John K. White

I'm not at all convinced on the Badgeman shape. Look at it closely. The white wall looks like a sea of gauze and fuzz. But a shape standing far back from the fence is clearly defined, a photographic impossibility. But if the figure is real, he would have to be elevated on a car bumper in order to have his chest come up above the five foot fence. Why would an assassin do that if he wanted to get a good shot but didn't want to be seen. Look at this picture comparing "Gordon Arnold" to the Badgeman figure. Only one of these figures can be real, Arnold or Badgeman. But if one figure isn't real, it puts the other figure in serious doubt. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arnold2/hargiscomp.jpg <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Isn't it possible that Black Dog man was actually Gordon Arnold before he hit the deck?

Thanks for the email address. I will follow up on that.

I posted this as a reply to a reply on my question about the stare of death photo, but I thought I would repost as a stand alone topic to get feedback... I remember seeing one TV special that focused on the dictabelt recordings, and they matched up the sound with a viewing of the Zapruder film. Of course, it was an educated guess for them... they matched the sound of the first shot with JFK reacting to the throat shot. What intrigued me, was the last shots were right on top of each other - bang, bang - and the first of those shots was the explosive headshot, and the last shot appeared to strike the exposed brain and continue on. There was a noticable stream of blood and tissue moving forward off of his head, that did not appear to be blood spurting from an artery or vain, after the sound of the last shot. That was something I hadn't perceived until hearing the shots while viewing the film. I hypothesize that that last shot struck soft brain tissue, and continued on to strike the curb, and then struck James Tague. This idea adds strength to the argument that there were two distinct volleys of shots, with the radio men - guided by Umbrella Man's signal - telling the shooters more shots were needed. The other thing I would like feedback on is the theory put forward on the Morningstar website that J.D. Tippit was the knoll gunman, based on a comparison of a rare Tippit photo and the Badgeman photo... It would explain the need to take him out after the assassination...

Welcome, John K. White. My father was John N. White! At the moment I do not have access to my 8x10 sets of autopsy pix. Tomorrow I will scan a giant enlargement of that area for you to look at. I am attaching the only image of that pic that resides in this computer. The red oval was on it for another purpose... but it is slightly larger and better than the one you attached. I believe: ...the body was altered ...the photos were altered If so, your observation may have little evidentiary value. Greetings from your Texas "namesake". Jack White <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks for the welcome! Appreciate that. While I agree that the autopsy pictures show signs of fakery, I wonder if they may have been working from some legitimate photos, which may still display elements of truth? There are a few other things I've been wondering over the years... I remember seeing one TV special that focused on the dictabelt recordings, and they matched up the sound with a viewing of the Zapruder film. Of course, it was an educated guess for them... they matched the sound of the first shot with JFK reacting to the throat shot. What intrigued me, was the last shots were right on top of each other - bang, bang - and the first of those shots was the explosive headshot, and the last shot appeared to strike the exposed brain and continue on. There was a noticable stream of blood and tissue moving forward off of his head, that did not appear to be blood spurting from an artery or vain, after the sound of the last shot. That was something I hadn't perceived until hearing the shots while viewing the film. I hypothesize that that last shot struck soft brain tissue, and continued on to strike the curb, and then struck James Tague. This idea adds strength to the argument that there were two distinct volleys of shots, with the radio men - guided by Umbrella Man's signal - telling the shooters more shots were needed. The other thing I would like feedback on is the theory put forward on the Morningstar website that J.D. Tippit was the knoll gunman, based on a comparison of a rare Tippit photo and the Badgeman photo... It would explain the need to take him out after the assassination... P.S. - My middle name is Kennedy... My dad named me after JFK in '67... Guess I was destined to snoop around this case from birth. Well, I started when he gave me all of his clippings when I was 16... I took it from there.

Short-time lurker, first-time poster... have been reading every book on assassination science for 20 years... Something I've always wondered... Is there not an obvious concave, bullet-sized wound on the president's temple in the stare of death photo? I apologize if this has already been discussed here... See attached