Jump to content
The Education Forum

David Collins

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

David Collins's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. A bit of formatting will increase the probability of a text to last a little longer. Still curious how long it will remain online now. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...;oldid=96748602 Rest in peace, loyal boyscout who made a career out of covering up for others. Gerald wasn't entirely evil like LBJ, Nixon, Poppy and Dubya, but was more a clean and cover up artist with little or no original plans as was clear during his presidency which could only be described as dull, grey and maintaining the status quo without any original plans whatsoever. Then again covering up seems to be very good for one's career, because Bill Clinton got the job because he looked the other way at Mena were the CIA was importing massive amounts of cocaine to finance George H.W. Bush's Iran-Contra. Why did they try to impeach him for a blow job when there was a snow job as well or was it because he worked with George H.W. Bush and the CIA on that little affair. Since Dubya will probably be succeeded by Hillary Clinton (2008) and Rudi "WTC" Giuliani (2016), we'll only have Carter so my request to John Simkin is not go skull digging in Jimmy Carter's career, because he'll be the only half decent president in the Era of Rogue Presidents (1963 - 2024).
  2. A bit of formatting will increase the probability of a text to last a little longer. Still curious how long it will remain online now. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...;oldid=96748602 Rest in peace, loyal boyscout who made a career out of covering up for others. Gerald wasn't entirely evil like LBJ, Nixon, Poppy and Dubya, but was more a clean and cover up artist with little or no original plans as was clear during his presidency which could only be described as dull, grey and maintaining the status quo without any original plans whatsoever. Then again covering up seems to be very good for one's career, because Bill Clinton got the job because he looked the other way at Mena were the CIA was importing massive amounts of cocaine to finance George H.W. Bush's Iran-Contra. Why did they try to impeach him for a blow job when there was a snow job as well or was it because he worked with George H.W. Bush and the CIA on that little affair. Since Dubya will probably be succeeded by Hillary Clinton (2008) and Rudi "WTC" Giuliani (2016), we'll only have Carter so my request to John Simkin is not go skull digging in Jimmy Carter's career, because he'll be the only half decent president in the Era of Rogue Presidents (1963 - 2024).
  3. Rest in peace, loyal boyscout who made a career out of covering up for others. Gerald wasn't entirely evil like LBJ, Nixon, Poppy and Dubya, but was more a clean and cover up artist with little or no original plans as was clear during his presidency which could only be described as dull, grey and maintaining the status quo without any original plans whatsoever. Then again covering up seems to be very good for one's career, because Bill Clinton got the job because he looked the other way at Mena were the CIA was importing massive amounts of cocaine to finance George H.W. Bush's Iran-Contra. Why did they try to impeach him for a blow job when there was a snow job as well or was it because he worked with George H.W. Bush and the CIA on that little affair. Since Dubya will probably be succeeded by Hillary Clinton (2008) and Rudi "WTC" Giuliani (2016), we'll only have Carter so my request to John Simkin is not go skull digging in Jimmy Carter's career, because he'll be the only half decent president in the Era of Rogue Presidents (1963 - 2024).
  4. A bit of formatting will increase the probability of a text to last a little longer. Still curious how long it will remain online now. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...;oldid=96748602 Rest in peace, loyal boyscout who made a career out of covering up for others. Gerald wasn't entirely evil like LBJ, Nixon, Poppy and Dubya, but was more a clean and cover up artist with little or no original plans as was clear during his presidency which could only be described as dull, grey and maintaining the status quo without any original plans whatsoever. Then again covering up seems to be very good for one's career, because Bill Clinton got the job because he looked the other way at Mena were the CIA was importing massive amounts of cocaine to finance George H.W. Bush's Iran-Contra. Why did they try to impeach him for a blow job when there was a snow job as well or was it because he worked with George H.W. Bush and the CIA on that little affair. Since Dubya will probably be succeeded by Hillary Clinton (2008) and Rudi "WTC" Giuliani (2016), we'll only have Carter so my request to John Simkin is not go skull digging in Jimmy Carter's career, because he'll be the only half decent president in the Era of Rogue Presidents (1963 - 2024).
  5. This is with regards to Charles Matthews post. I think that there are two issues here and it is not so much with regards to John Simkin's edits: 1. Spartacus has been deemed "unreliable, propagandistic and extremist" without due process and without providing the accused any chance of a defense and even deleting the defense using a straw man argument of "not posted on the right place." 2. The Mongo affair and the conspiracy noticeboard. Despite working for the DHS, despite being desysoped for abuse, he is still active as a government appointed censor and has nominated: CIA and September 11 by von Bülow and The New Pearl Harbor. These are bad faith nominations since both books sold well over 100,000 copies and are not written by anybody but by a former German minister of Defense von BÃlow who after leading the investigation into the activities of the Stasi became very concerned about the BND and CIA's activities in Germany. Since both the BND and CIA immediately refused any cooperation with a minister of Defense, he was taken it upon himself to investigate both secret services and came to the conclusion that their methods are exactly like the Stasi except that the BND and the CIA are even better organized. We are not talking about a kooky conspiracy theorist, but a career politician who was frustrated that even minsters of Defense are not allowed to know anything about the secret services and discovered that propaganda, money laundering, drug dealing and arms dealing were their main objectives and that intelligence was only a minor task of the secret services. Both books clearly meet the notability criteria and looking at the Conspiracy Noticeboard it contains many subjects which easily make the criteria, however since they do mass voting they can delete everything they want. This IS government appointed and politically motivated censorship. Also the behavior of Fred Bauder is very much a concern, yet Wikipedia thinks that there are no issues whatsoever and keeps on allowing censorship and propaganda. Please explain why you considered John Simkin's Spartacus site an unreliable site and please explain Mongo and the Conspiracy Noticeboard, because the discussion about Mongo's affliation with the DHS has been known for about half a year now and Jimbo himself wants to reinstate him. That sure reeks like full cooperation with the US Department of Homeland Security and given the reliance of Wikipedia on donations, the likelyhood of conflicts of interests is immense.
  6. Interesting discussion about Federal Reserve. After looking at 9/11 I come to realize the importance of banks and the people who put the international bankers at the top of the elite pyramid are very correct in doing so. It's an angle which is very much misunderstood and could well have been just as important as Texas Oil, Military Industrial Complex as far JFK goes. The problem is that it is behind the scenes. Nevertheless the CIA has not been created to protect the US, but to protect the interests of Wall Street. (OSS also mainly consisted of bankers) So they could have played a major role in the background, but we'll never know...
  7. I think it'll be difficult to get a clear picture of why Wikipedia is so overrated despite its flaws. I agree that mcadams is of course put on top by giving his site an artificial rating. Then again your site still scores very high as well, so Mockingbird clearly isn't perfected yet in the Western world (google.cn makes it clear that they do have the technology for full censorship) Wikipedia is of course perfect for the Intelligence Community because they need a semi open system which can be controlled and which is a form of bureaucracy with matching corruption. In a way Wikipedia is a perfect example of a micro cosmos of this world were you have your semi-secret societies, backdoor channels for communications, cliques, coverup of critism and persecution of critics with even a rogue police forces and corrupt judges. If you ever want to know why society is so screwed up then you just need to look at Wikipedia were you have all elements on a microscale and real problems like Vandalism are not dealt with because the system is completely incapable to change itself (Notice that vandalism on your biography stayed online for 18 hours! and that is pretty the norm nowadays) As far as mockingbird goes it is definitely inefficient however that doesn't matter, because on some conspiracy forums you have dozens of operatives active 20 hours a day/ every day in the year for years now. So spending millions on debunking conspiracy theorists is simply part of the budget (and hey, it is mainly outsourced nowadays and probably derived from drug dealing, so who cares). The funny thing is that English wiki isn't just covered by the US and UK alphabet agencies, but I also notice that Spanish, Saudi and German scandals also have people constantly guarding the integrity of their scandals. So the only thing which is yet unexplained why google wants wikipedia especially after today's announcement that Jimbo thinks that he can make a better search engine (despite the fact that his own doesn't even function properly) Google would be better off with wikipedia links somewhere at the middle or below the page, because the quality is often substandard, and good articles tend to become mediocre as soon as editors have given up watching and cleaning the page over and over again. And good editors tend to have because of excessive vandalism and excessive amounts of flame fights. I think that google still mainly depends on the size of the overall site/pages for the ranking, because content spammers for ad revenue like lyrics sites and wikipedia clones have a far too high rating as well despite having no original content whatsoever.
  8. The conspiracy theory noticeboard is one of their latest additions and it is fully supported from the administrators. Notice that they work as a group consisting of alphabet suspects (TBeatty, MONGO (confirmed DHS), Morton devonshire, etc.) and neocon supporters from xxxxx havens like Conservative Underground, a website created to insult liberal posters. Since they work as a group and Wikipedia works by consensus (or supermajority), they always win every fight. I suggest that you look first into Mongo, because he ran for Arbitrator as well and wanted to become a corrupt, government appointed judge at Wikipedia. Luckily he didn't make the quota, and was brought for Arbcom himself for abusive conduct. There is a long discussion at wikipediareview.com about Mongo and notice the comment by Jimbo Wales that he will personally vote for Mongo to be reinstated as an administrator (Is Wikipedia on the DHS payroll?)
  9. ArbCom is the equivalent of a kangaroo court on Wikipedia. Even though there are elections, it is not democratic, since King Jimbo has a final say in selecting the candidates because for him the site is about a "cult of personality" and power games, so democracy is not what he wants. The main person in Arbcom is his friend Fred Bauder who is a disbarred lawyer and not allowed to practise law anymore and Wikipedia is his revenge. Since disbarred lawyers are pretty much unelectable, he calls himself retired and has deleted and banned everybody who mentioned that he was disbarred, so Wikipedia contains no mentioning whatsoever of his little personal problems. This of course means that he is highly corruptable and that is exactly what Jimbo wants and therefore he is the first choice as "Supreme Judge." http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getc...25a&invol=1 Fred has been involved in many controversies, like trying to delete the John F. Kennedy assassination theories: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...nation_theories This gives some idea to what he probably is, yet another disbarred lawyer with CIA connections. If you look at the MONGO case, you'll also notice that Fred tries very hard to keep Mongo from getting desysoped: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...ration/Seabhcan
  10. ArbCom is the equivalent of a kangaroo court on Wikipedia. Even though there are elections, it is not democratic, since King Jimbo has a final say in selecting the candidates because for him the site is about a "cult of personality" and power games, so democracy is not what he wants. The main person in Arbcom is his friend Fred Bauder who is a disbarred lawyer and not allowed to practise law anymore and Wikipedia is his revenge. Since disbarred lawyers are pretty much unelectable, he calls himself retired and has deleted and banned everybody who mentioned that he was disbarred, so Wikipedia contains no mentioning whatsoever of his little personal problems. This of course means that he is highly corruptable and that is exactly what Jimbo wants and therefore he is the first choice as "Supreme Judge." http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getc...25a&invol=1 Fred has been involved in many controversies, like trying to delete the John F. Kennedy assassination theories: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...nation_theories This gives some idea to what he probably is, yet another disbarred lawyer with CIA connections. If you look at the MONGO case, you'll also notice that Fred tries very hard to keep Mongo from getting desysoped: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...ration/Seabhcan ) Another person of interest is JayJG who is one of Jimbo's personal appointes and who plays an equally dubious role as enforcer. Overall the majority of Arbcom candidates are part of the so-called Cabal (which they deny exists) which consists of the IRC channels for their personal communication to ensure that the abusive administrators have free reign. Mongo is exceptionally that he was desysoped, but that was because his abuse was so extensive and widespread and because of running for ArbCom, his employment by the Department of Homeland Security was becoming public knowledge. He previously deleted all references to Encyclopedia Dramatica who first discovered the links between him and the DHS, however they couldn't keep it a secret anymore. The main problems with Wikipedia are: 1. Jimbo Wales who uses the site for his "cult of personality" and is active behind the scenes on the channels to enforce his view on the encyclopedia. 2. Abusive administrators. Especially the Scientology group (Kelly Martin and Tony Sidaways) are a real concern. It is unclear whether they are scientology, however they used to hang out at their usenet forum before they descended on Wikipedia. THere is no term limit to administrators and they actively cover each other's back and function as a clique, stiffling all critism. 3. Vandalism and misinformation. This is one of the major problems. The quick 5 minute revert is complete nonsense, since vandalism stays on the pages for hours and often days and they basically lost any control over school children, trolls and you name it. The site has into one huge pile of gravity and nobody cares. I think I ranted enough already. However it is a seriously screwed up site and it's unable to reform itself so hopefully it'll crash sooner or later under its own weight. The interaction with various alphabet agencies is immense, since it serves as a useful tool for propaganda and censorship and because it functions by bullying, it is right on their alley.
  11. I am a retired history teacher who is very interested in the way the intelligence services control the mass media.
×
×
  • Create New...