Dawn Meredith

Thank you Steve. Very well put and right on the mark. In a field where there are so many stand out books this one remains my favorite. Sounds like the poster above his come with an anti Kennedy bias. Hope he finishes the book and continues his study. Dawn

Ya facebook has become very adept at pushing lies and censoring a lot of truth. Making me wonder if it's not just some CIA op to keep track of people like us. As always great article Jim. I really need to get RFK's book "Framed". I have found that the left has always been terrible on the assassinations. And refuse to be educated. (I did manage to get my professor brother in law to read JFK and the Unspeakable but he was quick to tell me this would never happen today...ah...he missed the point.)

Indeed. It is called Deep Politics Forum for a reason. Lone nutters know zero about the study of the Deep State. By choice we believe.

WOW Joe, I posted before I read this. You hit the nail on the head. Bravo.

I totally agree. They will never agree with the truth. I have long wondered why so many lone nut advocates come to these forums. I have my own suspicions of course especially about the ones who post all the darn time. It is sad to see so many lone nut voices on a forum dedicated to serious discussion about the assassination of JFK. Last month our 15 year old grand daughter was asked to write a paper on this subject by her lone nut teacher. She did her own research and came to the conclusion that her teacher was dead wrong. She got an A.

Imagine if all those polled knew all the truly great things JFK did, he would be counted the greatest. But history books, mainstream media and college professors continue the lies. Such as LBJ continued JFK's policy in Viet Nam.

Very interesting tale of yet one more witness who only knew LEE Oswald. Thanks for bumping this Jim. Dawn

Zero proof. Joan Mellen alleges this in her Garrison book, but I have been told she hated RFK so that may explain this allegation. Sheridan was CIA so you can guess who sent him to sabotage JG. EDIT: Once again Jim D. corrects the record with facts. David Talbot was still a newbie on this case when he was writing Brothers. I think he would no longer be so quick to give Sheridan a pass.

Doyle used to email me and his email is "troppocrat".

Wow now I have to add this book to my growing list. I have always considered Sherman a bit of a fame whore but am just shocked at his lack of a cross exam. A layman would have done better. As a criminal defense attorney I am ashamed. Actually I need to make that former as I am closing out that part of my practice to focus on Child Protective Services cases. Had a great jury win yesterday on behalf of my kids, twins who turned four yesterday and a younger sibling. I am still feeling the joy of that moment, knowing these kids will be adopted in their forever homes very soon, after two years.

WOW, thanks for posting this Doug. For those requiring proof this should suffice! I would post it at facebook but they blocked me this am for the crime of posting "Americans are so stupid". So for 24 hours I am locked out. I "offended community standards". So much for free speech on fb. Dawn

I would love to see JFK and The Unspeakable made into a film.

I remember this as it was happening and how worried I became that HSCA would be one more cover-up as a result.

I would love to see your paper. I did two papers on this case while in college, but nothing in law school. Did come up with an idea for this case in law school however, that I was prevented from pursuing due to the actions of an unethical researcher who shall remain nameless. Kudos to Morley and especially his attorney who has been at his stuff for decades. Dawn

Michael, Since I seem to be the only member of this forum who is "pushing" the KGB or Castro did it "theories" (hey, maybe even with the witting or unwitting help of some rogue CIA types), I can only assume that when you say, above, "our prolific 'KGB did it' member," you are referring to me. Am I correct in that assumption? Or am I just being "paranoid," here? If so, why didn't you say my name? Are you afraid the moderators would chastise you if you did? Regardless, in my humble opinion there are lots and lots of patriotic Americans who truly love their country but who have been unwittingly misled and conditioned by at least 58 years of (Soviet/Russian) "active measures" counterintelligence ops interwoven with "strategic / operative deception" counterintelligence ops into doing certain things (like believing that we live in a "Deep State," etc, or like voting for a blackmail-able "useful idiot" of Vladimir Putin) or not doing certain things (like voting, or like fact-checking stuff on reputable fact-checking websites). I don't appreciate your insinuating that I believe that I am more patriotic than you or anyone else on this forum. More knowledgeable on certain things perhaps, but not more patriotic. At least I hope there aren't any dyed-in-the-wool traitors lurking here. (Laughing Out Loud) Have a nice day, Michael, and I (edit: really do) mean it. -- Tommy Are you serious??? You believe Russia or Castro had JFK killed? Have you done no research on JFK's peace efforts with both leaders, or do you just choose to ignore this?. When I asked you in another thread who you believed had JFK killed you avoided the question. WOW.

So you ARE admitting he was banned.? That is really outrageous.

I'll bite: Who do you think killed JFK? So if people (like me) believe the CIA killed JFK that can be grounds for removal? Or one's "style"? How are these decisions made here? At DPF we actually discuss such a move privately and take a vote. We also give ample warning.

It has come to my attention that David Josephs has been axed from this forum. With no warning or reason as to why. What is going on? Don't you have to break some rules or something? Or perhaps his views are simply unwelcome. ??? Dawn

Great question Don. You know of course from his fb posts that Tommy completely buys into the Russia hysteria. It makes me crazy- I refuse to argue this with people who parrot the rants of MSM.

OMG What a treat. I rarely come here but if RCD returns I will be a regular. Tommy you are WAY our of your league when it comes to the enormous talent, knowledge and analysis of RCD.

I do not consider him serious in the least. Never have. So I don't respond to him. In fact I rarely come here anymore as there are so many lone nuts that wading through all the posts is a waste of time. Glad I saw this one from you Don. Totally agree.

OMG I LOVE Sean Stone and I love RT.

WOW...you have just listed all of my issues with this trial. That said the lawyers are all well versed in this case and in spite of all of the above did very well. This case is simply far too complicated to present in two days. I did not know that about the cross of the state's sole witness, now it makes more sense. An whoever decided to do an ethics presentation as part of the opening was totally off the mark. You have to grab your jurors coming out of the park. On why your client is not guilty. A history lesson puts them to sleep.

Jim you can email me dmeredith@austin.rr.com The clothing WAS presented by the state's only witness -that and the silly drawing of the bullet going from neck out of neck, more than once but it was left unchallenged by the defense. As for the Mauser, the defense said that was a mistake. A mistake when that kind of gun has its name printed on it. How could trained cops make that mistake? But I do commend the defense for all the work that went into the trial, perhaps TX jurors would never vote NG. They also plan to learn from the mistakes and do it again.

Jim the site is down. I asked Maggie about it via fb message the other day... Jim Did you watch the entire trial? Will you write about it? I KNEW the prosecutor would jump all over LHO leaving as consciousness of guilt and that was left, no re direct to correct that. And when Bill said that we don't know that he was not involved I knew that the prosecutor would jump to the law of parties, which of course she did. I have so many criticisms of the trial but am too exhausted to articulate such in writing. Just getting over a terrible flu...I have enormous respect for the entire team but I would have tried the case very differently. Lawyers who try criminal cases know that too much technical stuff loses the jury. It was like they were trying to prove there were more shooters, NOT that LHO was a patsy.