Mike Perez

And look at the changes we have been through in the last 45 years. 45 years and 1 day ago tthe President of the United States could ride through an American city in an open car. Now he can't walk in front of a window at the White House. Your kids could play in the yard after dark, but they can't now. You thought the Government always told you the truth, when in reality we now know that they don't think we can handle the truth. In some American cities you don't leave your house now after dark. 45 years ago you knew the names of ALL your neighbors on your block and you actually talked to them I've lived in the house that I live in now for the last 2 years, I couldn't even tell you my neighbors names. Think about it ..... alot more died on that street in Dallas than just a man named John Fitzgerald Kennedy... May he forever rest in peace! Mike

If Oswald carried curtain rods into the TSBD WHERE ARE THEY???? The Dallas Police , FBI. SS do not mention curtain rods being found on Nov 22 or any other day. Also I believe Oswald's landlady testufued that Oswalds room had curtains , so if it had curtains it must have had curtain rods, So there was no need for Oswald to take Curtain rods from Ruth Paines house to The TSBD on Nov. 22..... Mike

The only problem with the Grand Jury senario, is IMO the Grand Jury would run up against the same problems that the Warren Commission, The House Select Committee, Jim Garrison and probably any one else that would start a legitimate investigation NO COOPERATION. It's been proven time and again that the Government and it's agencies are not going to help in the solving of this crime. The House Select Committee reccomended that the Justice Dept. (Namely the FBI) investigate further after they found evidence of a conspriracy, I haven't seen the FBI do anything but up hold the Warren Commission finding and then slink off out of sight again so that maybe these people who keep asking the hard questions will get tired of asking or else die off. IMO FWIW, We will never find out who was behind this crime, oh sure we can look at evidence that shows us who was behind it and how it happened, but the people who need to be looking at this never will because they are the ones behind it.

O'k with the passing of Ford,who is left alive that served on the Warren Commission. Seems to me we should be getting to the end of people. Specter is the only one of the main players I can think of that is left.

Stephen, John, Wim; I also think that the autopsy photos look like they are of a younger John Kennedy. More like during the time he was in the Senate and having all of his back surgery. That was one of the first things that made me think that the photos are fake. Mike

As far as the spray of blood or brain matter on Jackie, I believe I remember reading either in Lifton's book or Manchester's book that Parklane Nurse Doris Nelson gave Jackie a towel to wipe her face with... I may be wrong but that idea is stuck in my head for some reason.. Mike

I heard that George Sr. had a writ of Hapeas Corpus issued but...... The writ was denied due to lack of prove of the issistance of a brain in the first place. I just had to put in my 2 cents worth Mike

There is nothing in the forum rules that state that Mr. Moldea has to answer your's or anyone else questions. This is why forums like this have a propblem with getting people to join who can really add something to a thread and in stead they have people who insist on badgering someone. I'm sorry John, but I'm sick and tired of one person running another perrson off just because another person won't answer their precious question. Stick by your guns Dan. Mike

I believe it could be be because the ln's don't want to have to defend their position with the likes of the heavy hitters that post on this forum. Just look at some of the names John posted and put yourself in their position. So basically I think they are just scared to go up against anyone that can and will defend the conspiracy therories on a public forum where there are this many heavy hitters. They would rather do it one on one so they say something and then say they didn't say that when they are called on it. IMHO... Mike

Hello All: I believe the 6th Floor Museum should be boycotted, because of the exact reason that John states. I was in Dealey Plaza on Nov. 22, 2005 for the first time in about 20 years. The last time I was there, The 6th Floor Museum didn't exist. And as far as I am concerned it doesn't exist to this day. I believe the Museum should present ALL aspects about the assassination. My wife who isn't as well read on this subject as I am, insisted on buying me a book while she was in the gift shop. I wouldn't spend the money to go to the 6th floor because I believe because it is a part of history it should be free for everyone. Any way she ended up buying me the book "Without Malice". It had a lot of good information in it about Tippit's murder and how Oswald did it but other than that it was definately pro lone nut material. I didn't see one book, dvd, or any other item while I was in the gift shop that was pro conspiracy. So obviously Gary Mack's idea about what happened on Nov. 22, 1963 is that Oswald did it alone which makes Gary out to be a Lone Nutter.

Chuck; True, very true but I have seen the pictures of the fingerprint cards and they do not look like they came from a corpse. Fingerprinting a corpse is not as easy thing to do as printing a live subject. I have experience in this, as fingerprinting is one of my main duties. I fingerprint mostly live subjects but I have been called on to fingerprint corpses also. The prints that I have seen that are supposed to come from LHO were not taken from a dead body. They are normal fingerprints and were not taken with the use of fingerprint spoons. Best Regards; Mike

Much has been made of the fact that the the FBI went to Miller's Funeral Home and fingerprinted LHO. The inference is that the FBI used those prints to place them on the rifle so LHO would look more guilty. I was just thinking about this and the thought occured to me that there are either LATENT prints or KNOWN prints. For those of you who don't know Latent means (unknown) ie. the fingerprint expert doesn't know who the print belongs to. Everytime you touch something, the print you leave behind would be a latent print. Because a crime scene investigator who would lifts the print and a expert that would classify the print wouldn't know who it belonged to. The expert would have to compare it to known fingerprints in order to either find or eliminate a person as a suspect. (Correct me Al is this is not right, you have more experience than I do.) When the FBI went to the funeral home and fingerprinted LHO they didn't have to use fingerprint ink to put his prints on the rifle. All they had to do was take Oswald's hand and touch it to the rifle where they wanted to find his prints, and then protect the rifle like they would in a regular investigation till they got it back to the FBI Lab where they could lift, and compare the "latent" print with "known" prints of LHO and low and behold they had their "EVIDENCE." Now the way we know that the FBI fingerprinted LHO is by word of mouth. The mouth being Paul Goody a Funeral Director for Miller's Funeral Home. Goody stated that the FBI came to the funeral home I believe on the night of the 25th and fingerprinted Oswald. Not calling Mr. Goody a xxxx, but he has been wrong about some of his other statement and has been known to elaborate a little. When Oswald was exhumed in 1981 Mr. Goody stated that he was in the autopsy room at the time that tha pathologist performed the examination on Oswald. Actually he was outside the room and was not allowed in the room except to open the casket so the autopsy team could remove Oswalds body for the examination. Mr Goody also stated that he did not observe the incision in the top of Oswald's head that had been made in order to remove Oswald's brain during the first autopsy that was performed by Dr. Rose. But yet the report and notes from the exhumation autopsy team makes note of and describes the incision. I don't know why the FBI would be fingerprinting Oswald after he was dead but I don't believe it was to place his prints on the rifle. Comments welcome!!!! Mike

Starting with the FBI / SS reconstruction of the assassination for the Warren Commission Report. Has anyone besides me noticed that everytime someone does a reconstruction of the assassination whether it is done in Dealey Plaza or not. Whether it is for a fictionalized version of the assassination or not, that the people in control of the reconstruction never make the reconstruction exactly like the assassination happened on 11-22-63? They always use a different car, different location, a gun similar to but not the actual gun that LHO was supposed to use, the shoot a watermelon or some other inanimate object. ( I do realize they can't actually shoot a person) IMHO (which isn't worth much) I think if they are trying to prove that LHO committed the assassination with the weapon "they" say he used, at the time "they" say he did it, And President Kennedy was Where"they"say he was, in the car "they" he was in, then they should utilize all of the original information I state above in order to make the recreation acccurate. Maybe I am off my rocker but it seems to me that everything has to be exactly the same for a recreation to take place. Including date, time, place, weapon, vehicle, and stand-in''s that are the exact size of Kennedy and Connally. If they film it, they need to use Zapruder's camera with the exact type of film he used and standing EXACTLY where he was standing. Maybe I am asking for to much, but to me that is the ONLY way that you can recreate the assassination of Kennedy and glean any information from the recreation. Comments are welcome!!!!! Mike

Ron; I'm not a street cop. But I'm going to put my two cents worth in as I have worked in Law Enforcement for close to 14 years. First, at the time that the Officers entered the Texas Theatre, Oswald was a suspect in the Tippet killing only. the Dallas PD didn't start looking at Oswald as an assassin of the President till after he arrived at DPD. McDonald frisked the other two men in the theatre so that he could have more time to observe Oswald. Remember they were searching for a man who they thought already had no regard for the uniform of a Policeman. McDonald I believe wanted to size up the suspect a little longer and to see if maybe he could see a gun on the subject. I truly believe that was what was going through McDonald's head as he was walking up the aisle. Mike

Bill, John and everyone else interested: I believe IMHO that the start to finding the truth is in the Autopsies. Notice Autopsies is plurel. I believe that the are a number of bodies that NEED to be exhumed before we can get anywhere with this investigation and definately before we would be able to present it to a Grand Jury. I know of at least 2 exhumations that need top be preformed. In order to get ALL the medical evidence that we need to present to the Grand Jury. We need for once to go to these people with "ALL" of our ducks in a row and ALL of us working together to a common goal, instead of working for ourselves for our own agendas. We need to go at this with a united front. And now for the exhumations I think need to be preformed. First I would like to know what exactly happened to John F. Kennedy, sooooo I would exhume his body and do an extensive examination of his wounds and the extent of damage to his body. And then just for ***** and giggles i would want to exhume J.D. Tippet, just to see who's body is buried there. I make no accusations I just really want to know this information. After that then we need to get Marina (Oswald) Porter on our side so she can file a wrongful death suit against DPD then we'll be on our way o finding out what happened on Nov. 22, 1963 Mike

Merry, opps too Christian Happy, opps too Jewish Have a, opps too anything. I hope all forum members have a good day, but please remember why we all really celebrate this day. It happened over 2000 years ago in a littlle town called Bethleham. Where a child was born, who was the son of God. I'm not really scared to say it..... MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL, from the Lone Star State

I agree with Al. During the campaign for the 1992 Presidential Election I was working for The Little Rock Police Dept. When Clinton came to town there were SS all over the place, but our local officers were used to supplement the security teams. Many a night I spent talking with Little Rock Officers and hearing them complain about having to spend all night on the roof of the TCBY tower in downtown Little Rock with a SS swat team.

Hi all I finally got back on the Forum!!! I wasn't able to go to the Lancer Conference, but I was in Dallas on Nov. 22. This was my first (but certainly not my last) time in Dealey Plaza on the date the assassination happened. It wasn't my first time there, just the first time on Nov. 22. I was kind of surprised in the size of the crowd that was there. I was expecting a large crowd and a lot of researchers and authors there, but there was only a crowd of about 300 people. Robert Groden was the only author I recognized, and as for researchers none that I know of were there. Or at least they didn't make it known they were researchers. I only live 105 miles from Dallas now so I will be returning to Dealey Plaza often. I sure hope that the size of the crowd this year will not be diminished next year.

Shanet: Wow what a shopping list !!!!!!!!! Did you happen to see a lower radiator hose for a 1966 Chevy Biscaynne?

You Know it must be the same all over the country as far as how people feel when it comes to LE doing their job correctly. Nobody can understand why a cop would walk up to a car with his hand on his weapon if he is only pulling that car over for a speeding violation. Nobody understands why an officer will fight with everything he has and use any tool he has to restrain a violent subject. People don't understand how if a subject is on the ground and tries to get up how this can be an act of aggression. You all can't understand any of this because none of you have ever been the cop pulling the person over for speeding, or you have never been the officer fighting a violent subject, and you've never seen what a subject that is just tring to stand up, can do to an officer or group of officers if he is allowed to get up.Like Al said when you have walked a mile in our shoes and understand the reason why we do the things we do, then the Rodney King incident, the O.J. and the Jackson incident will all become much clearer to you. Also a little more food for thought, you know it's funny that some of the most outspoken people against all police actions, are the same people that call you at 3:00 in the morning and when you arrive on scene at 3:02 they bitch you out because you weren't there at 2:59. It's like the people who lobby against capital punishment in this country. I will bet you dollars to donut holes ( and remember cops don't give up their donut holes real easy) that they who lobby against it have never had a loved one murdered in a capital offense or had any one even remotely close to them murdered. And as far as Rodney being scared so he ran..... I'm sorry but I must have been taught different when I was growing up in N.E. Iowa. I was always taught that a Police Office was the one person that you could trust and there was no need to be afraid of them. The way I look at it If you run..... YOU"RE GUILTY!!!! of something. Otherwise there would be no need to run. You can all call me what ever you want, but the one thing you can't call me is naive, like some folks around here. With all do Respect!!!!!!! Mike

Well I quess The criminal justice system is no longer America. What with the O. J. trial and now the Michael jackson trial, all of you people that dont live in the United States can now see how thing operate in the the good old U.S.A. If you're black and rich you can get by with murder. Why, because God forbid we would accuse a Black man of committing a violent act in this country. I have worked in Law enforcement since 1985, And I will be the first to admit that I am embarrassed because of our criminal justice system. I don't want top sound like a racist, but I am sure if Al Carrier is reading this he will say the same thing I am saying. He may work in a city that is bigger that the one i work in, b ut I have worked in a ith that is bigger than Waterloo, Iowa. Al I know how big Waterloo is i was born and raised in Oelwein. But I've worked in Little Rock Ar. which is bigger than Waterloo and let me tell you things are different down South. But what has happened in California 2 times in the last 10 to 15 yearsd is ridicules, everybody and they're dog knew O.J. was guilty and the same holds true for Michael Jackson. The only thing that go0t Simpson off was his lawyer playing the RACE card. Just let a WHITE man try that. and the same holds true for Jackson. I am so sick of this that it almost makes me feel like turning my badge. After all what good does it do is the person you arrest for a crime, no matter how gui;ty the evidence shows them to be, if thjey walk at the end of the trial just because of WHO they are or WHAT they are...... I do want to apoligize to the forum for blasting off, but the frustration level is real high right now. John move this subject wherever you see that it fits, I understand Thanks for letting me vent!!!!!!!!!! Mike

Hi John and all I still believe,(and I don't know why) that when a new sitting President takes office th "people in control" sit that man down in the White House Movie Theatre, and all of a sudden a movie starts playing on the screen. The President is allowed to watch the movie in silence, and when it is over, a man steps up in front of the President and simply states. "We are going to do this our way not yours." And then the man turns and walks out of the room. That movie leaves just as big of a impression on the new President as what LBJ saw on the streets of Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. For you see the film the President just watched was the Zapruder film. I don't know why I thiink this happens, but Clinton hasn't been the only President to say publicly that he didn't believe the Warren Commission and that if he got elected he would do something about it. And then when he got into office did absolutely nothing towards reopening the case.

Hi All; It would be nice to either see floor plans of Bethesda or schematic drawings on the floor plans. I know Lifton had a few diagrams in Best Evidence but they only show a specific area. I would like to see floor plans for all the floors that had any thing to do with the autopsy. Including the floor where everybody was waiting for the the autopsy to be completed. The floor plan for the floor where Lt. Com Bruce Pitzer committed suicide included. Mike

Yes the Plaza is smaller than what most people think it is. I was in the Plaza around 1985-86 and that is one of the things that conviced me that it was more than a one man job. You can talk about timing and where the car was at the time of the shots, but like Terri said you have to go there and walk it to really see and help you understand the lay out. Robin it looks like you have the position pretty well pegged. If you look in the forground which is at the bottom of the photo you can see the sidewalk that runs down to the steps and then to the sidewalk that runs along Commerce St. Great pic !!!!! Mike

Great discussion guys !!!!! But this is the way I look at things.. Might not be right but it makes sense to me. EVERYONE I don't care who you are has a price that their integrity is worth, for some it doesn't take much for others it takes the cost of making that man President of The United States. Now IMO there have been 2 people paid off with the Presidency 1st LBJ. And he isn't going to say anything after the payoff, remember he heard and saw the results of the shots in Dallas. So he know he has to hold the line. The 2nd Gerald Ford. His payoff was being made Vice President at the right time in history when it was almost guarenteed that Nixon was either going to be impeach or would be made to resign. Either way Ford was going to get his payoff. Ford wasn't going to talk because he had been a member of The Warren Commission and he already knew what had happened to John Kennedy in Dallas, and he didn't want that to happen to him. All the instigators of the plot had to do was find out what the price was for each individual for them to keep their mouths shut, and then be able to come up with the payoff. I believe with the exception of the 2 Presidents mentioned that each sitting President either just before they take office or immediately after they take office is taken into a room and shown the Zapruder film and it is explained to them that they are NOT in control and if they start thinking or acting like they are, then what happened to John Kennedy in Dallas could happen to them too. Their payoff was making it through the Presidency alive. Mike