Brendan Slattery

"O'Reilly was rude to a certifiable nut! How dare he!" Um, you have watched his show before, right? Fetzer knew he wasn't there to play pattycake. Fetz is leveling some pretty serious charges, and O'Reilly cross-examined him quite devastatingly. The ex-professor did nothing but stammer, plug his website, and fade into a catatonic trance when challenged. It was almost as good as Groden on the witness stand in the OJ civil suit. That's what happens to the nuts when they leave their comfort zones. They fall apart under the weight of their own hubris. Nor is it particularly libelous to describe Fetz as an "anti-American loon." Why is it so hard to believe that there are Islamic jihadists in the world who wish the US and the West nothing but death and destruction?

Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet! sock puppet? that term got started on alt.vietnam.war USNET group about 12 years ago Gee, I'm impressed. Did they copyright it or something? What would you know about Vietnam other than being fragged?

Brendan Slattery There is a problem with your photo, it seems your eyes are way too close together, must be a problem with your software and you should have that fixed. You are right, Shanet. A makeover would do wonders for his self-esteem. Jack Jack's just jealous 'cause I'm gonna outlive him by 40 years ... and do a little dance on his grave. Thanks for the craven Nazi smear. It's been awhile.

Hey morons: where's your precious Mr. Arnold in the Moorman polaroid? Seems to me he should be plainly visible. Either that or a lying sack of xxxx.

Well, you hate this country too, Jack, so you and Fetz can spoon to your heart's content. Accusing the Prez of murdering 3,000 innocent people is indicative of "calm class"? And you think this reflects well on the Marine Corps? What is his idea of "experts"? Those pimple-popping twits from Loose Change? Hilarious. Thankfully, I know an asshole when I see one (or read their posts). Just remember folks: you won't read any of Fetz's shocking revelations in the Bush-hating NY Times or Nation magazine because they're influenced by the evil gum'mint! LOL.

Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet!

Delicious. http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/12/vide...not-be-handled/

We've been to the moon?? Don't tell Jack.

Get ready to pop the champagne.

Let's call this the "sore loser" thread of the day. You couldn't get Rove, Cheney or Bush, so you had to settle for a pipsqueak like Libby. It is to laugh. Presumably, the moonbats who believe that Cheney was orchestrating the "Get Joe" conspiracy will also believe that Libby was ordered to avoid including her in his notes. LOL. When will you dopes realize that partisan hack Joe Wilson is the real villain? Washingon Post: Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame’s CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming — falsely, as it turned out — that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush’s closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It’s unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.

Does it go into the White House pedophilia ring? There is some evidence for that too, dating back to the Reagan administration. (There may have been a hiatus during the days of Clinton, who had more orthodox forms of diversion. It may be just a Republican thing.) Skolnick has written about it among others, though of course it will never see the light of day in the mainstream press. If it's true, however, it helps explain why the Republican leadership considered Mark Foley's behavior to be nothing (till he was caught). Ron...this is what you are referring to I think. On another thread I posted the link to Dubya's proclivities. Jack PS...since when are headlines from a Washington newspaper SINKING TO A NEW LOW? Would it be better if it were Clinton? Jack And it keeps getting worse john w John...if the president is a pedophile, why would you not want to know about it? To me, citizens should be concerned about the moral character of elected officials. Why do you think Dubya should get a free pass? Some may wish to read this. Do not click if you don't. http://www.anu.org/viewnationallistnews.as...356060401FB0%7D Support morality in government. Jack So you agree that Clinton should have done the honorable thing and resigned. Good to hear.

read HOAX, dufus... get educated!

More to the point: don't you think 2006 technology would be able to spot/uncover alterations to a film using relatively primitive 1963 technology?

______________________________________________ Brendan, Regarding my "real" last name, I was adopted at four months of age and found/met my biological parents in 1987. Thats when I found out that my original surname was "Mahon." Care to make a joke about that? ______________________________________________ That means sooo much coming from a man who ridicules the appearance of others in an unprovoked manner. I suggest you get out of the "joke" business yourself.

______________________________ Nope. P.S. How quaint for a consummate baiter to accuse someone else of being a baiter... But we digress, don't we, Brendan? P.P.S. You do look a bit "cross-eyed" in your photo. Maybe you should get your eyes checked? ___________________ Let's see: you call me out by name in a special thread, yet somehow you're the aggrieved party? Nice. Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not cross-eyed, though I notice you're four-eyed. And could your pose be any gayer? Unlikely. ______________________________________ (Quote) "And could your pose be any gayer? Unlikely. (End quote) --Brendan Slattery Wow. Regarding the "pose," all I can say is that the girls in the Czech Republic and here in San Diego seem to like it. It "works" for me... You're straight?? Yikes. You have a very active imagination, not to mention a short memory: I believe it was you who fired the first salvo about others' looks. And since when does accurately describing someone impute hostility? Goody for you. You can fend for yourself at the bathhouses. I'm sure you use it on yourself with regularity. I don't date effeminate men who use aliases. Another vain stab at humor. Go to bed, little fella. You're tired.

____________________________________ Interesting that you say "Negro." The common consensus is that he was a Cuban. You got something against "Negroes," Brendan? Or are some of them your "best friends?" lol ____________________________________ I believe in appropriating the vernacular of the time. Plus, Jack used it a couple weeks ago without incident. Nice slight of hand with the Cuban angle. Forum idiots: "Gee, that sure looks like a black guy. But why would a black man conspire to murder a civil rights hero like Kennedy? I know! Let's call him a dark-complected Cuban!"

______________________________ Nope. P.S. How quaint for a consummate baiter to accuse someone else of being a baiter... But we digress, don't we, Brendan? P.P.S. You do look a bit "cross-eyed" in your photo. Maybe you should get your eyes checked? ___________________ Let's see: you call me out by name in a special thread, yet somehow you're the aggrieved party? Nice. Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not cross-eyed, though I notice you're four-eyed. And could your pose be any gayer? Unlikely.

Er, any reason in particular why you're baiting me, Tom? I don't recall showing any interest in this topic before. Your obsessions aren't my obsessions. But since I'm not a jerk, I'll play along. Here's what I see: a grainy photo of a long-ago Negro onlooker bathed in daytime shadows, prompting amateur buffs in 2006 to ascribe sinister motivations. Satisfied?

My, my, Brendan, you are a bit sensiitive. Whatever accusations or smears you feel have been lobbed at your precious Republicans, the amount lobbed towards the Johnson Administration has been tenfold. And they're just as heinous and wrongheaded. And I have chastised Simkin for listing LBJ as a co-conspirator at Spartacus What are you implying? Guilt by association? Does his kooky dad work for Bush or something? Not that I can see. I felt embarrassed for McClellan, but his personal (family) problems don't really intrigue me. Sorry.

Some of you doth protest too much. If smearing were a competition, this forum would win hands down--esp if you had the misfortune of being a white male who worked for the CIA, FBI, Dallas Police, any Republican Administration, or any defense contractor.

Admittedly, I've been busy doing things you can only dream of: making a living; making love; not falling asleep in a recliner; being regular; etc. Just think how much more peaceful it'll be when God yanks your cord. Earth to John: This is at least the third time this wacco has called for someone's DEATH. Oh really? Get thee to Google and unearth those three instances. For the record, I never called for Jack's death. Too tacky. I said that when God eventually takes him (i.e. natural causes), the end result will be greater harmony due to the lack of his daily spam. Jack thinks he can make the most wild and hurtful allegations and never be called on it. He is mistaken. Not everyone's as wimpy as you, Dawny. Not true. My three aliases would vote for me.

Admittedly, I've been busy doing things you can only dream of: making a living; making love; not falling asleep in a recliner; being regular; etc. Just think how much more peaceful it'll be when God yanks your cord. High road? He deserves no such courtesy. Funny how his "paid provacateur" slur totally escaped your notice. When you treat people with contempt, don't be surprised when you get it in return. Loved it. Bubba is saying and doing things that ensure that the runup to the 2006 elections will be filled with unflattering looks at the Clinton Administration's antiterror policies. Thanks Bill! Admittedly, I've been busy doing things you can only dream of: making a living; making love; not falling asleep in a recliner; being regular; etc. Just think how much more peaceful it'll be when God yanks your cord. ******************* Brandon... Shame on you, that is disgusting...Grow up.. ...Never ever say anything like that, you have no idea, if you will wake, up tomorrow...nor someone in your family.... Talk about tempting fate, also be concerned about driving your car, and crossing the street in fact, be very....What goes around, has the distinct habit of coming around.... Whether you agree or not, it does...shame... B.... Um, Jack in the past has accused me of being an accessory to murder. Where was your outrage then? Terry Mauro wished death upon me, then promptly pulled her post.

Shilling for Communist police states, John? Guess you're not up to snuff on the latest human rights reports--or the preceding 40 years in world history. Why not swap your cold, cruel existense under John Howard for Fidel's sunny paradise? People flee Cuba every day; I'm sure they'd make room for you. Start packing.

Admittedly, I've been busy doing things you can only dream of: making a living; making love; not falling asleep in a recliner; being regular; etc. Just think how much more peaceful it'll be when God yanks your cord.

Life as a buff sounds really cool. If the "evil Gum'mint" charges you with any kind of legitimate wrongdoing, you can just point to your Kennedy assassination hobby as an excuse. Because, hey, you're important ... and therefore must be silenced. LOL.