Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) In the event this one confuses, do not feel all alone. It has escaped scrutiny for a long time for this reason. Tom Edited August 2, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) In the event this one confuses, do not feel all alone.It has escaped scrutiny for a long time for this reason. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-2 Edited August 2, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) In the event this one confuses, do not feel all alone.It has escaped scrutiny for a long time for this reason. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-2 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-3 Edited August 2, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) In the event this one confuses, do not feel all alone.It has escaped scrutiny for a long time for this reason. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-2 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-3 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-4 Edited August 2, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) In the event this one confuses, do not feel all alone.It has escaped scrutiny for a long time for this reason. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-2 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-3 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-4 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-5 Edited August 2, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) In the event this one confuses, do not feel all alone.It has escaped scrutiny for a long time for this reason. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-2 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-3 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-4 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-5 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-6 Please recall that the WC "inadvertedly" omitted publishing of the actual frames of the Z-film on each side of Z-210. Some member of the Commission later responded that they had not received these frames of the film from Time/Life. If one wishes to believe this, then that is of course their option. However, the "Composite" says Z-210 as best as I can read. Tom Edited August 2, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) In the event this one confuses, do not feel all alone.It has escaped scrutiny for a long time for this reason. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-2 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-3 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-4 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-5 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-6 Please recall that the WC "inadvertedly" omitted publishing of the actual frames of the Z-film on each side of Z-210. Some member of the Commission later responded that they had not received these frames of the film from Time/Life. If one wishes to believe this, then that is of course their option. However, the "Composite" says Z-210 as best as I can read. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Adjusted-7 (last one) Please note the white dots marking aiming points. The one at the edge of the hairline is the one meant to represent the entrance location for the shot to the head which the autopsy surgeons recognized and examined. Try and fit this body position into a scenario in which the shot struck here on an approximately 15 degree downward angle, and thereafter penetrated the skull in the vicinity of the EOP or the Cowlick. Tom Edited August 2, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now