Jump to content
The Education Forum

Anthony DeFiore

Members
  • Content Count

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Anthony DeFiore

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

6,515 profile views
  1. Personally, I want the BERNARD BARKER FILE opened #104-10164-10000. It was released in July 2017 as blank pages. And of course, yesterday, it was suppressed. Barker links it all back to "The Bay of Pigs" thing that Nixon was caught on tape saying, and why was Bernard Barker, the Cuban American, War Hero, CIA Agent...in the Watergate. Barker was on the Grassy Knoll. He showed his fake Secret Service badge to Dallas Deputy Constable Seymour Weitzman and Reporter Michael Canfield confirmed it when Weitzman was shown Barker's photo. Barker, E. Howard Hunt and Sturgis/Fiorini were part of Nixon'
  2. THEY DELAYED THE JFK FILE RELEASE FROM THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES AFTER A 25 YEAR AGREEMENT TO RELEASE! WHY?! BECAUSE THERE ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH LINKS TO PROVE THE DAMN MURDER CONSPIRACY! GAME OVER!
  3. LHO never left the second floor lunch room.
  4. It's all in the ring on his left hand.............
  5. Ron, I read in Seymour Hersh's book that it happened that way ~ I think that is the book. I saw a show on Discover or one of those "Hate JFK" channels. The show tried to pin it on RFK putting the rectal shot in ~ ??? But they also had FBI surveillance mentioned in the show the missing diary and strange comings and goings by Peter Lawford and I think RFK??? And I'm sure that the usual suspects would be brought up here. Mafia, CIA, Hoover....
  6. Brethren, I am unable to link these articles written about dying CIA Agent James Hayworth. Needs to be properly vetted. The fact that Monroe had a rectal barbiturate et al that killed her has always made me suspicious about her death.
  7. So long Cliff, that's my story, and I'm sticking with it. My research is my truth.
  8. Cliff, Try being academic. I say you are begging the question. 1) Your Willis premise is false. Z202. Fine. JFK still did not get hit from a shot from the right hand side as I have explained ad nauseam. 2) You are quoting Rosemary Willis ~ the ten year old ~ as I will agree that from the mouth of babes.... ~ if anything, BDM does not exist and she saw Gordon Arnold disappearing behind the wall similar to Sen. Yarborough's statement. And Rosemary "distinctly" heard four shots. We need to take her testimony in total (?) But testimony is not science nor logic. 3) The straight line from the
  9. Cliff, I disagree with you completely. You criticize my research and you just keep telling me everything is not possible or true. You provide nothing to dispute my work. Tony
  10. Gentlemen, As I have read the discussion of how BDM continued to stand at the corner of the concrete wall during the entire assassination, I am having problems with a few things. 1) While Marilyn Sitzman noticed the black couple running behind the fence together, she doesn't mention a third person (BDM?) ~ If the man coming up the stairs after the shooting is the partner joined with the women that Sitzman is referring to, then where is BDM? Sitzman would have had to have seen all three of them there at some point and she would have had to have seen Gordon Arnold too. A bit crowded up there
  11. Ron, No head. Obliterated. Impossible to piece back together. All you have is Patsy on the sixth floor and a guaranteed hole in the windshield (which can be debated as a fragment or a hole or whatever like the SBT apologists do today). The belief was that no one would miss by as much as they did from the rear: County Building and Dal Tex. But you could still cover up their shots and misses if the entire head is obliterated. I think this is very plausible as to why the front shot from the left of JFK (South Knoll) was a preconceived shooting position.
  12. Ron, I would love to see that reasoning on the man being obscured on the concrete step. I really can't see enough legs there to say two men were standing there in Willis #5. Thanks always.
  13. Jon, When I stood on the winged portion of the overpass at the corner ~ South Knoll ~ and took photos, I can only tell you that with a lense on a high powered rifle (for me it was a zoom camera) one can see directly into the back seat of any car travelling between Z180 and Z225 on Elm Street. I was flabbergasted at how the autos seemed to just hang in "mid air" for about 2 seconds (my unofficial timing). The shot is very possible for an accomplished sniper. As for why take the shot thru the windshield, 1) from the multiple shooting positions the goal was to blow JFK's head off his shoulde
  14. Well Gentlemen, it seems that you've read my paper a little bit. Let's get down to it. Willis#5 is synced at Z207. JFK was not hit yet. I believe that is the end of the debate there. If it is synced to Z202, it proves the Z film is altered. Yes the shooter on the South Knoll planned to shoot JFK thru the windshield. It was not a bullet proof windshield, and a high powered rifle can blast right thru it with minimal deflection. After standing on the South Knoll and the corner of the concrete wing, it is a straight shot to JFK. I have photos in my paper. Also, with shots, IMHO, being ta
  15. Don't confuse yourself. Z225 is the title of the paper. Z180 to Z225 are studied throughout it.
×
×
  • Create New...