Jump to content
The Education Forum

Ollie Curme

Members
  • Content Count

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ollie Curme

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,493 profile views
  1. I think Milicent Cranor's article on The Third Wound is better: http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/C%20Disk/Cranor%20Millicent/Item%2001.pdf
  2. It was also published in a book titled The Letters of John F. Kennedy, published by Bloombury Publishing, a reputable UK publisher: https://books.google.com/books?id=zZC1AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA159&lpg=PA159&dq="It+would+be+very+helpful+if+you+would+have+the+high+threat+cases+reviewed+with+the+purpose+of+identification+of+bona+fide+as+opposed+to+classified+CIA+and+USAF+sources.+"It+is+important+that+we+make+a+clear+distinction+between+the+knowns+and+unknowns+in+the+event+the+Soviets+try+to+mistake+our+extended+cooperation+as+a+cover+for+intelligence+gathering+of+their+defence+and+space+
  3. Here's a link to a British tabloid that purports to show a declassified memo from JFK to CIA to review UFO intelligence files as part of JFK's proposed joint space effort with the Soviets. http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/631341/New-shock-claim-JFK-was-murdered-by-CIA-days-after-demanding-UFO-files-and-NASA-visit No idea whether it is valid.
  4. Freedom of religion is granted as part of our First Amendment liberties. Maybe you should find an alt-right forum to post your anti-constitutional rantings.
  5. When is a yard not a yard? See these two pictures of a yardstick. The top picture was taken with a focal length of 35mm. The bottom picture was taken with a focal length of 300 mm. Why don't the inches in the middle line up? Are the yardsticks two different lengths? No, it's the same yardstick.
  6. Sandy, If you read Pat Speer's Chapters 13 and 14 he clears up a lot of confusion. You can see the 15mm by 6 mm hole in the scalp by the external occipital protuberance in the Back of Head photo and you can also see the corresponding complete through hole in the underlying skull in the Mystery Photo. I have attached one of Pat Speer's comparison slides showing the EOP hole in the scalp and skull as well as a Mystery Photo that shows the EOP hole as well as a bevelled half circle hole in the skull at the top of the head. It is the bevelled half circle hole in the top of the head to which sk
  7. I'm not sure I can agree with you David that Hume's vague description of the location of the large head wound allow him to be describing the blowout in the back of the head as described by the Parkland doctors. For the same autopsy report describes a small 15mm by 6mm hole in the occiput, slightly above and 2.5 cm to the right of the external occipital protuberance. How can you have a small 15mm by 6 mm hole in the same spot where there's a hole the size of a small orange?
  8. Thanks Paul. I agree that Pat Speer has done excellent work on interpreting the evidence in a way that explains away a lot of the anomalies and doesn't require that the Z film and autopsy report, photos and Xrays were all faked. Thus, according to Occam's Razor, his theory is better than a lot of others'. But if you look at the slide deck titled "A New Perspective on the Shot that Killed Kennedy" at PatSpeer.com he concludes that JFK was not hit by a shot from the front. In addition to the back wound, there was a bullet hole of entrance in the occiput which travelled down the nect and a t
  9. How exactly do the conspirators alter the body so the large blasted out hole in the occiput goes away?
  10. I agree that Hoover seemed to come to a LN conclusion unduly early, but he didn't call off the search for possible confederates until Saturday morning: At 4:01PM EST (3:01PM Dallas time) Oswald had been in custody for 1 hour and 11 minutes. At this point there was little evidence against him, except for an eyewitness report that he entered a movie theater without paying. Despite this, Hoover called Bobby Kennedy again and told him “I thought we had the man who killed the President down in Dallas.” and “since the Secret Service is tied up, I thought we should move into the case.”http://www
  11. Robert Harris analyzes the Towner film in this Youtube video: He concludes that there was a suppressed shot at the turn onto Elm Street which caused JFK to startle, slump to the left and then sit back up again. Testimony from two Secret Service agents in the followup car would seem to support this. See John Costella's Assassination Research pp 44-45: http://assassinationresearch.com/v5n1/v5n1costella.pdf Sam Kinney (Secret Service agent, driving the follow-up car), November 22, 1963: “The first shot was fired, I glanced from the taillight of [the Presidential lim
  12. If you believe the files FBI files, as of 2:17PM EST (1:17PM Dallas time), Shanklin told Hoover that he had heard the dead Secret Service agent story and confirmed it with the Dallas Police Department: http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62251#relPageId=57&tab=page I agree with Mr. Lifton that the fortuitous result of that rumor was that it allowed the FBI to immediately move into the case, prior to the official sanction from LBJ later that evening.
  13. Pat Speer has done a superb effort in allowing us to orient and understand the mystery photo, which shows a skull defect extending towards the rear of the skull including a great amount of lost parietal bone and some occipital bone. The point I want to make is that you don't need a McClelland style occipital bone blowout to observe the back of the brain. I have posted a picture of a skull below with just the parietal bone missing; as you can see, the view extends all the way to the back of the skull. So my point is that Pat Speer's orientation of the mystery photo has allowed us to understa
  14. Sandy, I'm not an expert in this area but I'll offer two observations, and appreciate if anyone can correct me. We have a thoracic X-ray which appears to show the last three cervical vertebrae, C5-C7. I do not believe we have an X-Ray which shows the first four cervical vertebrae: C1-C4. Given that the purpose of the X-rays was to find the bullets, it may be that a high neck X-ray was taken but later disappeared. Cyril Wecht examined the autopsy photos and X-rays at the National Archives and wrote a paper on his observations and conclusions. In the paper he mentions that in the AP skull X
  15. Jim, I agree. Stringer was supposed to be the best, but when you look at those photos they are terrible: out of focus, not centered on what they're supposed to be taking, and even if you add in the ones which went missing, there are far too few to adequately document the wounds. Now on one hand, most were reportedly taken at the beginning of the autopsy when they were told it was a rush job because Jackie was waiting for them to finish and Burkley told them their job was to "just find the bullets." But I think there is strong indication that the cover up was in play by the time the autopsy
×
×
  • Create New...