Cory Santos

Thank you. Well done.

Max this is your area and you are the expert here on her. Please continue. Your thoughts on Shanklin, etc.

Finally. Thank you for reading it. There is a little more meat there too regarding Shanklin but I am so busy I haven’t had a chance to write anything. I am not sure why it took this long for anyone to notice these things.

No, oh David.

Oh David…

Kirk. You and I see things differently. When I examine a persons credibility one thing I look for is consistency of action considering the person’s background. Do you not think she knew the parade route? Did she not read the paper?

You are not walking this back DVP unless you are saying there are forged government documents. Are you suggesting that? She knew the address before. “The first I realized that there was a building on Elm was when I heard on the television on the morning of the 22nd of November that a shot had been fired from such a building."

Check my IMDb page so I get clicks.

DVP you proved nothing. You clearly failed to read that which I actually posted. You also failed to read the document I linked. She told the location on Elm. She knew. Sorry. Your defense fails and you cannot refute this proof. You might want to update your little link.

Lol. Cliff educate the man. Kirk all you have to do is go to Google.

Previously, I brought up how odd Ruth’s actions were. For example, she chose to shop rather than see the president- interestingly Ruby wanted nothing of Dealey plaza either. Someone defended her by saying there were two book depositories and it was claimed as a defense that Ruth did not know which one LHO worked at prior to the assassination. I felt this defense stunk and did not comport with my recollection of the documents. For many reasons this is important. Namely, why she did not go down to the parade with Marina and children? Well, here is the proof showing the “Ruth didn’t know” defense is garbage. She knew WEEKS BEFORE the assassination where he worked. The copies destroyed part was good too👍 https://ncisahistory.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/OSWALD-LEE-H-Verification-of-employment-at-Texas-School-Book-Depository-Nov-4-1963.pdf

Duh! You have to have style.

Watched this last night. Great interview.

Lol no relation that I know of.

This proves? What exactly? I am sure if you can prove anything msnbc will put it on. Do you have any real proof?

But then by your logic why did they not lie and say he was coming down from the sixth floor? I mean in golf if you’re going to lie when you’re in the rough you don’t just tap the ball a little.

So let me get this straight. According to Sandy and Ron Ecker, you both feel Fox News lies in its reporting 100 percent of the time? Yes or no please.

I know it’s crazy. It’s like the whole fake Russia helped Trump news. Geez. Those crazy reporters.

The cc is incorrect. He said it. But people make mistakes when they speak. No big deal. My point is Fox didn’t misrepresent what he said. I do hope your ear issue gets better. Please stop hanging out with Tyson lol. He has a thing for ears.

Because here is the transcript of what he said. I MEAN THIS FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART AND I THANK VICE PRESIDENT HARRIS FOR LEADING ON THIS ISSUE AND SO MANY OTHERS. YOU KNOW, IN PENNSYLVANIA, I HAVE A MESSAGE FOR YOU, SEND ME TO CONGRESS SO I CAN SUPPORT THIS RIGHT

Is this the clip Ron? Was it edited like the Zapruder film? https://www.foxnews.com/video/6348574710112

Where can I go for real factual news then?

He has nice things to say about you.

David, so your position is: LHO lied here and other times but told the truth sometimes. Yes or no. Also, your position is LHO never said he was outside watching the parade when asked where he was. Thus, Hosty was misinterpreting what Oswald said- in your opinion, lied about- incorrectly? Yes or no. I just want your position to be clear.

I am aware of a video copy.