Peter McGuire

He was right about the Mauser and it got him killed. 

She picked up Oswald as seen by Roger Craig , who died because he reported it. 

By directing McGahn to "start the process to get rid of Mueller," Trump violated U.S.C. 18 section 1503.

I think this topic is worthy of another bump! 

“On the trail of the non - assassin,” is an excellent way to describe much of the conversation here. And that is why I tired of the matter a few years ago.

The accused assassin was a Marine , a multilingual married man with a lover on the side who got used by powerful forces who felt Kennedy was a threat to the security of the United States. 

My only question is out of the hundred or so reasons different people felt Kennedy had to go, which reason was actually a National Security issue? 

On 9/26/2017 at 3:09 PM, Michael Walton said:

Hi John. Are you  seriously  saying that the photo above is when the shooting started?

Kennedy was shot in the back first. It was a “short shot,” or it would have killed him. This made the assassination more complicated and messy since frontal shots were then needed. It also allows the killing to be exposed because it had to be covered up by saying all shots were from behind. 

edit 

He is hurting national security by his immature behavior. I don't know what more can be said. I have written to my representatives several times - even before he was the nominee. Now, as POTUS, he is harming the interests of the United States and the world. 

yes it was

yes was worthy of a bump

History is in the making.

• Since I became bored with the Kennedy assassination as it pertains to gathering evidence in the private sector, sadly this immature brat who somehow got elected POTUS is making life fun again.

It seems to me that Schumer gave Trump some helpful advice.

On 12/21/2016 at 6:27 PM, Douglas Caddy said:

As I concluded in my commentary at the beginning of this topic:

There exists the National Defense State whose purpose is to protect the national security and assure the survival of the United States.

Surely Trump is not so narcisstic and arrogant that he fails to recognize that the National Defense State will not tolerate him as President-elect and then as President dealing unilaterally with the Russians with only him and Premier Putin knowing what is being discussed and agreed upon. Again treason is being heard about an American president. Surely Trump has not forgotten why JFK was assassinated? Or has he in his early stage of Alzheimer’s dementia?  

 

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/veteran-spy-gave-fbi-info-alleging-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump

On 1/8/2017 at 0:59 PM, Cliff Varnell said:

Millions of American patriots don't view Trump as legitimate given the corrupt practicies of Kris Kobach and other GOP officials disenfranchising miilions of minority voters, and James Comey's criminal intrusion in the election.

Get over it.

 

 

 

Great posts Douglas and Cliff. The "get over post" represents so many Americans who can not see what Trump is.  Adding insult to injury we have Trumps speech at CIA and the White Houses Press Secretary lying on the job this past weekend. 

I moved away from the forum because it became clear, from the great research here, what really happened to Kennedy and more importantly why. The only thing that it seems that we don't know for sure is exactly by whom. But I think you have a pretty good idea. 

Now we have history in the making with this incompetent POTUS who is endangering our national security. 

Great speech by President Kennedy addressing what Blacks face every day. So many of us enjoy White Privilege and forget how difficult it is for all minorities.

On 7/1/2009 at 3:01 PM, David Yarnell said:

Mr. McGuire, you can access video and audio of Kilgallen's hairdresser Marc Sinclaire saying he found her dead a few minutes after nine in the morning, and he noticed another person inside the house who seemed to be aware of the death already. There is a document from the NYPD saying her body was still inside the house after three in the afternoon. You also see and hear Mr. Sinclaire saying an NYPD squad car was parked in front of the house with two officers seated inside. They paid no attention to Mr. Sinclaire.

The number of barbiturate capsules she took was never established. There was something else in her stomach that had nothing to do with barbiturates or alcohol: an unidentified pink liquid. That is in the autopsy report that anyone can access at the National Archives in Maryland near Washington, DC. Lee Israel did not invent the pink liquid when she included it in her book. She asked officials of the medical examiner's office about it, and they said they never knew what the pink liquid was. The chemist responsible for analyzing it, a man named Charles Umberger, died in December of 1977 at age 70 without having talked to Ms. Israel.

My post got this response.

On 6/27/2009 at 10:25 AM, Peter McGuire said:

I just got a hold of a 1979 copy of the book of her name. Hard to read, but the first thing that I get out of it is that in such a big "house" ( five story Park Avenue Mansion) , unwelcome people could have came and went with ease. The husband was drunk; there was help coming and going; an ideal place to off somebody.

Specific to the case, her time of death or even the time NYPD found her has not really been established, which makes it suspicious at the outset. She did not kill herself and that was what they wanted in order to avoid the investigation of a suicide, so it had to be an accident.

15 or more pills do not an accident make.

She was murdered.

I wanted to see what I had previously written before I post again on this 12 year old thread. 

Thanks Jim, for taking the time to chime in on my thoughts and this topic. I guess I may be a little hungry for an issue worth looking into. My biggest concerns are about our National Security under a Trump administration.  I think voters should have had that in mind rather than voting anti-Clinton. An interesting story brewing is the unwillingness of National Security experts to even work for him.

The more I put together what has happened in this election, the more I believe it is related to the assassinations of the 60's - all of them.

They began with JFK and that makes this thread relevant. I believe forces that need the Republican establishment to stay in power have completely taken over the government in a very slick coup.

What Comey did is obvious,as is overlooking Trumps dialogues to Russia. Someone backing Clinton tried to stop him with the Bush tapes ( with a Bush family member no less) but it the counter punch by Comey neutralized that move.

The bottom line is that powerful forces could not bear a Clinton presidency, just like they could not have the Kennedys stay in power.

22 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

Larry:

 

When you say Maheu was doing his main work for the CIA in the fifties, do you disregard what he was doing with Hughes later on?  As many people have commented, by that time it was hard to see where Hughes' empire stopped and the CIA began. For instance, it was later found out that Hughes Medical Center was nothing but a CIA shell company.

 And you must know that Angleton attended Hughes' alleged funeral. (I say alleged, because the circumstances of Hughes's death are clouded by secrecy, contradiction,and differing testimony.)

In my opinion, and a few others, the whole expulsion of Maheu from Las Vegas and Hughes empire posits so many questions about Hughes, as does the alleged robbery at Summa Corporation--which as Jim Hougan demonstrated,  was not really a robbery but an inside job--that it  raises very serious questions about who really expelled Maheu and why.  

As does the appearance of FBI/CIA asset James Phelan's cover up book so quickly after Hughes allegedly died. I am sure you know how close Maheu and Phelan were.  Phelan used Maheu's office to copy the documents that an unsuspecting Jim Garrison gave him during their long interview in Vegas. Phelan's book was a top secret project at Random House under the strict control of CIA toady Robert Loomis.

From all of these facts, and more, one can make a reasonable case that Maheu was working as a CIA proxy through, and even after, his work for Hughes.

Jim, I was first read about Maheu when reading a biography of Hughes. That was before I read about the Kennedy assassination. Have you written in detail about Hughesgate in one of your books? I read this biography around 1985.

13 minutes ago, Douglas Caddy said:

Joseph McBride wrote on Facebook today:

 

"The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature." -- Abraham Lincoln.
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt.
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." -- John F. Kennedy.
"Grab 'em by the pussy." -- Donald J. Trump.

 

 

And then about half the voters in the United States voted for this man - and about half of those voters were women.

Did anyone else think that when  the Billy Bush tapes came out,  it was a political assassination of Trump?  And it seems to me that it worked. Then came Comey.

I think discussing what Comey did is relevant to the JFK discussion here. Among other things, it shows that when you allow one thing to happen, there is no reason another of its kind wont follow.

The man who is not qualified to be POTUS is still backed by many from the Eastern part of the United States!

Interesting

I used to think Easterners were more inteligent than the rest of us. ( but arrogant, fast talking and impatient )

When Lee Farley was on this forum, he made some really interesting posts about this topic.

In fact, he took it further than anyone I know.

See, Ruth's testimony and Linnie's testimony disagree with each other.

The Paine's are interesting spies.

I learned a lot about deception and how to lie from them.

Sorry my post is so short,

but I want to say that I am not angry at Trump because he has the right to run for president.

I am angry at those who follow him, and will be sickened if this unqualified man is elected POTUS.

The list of disqualifying things he has said are too numerous ( and sickening ) to mention.

Go ahead, America, elect an unqualified individual if you like.

I guess it is your prerogative.

Then you can get back to bowling and tats.