Rob Clark

Bart's latest (and greatest) interview! https://www.spreaker.com/episode/57599477

By the way @Jeff Carter, I have audio from an interview with Gen. Krulak done with Harrison Livingstone in the early 90's in which he denies ever telling Prouty that he thought it looked like Lansdale in the tramp photo. Real horse's mouth type stuff...not Prouty said this, and Prouty said that...

I don't care about, and have never addressed Prouty's career or work. I addressed his claims. Judyth Baker has written a couple of books as well...so what's your point? Again, just because someone wrote a book means nothing. Real simple, Prouty claimed a lot over the years in various places...and walked it ALL back to the ARRB. That makes him a fraud, not smarter than the average bear. You wanna keep believing the fairy tales, go right ahead...I'll be over here concentrating on things that actually matter. By the way Neidernut, watch my Lancer presentation this year, you might learn something.

Actually, the ARRB's critique was premised on the cumulative remarks of Prouty throughout the 70's, 80's & 90's, his articles and books, statements made to Stone for JFK, correspondence with other researchers, and conference speeches. People like Livingstone and Weisberg smelled a rat long before the ARRB exposed Prouty as a fraud. I love when people like you are afraid to engage people like me directly. It tells me all I need to know. If you only knew a third of what you think you know about me, this diatribe would be comical, however it's just sad & pathetic. I'm actually on the conspiracy side of things, but even more so than that, the truth of things. I put Prouty on the same level as Judyth Baker, James Files, Chauncy Holt, Beverly Oliver and a host of other frauds that have tried to make money off the assassination by injecting themselves into the lore and muddying the waters of truth. Oh... and just because someone wrote a book, doesn't mean that what's in between the covers has any substantial value whatsoever. Here's a list of people that didn't or don't now believe what Prouty claimed.... Harrison Livingstone, Viktor Krulak, Harold Weisberg, Oliver Stone, John Newman, Col. Rudolph Reich of the 316th INTC, two prattling podcasters, & the entire ARRB.

One guy here, (Me) with a podcast that prattled on about this issue 2 years ago now, and for much more than 20 mins. I actually do know what I'm talking about, and your willful ignorance to get even the most basic of facts right is pathetic. The only reason you and Osanic "doth protest too much", is because you make money selling Prouty's lies and stories.

Well, anyone with half a brain can see why I was pissed off upon seeing this video on YouTube. Then I see it was posted here also. I kept things vague for a reason, as this line of research is for me and Joe Borelli's presentation at Lancer this year. I didn't post it for some looky-loo too afraid to reveal his identity or allow comments on his videos, to co-opt it for his YouTube channel to get views. An ethical researcher would have reached out either on here via personal message, or via my email which I know he has, because I know he listens to my show and comments frequently on my YouTube vids. So yeah...thanks A-Hole!

Best guess I got based on additional docs is that it is a SIGINT project in West Berlin targeting Russian intelligence...

Ha! So said Imma's brother Paul...

Yes....her name was previously redacted from earlier releases. Also, know anything Lee Wigren or R. DeFelice (Acting Director of Personnel)?

It's Lola...and this is not referring to E. Howard Hunt's wife. Chief of Base Berlin.... I'll work on getting a RIF number

Looking for some help identifying and describing this CIA project. Reserving who this document is referring to for the moment as it pertains to primary research, but just know it's a figure associated with the assassination. This document accompanied a handwritten note in the file describing this woman as "not your typical wife" and could "handle herself as a SIGINT intercept."

Hi alll! Thanks for posting this! Just to clarify how telexes worked, according to Walter, they were sent to field offices using a coded system on tickertape that employees like Walter would have to decode using a machine kept in the safe and type it up. They would then be responsible for disseminating the information to the appropriate agents, hence the names written on the telex.

https://www.spreaker.com/user/7336374/ep-229-historys-greatest-mystery

Max, You mad she didn't spill the beans to you? Lol

Robin...is your site down? I can't get anything to load. Also do you have any pictures of any John, Jack, Jim, or James Martin that is not Jack S. Martin? Thanks!

Seems like a pretty pointed implication to me...

It's kind of a running joke on our Quick Hits podcast how many variations of the J first name and Martin surname associated within the assassination milieu... These are top of mind...I think there are 4 more we found John Martin Jr. - Took film in Dealey Plaza John Martino - CIA asset, Castro prisoner, helped Anti-Castro causes John Martin Sr. - Father, worked at Postal Annex Jean Martin - Pierre LaFitte's (Coup in Dallas) CIA pseudonym in New Orleans John T Martin - Took Film, Walker house & New Orleans Oswald arrest Jack Martin - Alias Ed Suggs, Banister associate James Martin - Manager Six Flags, brought Marina home with him Jim Martin - Attorney at meeting at Ruby's house night of 11/24/63 Jim Martin - Department 03 of CIA Johnny Martin - Dating Serita Odio

For those interested, a good friend hit me up privately with a link... https://www.jfk-assassination.net/pdf/lane_interviews/ Not a complete list though, I see my good buddy "Dago" Daryl Garner's is missing offhand... If anybody knows of any others, please post a link, upload, or email me...Thanks!

Thanks Micah!

Does anyone know where I might find Mark Lane's witness interview transcripts that he did for his book and film "Rush To Judgement" ??

1. Nobody is disputing that...it failed. 2. Has nothing to do with this thread. 3. Prove this...also he was retired by then.

Interesting that Stone doesn't buy Prouty's BS about Ed Landsdale either....

Just for the record, I am a CT and in no way like John McAdams. I also don't say or post anything as fact that I can't back up in some form or fashion be it documents or testimony. If I'm ever speculating, I'll let you know. I just have a real low tolerance for those that muddy the waters with unsubstantiated claims and pure BS. What derisive and defamatory comments I posted or said about Prouty, came straight out of his own mouth to the ARRB. Col. Reich called him a nutjob to the ARRB, and as I posted in the other Prouty thread, I have audio of an interview with Gen. Krulak denying his Landsdale in Dealey Plaza claims. Jim D's article debunked nothing about the Prouty claims, and in fact, didn't even address multiple others. I'm not the one eating Crow here Niedernut, and trust me, my feelings don't get hurt on this forum. It wasn't me that complained about your post.

From the article, and I quote.... "He was probably the only man in the building who would recognize who former CIA officer George Joannides was and why he was really there." Just wondering if Jim could post any evidence at all regarding this wild speculation? This is the RICHEST thing I've read in JFK assassination research literature in quite some time...BRAVO

Not so fast...from one of the eager beavers here. *IF* this article Jim, was meant to be a rebuttal to our respective podcasts, then it struck out on many levels. The only thing addressed in the article was the 112th MIG, so you have 3rd hand hearsay...and a guy who's name phonetically sounds like Sorrels declined the offer of supplemental protection in Dallas. It seems to me the proper protocol would be the Secret Service would ask for help, not the other way around. It speaks volumes that you ignore what Larry Hancock so thoughtfully said in this thread, research is not picking and choosing what you want to fit your narrative, its deep diving and doing all the necessary work. You conveniently leave out Col. Reich's testimony to the ARRB because it doesn't fit your narrative, along with EVERYTHING Prouty backtracked and played down to the ARRB. The ARRB was NOT an investigative body, so you can't equate it to the Warren Commision or the HSCA. They were document collecting, seeing if Prouty had anything at all to offer because of all the claims he made over the years in his essays, books, forewords, and to Oliver Stone, and the last being the catalyst for the ARRB to be conceived from? You say Len has all these documents? So he purposely lied to the ARRB and purposefully withheld documents from them too?? "Just told them what they wanted to hear" is the lamest rationalization/excuse I've ever heard. He lied to them BECAUSE he told us (researchers) the truth?? Seriously, you expect people to buy that??