Steven Skeen

Im guessing a lot of Bobby Kennedys remarks would be deleted too. lighten up gentlemen

Is this a clever photo edit?

I dont recall anyone addressing Jean Hills account of the event (while mary moorman stands quietly at her side during the interview) that "the president slumped over toward mrs kennedy...she said they have shot my husband...there was an interval...then 3 or 4 more shots rang out and the motorcade sped away". I dont remember anyone attempting to provide an explanation for an eyewitness account of "3 or 4 shots" after the fatal head shot -an eyewitness standing 3 yards from the fatal head shot so close that she could hear what Jackie said.

I'm having trouble finding information on LBJ's life after Presidency. Heresay is he secluded himself to his ranch, behaved eccentrically, and revealed haunting secrets to psychiatrists who visited regularly. Any information or literature references appreciated. I would guess if he truly became guilt ridden and unstable, he would have been wanted dead.

How much weight does the theory of multiple persons on the 6th floor at 12:30 that day, complicit in the murder, carry with the members here? Have been fascinated for some time by the postulations of theorists like Glenn Sample based on the statements of possible assassination participants and other debatable evidence. So I bring it to no other venue but here, to who I consider the foremost experts.

I will open this hypothetical fantasy and say I would be very tempted to choose the murder scene of Tippet to provide the most compelling eyewitness evidence.

If you could travel to that Nov day 1963, where would you place yourself to best solve this crime at 1pm to 3pm. 1. the 6th floor SBD 2. Parkland ER JFK room 3. Anywhere in Dealy of your choosing. Where? 4. Some other place. Where?

The feelings of the man mean nearly everything. Show me how the man feels and we can solve his intentions.

For purposes of a quick and simple statistical view, how many researchers believe LHO had good intentions toward the President?

While it's longevity exists in not being substantially proven or disproven, it most certainly has been reborn through intrinsic monetary motives and the window afforded by Hick's passing, as noted by John. I also agree the book is a good read, but the raising and inadvertent discharge of an AR-15 in the follow vehicle would have been significantly observed and impossible to suppress. As well, the weapon's striking of the President's head from that position would have to rate as the worst misfortune in history, and closely rank with the plausibility of the stories of Jackie having shot John in the left temple with a pistol during her 'lean in'.

Menninger's book citing SS agent Hickey as accidental shooter is reinforced by an upcoming television program. This theory researched in depth and never appreciably debunked as far as I have seen. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/28/jfk-second-shooter-documentary_n_3667317.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl4%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D350520 A brief discussion of the 1992 book: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20021&hl=%2Bgeorge+%2Bhickey

Reading thru just now. Cannot comprehend why contributors are so emotionally charged. Why the emotions and personal attacks? If an assassination study contributor is thought to be dishonest, just provide the facts or evidence justifying that suspicion and suspend the emotions.

So it seems Dan Marvin was discredited. I am at a loss to think of one witness with a profoundly difference making experience related to Nov 23, 63 to convey that would alter what little we've known all along; not Marvin, Craig, Baker, Files, etc, etc, ad nauseum. How irretrievably wrong, pathetic, and mostly what an indictment of the soul of mankind! The darkness within the liars far outweighs that what exists within the murderers.

Tom forgive my error. Posting too quickly without enough software control to harness the input. Bernice, thank you. William Bruce Pitzer is the name I intended.

I appreciate the fact that no credibility was given to Morningstar's body switch theory (another good researcher who has ventured a bit too far into the quagmire, imo). I do approve of the techniques he used to validate the alteration of Zapruder's film: ie, timing of motorcade flashing lights and stance of bystanders in motion. Why would CIA hold the film for so long while other pictures confiscated were never released or released with blots and mars.So I do not approve of Zapruder references for head damage. Daniel and David, I have spoken to Parkland Dr's and can cite medical sources swearing there is no way the body could be altered so significantly in the brevity of time allowed even with wax, makeup, grafts, etc,etc, and David, thank you for keeping the disagreement civil. I mildly and respectfully regret that the wording of my stem post was not more gracious. The fault I find with this forum is unwarranted pseudointellectualism and repugnant arrogance. Also thank you for using the word "reread". Your book is fascinating to me. I know you have critics, but I have not read any of them though I know of Posner's name.

Thank you for less sensational homework then Rivera. My original post made valid points but was deleted by moderators with subjective agendas...an unavoidable pitfall. I will try to remain mainstream, self absorbed and circular...yes circular meaning not one shred of new evidence has been a breakthrough since the altered Zapruder was released. So we will keep restudying endlessly mired stew hopelessly and eternally moshed by psychotic attention whores, dishonest authorities with a hundred different agendas, and sold out media.

Is Lt Colonel Dan Marvin's name missing from JFK's noteworthy people's forum index? He was intriguing in 'The Men Who Killed Kennedy' series. Has he been so discredited without my knowledge as to not warrant his name among his peers? And does anyone know why his autopsy photos have not been released? edit: vince foster's photos that is.

Wasn't that Stephen King's story about quitting smoking? Are you asking for a link or attempting beginner's humor?

By concensus, and I will quote sources if pressed, a team of leading plastic surgeons at the time could not have altered Kennedy's head in the way Lifton claims in the time period given. Morningstar's theory of Tippet being postop Kennedy is impossible. The hairlines are all wrong and couldn't be imitated today much less in 1963...absurd ideas that far too prominent theorists hang their hats on. The pictures of badgeman are absurd. The foreground objects are way out of perspective compared to more distant objects. Were all shots from the snipers nest obviously not the only ones, surely evidence proves it, the muddy water doesn't help at all!

Has anyone determined the credibility of Lee's brother's story that Lee disappeared for a couple of days to reappear missing a finger and acting oddly?

Duke, regarding an issue more relevant then cab 107, why did Ruby have no interviews from major news networks between incarcartion and expiration?

Duke, any idea why the three major networks or other primary news did not interview the only living man linked to the assassination, Ruby, from his Dallas jail cell between his conviction and death, rather all we have is a brief few moments of poor quality tape of cryptic replies?

Has anyone insight to offer on the upcoming book by Bill O'Reilly, "The Killing Of Kennedy"? He alleges, of course, it will solve unanswered questions. Due out Nov 2. His book "The Killing Of Lincoln" is still on the NYT Best Seller List.

Great material! Another mockery of this country is the offended reaction his garb incited on the red carpet. I divide all people into two categories: the offended and the non-offended.

Well that changes everything! They have conceded guilt of 3000 murders in a boastful way, Len (and I'm unashamed to leave that number rounded off as well). Think of the most extreme opposite of the US legal system being mocked and fiscally raped here and then try to conceive the most polar and extreme opposite of it, and you have your answer. I would offer their attorneys a couple of options to choose from for their clients: 1. death today. 2. death tomorrow. Either way they should welcome the sentence in order to receive the Islamic rewards of the afterlife. In lieu of their beliefs, amusing how one plaintiff was terrified for his life based on threatening behavior of a correctional officer. Oh, if I were king, I'd give their lawyers (and the first 2000 lawyers of every major American city) the same two options for themselves. J/K. Members in law, please hold the emails. I'm fairly sure there are ethical lawyers practicing somewhere.