Marcel Dehaeseleer

More from Gary Mack... "Marcel, As far as I know, the photographer's name is unknown to the general public. I'd sure like to know for sure who it was. Gary"

DENIAL !!! I was wrong by thinking that the author of this photograph was Arthur Krieger. Even if this photo is often presented as been taken by Arthur Krieger. An example among others HERE Hereunder some explanations that Gary Mack sent to me. Marcel, The photographer was NOT Krieger and the picture was not taken at Love Field as the seller suggested. It was taken miles away near downtown Dallas and the picture was widely distributed in the Dallas area in 1964. All this guy has is a negative OF the picture and he assumed his relative had taken the picture. Gary Mack

Don, The photographer's name is: Arthur KRIEGER Source: http://jfkmurderphotos.bravehost.com/photos.html Link to the Photo: http://jfkmurderphotos.bravehost.com/photos.html#_K The seller's nickname is arthurk215 ...and the photo was already published before, because... I already have several copies. You'll see by comparing the photo from ebay and the other hereunder that both are differently cropped (slightly) on the edges. Best regards...

Gentlemen, Thanks for your answers ! More than the "left turn" problem, there is a possibility that Greer had the pre-knowledge of the assassination and took part voluntarily in the completion of this one. At least, it would seem than he voluntarily slowed down the Limo when he realized that the shooters had not fatally hit the target! That's why he turned the head twice toward JFK and only accelerated after the fatal head shot! As an old well trained SS Agent (55). How Greer can have remained so passive whereas he heard … - The shouts of the passengers. - The blast of rifle shots - The bullets impacts (the crack in the windshield and the dent in the chrome strip). Even if the weight of the Limo (three tons) is taken in consideration, these impacts must have been perceived by Greer (those occurring in front of him). Or… Greer realised that they were in the middle of a kill zone made of converging shots and there… he hesitated, unfortunately, during a few too long seconds. (Sorry for the grammar, my written English is really very bad).

Some lines for a brainstorming… The turn onto Houston/Elm was always described as a Sharp Turn very difficult to negotiate for a car of the size of that of the President. Even if,… Tina Towner film shows a turn apparently without problem. My question is the following: How the two Press Buses have negotiated the Houston/Elm turn without no reported problems??? Bond and Towner photos showing that the buses kept their position in the motorcade without special increase of the time between them and the other vehicles. However, the buses were very much longer than the Presidential Limo and have two not-directional wheels axles behind (this increasing the turning radius.)

Hi! The new page regarding Tina Towner's camera is online! Click H E R E to reach the page. Best regards...

Coming soon... Cameras reviews! - Tina Towner Double 8mm Movie Camera (Tower Varizoom). - Marina Oswald Imperial 620 Duo Lens Camera (Backyard Photos) CE-750.

Hi ! The drawing in the background is a lithograph from Pablo Picasso. There is a kind of analogy between Don Quichotte who fights against windmills like today Researchers who fight against U.S. Government's disinformation. About the Zapruder film I could have used a drawing of Belgian painter René Magritte and to say "this film is not a film"... ...But a fabrication! Regards...

Eugene, I think than the informations hereunder may be useful and interesting for the newcomers or for those unfamiliar with the photographical characteristics of Polaroid cameras. Before finishing, a very useful link: http://www.rwhirled.com/landlist/landhome.htm

Hi ! Consecutively to several private messages that I received, from Gary Mack among others, in the hours and days following the update of my Homepage… …I would like to clarify and explain the reason why I decided to post the page called "Mary Moorman Photos". This page refers to the way in which Mary was holding her camera when she took the famous Moorman #5. The valuable explanations Gary Mack sent me by e-mail were added at the bottom of the page in question. As explained by Gary, The History Channel had nothing to do with the wrong vertical orientation of Mary's camera. I'm ready to accept that it is a innocent mistake. But,… this innocent mistake had not been publicly announced to date. On the other hand, I suspect that Oliver Stone had been misled by this documentary distributed (without corrections) by The History Channel - This could explains why Stone also shows Mary holding her camera vertically in its movie JFK. Where is the problem ? Simply, the Moorman's Camera (Polaroid Land Model 80) isn't a Reflex camera. So, the viewfinder is shifted from the lens and therefore one must take account of an important factor induced by the parallax. As you will see in the illustration hereunder, the vertical shifting varies considerably according to the way in which the camera is held. This demonstration is intended to avoid new possible controversies regarding the real elevation between Moorman's lens and the ground. In conclusion, I had modestly posted this page in an educational purpose, this page being mainly addressed to the novices in the field of photography. (off topic) As you will learn when the page "Moorman Polaroid Camera" will be finished and posted (including User's manual); The Morman's camera maximum shutter speed was 1/100 sec. A shutter speed slow, rather intended for portraits or landscapes photographs. Therefore, considering the fairly good sharpness of the Limo and also of the people in background… For me, there is still several unanswered technical interrogations… Regards…

Hi to All, Following a mail that Gary Mack sent me, I have slightly modified the page related to Moorman Camera Orientation. Interesting informations sent by Gary were added at the bottom of the page. Best regards...

Website updated to 80% Hi! My Website update is almost finished! Several new pages were added and old pages updated. Homepage: http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/ Short descriptions of the topics. The Camera Obscura Experiment: The use of an old fundamental photographic principle, called "Camera Obscura", in order to know accurately where Mary Moorman was when she took her famous Polaroid #5. http://users.skynet.be/copweb/labo/co2/co2.htm Orlando Bosch Avila in Dealey Plaza: Unidentified to date, "The Cuban" aka "Umbrella Man Friend" aka "Dark Complected Man" could be Orlando Bosch Avila. This study is based on the analysis of a photo taken by Clint Grant. http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/Orlando%...sch%20Avila.htm A Tribute To Mister Jack White: A great Researcher, an honest man and above all an exceptional human being who deserves respect. http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/A%20Trib...ack%20White.htm Cecil Stoughton and Arthur Rickerby photos: Comparison and demonstration in order to avoid any confusion between these two photos that are different even if seem identical. http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/Stoughton-Rickerby.htm Mary Moorman was holding her camera horizontally: In purpose to debunk what could be regarded as an operation of disinformation conducted by History Channel into the documentary "The Men Who Killed Kennedy". http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/Mary%20M...an%20Photos.htm Ghost Images - The film within the film: An highlighted animation of the strange activity I discovered into the lower sprocket hole area of the Zapruder film (from Z-466 to Z-476.) http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/strange%20activity.htm Topics that will be added soon… Zapruder Camera Bell & Howell 414PD: The user's manual (all pages) and an overview of the movie camera used by Zapruder on 22nd November, 1963. Tina Towner Camera: The camera used by Tina Towner was a Tower camera, almost a perfect clone of the B&H 414. In fact, it would seem that it is a camera manufactured under Bell & Howell license. Mary Moorman Camera: The user's manual (all pages) and an overview of the Polaroid Land Camera model 80 used by Mary Moorman on 22nd November, 1963. Imperial Reflex 620 Duo Lens Camera: An overview of the reflex camera allegedly used by Marina Oswald to take the backyard photos. Caution: it is possible that the foreign proxy servers were not updated. Therefore, if you still see the old version of the homepage... Click the "reload" button on you Internet browser in order to update the proxy server.

Hi ! Happy New Year to all Members! I would like to know the real reasons why Sam Pate (and buddies) has done a re-creation of the well known K-Box tape !!! "it…it…it appears as though something has happened in the motorcade route…something…I repeat has happened in the motorcade…there are numerous people running up the hill alongside Elm Street there by Stemmons…several police officers are rushing up the hill at this time…standby…just a moment please." In fact, the K-Box tape(s) were sized by the FBI the day of the assassination! The well known K-BOX tape cannot be used in research purpose!!! On 22nd November, 1963, Sam Pate used an omnidirectional microphone (ambiant sounds are perfectly audible), therefore, the shots should be (more than probably) recorded on the original tape. However, there is no supersonic blast (shots) audible on the "extant" K-Box tape.

Hummm... We have some points in common in our visual perception of this unidentified guy. 1) He walks toward the TSBD. 2) He has one hand in his back trousers pocket. I dont want to give up that topic... Therefore, I will try to see whether he would not be captured, by chance, into the very jerky Weigman film. Best...

James, Very interesting! At first glance, there is undeniable stoutness similarities...

Dear Wim, As promised... Hereunder an enhanced enlargement of the unidentified guy (shadowed). That's the best I can do! I dont like to trace the outlines of human shapes, this is too subjective! In a friendly way...

To Tim and Wim... Tim, Thanks for your answer, you're a wise guy! Wim, Your description matches with what I can see when examining attentively this unidentified character I'll try to carry out some enhancements on an extreme enlargement and I'll send it here tomorrow afternoon

Hi Wim! Indeed, it's a plausible possibility (among others)... You will find hereunder the enlargement of Bothun's photo. Soon...

Hi Tim! I dont want to force anybody to believe that OBA was on Dealey Plaza. That is my conviction to 99,99% but I'm ready to admit I may be wrong! Regarding your possible candidate for DCM (Virgilio Gonzales) he has a very distinctive facial singularity... What I would call "concave temples", see illustration hereabove. Nevertheless, he may be a very interesting candidate linked to the conspiracy in general! I also join a comparison between Chism, DCM and UM (skin tone). Kind regards from Belgium...

Hi to All! I have received some questions regarding the clear skin tone of DCM in my graphic related to the possible presence of OBA on Dealey Plaza. You will find hereafter some explanations I sent about these questions. "You're right with your remark regarding the skin tone of OBA in my graphic. In fact, the contrast and brightness were enhanced, mainly for highlighting some details of the face (especially the frame of glasses). You'll find hereunder two photographs (Clint Grant and Richard Bothun), unmodified contrast and brightness. You will notice the great skin tone difference between DCM and UM. Moreover, according to the sun orientation, the right cheek of OBA should be directly enlightened by this one. Nevertheless, OBA skin tone seems highly dark (almost black brown)." Best regards from Belgium...

Hi to All! In a modest educational purpose... Following the question of a buddy (French researcher) regarding Stoughton/Rickerby, I carried out the small illustration hereabove. Stoughton's photo is not an enlargement of the Rickerby's photo. Best regards from Belgium...

Was Orlando Bosch Avila on Dealey Plaza??? ...on 22nd November, 1963. Can Dark Complected Man be Orlando Bosch Avila??? Hi! Many Researchers on JFK Assassination are convinced without shade of a doubt that DCM is Filipe Vidal Santiago. Their certainty comes from the analysis of an extreme enlargement of the Bothun's photograph. I'm disagreeing with them on that point, simply because the vertical blurring of the enlargement induces a false perception mainly regarding the morphological characteristics of the face. It is a bad visual perception! In fact, the faces were deformed by blurring generated by their movement at the time when the photo was taken. I humbly think that the Clint Grant's photo (Press Car #2) is more suitable in morphological analysis purpose. You will find here after my last webpage related to the guy often called "Dark Complected Man" aka "The Cuban" aka "Umbrella Man Friend". Here is the Link to Click Best regards from Belgium... Marcel Dehaeseleer

My name is Marcel Dehaeseleer, I'm living in Belgium. The reading of my modest biography will help you to know my position within the Research Community. If I can help you, do not hesitate to contact me, I always answer the serious mails (sometimes it takes some days). In general, I often post messages on Rich DellaRosa's Forum: JFKResearch. Nevertheless, I appreciate very much the work, efforts and seriousness of John Simkin regarding JFK. And to finish, I must be honest and warn you that I have a great admiration for Mister Jack White. You must be aware than Jack is right on many points related to the images forgeries. I trust him! Therefore, I published this Tribute to Jack White! Best regards from Belgium... Marcel Dehaeseleer Contact: copweb@skynet.be Some lines extracted from its Biography available to: http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/mdbio-en.htm Marcel Dehaeseleer Homepage: http://users.skynet.be/copweb/jfk/ ...For a long time Marcel believed that the Zapruder film was original and free from any alteration. A few dying articles which refer to that firm belief can still be found on the World Wide Web (in some newsgroups). Lately, a whole chapter of author Caroline Lebeau's new book goes over some allegations regarding this issue of authenticity to which he hardly believes any longer. Marcel likes to introduce himself as an Independent Researcher, for he never stops swinging between both sides; on the one hand, those who follow the conclusions reached by the Warren Commission, and on the other hand the proponents of a large-scale conspiracy involving the highest realms of the US government. His opinion is the following:there is some truth on both sides, which makes it hard to take sides. To decide definitively upon one or the other would be to show deliberately a lack of objectivity and by the same token would mean to deprive oneself of some of the pieces of news, true or false, fresh pieces of news popping up every day... Among others Marcel Dehaeseleer deplores the restricted vision which is generally shared by the majority of French-speaking Europeans. Oliver Stone's movie JFK is the main reference for most of them. That film, which incidentally is excellent, is not exhaustive and lays out the facts superficially. Let's give credit to Stone for having tried to change things and succeeding in doing it. In the end, Stone managed his affairs with great courage. Running the risk of being totally discredited, he still faced up to things and gave the public a cult movie which is at the root of some Independent Researchers' vocations...

Hi to All !!! Recently, I've been the target of criticisms and sarcasms coming from defenders of the Warren Commission Report's conclusions. Those same ones who persist in believing in the only responsibility of Lee Harvey Oswald in the assassination of the President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Some of them even have tried to make me stop my investigation, their exact words were: "Please, Mister Dehaeseleer do not become the European Jack White!" Well, here is my answer to those criticisms: A Tribute To Mister Jack White I await your comments...

Dear Larry, Dear Lee, and to all Members... I agree completely with all that you say in the above message. In other words, my "X-Crew" may be an optical illusion or, at least, an artefact! Indeed, the Sprocket Hole Area contain, not only two, but well, THREE images superimposed! I think you must forgive and forget all the messages exchanges that I had with Mister Bill Miller. It was a longtime ago... And... There, I rewind! I may be wrong, I agree! But till I have a firm certainty, I will continue to seek the truth and to investigate this section of the Zapruder EXTANT film. I agree that I was wrong concerning ED Hoffman testimony! If the guys which I saw are real human beings, these are not those that ED Hoffman saw! For the remaining, It is too soon for firm declarations! Larry, I am very pleased to have made your acquaintance. As you noticed, my "Fr-English" is really bad but my eyes are always opened in the right direction. You must, all, understand one thing! I always try to be in the center, just between: G. Posner, B. Miller and J. Fetzer, J. White! It is not always easy! Meanwhile, and that is not negligible, I published a report on the real localization of Mary Moorman. You should read it attentively; For future experiments which you could make yourself. The report in English: http://users.skynet.be/copweb/labo/co2/co2.htm Le rapport en Français: http://users.skynet.be/copweb/labo/co2/co2-fr.htm Respectfully my Dear Friends... PS Do not put Marcel Dehaeseleer on fire immediately,... It is really too soon!