunately, there are many here, and elsewhere, who get their "factual" research from such books.

If it's in any way relevant it'll probabaly fade. But take heart, there'll be lots of stuff to fill the veacuum.

Mr. Dolva, was that the "cerebral vacuum" which one fequently observes in regards to this subject matter?

Or, merely the literary vacuum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Tom, it was a bit of a dummy spit on my part with regards to how so readily glimpses of truth (which I'm not suggesting this is) is ignored and replaced with, what I suppose, really is a vaccuum parading as something of substance.

Still, plugging away with a flexible mindset and at least a desire for truth and some attempt at sticking to 'the scientific principle', even if one takes a wrong turn one at least has a chance of back tracking and refinding the trail.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, Tom, it was a bit of a dummy spit on my part with regards to how so readily glimpses of truth (which I'm not suggesting this is) is ignored and replaced with, what I suppose, really is a vaccuum parading as something of substance.

Still, plugging away with a flexible mindset and at least a desire for truth and some attempt at sticking to 'the scientific principle', even if one takes a wrong turn one at least has a chance of back tracking and refinding the trail.

Still, plugging away with a flexible mindset and at least a desire for truth and some attempt at sticking to 'the scientific principle', even if one takes a wrong turn one at least has a chance of back tracking and refinding the trail

You speak of the method of conducting empirical research, however there remain many who are of the opinion that the reason which they can go no farther in regards to understanding of the evidence is due to some giant conspiracy which is related to body kidnappings and wound alterations; multiple assassins and a coverup of the medical facts; etc; etc; etc; aka sometimes all of the above!

Certainly beats having to admit that one has neither the ability nor the drive to actually conduct empirical and analytical research.

Along with not having to admit that they fell for/believed the misleading interpretations of the WC version of the shooting scenario.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom" there remain many who are of the opinion that the reason which they can go no farther in regards to understanding of the evidence is due to some giant conspiracy which is related to body kidnappings and wound alterations; multiple assassins and a coverup of the medical facts; etc; etc; etc; aka sometimes all of the above!

Certainly beats having to admit that one has neither the ability nor the drive to actually conduct empirical and analytical research.

Along with not having to admit that they fell for/believed the misleading interpretations of the WC version of the shooting scenario."

I can't but help agree with you (without pointing a finger at anyone, it's a freely available hat that those who choose to wear it are the best judges of who they are). Having studied this matter now for about two years, I've gone through many ideas and ways of thinking and doing things, many of them erronous, and I see others going through many of the same avenues. I think that often I have come to know something that is true by believing something that is un-true.

I think it's a lot to do with what is really ones agenda?

If it's a proper one, then it doesn't really matter if one has wandered down a 'rabbit hole' leading nowhere. One will in time find out.

I personally think there are multiple layers to the Forum. I've little need in me to be a 'catcher in the rye' or 'the boy with the finger in the dam'. I guess I have a faith. Truth, sooner or later has a boyancy all of its own and un-truth has a weight that drags it down and which no amount of vigorous support will stand the test of time.

Edited by John Dolva
Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom" there remain many who are of the opinion that the reason which they can go no farther in regards to understanding of the evidence is due to some giant conspiracy which is related to body kidnappings and wound alterations; multiple assassins and a coverup of the medical facts; etc; etc; etc; aka sometimes all of the above!

Certainly beats having to admit that one has neither the ability nor the drive to actually conduct empirical and analytical research.

Along with not having to admit that they fell for/believed the misleading interpretations of the WC version of the shooting scenario."

I can't but help agree with you (without pointing a finger at anyone, it's a freely available hat that those who choose to wear it are the best judges of who they are). Having studied this matter now for about two years, I've gone through many ideas and ways of thinking and doing things, many of them erronous, and I see others going through many of the same avenues. I think that often I have come to know something that is true by believing something that is un-true.

I think it's a lot to do with what is really ones agenda?

If it's a proper one, then it doesn't really matter if one has wandered down a 'rabbit hole' leading nowhere. One will in time find out.

I personally think there are multiple layers to the Forum. I've little need in me to be a 'catcher in the rye' or 'the boy with the finger in the dam'. I guess I have a faith. Truth, sooner or later has a boyancy all of its own and un-truth has a weight that drags it down and which no amount of vigorous support will stand the test of time.

I guess I have a faith. Truth, sooner or later has a boyancy all of its own and un-truth has a weight that drags it down and which no amount of vigorous support will stand the test of time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels

perfection of the so-called Big Lie technique of mass propaganda.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it. - OSS report page 51 [2]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of which JBC reportedly frequently repeated a variation of.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nevertheless, history only manages to re-establish it's correct course when someone takes the time to point out the correct direction which should be examined.

You are openly sharing your work, but there are several who review this forum, that for whatever their personal reasons, are searching for the correct facts necessary to establish the correct course.

And, one can be assured that sufficient facts are now present that history can re-establish the correct course in the issues of the JFK Assassination.

Tom

P.S.

"Pissant":-------Thought to be a variation on "peasant" as stated by LBJ.

When in reality, it was "Piss Ant", which was meant to indicate an insignificant individual/group, which although could sting, could also be just as easily squashed.

"MineSport":----- All kinds of supposedly/reportedly meanings on the part of LBJ.

The Kennedy's had "Hyannisport", in which the social skills of LBJ effectively eliminated him from participation in, therefore, LBJ came up with "MineSport" aka "Mine Sport/Mines Port" which was utilized to identify his current recepient of his sexual activities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on Goebbles: "After the Nazis seized power in 1933, he was appointed propaganda minister. One of his first acts was to order the burning of books"

further, as the Red Army was only some 100's of miles from Berlin, he continued to churn out films showing happy parties, and idyllic germanic celebrations, and victorious enthusiastic eastern front soldiers, and lots of dead Russians. By this time much of it in color.

Still, we know what soon did really in the end happen to this 'big lie' proponent. After Hitler comitted suicide, 'The Big xxxx' killed his six little children (or rather 'allowed' his wife to do it, and then shot his wife and then himself .

It's when the book burnings start and the alternative sources disappear that we're in trouble. Not quite there yet.

_______________________

OSS, Hitler and the 'big lie' : "His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it." - OSS report page 5

(BTW the 'Downfall' is a good fairly recent German film on the last ten days in Berlin, much of it in the Bunker)

Edited by John Dolva
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...