Richard Jankiewicz

I am currently re-reading Garrison's book "On the Trail of Assassins" and in the book as he tells the story.....on the day of Ferrie's death, he is PERSONALLY in David's apartment and he says though the mice were recently gone the smell (I assume the cedar shavings) was still very strong throughout the apt. He mentions both the smell and the mice. Now it could well be told that way for added drama.....(that he was there personally) but that is DEFINITELY what the book says.

so why didn't they react violently to being double crossed if they were led to believe that the part of the plot that johnson turned off (invasion) was really going to happen and then the rug was pulled out. they just dont' seem like the type to go quietly Perhaps I wasn't clear. I always assumed the anti-Castro Cubans were brought into the plot expecting little more than the satisfaction that revenge brings. (and probably an extremely healthy pay day) If there is any evidence of other promises made by Johnson I'm certainly not aware of it. Many of the Cubans lost multiple family members and friends because of what they saw as a "double cross" on Kennedy's part in the Bay of Pigs invasion. Of course, the luxury of hindsight shows that there was plenty of blame to go around regarding the BOPs but blind anger isn't all that rational. Sometimes I think the greatest mystery of both the Kennedy assassinations is that neither one of the brothers seemed to see it coming.

I always assumed they were in it strictly for REVENGE for the BOP.

This is the new link for Dealey Plaza UK http://dealeyplazauk.org.uk/

Tom, I'm new to this forum. Your post has me a bit confused. Watching the "Z" film I am finding it difficult to understand your theory. Could you please elaborate by explaining which shots you feel caused which wounds to the Limo's occupants. You say: 9. The third/last/final shot fired in the shooting sequence, impacted the head of JFK some 30-feet farther down Elm St. than that location of the second shot impact at frame# 313 of the Zapruder film. What time frame do you see between shot 2 & shot 3? Do you feel the "Z" film was "adjusted" to conform with the "Official WC version of events"? Respectfully, Richard Richard; Your prescence here (as well as a few other new persons) was the primary reason for having presented "One Last Time", in order that just perhaps you and a few others could get started off on the correct road and not become lost within the labyrinth of confusion which surrounds this, as well as the other JFK forums. 1. The first shot & impact was just as JFK went behind the Stemmons Road sign. 2. The second shot is what we see as Z313. 3. The third/last/final shot was just as the Presidential Limo approached the position of James Altgens, some 30-feet farther down Elm St. from impact of the Z313 headshot. http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol17_0464b.htm Note the stationing/footage measurement for Z313 http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol17_0449a.htm Note Stationing 4+95 (Station 5+00 minus 4-feet) (4+96 actually) but the survey work established it at stationing 4+95. The US Secret Service as well as the FBI clearly resolved the issues of the three shots fired, to the extent of conducting surveys and preparation of survey plats which clearly demonstrate what the witness testimony also reinforces. So, no! I am not "smarter" than the US Secret Service and/or the FBI. However, I am smart enough to know that these investagative entities were fully qualified to resolve the issues of the assassination, as well as where one should have looked to find out what they resolved. Throughout this forum, the answers to your questions regarding the wounds will, for the most part be found. Unfortunately, in order to continue to post attachments such as drawings, etc;, these had to be progressively deleted, and now one merely has the written word. One can be assured that there have been multiple "adjustments" made to the Z-film in order to demonstrate a vehicle speed which did not slow down to the extent that some even thought that it stopped. And, for the most part, I have also pointed out where, those who have the ability, should concentrate their efforts if they wish to find what they are looking for in the Z-film. Those who wish to remain lost and confused for another 40+ years can continue to look for multiple assassins and other mythological creatures. Those who wish to know the factual truths will recognize what the factual evidence has always indicated, not become lost and/or confused with the WC's "THE SHOT THAT MISSED", and hopefully work from that point. The complexity lies NOT in the shooting sequence in Dealy Plaza, as it is quite simple as well as simple to resolve. The complexity lies in how certain members of the WC took these simple facts of three shots fired and three impacts, thereafter made an entire bullet disappear, and thereafter blamed much of the wounds created by it on CE399 and therefore insured that it become dubbed as "The Magic Bullet". In reality, the true "Magic Bullet" is the one which created wounds to JFK as well as JBC, and thereafter disappered. "There is no Magic" however! "Politicians, not unlike Magicians, can make things disappear"! Tom Tom, Thanks for your reply...but I really am interested in knowing YOUR THEORY as to WHICH SHOTS CAUSED WHICH WOUNDS. Please understand....my reason for asking is not so I can pick YOUR THEORY apart, look for flaws and show you the errors of your thinking but only so I can FULLY UNDERSTAND your theory and evaluate it in my own study. And if your answer is "I'm not sure" that is certainly a valid answer and doesn't in any way lessen the value of what you have already posted in this thread. Respectfully, Richard

Tom, I'm new to this forum. Your post has me a bit confused. Watching the "Z" film I am finding it difficult to understand your theory. Could you please elaborate by explaining which shots you feel caused which wounds to the Limo's occupants. You say: 9. The third/last/final shot fired in the shooting sequence, impacted the head of JFK some 30-feet farther down Elm St. than that location of the second shot impact at frame# 313 of the Zapruder film. What time frame do you see between shot 2 & shot 3? Do you feel the "Z" film was "adjusted" to conform with the "Official WC version of events"? Respectfully, Richard

My name is Richard Jankiewicz. I am 54 years old and I have been researching the JFK assassination for about 15 years.