Jump to content
The Education Forum

Richard Price

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

989 profile views

Richard Price's Achievements

  1. It is indeed quite striking and disturbing. I recently had a short conversation with a friend's son who has been working as a civilian contractor at various middle eastern military bases. He said that while stationed with the military, their only news outlet (or at least their primary one) is One America News. He discounts any other source now and says that is the view of most. Extreme right wing media is definitely taking careful aim at those who could cause the most problem in our society.
  2. Is there a problem with the forum servers? I am having problems replying to this topic. I wanted to share what may be all or at least part of the above article. https://spanishhalyon.wordpress.com/2020/08/30/jack-ruby-the-zionist-puppet/
  3. Lawrence, everyone has an opinion about Brennan. After reading as much as I can find on him, including his ghost written book, I would tend to disagree with your above statements. I'm not saying my opinion is any more valid than yours, but I will give it anyway. I'll break it down as follows: a) he would have never held up under cross examination - Who was going to cross examine him, there was no trial. b) he couldn't identify LHO - He didn't identify LHO because that is not who he saw shooting c) Z film shows him looking away at the time of the 1st shot - He said he was looking at a shooter on the 2nd floor from the top in the east end of the RED BRICK building, that is NOT the TSBD, but instead is the Dal-Tex building. As an addendum to a) He did NOT stand up under the cross examination/interrogation of the police who were interviewing him. They got him to acquiesce and accept their story of a shooter in the TSBD. He was followed, surveilled and told not to speak to ANYONE because he might be the ONLY one who saw the assassin and could be a target of any associates of that assassin. This ruse was used by those taking his information until they had him sufficiently scared to follow the official story. Between 11/22/63 and his WC interview, he was reminded again of how vulnerable he was. His once BETTER than 20/20 vision was destroyed when as he said - his eyes were "SANDED" - in what was described as an on the job ACCIDENT. Anyone can attack his story because he never bucked the official one after 11/22, but for at least a couple of hours after 12:30pm that day, he told a different story. Once shown how vulnerable he and his family were to violence, he opted to make his family safe. He, to me, was/is the epitome of the strong silent type in this generation of men. Had the threats only involved himself and not his family, I don't think he would have relented in his original story.
  4. Just perusing the internet on a hot humid day at home and decided to read some of JFK's speeches. I found this and thought some on the forum might not have seen/read this. Our current politicians/lawmakers should have such a deep well thought out definition of what they stand for instead of just relying on labels with absolutely NO underpinnings. In particular, if today's "liberals" could use the English language to define themselves in a similar manner (not just quoting JFK), they might be able to make inroads with those who are now repulsed by the title "liberal" because they don't understand the meaning and the context. https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives/other-resources/john-f-kennedy-speeches/liberal-party-nomination-nyc-19600914
  5. Thank you for your reply. Please don't. Sometimes minute things that get included may lead to much more information. I wasn't asking specifically you the question. I thought since you posted it you might have further information on the nexus, but I was directing the question to anyone who might know more about any of the info.
  6. I, for my part, certainly hope so. All these things related to Trump have been kicked down the road for way too long. He is only emboldened by every reprieve. People in positions to do something to bring about punishment for both him and his rabid followers need to see the deeply troubling underlying threat to the republic. Specifically the punishment needs to be directed at him, he really does not care what happens to anyone else. He will continue to throw people under the bus and await them to come out the other side to bow and kiss his ring (A**). Until he is actually found guilty AND punished in a manner that is not a slap on the wrist, this country's government is at EXTREME risk. The problem is and will be, he is so sleazy, corrupt and underhanded, the ability to CONVICT him may not exist. In a criminal court you would need 12 unbiased and "unbuyable" and incorruptible jurors and I am sure that it would/will become a circus with all kinds of charges of political bias from Republicans, right wing media, etc. Just as in the election, he will NOT accept a loss or conviction (and unfortunately neither will his 30% totally enthralled/mesmerized followers). This I can promise because I live amongst them.
  7. Chris, is the above statement correct? 1962? I haven't focused on (pun intended) Zapruder, but have learned many things while scanning/reading just about anything that related to the assassination. I could have sworn that he had said that he had not had the camera long and was ecited to use it for the motorcade. If your date is correct, even without a month stated, he would have had the camera at least 11 months. With that many months expired, I don't think I would be referring to it as my new camera. Of course, perhaps I am wrong to make that inference or maybe he didn't say what I thought I had read or seen attributed to him. Thanks again for all your detailed information.
  8. Thanks Ron. I believe I read parts of that thread, but have never seriously thought (or found any kind of proof) that there was a train moving anywhere immediately before, during or shortly thereafter. Had the Warren Omission been a standard quality investigation, it would have been interesting to have patrolman White explain his "ghost train" He must have had some reason to say he could not see people on the other side of the overpass. Perhaps it was his way to make sure he wasn't asked about people behind the fence in the rail yard. I'm sure at some point in the later afternoon they had to begin moving in/out of the yard to maintain or get back on schedule as the police supposedly "cleared" the train cars of suspicion/nefarious characters.
  9. I know what you mean by "funny", but unfortunately it has been used by the MSM to again proclaim LHO as the "killer of the President" as opposed to "accused" of killing the President. That alone, unfortunately makes it no longer funny to me and I am sure most of those on this forum. Lt. Col. Yevgeny "Eugene" Vindman, an Army officer who was fired by the Trump White House, has said Trump's former national adviser Michael Flynn could face a court-martial over his remark that a Myanmar-like military coup "should happen" in the U.S. Lt. Col. Vindman has shown that courage, patriotism and duty run in the blood line. The question is, will he (or anyone) be allowed to follow through.
  10. I think it is time for someone in our judicial system to have the courage to charge sedition or treason for actions such as this (link below). This former US general has lost his way into Trumpism and QANON. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiEp8WU8fLwAhVBQ80KHVDLBn0QxfQBMAB6BAgCEAk&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketwatch.com%2Fstory%2Fex-trump-adviser-michael-flynn-says-myanmar-like-coup-should-happen-in-u-s-11622426143&usg=AOvVaw1Nlf88zQAy8S50GHbyA7AP
  11. John, as the linked testimony shows, he did not mention a train at all (assuming this is his only testimony). I found no other in my brief search. The interview following his is for patrolman White and he does mention a passing train. I think the statement in a posting earlier by Tony Krome is an FBI document possibly as denoted by the (DL 100-1046). If I remember from another posting this would be how the Dallas FBI office would designate their documents/memorandum.
  12. Like this disgusting photo? Out in the open, but debatable. Just another coincidence. Nothing to see here.
  13. On the other hand, if the plotters could count on an incapacitated (at the very least) JFK, perhaps LBJ would do exactly that - and quickly since he would have wanted to be seen as a man of action/swift judgement and boldness in a time of peril.
  14. Here is a link to Foster's testimony with Joseph A. Ball. https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh6/pdf/WH6_Foster.pdf
  15. Tony, I didn't go that far in my initial post in order to elicit other members opinion. I agree, once the head explosion shot occured, any "normal" person's first instinct would have been to drop the camera from a filming position or at least let up on the trigger, thereby not capturing the continuing flight of the limo. This, of course is considering the date of the event. I'm not sure how our current "normal" person would react, but this is nearly 58 years removed and in a highly visualized new reality. As an aside comment: With my recent review of Howard Brennan's testimony/statements and the realization that he was pointing out a gunman in the Dal-Tex building sixth floor eastern most window, Zapruder's part in this whole situation is in my mind, brought into question somewhat. His business was located in that building as well. Naturally, with its proximity, this is not damning, but another "coincidence" to add to the large quantity already in evidence.
  • Create New...