Pamela Brown

With all due respect, I disagree. This seems like quibbling over things. In fact, at this point I would say that we each know where the other stands on the issue of description, so why not agree to disagree and move on? The person who visited the embassies had valid documentation, or so they said. The behavior of the person who visited the embassies is consistent with that of the Lee Oswald Mr Hosty encountered in Dallas. I haven't done a timeline yet of who said what about the Lee they say they saw, but initially boh the Cuban and Russian embassies claimed the person arrested for the murder of Tippit and JFK was the one they saw. And I think there is something bigger going on here that may be a reason for the JFK files not yet released. We are supposed to quibble over minor items and thus be distracted from actually researching what happened to Lee Oswald in MC and why, and his Cuban and Russian connections. And I think there is someone behind the scenes in all this dynamite about MC who is being protected. I could be wrong, but I think it may be RFK.

'Blonde' is relative.

Sounds like a good idea for.a book...

He was. It is hard to imagine what Lee thought he was doing, expecting to get a visa for Cuba right away. I can't imagine his frustration, knowing he had only a few days... Lee was angry with Hosty before he even met him, so, yes, it all came out in the interview with Hosty on 11.22.63. I think Mexico City was just the final straw...

I have considered Mr. Trump a candidate for assassination since Bob Dylan's RARW came out. One of the songs, a 'key' song, has a double meaning that I think may refer to Trump. IMO Bob uses his 'key' songs ('Key' in the name or lyrics) to alert his people to target someone and make their life miserable, and, if possible, do something to hasten their demise... (In other words, a Murder Most Foul)... The song is Key West... The 'dual' lyrics are basically (1) raving about the virtues of Key West and (2) hearing about Pres McKinley's assassination on a radio in Key West and Pres Truman's visits to the summer white house in Key West. https://www.bobdylan.com/songs/key-west-philosopher-pirate/ https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-mckinley-is-shot-while-roosevelt-is-traveling https://www.trumanlittlewhitehouse.org/

Something else that intrigues me is the Russians' description of their experience with Lee, agitated, emotional, claiming the FBI was tracking him, and the Lee James Hosty experienced, who wrote a note complaining about the FBI contacting his wife, and who was agitated and emotional to the point of refusing to take Hosty's questions after he asked him about Mexico City...

I am quite comfortable agreeing-to-disagree. In fact, I spent an entire day with Ken Rahn some time ago, at the Minnesota State Fair, where we agreed on absolutely nothing but had a great time...

Nosenko may have considered himself a genuine defector while being set up by those above him.

There could also have been another entrance that did not have surveillance...

Just what we need... https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/06/weather/hurricane-lee-potential-path-atlantic-climate/index.html

No mention of a sweater.

Sandy, I don't think it's fair to suggest that any of us is "believing the WC." I hope you will agree with me that weighing and evaluating evidence and then forming a hypothesis is what research is all about... Right now, I am working on an hypothesis that Lee was in MC, and so were others who, for whatever reason, were impersonating him and possibly also tracking his movements. To say that Lee *couldn't* have been at the consulate because there is no photo seems to be jumping to a conclusion. For example, Lee could have anticipated the possibility of a camera and pulled up a jacket collar or in some other way took action to avoid being photographed.

Lee was wearing a v neck sweater in these photos. Is there a description of what he was wearing when he went to the Cuban embassy?

Lee showed them the handgun, saying this is how he.had to protect himself from the likes of the FBI. who had even contacted his wife.

Lee could have gone back to his hotel to get the photos.

Let's not fall prey to the fallacy of false alternatives... He may have brought the photos with him...

And then we have the Nichiporenko book, "Passport to Assassination" which claims that the Lee Oswald who staged a dramatic scene at the Soviet Embassy was the same Lee whose photo they later saw after the assassination....

I do agree that it looks as though the Lopez report cannot be treated as a credible source... However, I am not at this point confident that they were intentionally clarifying issues, but possible just adding to the confusion that already exists...

I thought this would fit right in... https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/tucker-carlson-is-saying-radical-left-is-planning-to-kill-donald-trump-speeding-toward-assassination/

Then are you saying we cannot trust the report?

I was simply quoting the Lopez report.

A. FYI..."Pam" happens to be an alter-persona that was supposed to have been created through trauma based mind control. My name is Pamela. B. I was quoting from the Lopez report.

It seems to me that Lopez and the report are tiptoeing through the tulips. They say one thing in one place and another somewhere else. Here is an example where the report says that they cannot confirm (nor deny the possibility) that there was an imposter... https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/lopezrpt_2003/html/LopezRpt_0264a.htm Their approach seems also somewhat ham-handed. They say that Lee spoke good Russian, so anyone speaking broken Russian could not be Lee. Well, suppose when agitated and under pressure, Lee spoke broken Russian. Or suppose Lee hired someone to impersonate him (for reasons unknown). In another place the report acknowledges that Lee himself must have come to the Cuban embassy at least once because he filled out and signed a visa with a signature consistent with his handwriting. But they also say that they cannot confirm that it was Lee who visited the Cuban embassy. For whatever reason, including the possibility that Lopez/Hardway were denied information that they needed or were instructed to keep things purposefully vague by powers unknown, it seems as though they were incapable of coming completely to grips with the mystery that is Lee Oswald and Mexico City.

I'll stick to 'explosive' for now... BTW, here is a definition of 'agitated'... https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/agitated Mr, Hosty did not 'drop the subject'. It is my understanding that Lee refused to answer any more of Hosty's questions after he asked Lee about Mexico City...

Sandy, do you have a cite for Agent Hosty saying the subject of Mexico City was 'dropped' after Lee's explosive reaction to Hosty's question?