Jump to content
The Education Forum

Craig Lamson

Members
  • Posts

    5,063
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Craig Lamson

  1. Because it is a silly question. Lovelady wore a DIFFERENT shirt for thje FBI. Simple. Because you have it incorrect. The shirt is unbuttoned and open in both films. You simple fail at one of the more basic of photographic principles...point of view. And of course BOTH films show his tee shirt between the unbuttoned placket of his checked shirt. The only ones grasping for anything is James Feezer and the OIP. Where was Billy? Right were Altgens shows him, You get so much wrong its hard to believe you would even dare show your face in the rational world.....
  2. You don't think all the photos you posted show the exact same thing? ARE YOU BLIND?
  3. You can't just claim the photos are fake (unless you are intellectually dishonest) you actually have to PROVE the photos are fake. Good luck with that. Give Cinque and Hooke a call. LOL!
  4. Sure jimmy...the witnesses that support you are correct. So ALL the witnesses in this case are 98 percent accurate and 98 percent complete. Or is it just the ones YOU want to support whatever silly claim you have cooked up?
  5. Yes, read them and see where Fetzer and his cohorts make huge ASSUMPTIONS instead of accurately reading the words. Please show us where the other quotes tell us Chaney was going PAST JFK's Limo...
  6. Von Pein fails photo 101 just like Cliff Varnell. Done in by the sun.
  7. And yet since there IS a fold, the rest of your so called evidence fails. And FAIL it does.
  8. Yep. That's exactly what it shows. You are done cliff. Maybe you should heed your own "oversold" words. CV" 2-23-13 "I've only read a few posts. I'm not going there, to the EF. I'm not going back." Once an "OVERSELLER" always an "OVERSELLER!
  9. Fetzer's only port in a storm...THE PHOTO MUST BE FAKE! ROFLMAO!
  10. You are right, there is NOTHING left to debate. There was a 3+ inch fold of fabric on JFK's back ..as the WEAVER photo shows so well. Thanks so much Cliff for proving me correct once again.
  11. Well the images tell another story and you have yet to impeach the images and show evidence they were faked. Back to the drawing board for you! No, wait, I'm sure the FETZERING will continue... 1. Fetzering 11 thumbs up Noun: 1. The act of making an unfounded or unsubstantiated claim. 2. In philosophy, a method of debate or discussion based of the premise of: I think, therefore I am. I think you're wrong. therefore you are. 3. The act of disagreeing by employing rancor, name calling, ad hominem attacks or straw man argument. Etymology: Fetzering began in earnest in the late 1960's, being implemented by a JFK conspiracy theorist and has since expanded it's use in the 9/11 debate arena. 1. Without evidence your claim is simple fetzering. 2. He should rely on his data instead of fetzering.
  12. You don't know what you lost sucker? lmao. Delusional..... LOL Craig, you should volunteer to put yourself on moderation. Laughter might be your best course of action, Then you can join the chorus laughing AT you.
  13. And yet Croft, which Varnell loves to show to try ( and fail) to prove his point shows us exactly that. A 3+inch fold of fabric on JFK's back and the jacket COLLAR in its normal position. Kindergarten photo analysis by Cliff Varnell, which is his STANDARD level.
  14. You don't know what you lost sucker? lmao. Delusional.....
  15. Backslapping and you LOST! Roflmao! Delusional......
  16. You're not to be taken seriously on this issue, Pat. Sorry. "CV" 2-23-13 "I've only read a few posts. I'm not going there, to the EF. I'm not going back." Once an "OVERSELLER" always an "OVERSELLER!
  17. Only in your dreams fetzer...only in your dreams. Get back to us when you can find a way to impeach ALL of the images. ROFLMAO! That will be NEVER.
  18. No doubt watsoever the jacket was folded on the back. And since the holes in both the shirt and jacket match...well you do the math jim, if you are capable. You have yet to provide proof that all of that photos showing the fold are faked, heck you have not even started. Strike two for Fetzer. As thread has aptly shown, its not even CLOSE to being settled. Fifty years on and CT's still can't agree. Strike three jimmy. That is exactly true...FOR YOU. And you are painfully obvious.
×
×
  • Create New...