Craig Lamson
-
Posts
5,063 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Craig Lamson
-
Is that another, "I'm jimbo and I don't know what I think I know-ism"? LMAO.
-
The 'substance"? ROFLMAO! What a joke you are jimbo.
-
You are such an easy mark. If I did not know as you so wrongly suggest, then how could I have had a conversation about Stringer, Reibe and Spencer on another forum months ago, including ARRB quotes. You see jimbo, you just got powned. Could not happened to a not so nicer guy. Great work jimbo. I told you that you were not as smart and all knowing as you though you were. Excuse me while I go clean a few of my guns....sucker.
-
Really simple. Fetzer is no longer relevant. He has been abandoned by all but the most overt the top CT's. No one cares anymore about his Fetzering, unless it is just to poke fun. Jimmy is is full meltdown because he NEEDS his audience. And he has lost it. -
Save your pop quiz's for the poor dweebs that are required to sit in your classroom.
-
Really, it would indicate the lower wound, give the large fold of fabric we see in NUMEROUS plaza images? Give me a break. People do a bad job all time Jim, even you. Its because they are human. Look how badly you just screwed up. You are human, rihgt? Nice cardsharp bit Craig. That is not what I said. My argument was about the shirt. Secondly, you clearly don't know crapola about what I am writing about with the critique of the autopsy photos. Which is par for the course with you since your JFK literacy is about at a third grade level. (Which does not stop you from flapping your chops indiscrimanately.) The violation of protocol was not just a bad job. It was worse than that. The ARRB interview, which you did not even know existed, said there were necessary shots not taken. So this would be like an advertising client asking you to take a shot of a model from three different distances: one being a close up of her eyes and nose, one of her face, and one from the shoulders up. You then did only the close up of the eyes and nose but you shot it from such a distorted angle that you couldn't rally make out her features. That is not a "bad job" Craig and you know it. And if you do not know it then you are ignorant of what I am speaking about. Which, of course you are. You should really read some of this stuff some time. Then you would not come off as such an arrogant ass. First, duh? who's David Eisendrath? And now this. Don't flatter yourself jimbo, you are really not as bright and all knowing as you think you are. I'm far more well read that you would ever imagine. I'm just not interesting in getting into a pissing match over it nor doe it interest me.. Heck your looney ct's cant even decide whats what. So climb back down off your high hobby horse jimbo. You are just doing a bad job. I guess you are human after all. I'm human too. I've screwed up the odd advertising shoot a time or tow.
-
And you have somehow missed all the photos showing a 3" fold on the jacket and the photo showing JFK's shirt folded up WELL over the level of the top of his shirt collar? Simple is right. His clothes were not flat.
-
Really, it would indicate the lower wound, give the large fold of fabric we see in NUMEROUS plaza images? Give me a break. People do a bad job all time Jim, even you. Its because they are human. Look how badly you just screwed up. You are human, rihgt?
-
Best of luck with that one jimmy, even your die hard ct playmates can't agree. So were did that 3" fold go? LOL!
-
Ya can't even tell us what generation Z-film you've studied, and provide proof as to that lineage. Till then hon, you're whistling in the dark, even the Tinkster can't help. What you got dude, is O-P-I-N-I-O-N! That is IT... You'll be mowing that Z-film lawn for the next 20 years (if your lucky). Carry on! Oh I can tell you what generation I have, and quite frankly I suspect its far closer to the original than you have ever seen. I just choose not to tell you , at least at this time. Now davie, why don't you slink away because, as is usual for you, there is nothing of value to your post once again. You got no game. As for opinions at least I have one and am willing to post it. You are deathly afraid of getting yours in the mix. Not surprising.
-
Does it matter? The pictures exist. And as we can see from this thread, 50 years later even die hard CT's can't agree on where the wound was. Yes it does matter. Because the provenance of those autopsy photos is very much in dispute. And you would have to be either a fool or an agent not to at least acknowledge that fact. I'm not talking about the autopsy photos. Based on this thread, the entire issue of the back wound is still unresolved, photos or no photos It's roflmao funny!
-
Does it matter? The pictures exist. And as we can see from this thread, 50 years later even die hard CT's can't agree on where the wound was.
-
That you claim to have not seen the debunking of the junk "science" you pimp, does not mean they do not exist. Here, let me help you find them. www.google.com You got no game Fetzer. Heck even your ct closest friends have turned against you. And now you are stuck with Ralph Cinque. That pretty much tells the world all they will ever need to know about Jim Fetzer and his search for "truth". There is none. As much fun as it is to play whack-a fetzer, its getting really boring. Keep fetzering...its all you have left.
-
Great now offer proof that those photos have been altered. BTW your list of six does no such thing. Maybe you can get that master photo analyst friend of your, Ralph Cinque to help you out. ROFLMAO! Once again (for the third time) prove your proofs that JFK clothing could NEVER fold or bunch as seen in the Plaza images. This one alone does you in. But I suspect the Fetering will continue.
-
Over the years MANY have "come to grips" with the weak arguments you have tried to make , and over the years they have been taken apart one after the other. Despite of that you keep coughing up these hair balls over and over again, like they actually still had merit. Earth to Jim. They don't.
-
No you have done no such thing. You offer a bunch of hand waves. Show us the proofs of alteration. You have impeached nothing, other than your own reputation. The Fetzering continues.
-
Another hairball...there is no "honest" evidence that shows the film fake. Fetzer beats a very dead horse. Otherwise know as Fetzering.
-
No jim, its a plethora of photographs. Are you now claiming they are all fake? ROFLMAO! Please prove them all fakes.
-
Aside from Chaney, which one those statements is a discrepancy?
-
They HAVE been refuted time and time again, and you keep 'hair balling them"...
-
been there, done that, got the tee shirt... No one with a even bit of sense thinks you have anything of substance to offer.
-
eck, eck...another fur ball from Fetzer...
-
It takes a special kind of arrogance like that shown by Jim Fetzer to try and deny the existence of the large fold on JFK's jacket. It is aptly described as FETZERING...properly defined... Noun: 1. The act of making an unfounded or unsubstantiated claim. 2. In philosophy, a method of debate or discussion based of the premise of: I think, therefore I am. I think you're wrong. therefore you are. 3. The act of disagreeing by employing rancor, name calling, ad hominem attacks or straw man argument. Etymology: Fetzering began in earnest in the late 1960's, being implemented by a JFK conspiracy theorist and has since expanded it's use in the 9/11 debate arena. 1. Without evidence your claim is simple fetzering. 2. He should rely on his data instead of fetzering.
-
Been done, over and over again...and like a cat with a hair ball they get coughed up all over again.
-
The Fetzering continues...everything has been altered except that which Fetzer needs so that must be authentic... Never mind all of this has been debunked many times over Fetzer regurgitates it.
