Allen Lowe

I have great respect for the way you handle things - BUT LOOK AT HIS HEADLINE: "JEWISH SPY" - it is crazy that you don't see this as an anti Semitic dog whistle - WTF DOES it have to do with the fact that Efron was Jewish? Geez. you really don't get it. So please explain to me why it is OK in the title to refer to his being Jewish? Really, try and justify it.

because you cannot prove you own the information or that it is original to you unless you can produce the documents that SHOW is is original to you. Like with the fake LaFitte diary.

oh - this is one of the most viciously ANTI-SEMITIC thing I have read here. It is disgusting - the use of the terms "Jewish Spy" is a classic anti-Semitic trope - use the words, and then deny any connection - "Oh no" Matthew Koch will say, "It's not because he is Jewish but because he IS Jewish it must be connected to the Jews and Israel." HOW LONG are the moderators going to allow this filth? Matthew Koch ought to be banned, the topic ought to be banned. THEJEWS xxxxING GET BLAMED FOR EVERYTHING. This is Marjorie Taylor Green territory. MODERATORS? WHat the hell are you allowing here? A Jew opening Oswald's mail? I heard his mailmen was a Melungeon, so they must be plotters. The headline should be: "NEW THREAD PROVES GERMAN MATTHEW KOCH HATES THE JEWS AND BLAMES THEM FOR EVERYTHING." Shame on you all.

well you see I don't really care enough about this chart to use it in any form anyway. However, you did mention private documents, without citing them with proof that they are real or belong to you. Sound familiar?

edited

1) there was no Israel when the King David Hotel was bombed. So it doesn't defeat my point that the Israeli state would not perform an operation that killed Jews. 2) I did err at the number of Jews killed in the WTC, but there were plenty: https://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/archives/the-jewish-victims-of-sept-11/article_6271d354-13ab-5051-9a80-4ea156b4ad48.html

As usual you are a paragon of inaccuracy. I didn't know the guy. Simply pointing out that you have no understanding of copyright. You can't put a claim on public information.

but if the charts are altered they are no longer the same and so are no longer covered under copyright. It becomes a different document.

you have missed the point massively - first of all, the burden of proof is on YOU to prove their intent - I can't prove a negative. And the memo CLEARLY indicates that the target was crops, not people. And probably no worse than the pesticides we use here. Second of all you conveniently missed that part of my post which explained that these were not the kind of chemical agents that constitute chemical warfare. I won't argue this point any more. It's just futile.

Thank you for reprinting about 10 pages of "evidence," none of which is anywhere near proof that the Israeli's had prior knowledge of 9/11. I need to explain something to you - there were approximately 3000 Jews killed in the WTC bombing. If you know anything about Israel and the operations of its intelligence services, they would never have approved or ignored a terrorist act that resulted in such massive loss of Jewish life. And you have absolutely nothing, some possibly intriguing actions and connections, but no evidence, NO EVIDENCE, connecting these men and women to the bombing. Much less the JFK assassination.

Yes, not as coherent as blaming the Jews for 9/11 and the assassination - in case you didn't notice, these insane claims have been espoused by neo-Nazis everywhere. It is a classic anti-Semitic trope, use as a rationale to slaughter Jews for centuries. It is disgusting, and even more disgusting is your bewilderment that anyone might find it so. You have no evidence, just a supposition driven by stereotypes that we thought had been eradicated. But of course they have not - we control the media, the weather, the music business, television, film - you are in good company, so keep going.

well, you've convinced me now.

since your comments are not completely coherent, I will try to respond - first of all, Vince has made clear that he no longer agrees with Bugliosi. Or saying he "motivated those Secret Service Agents to write a book that affirmed....etc" is completely nonsensical. Should Vince have tried to stop them? If they wrote the book it was because Vince had showed what complete disinformationalists they were.

uh, no it does not; does putting pesticides (which is poisonous) on crops constitute an attack against the citizenry of the USA? The original post more than implied that they were advocating a form of chemical warfare. Look it up - this wasn't it. Any more than the pesticides would poison farm workers. Yes, there would be some residual danger - I am not advocating for this action - but it is a far cry from chemical warfare. Also - biological weapons are composed of very specific kinds of toxins - if you read the document they propose using agents "which would appear to be of natural origin." In which case, this is NOT a biological weapon. Unless you can tell me, please, what they had in mind. If not, then you have no basis for the accusation.

does anyone actually read these documents? It advocated use of chemical agents to promote "crop failures." NOT against Cuban citizenry; this was part of a general plan of sabotage against Cuban economic targets. Big difference.

well, significant article because Hall, who hinted at knowing much more than he said, told his sons there were men on he Knoll. Also, if we want to hypothesize - perhaps the gun he gave the kids was used to shoot at JFK, and then the other, that was found, was left there for evidence of that type of rifle being used. There are still some problems - bullet size - but in the scheme of things, the forensics were so cooked in this case that it probably did not matter.

this is a shocker. U of New Haven, where he has taught and which I think has all his records, is just down the road from me.

the problem is that we have literally no evidence that it was an imposter call, but we do have several witnesses id'ing the caller as LBJ (the operators who recognized his voice). So we have to accept that for which we have evidence, so yes, LBJ made the call. Given his desire to cover up the crime with the Warren Report and the FBI, it makes most sense that he was keeping close tabs on the case.

People have said Craig went a little crazy, and cite this as a way of discrediting him - but if you read his book, he was fired from one job after another, likely for his outspokenness on the assassination - and as a result he lost his home, his family - something that would push the most stable person over the line. Also, just to get a sense of his Craig's credibility about harassment, in Barry Earnest's book he tells of sitting in a car with Craig when two cops come over and start to give them a hard time, clearly because of Craig's presence. So to me he has plenty of justification for losing it. I have had a mild version of this kind of personal harassment, and it makes you paranoid and hostile.

I am amazed - if that's a strong enough word - that ANYONE is repeating the thing about Israelis dancing on top of a van, or smiling or whatever TF they were supposed to be doing. Dancing on top of a van? Try doing this with one person let alone 3. You will fall on your dumb asses. Are you aware that American Nazis have been involved in spreading this crap? And that these men were sighted by a lady looking at the WTC with binoculars who said they were smiling - as though she could see all this - then WHAT THE HELL was she doing watching the burning WTC? Maybe exactly what these guys were doing - this is all so repulsive and stupid that I just had to post this to tell you how dumb anyone who spreads this stuff is. Shame on you all. Moderators, how can you permit this?

thank you Michael; this kind of thing is so disgusting, I am ashamed to be reading this forum. Of course we killed him, I mean, if we were willing to kill Our Lord, why wouldn't we kill a president? This is the kind of un-veiled and vicious anti-Semitism which roils so much below the surface of American life. To paraphrase Lenny Bruce, it's true, we found a note which said: "we killed him, we killed JFK. We did it because he wouldn't become a doctor." signed, Morty -

If JFK had wanted to remove Castro he would have done it at the Bay of Pigs. It was all set up, there was a rationale (protect the Cubans); but it is all b.s. And by the way, Morley, on his substack, has already demolished Litwin's arguments.

got it. And I think his actions in New Haven were something of a continuation of that role.

I am somewhat bewildered, but then I am not as active as many of you here - this, to me, is old news. Barnes' position as head of domestic contacts has been established for some time. It is doubly interesting because, as assistant to Kingman Brewster when he was head of Yale, Barnes was the favored contact for the Black Panthers as things roiled up in New Haven with the Ackley murder and the trial of Bobby Seal. As a friend of mine, a journalist in that city, has said, the Left loved Barnes and he was in frequent contact.

Posted July 1 "LS: The "problem" with Prayer Man remains, how can he be an effective patsy if he's filmed standing outside the building at the time of the shots" think of what you are saying - t here it is 60 years later and it worked - he is considered, by many if not most, to have been the killer. And by the official record. It worked - it worked - so where's the problem?