-
Posts
5,073 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
Thomas H. Purvis's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
-
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ What would appear to be a true researcher! Now, delete the word "alledgely", as the three shots in approximately 5.6 seconds is BS. Factually, there were only two shots in this elapsed time. Shot#3 did not occur until approximately 1.9 seconds AFTER the Z313/Shot#2 headshot. And, due to the short elapsed time, this had to be what is referred to as a "Snap Shot" in which one throws the rifle up, and utilizing it's fixed iron sights, shoots. Which shot, by the way also struck JFK in the head. Tom
-
And the correct answer would be that when one has a "rabid" dog that in fact has no teeth, one gets rid of the dog anyway. P.S. "Rip" Robertson worked for the CIA during the Korean War, in which he was assigned ALL responsibility for landing of boatloads of Korean "guerilla" fighters into North Korea. He. Robertson, had held a similar position in the South China sea, prior to his transfer to "JACK" Command in South Korea. South/North Korea has one of the highest rising tides of any place in the world. In order to land seacraft, one must know all about the beach gradient as well as to whether one may have to bog through several feet of mud. As the holder of his position, Robertson would have fully known the "beach gradient" at the Bay of Pigs, long prior to any attempted amphibious landing.
- 5 replies
-
- Bay of Pigs
- Castro
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Was Oswald To "Hit" Castro For CIA?
Thomas H. Purvis replied to Thomas Graves's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
-
Multiple Ejecta or Single Piece?
Thomas H. Purvis replied to Robert Prudhomme's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
For reasons (which have been fully explained to others), the FBI never presented this attempt at manipulation of the facts, and were it not for Mr. Robert West having provided me with the survey plat, survey notes, as well as having explained what actually transpired, this little event would have been lost in the other confusion surrounding the subject. Tom Purvis -
Am I Detecting A Pattern Here?
Thomas H. Purvis replied to Mark Knight's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
-
Thanks, Robert, for posting this. How uninspiring. It sounds like a rehash of the Discovery Channel's programs. They actually think McAdams is an expert on the medical evidence. Sickening. =============================================================================================================== They actually think McAdams is an expert on the medical evidence. Sickening. =============================================================================================================== Coming from someone who does not even recognize a "reverse image" of an autopsy photograph, this statement does not pass any test of credibility. Tom Purvis P.S. Since Professor McAdams is in receipt of the full contingent of 80+ newspaper publishings which deal with all three shots of the assassination, and since "Tink" Thompson is in possession of the 30+ publishings which deal ONLY with CE399, how it came to exist, and the wounds that it is responsible for, this just may be an attempt at presentation of some relatively new factual information. Which, is considerably more than one can usually expect to see here.
-
Tom: Could you please elaborate on this. Who created the smoke screen? First off, history needs to be corrected in that Lee Harvey Oswald was of Louisiana (& Primarily New Orleans) descent. As most persons are aware, one does not s**t in their own back yard, and Dallas, TX with it's radical right element was certainly a good location in which to assassinate a President of the US and ultimately have the deed blamed on Dallas and it's right-wing politics. The "power structure" within New Orleans lies not with those who are currently in what is some temporary political position. It lies with those who possess the capability to place these persons in the various political positions. Therefore, Jim Garrison, not unlike any other political figure in New Orleans, did what he was instructed to do or else he suffered the consequences. Now, if one could only resolve exactly who, within the deep south city of New Orleans, LA, would have reason to replace JFK. Hint: It would be those who, for whatever reason, had the means and reasons to end Fidel Castro's control of Cuba. Just perhaps someone whom United Fruit entrusted to their most confidential tasks. (just more of my riddles, I am certain of)
-
6.5x52 mm Carcano - Elephant Gun?
Thomas H. Purvis replied to Robert Prudhomme's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
-
But that was Garrison's ENTIRE CASE, and it relied ENTIRELY on the ridiculous, uncorroborated testimony of Perry Russo. As was long ago indicated on this forum, the Clay Shaw/Garrison case was little more than a massive "smoke screen" that was created in order to mis-direct the attentions of those who were making attempt at resolving the issues of the assassination. In event there is any difficulty in location of these postings, one may want to look up the terminology "Land Sharks". Tom P.S. John.-----Glad to see that you have re-opened the forum. With the 50th anniversary of the event soon approaching there will no doubt be many who are searching for some of the factual truths. Many of which can be found on this forum.