Jump to content
The Education Forum

Rob Clark

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rob Clark

  1. I guess the book never was released? I can't find it on Amazon....no updates on his FB page. I also find it interesting the username he chose for his FB profile. "Wheelman1963" Wondering if he's implying something...or just having a laugh?
  2. Yeah...it was either in Weisberg or Malcom Blunts...can't remember which. I didn't realize he was gay too til halfway through, or the accent may have been more Joe Exotic-like.
  3. *Bows* Thank you very much! As for Nagell, he's a very odd fellow. It's obvious from his dealings with Garrison's guys that he was either a paranoid schizophrenic or playing the role convincingly. Reading his various correspondence it's clear he was a very intelligent man, and knew the laws and legal system very well. He also claimed alot, but never produced anything. I even did a show about him called "The Man Who Claimed Too Much"...Lol
  4. This is some fodder for perusal.... http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/H Disk/Hall Loran Eugene/ https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tQE0ik-3oribP187Nhwgr2lx2Z-hRxVn This is what you asked about....You'll have to print it out to mark it up.... https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=60422#relPageId=1&tab=page
  5. Amateurs would say at a glance, this is a perfect match. But if we are being honest here, the hairline is different. As we get older hairlines recede...not procede. The noses are way different...Bush's honker is way more pointy and prominent...the chins don't match unless the picture is fuzzed out. The proof lies in the William Allen photo series this "Bush" image was extracted from. His set of photos depicts the scene around the TSBD after the assassination. https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/displayimage.php?album=37&pos=41 This is the original image the figure is pulled from, and searching his entire set H.H. Davis is the match for who this figure is.
  6. It's in Barbara's 1994 autobiography, substantiated with a picture taken by an attendee. The trim of the interior decoration matches the Blackstone Hotel Conference Room in Tyler, Texas. How bout you post one iota of proof, evidence, or documentation Poppy Bush worked for the CIA in 1963. You know maybe he was a super secret spy part time running a Dealey Plaza hit team when he wasn't being chairman of the Houston Republican Party, running for Senate, fathering 3 or 4 kids, and being CEO of Zapata Off-Shore Drilling.
  7. Bush may have said he didn't remember where he was on 11/22/63, but his wife does. It's laid out quite nicely in her auto biography as she states her husband was running for a senate seat and was also chairman of the Harris County Republican Party. That day Bush was speaking at a luncheon at the Kiwanis Club in Tyler, TX and photographed doing so...credit Steve Roe. Kinda hard to be in two places at once..and he's not wearing a checkered suit jacket that day.
  8. C'mon Joe....murdering the POTUS in broad daylight sitting next to his wife is a little different than covert ops in a foreign country. You'll never be able to convince anyone with backside photos. How may guys in 1963 wore dark suits? Lots of cops, newsmen, business men...I mean look at detectives, look at Altgens, look at Zapruder, look at Roy Truly...it was a different time. How many had the same hairstyle? A ton! Stance and gait mean nothing when a person is caught mid-stride...it's a split second in time of a lot of moving parts when a person is walking. As for Prouty, he wouldn't be the first person to "embellish" his close brush with history for his own benefit. He has provably provided false and disinformation, and admitted the truth to the ARRB. Yet in his books, talks, and Oliver Stone's ear he says something totally different. I wouldn't put it past him to falsify a letter if he felt it gave him credibility in what he was saying.
  9. Welll, the letter was typed, crappy typed letterhead, signatures are easily faked...so why didn't Prouty turn his letter over to the ARRB? They were collecting documents.... The audio is very convincing...and again, who really thinks the recently retired General Ed Lansdale, would be in Dealey Plaza right after the assassination went down, and allow himself to be photographed? Do you realize how many newsmen and onlookers had video and film cameras that day? He'd have to be the dumbest General ever in the history of the United States. If he planned or took part in this at all, he wouldn't be anywhere near Dealey Plaza, let alone dare being seen and photographed walking in front of the TSBD. Seriously...how hard is that to comprehend?
  10. Email me at thelonegunmanpodcast@gmail.com I'd be happy to send it you Joe. And yes, the similarities between Baker and Prouty are striking...Judy just hasn't given up the goat yet like Prouty did.
  11. So let me get this "Niederhut Methodology" of research down...if someone wrote something in a book, then it is an irrefutable fact. if someone says something with no documentation or proof, then it is an irrefutable fact. Despite said subject contradicting everything he has ever said, ever wrote, ever alleged...he wrote it in a book so that negates everything he said to an official government funded document review board. Key witnesses like Col. Reich, Lansdale, and Krulak...yes Krulak (Courtesy of Bart Kamp, I have a 10 minute interview done with Krulak in which he does not support Prouty's theory of Lansdale in Dealey Plaza...called it kooky) But none of that matters because the guy wrote a book. Gotcha...duly noted.
  12. Niederhut....I have a clue, you sir are the one stuck in Prouty's fantasy world. Again, slower this time, just for you...JFK was not sold on the recommendations from the Krulak/Mendenhall Mission so he sent McNamara and Taylor a week later for a second opinion. Krulak was not with them, not on the plane, not in Honolulu, and had absolutely nothing to do with the writing of the McNamara/Taylor report. Lowly Col. Prouty, plane and boat getter for the CIA, had absolutely nothing to do with drafting any NSAM's...PERIOD! The moral of this story to me is never debate someone who hasn't done any research and only read a fibber's book. Prouty was one of the OG's of disinformation, and suckers like you are still taken in 50 years later by his "stories"
  13. Kennedy handpicked McGeorge Bundy to be NSA...and he was a Republican. They liked and respected each other so much, Bundy offered to switch parties to be Democrat and was devastated at hearing of Kennedy's murder. NSAM 263 was drafted by Bundy from the McNamara/Taylor report...so my guess is it exists somewhere. Probably the Kennedy library. Again, Prouty got history wrong...the Krulak/Mendenhall mission occured before the McNamara/Taylor mission. Two totally separate things...Next....
  14. In this book, according to Forrestal... Jones, Howard (2003). Death of a Generation: how the assassinations of Diem and JFK prolonged the Vietnam War. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-505286-2 The Krulak mission happened before McNamara/ Taylor were sent...two totally different missions and reports. The Krulak–Mendenhall mission was a fact-finding expedition dispatched by the Kennedy administration to South Vietnam in early September 1963. The stated purpose of the expedition was to investigate the progress of the war by the South Vietnamese regime and its US military advisers against the Viet Cong insurgency. The mission was led by Victor Krulak and Joseph Mendenhall. Krulak was a major general in the United States Marine Corps, while Mendenhall was a senior Foreign Service Officer experienced in dealing with Vietnamese affairs. The four-day whirlwind trip was launched on September 6, 1963, the same day as a National Security Council (NSC) meeting, and came in the wake of increasingly strained relations between the United States and South Vietnam.
  15. I wish I was CIA funded... Here's the truth about the way the McNamara/Taylor mission and report went down...So unless Prouty went to Vietnam and Honolulu with the Generals (he didn't) and helped them draft the report on the plane (he didn't), then the answer is he had absolutely nothing to do with drafting the report. Drafting the report After a one-day stopover in Honolulu to prepare their report, McNamara and Taylor arrived back in Washington on October 2. The report was written hurriedly on the plane trip back to Washington. Forrestal described the report as a "mishmash of everything."[2]:375 During the 27-hour flight, Bundy managed only to get two hours of sleep between his writing and later opined that "neither their draftsmanship nor judgment is likely to be at its best under such working conditions.[2]:375 They promptly met with the President and the National Security Council. Their report concluded that the "military campaign has made great progress and continues to progress." On the other hand, it warned that the serious political tensions in Saigon due to the Buddhist crisis and the increasing unpopularity of Diệm and Nhu as a result of their anti-Buddhist activities could stoke the dissent of some ARVN officers and erode what they believed was favourable military progress. Taylor and Maxwell reported to having seen no evidence of a successful coup being prepared, and felt that American pressure would probably only further harden the Ngô family's attitudes. Nevertheless, "unless such pressures are exerted, they [Diệm-Nhu] are almost certain to continue past patterns of behavior."[1]
  16. Also, here's another monkey wrench to throw into your theory...Lansdale had retired from the Air Force by Nov. 1st, 1963....so how could he send Prouty to Antarctica?
  17. Read the book...read the book...read the book.....anybody can write anything, it doesn't make it so...(see Judyth Baker) My suggestion to you is that you need to prove what you say. Do a little research, show me something tangible...documents. Prove the Pentagon liaison to the CIA helped formulate NSAM's, prove Lansdale sent JFK to Antarctica, he said in his own words it wasn't unusual...that it was routine, according to him he wasn't even in country on Nov. 21st to draft anything, and he admits he knew knowing nothing about Presidential protection and wasn't involved in coordinating it as he previously claimed.
  18. Excuses....excuses...is all I hear from Prouty supporters. The bottom line is he contradicted everything he had said over the years in correspondence,in articles, in books, and on film. He could have easily walked in there and maintained his story. The problem is the ARRB had access to documentation and individuals that could directly make a fool out of Prouty...which is exactly how it went with Col. Reich. He got the CIA a boat when they needed a boat, he arranged for AF transport when needed by the CIA. He wasn't sitting in on the Johnson and Joint Chiefs meetings when writing NSAM's, Lansdale didn't send him to Antarctica, he knew squat about Presidential protection, the trip wasn't unusual, the NZ newspaper stuff was just early reporting mistakes that still happen today...examples of the exact same articles in US papers on Nov. 22 & 23rd with the same exact mistakes are available today, his ID of "Lansdale" in DP means nothing without accompanying documentation he was even or near in Dallas on Nov. 22, 63. Hunt denies knowing him, Reich denies knowing him...he was a fraud. And that hurts some people because Prouty checks some boxes for them that fit into their theory that the big bad CIA was behind the assassination. The mother's milk of the JFK movie that got them interested in the case was spoiled with lies.
  19. Prouty had claimed Reich was the source of his info, and I seriously doubt Prouty had any dealings with Hunt personally. Hunt denied knowing him at all.
  • Create New...