Barry Krusch

First TV piece on my book. If anyone wants to back an offer for $1,000,000, let me know. Your money is safe, I guarantee that. http://www.foxcharlo...-180451741.html

i know, it stinks!!

They are in boxes. If I discover a scanning error, I can rescan the page.

Well, they were on the site, now they're not. I didn't charge anything for them.

Great, love to know what you think, Dawn....

Won't be uploaded again for the foreseeable future, BA.....sorry!!

The number of people who are possessed of the facts are vastly dwarfed by the people who do not, and with the media ready and able to reinforce false perceptions, we realize we're definitely living in a Matrix.

I'll ask him.

Bingo. The ability to stratify information is their great advantage.

A simple O'Reilly/Bezos connection would do it.

Good review. May is a real nutcase. Looks like they actually deleted his post; lucky you.

This from -- believe it or not -- David Von Pein! Fantastic! "Even though I totally disagree with just about everything uttered by Mr. Barry Krusch regarding the JFK murder case, I think it's ridiculous and unfair that Amazon has chosen to remove his video review for O'Reilly's book from the Amazon.com website. Barry's video review obviously met all of Amazon's requirements for a video review, otherwise it wouldn't have been allowed to go live on the Amazon site in the first place. But now, many days later, it's suddenly pulled from the site. It's ridiculous. Everybody has a right to express his/her opinion, and Barry did just that in his video review, which, as mentioned, Amazon obviously had no problems with at all for the first several days, because it was available on Amazon's site during that time period. Did Amazon give you any reason for pulling your review, Barry? I'm just curious. I, for one, think Barry's video review (which is very well constructed) should be reinstated to the Amazon site. Freedom of speech is important. And there was certainly nothing in Mr. Krusch's video review that would warrant it being removed from the Amazon.com website. Another reason I was angry about Barry's review going bye-bye from the Amazon site is because it caused a link that I posted earlier to go dead. And I hate dead links more than I hate Lee Harvey Oswald. :-) RELATED ARTICLE (which replaces the dead link in my earlier post): http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2012/10/constructing-oswalds-snipers-nest.html" http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,7035.36.html

Doesn't look like it appeared yet (2:54pm EST). If you get lots of "unhelpful" reviews, you have half a prayer of keeping it up thereI

With this Amazon policy in place, there won't be.

Yes, I should do another video review, but this time leave out all the evidence that shows that what people see as a "theory" is actually a fact. That might actually do it. Sorry for the sarcasm, but I guess I won't be playing their game. You know, the funny thing is, I actually really toned that review down for precisely the reason you are discussing Mike, and just focused exclusively on the official evidence. But I'm afraid that the fix is in. It's helpful to know what we are dealing with here, and I'm afraid that the ones with the facts on their side are woefully outmanned and outgunned.

Amazon just deleted my video review of Bill O'Reilly's book, which, at the time, was the most helpful negative review, and 2nd most helpful overall!! Luckily, I have it archived here: http://www.krusch.com/jfk/ This folks, is how you keep a myth alive for nearly 5 decades; when someone comes up with the evidence that shows you are spouting fiction, shut them down. Looks like the O'Reilly people couldn't stand the heat.

Arbitrators are the jurors.

I think that you will want people who have not formed any opinion on the case. You want jurors who will base their decision only on the evidence. That is right.

Details here: http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,6230.0.html Virtual jury members will be co-selected by myself and the challenger. The document set will be co-written by myself and the challenger, Mike.

Even standing alone, I do think it means something. After all, the person who became president after Pres. Kennedy was assassinated turns out to be friends with the man who owned the Texas school book depository building. Now, take it to the next level. In how many assassinations in history is the target DRIVEN to the assassin? And, that location just happens to be by a hairpin curve: how many of those are in Dallas?. And, curiously enough, that very week a plywood floor is being laid, which necessitates the moving of boxes, some of which are used to create a "sniper's nest". a "nest" NOT constructed by Oswald. Who would have the authority to order that floor being laid? The owner of the building? and, curiously enough, the successor to Pres. Johnson, happened to have hired Jack Ruby as an investigator many years earlier. And the President after him served on the Warren commission!! This is just the very beginning. Put a large number of these facts together, and a picture begins to emerge. You create a neural network, a probability matrix. This is very useful, particularly when most of the significant evidence has been destroyed.

I have another photo of LBJ and Byrd, from Byrd's book "I'm An Endangered Species" (1978). It seems reasonable to infer that Byrd knew LBJ; the question is: "how well?" etc. And is there evidence which might establish a link between a Byrd-LBJ relationship, and Bryd's leasing of the building at 411 Elm (what we today call the "Texas School Book Depository") to the TSBD back in late 1961 or early 1962? That would be (potentially) significant. But, imho, anybody that did anything in this plot made sure that whatever was done was handled in such a way that it was an "arm's length transaction". DSL Lots of info on this in my archive: https://www.box.com/s/8849089d6437c9cf4d93 Go to "Conspirators_Dallas" folder and also "DallasMorningNews_Articles". Specific Links: https://www.box.com/s/lztk3vl9jbb1q6ugc6dx https://www.box.com/s/19c152p8z3ucnmms4dbg Also, photograph with the caption: https://www.box.com/s/efi0l7li7e7xi1pup6wt

Great idea.

True. I sent my copy back to Amazon, returning as "defective."

My challenge to O'Reilly on YouTube:

DELETED